That either was or was not a breach of the law. If it was a breach of the law, then action should have been taken against the individual concerned. If it was not, it was either because a person had certain rights or because there was a loophole in the law. So far our law has not been tested to any extent,, and one does not know what loopholes may be in it; but it is a type of industrial property legislation which is more or less in common form right through the world. There are different methods of office treatment, but the legislation is pretty definitely the same, and there are international conventions regulating the whole thing. We have our laws. In addition to that we are in touch with the two unions mentioned in the sub-head, one dealing with such things as patents, trade marks, and designs, and the other with copyright generally. There is a convention which has certain regulations of law as it affects the nationals of all countries who are members of the Union. Being a member of the Union, we are protected, and in so far as protection is given here, we will be protected in the other countries that are members of the Union. We have no special arrangement with Great Britain, and, to my knowledge, Great Britain gets no special rights here that the national of any other country who is a member of a patent or copyright union would not, also, have here, and we have exactly the same rights in these other countries.
As to the Committee, I said last year that it was recognised that the legislation that was introduced in the first instance would have to undergo very many changes before we get a complete system; that, in fact, the Bill has taken two years to prepare, and, after being introduced, had eventually to be withdrawn and brought in in another form; that it suffered one very big change on the Report Stage in the Seanad, and that the only thing I could say to either the Seanad or this House was that we had to have some type of legislation governing industrial and commercial property, that we believed this would suit the circumstances of the moment, but that the situation was a changing one. I never pledged myself to appoint a Committee within any given time, and I never promised, and I would not promise, to appoint a Committee other than a Departmental Committee. I have had the intention for a long time to get the whole matter reconsidered in the light of certain things. There are one or two big things which have happened since. There has been a Copyright Union meeting held and certain arrangements made. Small changes have recently been introduced in our law arising out of this Convention. There are certain other bigger things which have happened, and other things which are happening.