Speaking as a Deputy who is not a member of the committee but who listened to the exchanges here last month between the Government on the one side and Deputies FitzGerald and O'Keeffe on this side, I should like to get it completely clear whether the purpose of this motion is to make it impossible in future for a Deputy, having seen a question on the Order Paper or having learned that it has been put down, to prevent, by means of putting down a written question on similar lines, the former Deputy from getting an oral reply? Is that the purpose of the motion?