Deputy J.J. Byrne does not approve of the Gaelicisation policy of the Government, and that produces a very interesting suggestion from Deputy Patrick Hogan, with which, like Deputy Tierney, I find myself unable to agree. Like Deputy Tierney, I agree that it is worth examination and discussion. There is one thing that Deputy Hogan said with which I am in entire agreement. He said that too much confidence was placed on school teaching to save the Irish language. He said, further, that the teaching of the language by itself in the schools would not restore it as a spoken language in Ireland. There is no doubt in my mind that we are placing too much confidence in the schools to save the language. We are taking it for granted that the Irish teaching which the children in the English-speaking districts are getting will, in the course of time, produce an Irish-speaking people. I do not think that is going to happen, because a gap is left after children leave the school until the period when they reach more mature age and take up work. There is no form of continuation school, no night school or folk school by which they could improve and consolidate the knowledge they got in the primary schools. That is a gap which, I am convinced, will, in most cases, unless they have tremendous interest in the language, result in the absolute disappearance of the grammatical or book knowledge which they may have gained in the schools. Deputy Byrne wanted to know what useful purpose the Gaelicisation policy of the Government was going to achieve. I do not think anybody with any sense would question that policy on the same lines as Deputy Byrne questions it. Suffice it to say in answer to Deputy Byrne that nationality is the basis of education, and if the Gaelic language, which is subject to so many attacks in this country within recent months, is not taught in the schools, if it is allowed to die, then there is no doubt the hope which Deputy Byrne expresses, that the children would be quite satisfied, will be achieved, but at what a loss?
In regard to the speech of the Minister when introducing the Estimate, I was very pleased to hear, in spite of criticisms to the contrary, that the School Attendance Act has been successful. The figures the Minister gave were interesting and illuminating. I had doubts that the Act was going to prove beneficial to the children, but I am convinced now, having seen it operating in the country, that it is one of the best pieces of legislation passed by this Dáil since its inception. I was glad to hear the figures relating to the numbers of students from the Gaeltacht attending preparatory colleges. That is a good thing. Could the Minister give us any indication when the transfer will take place of Colaiste na Mumhan at Mallow to the Gaelic-speaking districts? Mallow is in the heart of the Gaeltacht, and two places in Cork have been recommended—Coolea and Ballyvourney. I would like to know when the Minister intends to transfer that college to one of the Irish-speaking areas I have mentioned.
In looking through the Estimates I was sorry to note a steady decrease in the amount asked for technical education. Undoubtedly, it is a good thing that the Estimate for primary and secondary education shows a steady increase, but the Estimate for technical education in 1924-25 was £201,585 and that has dropped to £184,739. Like other Deputies, I am curious about the Government's policy with regard to the Report of the Commission on Technical Education. I hope some information will be given us when the debate is concluding as to the Government's proposals in the matter. I regret also to notice the decrease in the Estimate for elementary schools in the City. There is a decrease of something like £6,500 for night schools. I think when the Minister spoke of economies it was very bad economy to commence on some of the items in this Estimate. One item is that of £6,500 which I have just mentioned.
I was sorry to note a decrease which means the practical elimination of the Irish summer courses for teachers. It was stated that out of 13,300 teachers, there are still nearly 6,000 who do not possess a bi-lingual or Ard-teastas certificate for the teaching of the Irish language. It would be well if the Minister stated what he proposes to do to bridge that gap and enable the 6,000 to acquire the bi-lingual certificate within a reasonable time.
Looking through the White Paper with regard to the Gaeltacht Commission Report, I find the Government's attitude set out in paragraph 51:—
That special local courses, which will not interfere with the ordinary working of the schools, be organised at suitable times for the purpose of helping teachers in the Gaeltacht at present unable to impart the whole course of primary education in Irish, to become so qualified.
The Government set out that they do not find this possible but that the following alternative arrangement is under consideration:
The appointment of special organisers who would travel from district to district, organising in the schools instruction through the medium of Irish, and, where necessary, assisting teachers who already have a knowledge of the language to improve their proficiency to the required standard.
That might provide an alternative for the abolition of the summer courses, but I do not think that it would work out successfully. There is another way out which the Minister might take into consideration. There is a lack of co-operation existing between the Department of Education and the local County Committees of Technical Instruction. The services of the Irish teachers employed by the County Committees are availed of at night. Classes are mostly held at night in country districts. During the day time the teachers are free and I do not see why some arrangement should not be arrived at so that the teachers under the County Committees could attend schools in districts where students are not otherwise sufficiently equipped or facilitated to learn the language. Closer co-operation between the County Committees and the Department would result in some alternative for the abolition of the summer courses. That abolition is going to do harm.
Another point mentioned here was the question of school libraries. Some arrangements should be made by the Department of Education by which a library scheme would be put into operation and under which the primary schools could avail of the libraries worked by the County Council. In the Cork County Council we have, under the administration of the County Council, a very successful county library scheme, and in something like 210 schools that has been taken advantage of by the teachers. Some teachers, to whom I have been talking, have assured me that it filled a long felt want. I am sure the experience of those teachers would be the experience of every school in the country were this scheme adopted.
One other question which I do not think has been referred to is with reference to the question of the provision of school buildings. I suggest that some better arrangements should be made with regard to the erection, maintenance and enlargement of school buildings than the present arrangement. I want some information from the Minister when he is replying with regard to the schools that I have been pressing him about for a long time—Adrigole school, which is in the Gaeltacht, and Belgooly school, which is in the Galltacht. The reason I mention the Adrigole school is that in the Government White Paper in connection with the Gaeltacht Report we have it stated that provision for the erection of school buildings, not alone for the Gaeltacht but for the English-speaking areas as well, was in course of preparation. I hope we will get some information on that point before the debate closes.
I think that the amount of money allocated for the cleaning and heating of schools is too small. I should think that should be an all State charge and the responsibility not divided between the local people and the State. Last year, in connection with this Estimate, I referred to the advisability of an extension of the use of the cinema, or at least lantern slides in the schools. Nothing has been done on that matter since, and nothing has been suggested by the Minister in this regard. I suggest that he should give consideration to that question. Some of the districts in my constituency of West Cork. Castletownbere in particular, would be much benefited by such a scheme. We suggest that a travelling teacher could be sent round to visit these schools and give lectures on history and geography which would be illustrated by these pictures or lantern slides. That would be the means of inducing the children to attend school. It would give them an added interest in school life, and would prove a great attraction to them in continuing their studies. Another point on which no information was given by the Minister, when introducing the Estimate, was the question of the teaching of traditional Irish singing in the schools. Some time ago that question was raised in the Dáil. We would like to have from the Minister some definite statement as to the treatment of traditional Irish singing in the primary schools. I hope the Minister will give us some information on that, when he comes to reply, because that is a subject that has been sadly neglected.
Reference has been made to the question of the school books. I agree that the prices of school books are absolutely out of all proportion to the capacity of many parents in the country to pay. The prices of these school books are unreasonable. There is no doubt whatever that were the Government to set up some particular board or authority under the Department of Education to whom would be given the job of publishing suitable school texts, that those texts could be issued to the children at a very reasonable cost. In fact, they could be issued at cost price to children in the Gaeltacht as was suggested in the Gaeltacht Commission Report. One example of the cost of these books is given when I say that five years ago the cost of a one hundred and twenty page copy book was 2d; to-day the cost of a forty-eight page copy book is one penny. Any parent with say, six or seven school-going children who will at the start of the year have to equip the children with copy books as well as the readers that will be required for the children, will find that the small wages paid at present, especially to the agricultural labourers in the country, means to him that he is faced with an almost impossible task. No parent likes to send his children to school and to know that they are worse equipped than the children of other parents. The Minister should give more attention to that question than has been given up to the present.
The suggestion made by Deputy Tierney last year and also in the course of this debate that suitable text books should be taken in hands and published by the State at a reasonable price is a suggestion that is worthy of more consideration than appears to have been given to it by the Government up to the present. Complaints have been made that there are many unsuitable books in use in the schools, particularly history books. I agree. I have been reading through some of them in the last few days. There is very little in them but a hard metallic statement of facts. They are, unfortunately, written in such a style that no child would acquire an interest in the subject which they teach. History written in such a style is not made sufficiently interesting to the children. In these books on history there is very little given as to the conditions or the social life of the people, or the customs of the people in ancient Ireland. Very little attention has been devoted in these books to make the history attractive to the children in the schools. Had these histories been written, for instance, on the principle of A. M. Sullivan's "Story of Ireland," the subject would be made much more attractive to the pupils. At present the history taught in the schools seems to be only a collection of the dates at which certain incidents occurred, and very little else.
Another thing in connection with this is that sufficient attention is not devoted, I maintain, to the teaching of local history. When the teaching of local history is made more attractive to the children a better type of citizens will be built up in this country, people with a good independent, broadminded outlook. The children of to-day would thus, in the next generation, be people of a broadminded, independent outlook. I believe that if the teaching of local history were attended to from this angle the children would get a better understanding of their country, and they would better realise their responsibilities and their duties to the country. Sufficient attention has not been devoted in the way of teaching it. Deputy Clery, in the course of his speech, made a plea for closer co-operation between the County Committees of Technical Instruction and the Department of Education. I should like to support that. I believe that the services of the agricultural and horticultural instructors should be utilised in the same way as I have suggested that the services of the Gaelic teachers should be utilised for the furtherance of the studies of the children in the Irish language. At present agriculture seems to be despised by many people in this country. The tilling of the soil does not attract the possibilities that it should. I believe that if more attention were given in school hours, or even after school hours, to demonstration plots, more interest could be aroused in the minds of the children in country districts in agricultural pursuits.
Under Vote 49, for Science and Art. I presume we can deal with this matter. I find under that that there is £2,400 allotted for publications in Irish, that is, grants-in-aid towards the preparation and publication of translations of original works of general literature. We would like the Minister to give some attention to that point, and if he would say how far the scheme has progressed. For instance, how many translations from foreign authors have already appeared, and what original works have been sanctioned, and the grant made in each case towards the publication.
In reference to (B) (1)—"Publications and Plays in Irish (Grant-in-Aid)" and "An Comhar Dramíochta"—I may mention that last year I had occasion to criticise this sub-head. I should like to know from the Minister whether this grant-in-aid is applicable to any other society than that which is recognised in Dublin, and whether, in the case of a dramatic society operating with his sanction in the country, such, for instance, as that in Cork, any financial assistance is given for the production of Irish drama. If that grant is to secure the best possible results, I think that some encouragement ought to be given to country dramatic societies which, like the Dublin Society, are endeavouring to propagate Gaelic literature. In regard to the grant-in-aid of £500 given for "Preparation of Records of Irish Speech," I would like to know how much has been done in that direction, how many records have been prepared, and whether such records are obtainable by the public, and, if so, where they are to be got.
In connection with educational facilities for Gaelic-speaking districts. I may mention that some time ago, when we had a debate on the Gaeltacht, we secured a good deal of valuable information, but I find that we missed some information on points which come under this Vote, and I am sure that the Minister will endeavour to answer them before he concludes. It is stated in paragraph 4 in the White Paper dealing with educational facilities in the Gaeltacht: "That systematic steps be taken to ascertain the number of teachers in the Irish-speaking districts who are not likely to acquire this essential qualification within reasonable time." The comment on that is: "This information is now in the hands of the Government." The Minister should let us know, if possible, what is the relative proportion of teachers who have got the bilingual certificate and the Ard-Teástas and those who have not yet qualified or who would not be able to qualify in this respect within reasonable time.
Paragraph 5 states "That all teachers who are not likely to qualify in a reasonable time to impart the whole course of primary education through the medium of Irish be removed from schools in the Irish-speaking districts, within a period which, as far as possible, shall not exceed three years; and from schools in the higher percentage areas of the partly Irish-speaking districts within a period which, as far as possible, shall not exceed five years." The Government comment on that recommendation was that as it stood it would present great practical difficulties. It goes on to state "Before the problem is dealt with it would be desirable that a small committee of managers and representatives of the Department of Education should investigate the question in all its bearings. If such a committee could present an agreed report there would be much less danger of friction in the carrying out of whatever changes might be considered necessary and feasible, as the result of the committee's investigation to meet the needs of the Gaeltacht. The Government hopes to be able to set up such a committee."
I should like to know from the Minister whether such committee was set up and, if so, whether its report has been presented and when it will be available to Deputies. In connection with Paragraph 10 (Recommendation 55) it is stated: "That in schools in the Gaeltacht in which Irish is the sole medium of instruction, and the school-work is carried out efficiently, teachers who are reported as ‘highly efficient' be granted a ten per cent. bonus on their salary and teachers reported as ‘efficient' a five per cent. bonus." The comment of the White Paper on that is "The Government accept the principle of special recognition of efficient teaching through the medium of Irish. A suitable scheme is being prepared." Being very curious and having addressed many questions to the Minister I do not think that it is any harm to ask whether that scheme has yet seen the light and, if not, when he expects that it will do so. I have no great quarrel with the administration of the Department of Education and this is one of the Votes which I do not like to see decreasing. I should, in fact, like to see it increase because any money spent on education is well spent. The Department of Education is about the one Department which does not leave itself open for much adverse criticism on administrative details. I have no great quarrel with that Department and I trust when the Minister winds up the Debate that he will give the information asked for on the various points which have been raised, particularly those in reference to the Gaeltacht which I have drawn to his attention.