Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 28 Mar 1928

Vol. 22 No. 17

ADJOURNMENT DEBATE. - EMPLOYMENT OF GANGERS ON RELIEF WORK IN CO. GALWAY.

Professor THRIFT took the Chair.

In raising this question on the adjournment, I want to point out, first of all, that I have not got any satisfactory answer to any part of the question I asked the Parliamentary Secretary this morning. My question was to ask the Minister for Fisheries if he will state whether there are any men employed as gangers in County Galway under the Irish Land Commission, who own farms of twenty acres of land or more, and if so, if he will state the number. Now he has absolutely refused to do either of these two things in the reply he gave to me. I further asked him in view of the present position of unemployment in that county, if he will consider the advisability of employing men on such work, who have no land or other means of livelihood other than such work, and his reply was: "In the interest of the efficient supervision of the men engaged in improvement works, it is essential for the Land Commission to secure men of experience and reliability as gangers. It occasionally happens that some gangers temporarily employed are small farmers, but their employment is generally necessary owing to their experience and their satisfactory record." Now, I did not ask anything at all in regard to that answer, and there is no part of that answer a reply to the question that I asked. As I pointed out a few seconds ago, I asked for the number of the men who own land of twenty acres and more. There was no reply given to that. I hold that there is great injustice being done to men all over the County Galway, and I suppose all other counties, if I could speak for outside of Galway. The men who are unemployed and who have no hope of employment, and men I hold who are capable of doing this work just as efficiently as the men who are employed. should be given that work. First of all, I do not know what their experience is, or where these gangers got their experience when they started off. Secondly, I know men who were appointed as gangers, and the only qualification they had at the time was that they had served in the National Army. That is the qualification they had. I am not going to say whether the men who were in the National Army should, or should not, get the position. I hold, and I think the House or the Deputies who are present will agree with me, that the men who are capable of doing the work should be the only men who should get the positions. Well, first of all, I know men who are employed as gangers who own fifty acres of land or more. Every Deputy listening to me knows that there are men capable of doing the work that these men are doing, and these men are walking about with no work, and they have nothing at all for a living. On a job of this kind there is such a thing as a supervising ganger. There is a ganger in charge of three or four roads, and his duty is to see that these men working under him make the road according to specification.

I do not see where the question of experience comes in there. There were men working for the Irish Land Commission and for the old Congested Districts Board who had no land, nothing but their jobs a few years ago. That would be up to six or eight years ago. Later on these men were given farms of land. The Parliamentary Secretary may get up in a moment or two and tell me that they had holdings previously, and that they got an increase of land out of the lands that were divided. But here, and now, I want to state that I can name the people who had no holdings of land at all, and had no qualifications at all, but at the present time when there is an election on, they probably get out and do canvassing or other work necessary for the Cumann na nGaedheal candidates in the county. Those are about the only qualifications some of those men have. We had a debate here some time ago on the matter of unemployment, about men who were unemployed throughout Ireland. We fought on that matter, and we heard it repeated over and over again here, and men on the opposite benches told us that it was the duty of the Government to find employment for all men willing and able to work.

If, taking a farmer and giving him a position like this is finding work for the unemployed, I wonder where we are, and I wonder what we are doing here. I wonder why we do not get out. The other day there was a debate on these benches and Deputy Maguire gave the details of the qualifications of ganger, and he told us he knew a man who, a week before the election, came out and went into a village and said: "This road is going to be done. I have got a certain amount of money for it." That man would be President of a Cumann na nGaedheal Branch. He said that he had got a certain amount of money for that road, and he said: "I am going to be the ganger." His son would be the supervising ganger. That man was qualified for work and capable to carry on the work because he was President of the Cumann na nGaedheal organisation. If this is the way that we are going to look after unemployment, then I say God help the unemployed. I have not very much further to add. There is no need for me to go any further into details. I ask the Parliamentary Secretary when he is making such appointments in future not to take into consideration whether this man belongs to the Cumann na nGaedheal Party or the Fianna Fáil Party or the National League or any other organisation. I would simply ask him to find out what the qualifications of the man are, and then appoint the man who is suitable. I am not asking him to put any man who is incapable of doing his work into one of these positions. But there are plenty of men walking about with their hands in their pockets not able to earn a halfpenny, and these men are able to do this work, and I hope that they will be considered in the future when gangers are being appointed.

I want to say a few words about this matter in reference to the way the money has been spent on the relief works and on the appointment of the gangers down the country. This is important to every member of this House who does not belong to the Government Party, but it is much more important to members who come from the Gaeltacht, where the people are illiterate and vote illiterate. I do not want to take in the whole of the Gaeltacht and I do not want to take in Connemara, but I will give a few examples as to how these appointments were made in my own district. I will give nine or ten instances within a radius of a few miles of my house. It was said that the qualification necessary for a ganger was experience. There were ten works started within five miles of my house. The nearest one was on a road. The man appointed was Patrick Flaherty. His only qualification was that he was an ex-C.I.D. man. I do not know whether he is entitled to the "ex-" or not. His father is a publican and he is also a steward over a fishery. The man is well off. He has a publichouse and is a steward to a fishery, and the only qualification the son had was that he was a C.I.D. man. He was appointed as one of the gangers. My next case is that of a road started on the unemployment grant. The man in charge of that road was Sergeant Connolly of the R.I.C. He may have gained experience of some sort of ganger's work in the R.I.C. He has a pension of about £200 a year, and he is the only man in the place with £200 a year, or even £100 a year.

I might as well say that every one of the men I mentioned were personating agents for Cumann na nGaedheal at the last election. My third case is that of a man named Derann, an ex-soldier of the National Army, who served eighteen months for killing an old woman over seventy years of age. His only qualification was that he acted as a personating agent at the last election. Some of these people, I admit, had a little experience on the preelection roads, but that was all. The next case is that of Bartley Flaherty, who was dismissed for inefficiency as a ganger by the county council, but he proved so efficient as a personating agent that he was appointed by the Land Commission in charge of a gang working on a scheme at Cluas. In the Island of Gorumna there were two other gangers appointed. Festy McDonagh and another McDonagh, two personating agents for Cumann na nGaedheal. In Carraroe the two personating agents for Cumann na nGaedheal, Myles MacDonagh and Pat MacHale, were also appointed gangers. MacDonagh is the only man I know there who has a banking account. He is so well off that he had to get a man to work on his farm while he was employed as a ganger. Rumour has it, but I cannot vouch for it, that the man working in his place should have been working on the gang. I have mentioned nine cases. The tenth is Coleman Mannion, another supporter. I am not sure about him, but I know that the other nine men who got these jobs as gangers were personating agents, and that that was their only qualification. I went to the engineer and asked him why they were picked out as gangers, and he said he was not allowed to appoint the gangers. That may or may not have been correct. I think that evidence is sufficient. I am not referring to all of the Gaeltacht, but only to ten roads started within five miles of my own home.

It is quite clear that the grievance of Deputies opposite is that the only qualification for a ganger should be that he is a member of the Fianna Fáil organisation.

I have said nothing like that. Do you admit the facts?

Mr. HOGAN

I did not interrupt you. The Deputies made it perfectly clear that their point of view is that when the Land Commission is choosing a ganger they should choose one who is a member of the Fianna Fáil Party.

That they should not be selected exclusively from the Cumann na nGaedheal organisation, or that they should not be men with plenty of money; they should be selected from the unemployed.

I definitely stated that men should be chosen who are capable of carrying on the work regardless of politics.

Mr. HOGAN

What do you mean?

Mr. JORDAN

You are smart enough to know well what he means.

I said I did not care whether they were members of the Cumann na nGaedheal, the Fianna Fáil or the National League. Do not twist it too much.

Does the Minister admit the facts which have been stated by Deputies Tubridy and Killilea?

Mr. HOGAN

Not at all.

Do you deny them?

Mr. HOGAN

Absolutely.

Will you have an inquiry?

Mr. HOGAN

Is the Deputy finished? He has an obsession about inquiries. It comes well from people who went all over the country to every cross road and said: "Come along to us and we will get roads and bridges and drains for you." That is legitimate enough politics.

Who preached that policy?

Mr. HOGAN

You all did.

Does the Minister say that we promised roads and drains to each individual who supported us? After all it is different to promise roads and drains to people as a whole, rather than to individuals.

Mr. HOGAN

Will the Deputy keep to Wicklow and Dublin?

I represent Galway and I never promised a road to anybody there.

Mr. HOGAN

It comes well from Deputies who went round the country and told people: "All you have to do is to vote for us, and we will get you roads, and drains and pensions, and so on."

Name one.

Mr. HOGAN

Is there any one of you who has not?

I have not.

SEVERAL DEPUTIES

I have not.

Mr. JORDAN

Give names before you proceed further.

Mr. HOGAN

Deputies Jordan, Killilea, Tubridy—I mean the three.

Mr. JORDAN

That is so much. I will give you all you want.

The Minister for Agriculture led the band.

Mr. HOGAN

That is not my form at all. I know a thing or two. It is too cool for Deputies who have been doing that sort of thing, who have been promising everything to everybody, to come along, regardless of whether it was possible to carry out promises or not, and complain——

You are stating your own case.

Mr. HOGAN

—to come along and complain that the Government is attempting to administer these relief grants on political lines. I stood up to deal with the two cases which I happen to know that Deputy Tubridy mentioned. These are the cases of Patrick Flaherty, ex-C.I.D. man. I do not know that he was ever in the C.I.D.

I did not say that he was in the C.I.D. I said he acted as a personating agent at the last election and was dismissed for inefficiency by the county council.

Mr. HOGAN

I think you are referring now to Bartley Flaherty.

Yes, but Patrick Flaherty admitted to me that he acted as an intelligence officer.

Mr. HOGAN

In the National Army?

He was not in the National Army. He was attached, but he was a personating agent.

Mr. HOGAN

He is a good man, who is doing his road well, and he also worked for the county council.

Mr. HOGAN

I happen to know that man, and he is a tip-top ganger who knows his job well and gets real good work out of his men. Bartley Flaherty, it was said, was dismissed for inefficiency by the county council.

By the county surveyor.

Mr. HOGAN

The Deputy knows the circumstances as well as I do. He was not dismissed for inefficiency. Was he dismissed because he was not a member of the Fianna Fáil Party?

That was tried before. He was dismissed by the county surveyor, Mr. Kennedy, who is not a supporter of Fianna Fáil.

Mr. HOGAN

I do not mind these euphemisms at all. He was a ganger under the county council, who knows his work well and who did his work well. I do not know that he was dismissed at all. I know he was working for a certain time as a ganger under the county council. That work ceased. He is now a ganger under the Land Commission. He is an experienced man.

Might I explain? Bartley Flaherty worked under the county council. An assistant surveyor, Maurice Sweeney, suspected of having tendencies politically like ours, was his superior. He could not dismiss him, and he never attempted to. I think the man was not terribly efficient. His superior, Mr. Kennedy, the county surveyor, did it, and you could not say anything to him, because he is a brother of Canon Kennedy's.

Mr. HOGAN

I do not mind what his superior thought about him. I know the man is a tip-top ganger.

He is a good personating agent.

Mr. HOGAN

We will come to that. I merely stood up to deal with these two cases that I happen to know. These two men are most efficient gangers and do their work very well. There is only one thing against them, and that is, apparently, that politically they are not the colour of the Party opposite.

He was dismissed for inefficiency by the county council.

Mr. HOGAN

I join issue with you there-he was not. I happen to know these two men as I come from that part of the country. They are two first-class gangers, and if there were more roads to be done in that district, these are the sort of men that I would employ if I had any responsibility for it.

Mr. JORDAN

May I ask a question?

ACTING-CHAIRMAN

You must give the Parliamentary Secretary at least ten minutes to reply.

Mr. JORDAN

That is why I rise to ask the question. The Minister mentioned Deputy Jordan. If you want to give the Parliamentary Secretary ten minutes you cannot do it now. As it is. there are only eight minutes left, and the age of miracles has passed. Where do I come in then before the debate ends, I would like to know?

Mr. HOGAN

Raise it again.

Mr. JORDAN

I will, sure; you will not get away with it. You said a little too much for yourself. Wait until I am finished with you.

Mr. HOGAN

I know these men; they are tip-top men. They have every qualification for the work, and, forsooth, because they had the impudence to be—I do not know that they were— personating agents for Cumann na nGaedheal they are to be dismissed. That is the point that is made against them. Deputies cannot have it both ways.

Will the Minister apologise to me if my contention is right that this man was dismissed for inefficiency?

Mr. HOGAN

Yes, certainly I will do so.

Deputy Killilea and myself are agreed upon this, namely, that it is only capable and competent men who should be appointed as gangers and put in charge of these works. I am quite satisfied that the men appointed were all capable and competent men. They were practically in all cases experienced men and men who had been working for the Congested Districts Board for many years, and some of them have been working for the Land Commission for three or four years past. If you are to spend relief money to the best advantage, and if you are to give immediate relief, and relief to the maximum amount of the expenditure allowed, the only people to appoint over the works are competent and experienced men. We know to our cost that relief money has been squandered because incompetent gangers were appointed who did not know how to control the men and spend the money to the best advantage. We have had to dispense with the services of men of this kind. I instructed the Land Commission engineers this year to appoint none but efficient and competent men as gangers, and I am perfectly satisfied, as a result of the reports I received, that the men appointed have given ample and complete satisfaction. It seems to me that the point is this. It is not a question, from the limited material at our disposal, as to who the men we appointed were, but whether these men were competent and reliable. It seems to me that that is the real point. You can not base a charge against the Land Commission administration of the relief grant on any other ground. Deputy Killilea said it was only men who were unemployed that should be engaged as gangers. As a matter of fact, it is the usual practice in Galway, and in every other county in the Free State, to employ as gangers men who have no other means of livelihood, and those are the men who are kept employed constantly, practically all the year round. These are the men engaged by us constantly on improvement works over the twenty-six counties. We find it necessary to shift some of them from one county to another because of their experience. We have recently shifted an exceedingly experienced and competent ganger from Mayo to Kerry to carry out difficult works there. In addition, we did employ a few men with twenty-acre holdings in Galway. After all, I know some farmers in Galway who have twenty acre holdings, and the valuations do not amount to 5/-. It is not a question of the size of the holding; it is a question of the valuation that decides the question whether a man is entitled to employment or not.

Why, then, term him a farmer at all? Goats are all that should be reared where he lives.

The Deputy should have given the valuation if he wanted to make any point.

Why did not you give a reply to my question? You did not tell me the number of men employed.

We are dealing with the debate now arising out of your question. Three of these men have only recently got holdings of land. I do not know their valuation, but I know they are small farms. I know they are men who needed employment and are competent and men of experience.

I did not say whether they were appointed recently or not.

They were men who got holdings from the Land Commission recently. An estate has been recently divided by the Land Commission. One of them, as a matter of fact, is a very old and experienced official of the Land Commission, was working with the C.D.B. originally, and has been working with the Land Commission since the C.D.B. was transferred to the Land Commission. As to the other man I do not know the circumstances so very well. A point I want to make is that the men employed on these works in Galway, Mayo, Sligo and in every county where relief moneys are spent are all small farmers. Very often it happens that a man with a holding of 20 acres is very much more in need of employment than a man with probably only two or three acres of land. It depends entirely on the valuation.

When I referred to 20 acres I meant arable land.

A good deal of the land in Galway, as the Deputy knows, is not arable.

A good deal is arable.

—In parts of Galway, yes. At all events the money has undoubtedly been spent to the very best advantage. The men who were put in charge of the relief works generally have given complete satisfaction. Deputies must remember the difficulties under which we had to undertake the expenditure of the money. First of all, the money was not made available for expenditure until about the beginning of the year. Then engineers had to prepare the schemes on which the money was to be spent. Gangers were then appointed at once, in order that the work might be completed before 31st March.

Was it a mere coincidence that they were all personation agents?

In nearly every instance they were old gangers, all men of experience, and they were the only men to be appointed. There is no use taking a man from a town or a city and putting him in charge of these works. He might squander £200 on a work that could be completed for £50. If you are going to spread money around to the best possible extent and to give the maximum employment you must appoint men of experience to take control of the works and to see that the money is spent to the best advantage. There is no use in appointing young inexperienced men. You must appoint a man who is capable of controlling the men under him. He must have a little bit of personality, and must be a degree above the men working under him if you are going to have the works carried out efficiently. You must take all these factors into consideration. The gangers employed throughout the country on improvement works all the year round are very efficient men who have been selected——

Because it was thought they would be supporters of Fianna Fáil!

I have been all over Galway recently and everywhere I went I was accused of giving work to the Fianna Fáil Party.

A false accusation!

Members of the Party opposite claimed down the country that they are responsible for the relief works. The Deputy knows perfectly well that there is no point in that.

I gave ten concrete cases.

I think there was very little point in Deputy Killilea's case.

There is a lot in it.

They were appointed without regard to party. We were only concerned with spending the money to the best advantage.

They were appointed because they were members of your organisation.

Personating agents and gangers were interchangeable.

The Dáil adjourned at 9 p.m. until 3 p.m. on Thursday, 29th March, 1928.

Top
Share