It devolves on me, as the newly-appointed leader of the Farmers' Party, to state in short the attitude of my Party towards the proposal which is before the Dáil. My Party has decided to give its support to the nomination of Deputy W.T. Cosgrave as President of the Executive Council. We have to face the issue before us. We have to face up to the proposal which has been put before us to-day. We have to decide whether it is in the best interests of the country at the present moment and in the present situation to have Deputy Cosgrave appointed President or to have another Deputy appointed President. The thing that struck me as extraordinary in regard to the speech made by Deputy O'Kelly was that although he opposed the appointment of Deputy Cosgrave he has not suggested an alternative. Our whole attitude on this matter depends on that point—is there an alternative, and if there is an alternative, who is the alternative President? Perhaps Deputy O'Kelly would tell us if he has an alternative. Perhaps he would inform us if it is the intention of his Party to propose one amongst their members as President of the Executive Council. My opinion is that if there is a Party in this House, particularly a Party which is the second largest in numbers, opposed to the election of whoever is proposed for President, it is the duty of that Party to propose an alternative.
It may be political tactics not to propose an alternative. But I believe the situation is such in this country that this is not a time for political tactics. This is a time for this House to face up straight to the issues before us. And the issue which we see before us is this — is the future President to be President Cosgrave, or is the President to be the nominee of the second largest Party in the Dáil? We have to take our choice between the two. If I am wrong in my assertion that that is the choice before us, I would ask the Deputies opposite to contradict me. We here have to take our choice between the two, and we have to form a decision regarding the policy represented by both Parties. The decision my Party has taken is founded upon their examination into and their decision upon the relative merits, the records and policies of the two leading Parties in the House. We heard a good deal to-night about the past. We heard a good deal from Deputy O'Kelly about the past political record of Deputy Cosgrave. But there can be more than one point of view as to the past political record of public men. My Party and I happen to hold a point of view on the political record of Deputy Cosgrave which does not coincide with the point of view of Deputy O'Kelly. As I understand the history of recent times in Ireland, my view of what has been done by Deputy Cosgrave and his Party is that they, as part of the majority of the elected Parliament of this country, decided to take a certain course in regard to the Treaty, which course was ratified by a majority of the then sitting Dáil, and which course was further ratified by the elections which followed.
In short, in my opinion, Deputy Cosgrave and his Party accepted the will of the majority of the people, and my Party stand for the acceptance of the will of the majority of the people in this country. We differ from the leader of the Fianna Fáil Party, who has expounded a theory that the people of Ireland have not a right to do wrong. We believe that whatever action is taken by a majority of the people is right, and we believe that the sanction of the majority of the people of the Saorstát was given to the step that was taken by Deputy Cosgrave. It is upon that political record of his that we support him.
We are further supporting him on his political record as a constructive statesman. I have had the honour of taking part in the proceedings of the Dáil during the past four years, during the lifetime of two Parliaments, and it has fallen upon me time after time to differ, and differ very acutely, from the policy of Deputy Cosgrave and his Government. But despite the fact that I did differ, and that I do still differ, in regard to certain portions of the policy of Deputy Cosgrave, my Party and I formed the opinion that Deputy Cosgrave, in accordance with his own light, was working honestly and faithfully for the constructive advancement of this country. Deputy O'Kelly thought fit to introduce in his speech a statement as to the economic conditions in this country, and he thought fit to introduce into his speech a form of propaganda which has been all too prevalent in this country during the recent elections, and it is this: That the existing Government of this country is absolutely and completely responsible for the economic conditions. I think it is a disgrace that leading public men should mislead the populace of this country into the belief that the welfare or the contrary of this country depends absolutely or altogether upon the existing Government. The Deputy must be aware that economic conditions are very largely outside the purview and control of existing Governments. I am convinced a government can mar the conditions of a country, but I am not convinced that a Government can make the conditions of any country. When we have Deputy Cosgrave and his Party charged with the low prices of cattle, with emigration from the country, and all those different ills that are due to the economic policy of Deputy Cosgrave, then naturally the people of this country who are anxious to get enlightenment as to the panacea offered have to turn to the economic policy of the Party which is opposed to the present Government—to the economic policy of the Fianna Fáil Party. The honest course for the Fianna Fáil Party to take, if they believe in their economic policy, and if they are prepared to stand by it, is to appoint from amongst their members one of them to act as President and to offer to take up the reins of Government, and attempt to carry out that economic policy. I have not studied the economic policy of Fianna Fáil very deeply, and for one good reason, that I do not consider it is worth the serious consideration of a child in the fourth book going to a National School, but from what I have seen of it I believe it is wholly impracticable, and instead of regenerating this country it would, if carried out in its entirety, bring the country to ruin.
The Party which refuses to take up office, which has not got a nominee for office here, is not confined to an economic policy. They have a political policy and any Party that aims to take office ought to be clear, definite and explicit in regard to their programme. President Cosgrave and his followers have been clear, definite and explicit and with them we know where we stand. We do not know where we stand with the other Party. I have welcomed the Fianna Fáil Party into the Dáil. I am glad to see them here, but before I ask my Party to give support to Fianna Fáil I want to know to what policy we are going to give our support. I doubt if any man in this country knows what political policy he is going to support if he follows Fianna Fáil. My Party want to know before they take any action in this situation and before they would be ready to support Fianna Fáil, what is the Fianna Fáil attitude towards the Treaty. Have the followers of Fianna Fáil accepted the Treaty position or have they not? The people I represent believe that the Treaty was the best possible measure of freedom we could get and we do not propose to stand behind any Party that is prepared to take chances on the Treaty. We have before this expressed the opinion, and we again express it here, that a Treaty is not made for all time. A Treaty can be changed, but can only be changed in one way, and that is by negotiation with the other contracting party.
What line is Fianna Fáil going to take if it gets power? What line is it going to adopt on any of the vital clauses of the Treaty? If we knew what they were going to do we could then consider whether they are worthy of support or not. We do not know, and now that the opportunity arises of making it plain, clear and definite to the country what their attitude is, have they taken advantage of that opportunity? They have not. They remain as uncertain and as indefinite now as they have always been. The leader of that Party some years ago stood on the rock of the Republic but is not now standing upon that rock; he is standing on the shifting sands of an empty formula.
To come now to economic questions, there is no Party in the House which is more aware of the dire economic conditions of the country than we of the Farmers' Party. We are brought face to face day by day with the economic conditions, and we are too well aware that those economic conditions are bad. It is our desire that the political parties should turn their attention once and for all away from the political issues, and should devote their energies to the economic issues. I assure Deputies there is more than enough work for all of us in this Dáil to solve the economic problems and bring about an economic regeneration in this country. When we start to expound economic problems we find we are immediately up against political problems—immediately we are up against the fact that political problems run across economic problems. In so far as they run across the economic problems, we of the Farmers' Party found ourselves, in the last election, in such a position that economic problems did not seem to exist. The economic questions were only used as side issues, side arguments, to gain political ends by the leading Opposition in this House. I suggest to that Opposition that there is a great opportunity in front of them now. There is work enough and to spare for them if they devote their energies and their intelligence to the solving of the economic problems.
They do not seem prepared to take the responsibility of forming a Government. Apparently they are, instead, prepared to continue as an Opposition, to continue in the position which gives a Party that does not wish to be tied down to or tried out on its economic policy a chance of still making the people of the country believe that there is economic salvation for them as soon as they give an absolute and complete majority to that Party. I do not intend to go very deeply into the economic theories propounded by that Party.
As a representative of the farmers. I am well aware that the question of agricultural credit is at the present moment a pressing one for the farming community, and I know the Government, of which President Cosgrave is the head and which we are supporting, has taken steps to provide, through the Agricultural Credit Corporation, for the advance of money to farmers who are in poor circumstances. That is one of the reasons why I am prepared to give my support to that Party. I am aware of the urgent necessity for the provision of this money. On the other hand, I am aware of the promises made by the Party on the other side. As a Party, they hope to borrow money in America to provide those credits. Using whatever little judgment I have of economic and financial matters, I am convinced that any Party which continues to remain uncertain, indefinite, and is more or less nebulous on the main political question — the question of whether they are accepting the Treaty and Constitution — will not, and cannot, borrow money in this country, in England or in America unless at an extortionate rate of interest or unless they mortgage the whole future of our country. I cannot see that that Party which would form the alternative Government can provide the money which is required for the provision of credit for the agriculturists who are in such unfortunate circumstances at the moment.
As regards the remarks of Deputy O'Connell, we were told that at the last election we did not have freedom of speech. I, as a candidate on behalf of the Farmers' Party, did not have freedom of speech, but the attempts to prevent my freedom of speech did not come from the Party to whom Deputy O'Connell attributes interference with freedom of speech. I had the temerity to address meetings without notifying the Civic Guards and without telling the guardians of the peace in this country that I was going to make speeches. I found myself met with organised opposition and worse than that on several occasions. I recognise clearly that if it were not for the freedom of speech which I afterwards gained by the protection of the guardians of the law we would have had the same freedom of speech as in 1922. We had very little freedom of speech in Tipperary in 1922, but we had freedom of speech in 1927. I have little further to say. I have expressed, in so far as lies in my power, the feeling of the Party to which I belong. We have taken a decision, and that decision is, that in the present circumstances the only action which we and those who stand behind us will adopt is to give our support to President Cosgrave for the Presidency of the Executive Council. When I say that I hope that President Cosgrave will be re-elected, I have also other hopes, and I agree with the concluding words of Deputy O'Connell, to the effect that political parties should try to put aside the acrimonious differences existing between them, and that it is time for all parties to concentrate on the economic conditions of the country. I say, however, that before parties can concentrate on solving the economic problems of this country they will have to be honest and sincere in their economic policy, and that they cannot put forward a policy upon which they are prepared at an election to go before the country, but upon which they are afraid to stand after election.
I challenge the Party that sits on the opposite side to say that they are not afraid to stand on the economic policy which they put before the people. If they are not, the alternative is open to them. They can test the Dáil and see whether the Dáil will give a vote for their nominee who stands for their economic policy. The Party to which I belong will not, at any rate, give a vote for such policy. They do not believe that it is a policy that will make for the welfare, upliftment and advancement of the country. We believe that we have in the present charter of liberty which we have accepted full freedom to advance the national and economic welfare of the country, if we only realise it and take advantage of the opportunities open to this Dáil.