Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 2 Jul 1931

Vol. 39 No. 11

Public Business. - Vote No. 52—Agriculture.

I move:

Go ndeontar suim bhreise ná raghaidh thar £35,014 chun íoctha an Mhuirir a thiocfaidh chun bheith iníoctha i rith na bliana dar críoch an 31adh lá de Mhárta, 1932, chun tuarastail agus costaisí Oifig an Aire Talmhaíochta agus seirbhísí áirithe atá fé riara na hOifige sin, maraon le hIldeontaisí i gCabhair.

That a supplementary sum not exceeding £35,014 be granted to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending 31st March, 1932, for the salaries and expenses of the Office of the Minister for Agriculture and of certain services administered by that Office, including sundry Grants-in-Aid.

There are two items on this Estimate. One is an item of £1,014 for the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, and the other is an item of £34,000 for the extension of the creamery industry. The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons conducted examinations and collected fees in this country from the Irish members up to the establishment of the Free State. They have conducted these examinations for the convenience of members who wanted to get their degrees, but they have no legal power to collect fees, and as that became known the fees got less and less as the years went on. Up to 1927 the amount they had actually lost in conducting examinations was £714. That is to say, they were out of pocket £714 for conducting these examinations.

Under the agreement made between the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and ourselves they pointed out that the conducting of these examinations cost £250 a year up to 1927, and they were at a loss on this service, which was entirely for the benefit of the students who wished to become veterinary surgeons in Ireland and the members of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. They were at a loss in this sum, and it was agreed that we would pay them £500, which does not quite cover their out-of-pocket expenses. We also agreed that the amount of the annual fees due for 1930 and 1931 would be paid in full. That was £514. These are the fees due by the veterinary surgeons who have not paid fees during the past few years. The total comes to £1,014. That is so far as the first item on the list is concerned.

With regard to the second item, this is a new departure. Up to the present we have been buying creameries and reselling their milk supplies to co-operative firms adjoining them. Here we propose to establish creameries in areas where creameries have not been up to the present. The justification for that is that there are certain areas in the country where there are considerable quantities of milk, where the milk is turned into home butter, which, taking one year with another, is sold at from 3d. to 4d. a lb. less than creamery butter. The price of creamery butter may be very low, but still that does not alter the fact that 3d. or 4d. a lb. less is a very considerable loss to the farmers of the area. One such typical area is West Clare. There there are big supplies of milk scattered over a wide area, and we have decided, as an experiment, to erect creameries there this year at a cost of £34,000. That would include the purchase of a central and auxiliary that have just been erected, the extension of the central and auxiliary, and the erection of from 6 to 9 auxiliary creameries, and also a certain amount for working capital to cover certain losses which are bound to occur during the years in which the creameries are being organised.

It also provides a certain amount for loans to farmers to purchase cows, which is quite usual in creamery areas. We propose to erect that creamery and to run it ourselves for the moment, and to recover the price later with 5 per cent. interest from the suppliers. We think we can do that. We have been led to that view by our experience of creameries which we actually hold at the moment. It might be reasonable to ask why should not these people erect these creameries themselves; that is a question I could possibly ask myself. The trouble is that people do not always do what they should do, and there are special reasons why creameries have not been quite a success in West Clare and similar areas. The main economic reason is that West Clare has not the same intensive milk supplies in a small area as you would have in County Limerick. On the other hand, you have very much bigger milk supplies than there would be in a purely non-creamery or non-dairying county. You have quite big milk supplies in West Clare, but in order to tap them economically you require a very big central, and four or five, and sometimes more auxiliaries. The fact that the central is big and that the auxiliaries are big does not necessarily mean that they should be expensive. You have got to have a central, and you have got to have a number of auxiliaries at various points. It takes much more money than the initiation of the creamery industry in other parts of the country.

In other parts of the country the creamery industry was run in two ways. Strange to say, as a rule in a new district the proprietary creameries were the first to come in. Where that did not occur, where there was a certain creamery tradition, the creamery movement extended by putting up a central or maybe a central and an auxiliary in an area where there were milk supplies within a reasonable distance of the central and the auxiliary sufficient to make the unit an economic one. You have not that condition of affairs here. If you are to have an economic unit you must have a central and seven or eight auxiliaries. If you have that you have a very big supply. It is much easier to find capital for one central and an auxiliary than for a bigger unit. That has been one of the great causes of the failure of the industry in Clare. Well-intentioned people conceived the idea of starting the industry, found the difficulties of getting adequate capital greater than they anticipated, and even went ahead with the enterprise without providing sufficient capital for it. You had failures there, and that again makes it still more difficult for the farmers of the districts to establish successful creameries themselves.

Anyway, I am of opinion that it will be very hard to get these creameries established in an area like Clare and saving the farmer the difference, whatever it may be, between the price of the home butter and the net price, that is, after the cost of production, of creamery butter, which is considerable, varying one year with another, sometimes threepence and sometimes four-pence. I think if you are to save that difference something like this must be tried. I propose to try it in this area, which is specially suitable for a number of reasons. First of all, the milk supply is extremely big. If I have a central and five auxiliaries I expect to get milk supplies of something like 18,000 gallons in the first year, and the central which we propose to build or to complete, will be able to handle 30,000 gallons, and there are 30,000 gallons in the area.

I do not propose to continue this experiment, unless and until it is a success or a failure or otherwise and the experiment has been tried out in West Clare. That is to say, there is no prospect of any continuance of this experiment. I believe myself that I can establish these creameries much more cheaply even than a good society could do it, because, through the Dairy Disposals Board, we are able to get, as a rule, better contracts than other people. We do business in a bigger way. Our goodwill is more important to the possible contractor, and I believe these creameries can be established more cheaply than if they had been established by co-operative societies. I believe myself, after giving the matter considerable examination and being very much alive to the dangers and difficulties, that I can make a success of this experiment and I hope I will be able to demonstrate that it is an experiment which can be extended to other parts of the country. In any event, the bald fact remains that in that district for a very long time farmers have taken less for milk sold as butter than they could get if creamery butter were being made. I see no other way of extending the creamery industry into these districts except the way I suggest.

As the Minister will admit there has been very little time to look into this Estimate. I do not know that it is fair to ask us to adopt it straight off. With regard to the first part, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, when the Veterinary Surgeons Bill was going through the House some of us pointed out that the Minister for External Affairs in making that agreement with the British was facilitating the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, London, in collecting one guinea from every veterinary surgeon here that they had not any legal power as things stood to collect. When that Bill becomes an Act, it will enable the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to collect one guinea per year from every veterinary surgeon on the British Register. Now we are being asked to go back and collect, as it were, the back money that they were unable to collect legally before the Bill was brought in. It is a principle that I think we should not agree to.

It is very difficult on a few hours' notice to go into anything more than the main object of this. With regard to the extension of the creamery industry, this is a new principle of buying a co-operative creamery. Whether it is going to be a success or not, it is very hard to say. As the Minister says, it is an experiment, and we must try it. I should like to ask whether the shares owned by the farmers and members of this creamery company are to be bought at par, and is it the Dairy Disposals Board that is buying this. Having held it for some time, do they intend to dispose of it again to the same shareholders at the same price? In that case, what is the difficulty of giving them a loan or mortgage? There may be legal difficulties. But, if the same shareholders are going to own the group of creameries at some future date, as I think it is the aim of the creamery legislation to get them back into the hands of the suppliers, if we get them back into the hands of the suppliers, we naturally give them back to the same people. If that is the aim, what is the difficulty in the Government coming to their aid by giving them a loan, as they have done in other cases? I think loans have been given to creameries, and I do not know what the difficulty was in this case. The extension of the creamery industry proposed in the second part of this Vote is, I believe, a justifiable experiment, and probably the Minister should get a chance to try it out. But I would like very much to have an opportunity of voting against the first part, that is K. 4. It is impossible, owing to the short notice, to do that. If we had had time to give notice to refer the Estimate back, we could, perhaps, make our position clear, and I should like if you, sir, could say whether that could be done even now.

When the suggestion that this Estimate should be taken at 7 o'clock was made to-day, it was indicated by the President that if there was a motion to refer it back it would be favourably considered; in fact, he indicated that the Estimate would not be pressed. Now it is clear from what Deputy Ryan has said, that there are two items here, one of which we would be disposed to favour, but we are definitely against the other. The only way we can show that is to move a motion to have item K.4 referred back, that is in reference to the payment to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. If the President is prepared to put it off until Wednesday, that could be done. It is impossible to deal with these two items. In respect to one, even though we have not had all the information we would like, we are disposed to accept it, but in respect of K.4, we are definitely hostile, so I think that could be taken on Wednesday.

I have no objection to taking the motion now in regard to K.4 to refer it back.

If it is proposed to go on with the discussion now I would, in the circumstances, be prepared to accept an amendment without notice, that the total amount of the Estimate should be reduced by £1,014 in respect to item K.4. What Deputy de Valera wants is not a motion to refer the whole Estimate back, but to reduce the Estimate by the amount of the first item K.4.

Is there a misunderstanding? I would like to clear it up if there is. It does not follow that when I say I have no objection to having the amendment moved that I am going to accept.

An Leas-Chean Comhairle

Oh, no; the committee is prepared to proceed with the discussion of the amendment, and I am prepared to accept without notice an amendment to reduce the amount by £1,014.

I move formally that the Estimate be reduced by £1,104, the amount of item K.4.

When that amendment is disposed of shall we have an opportunity of speaking on item M.6?

The Deputy is aware of the practice. The debate can go on on the amendment, and I am prepared to allow the Deputy to discuss the Estimate as a whole, and then the Minister for Agriculture will conclude the debate. The amendment will be put first, and then without further debate the Estimate will be put.

I think it would be only wasting the time of the House to repeat the arguments we used here in the case of the Veterinary Surgeons Bill in regard to these payments. I feel that the Department of Agriculture was lacking—or else that the Department of Education was lacking —but I suppose it falls definitely on the Department of Agriculture—in not having made provision very much earlier for giving degrees and having a register of our own here. We are not at all satisfied with the provision made in the Bill. As a matter of fact, we are definitely hostile to it, and we cannot see any case in justice that can be made for the payment of this sum. It is not necessary to go over all these arguments again.

With respect to item M.6., I have the same difficulty that Deputy Ryan has in seeing exactly what the Minister is aiming at. He has indicated that his idea is to start this industry and that it cannot be started without his aid. How does he propose afterwards to dispose of these creameries? What is the scheme as a whole? It is an experiment. What is the experiment going to end in? That is not made clear and I do not think that we are in a position to argue the merits of the case until we know exactly what the Minister proposes to do and why he has elected, for instance, to proceed in a manner other than that suggested by Deputy Ryan by giving a loan and securing the loan. Who are ultimately to become the proprietors of the creameries?

I think while the ostensible purpose of item M.6 is a very laudable one and one which no Deputy on this side would oppose, nevertheless, the Minister should, in fairness to the House, have given more information.

Mr. Hogan

I am quite willing to answer any questions.

Will he state what is the original share capital of the West Clare Co-operative Creamery, Ltd.? The number of shareholders? Whether a valuation of the assets was made? What were these assets valued at? What price is the Minister paying for them? Has he taken over the book debts of the company? Is he accepting any responsibility for the liabilities? What proportion of the £34,000 is reserved for working capital? What proposals does he intend to make for the management of the company as a going concern? How does he intend ultimately to dispose of the company?

When the Minister answers these preliminary questions we will follow with others.

Ten marks for each question, 50 as a pass.

Who is to be the examiner?

As I understood the Minister, this Vote was introduced for the purpose of helping creameries where there are small supplies of milk. I think the Minister has found out now and has experience enough to show him that there is too small a supply of milk in these districts to make them economic, if he is not prepared to subsidise these creameries. I believe otherwise they will never become economic.

Mr. Hogan

There is a big milk supply in this district—30,000 gallons.

Yes, but that is over a very large area, and the cost of the collection of the milk will be very high. It will cost something like one penny a gallon to collect the milk, and the full price of the milk to-day is something like 4d. a gallon, so that the cost of collection would be 25 per cent. of the price of the finished article. That is a dangerous position. There is another matter. I did not know if the creamery mentioned by the Minister is at present in existence. I think it is. I am not opposing creameries; in fact, I favour them very much, but I have experience of large areas where there is a small supply of milk, and I know the cost of collection is very high, and the thing is not going to be economic. Another matter is that the people who are in the habit of producing butter at home become unemployed when the milk is sent to the creameries, and the Minister should devise some scheme of finding alternative employment for these people selling their milk to the creameries and having it manufactured at a higher cost than at home. He should develop the egg and poultry business, and get it to go hand in hand with the dairy business. Certainly something will have to be done to supplement the dairy business.

I am in entire agreement with the object of item M.6 of the Estimate for the extension of the creamery industry. Considering at the present time what is being done for other branches of industry in this country, for instance, the amount of money that is being made available for electricity development, which will affect our industrial position, I, as a farmer, would think it wise that the dairy industry side by side with that development, should receive adequate consideration from the Department of Agriculture. I look upon agricultural development as the main development for this country. In the initial stages in new areas or in areas where creameries, through lack of co-operation in the past by the farmers and because of insufficient capital, did not succeed, it is necessary for the Government to come to the rescue and to help the business by carrying out educational work and getting the farmers to realise what they can do by co-operation.

The unfortunate position which has affected West Clare, the industrial West Clare co-operative creamery, is true of other new creameries in the past few years. If we had a succession of years as in 1929 the industry would be able to get on its feet of its own. In a favourable year farmers would be satisfied with the prices and contrasting it with the old system of butter making at home, there would be no difficulty in convincing people that the creamery system would be better than the home system. Every Deputy in the House and men in towns and in business know quite well that during the summer time that milk is plentiful and home butter is correspondingly plentiful. There is also the great difficulty of several shopkeepers handling a large amount of not first quality butter and I can speak from experience in the district where a similar experiment is going on as in West Clare that even indirectly the effect of establishing creameries has benefited farmers as a whole.

It has benefited the farmers who refuse to come in and join creameries, and in the district I am familiar with I know quite well that several farmers who did not join the creamery have benefited very much. At this time of the year a large quantity of butter which would be manufactured at home is manufactured in the creameries as a first-class article and it left the market all the better. At the present time it is unfortunate that in several areas of the country there are very large quantities of Irish butter, almost unsaleable from the point of view that it has been very badly handled. I will say this, that we have in this country as good home butter makers as any in the world and at the same time we have a large number of people who make bad butter, and that butter is put on the market to the detriment of the industry as a whole. For that reason I believe it is good policy for the Dáil and Government to advance the necessary funds to help creameries in their initial stages. I said the industry can stand on its own if we had a year like 1929, but last year and this year have been years of acute depression in the butter market. We have had to compete with the butter production in other countries; we have had the difficulty of having to compete with these countries in the market where we sell our surplus butter, and when butter is produced in greater quantities than we can deal with at home there is a consequent reduction in price. At the world price now available for butter it is impossible for farmers to carry on the industry with any hope of success and even the old established creameries at the present time are feeling the pinch.

If you ask farmers to produce milk at 4d. per gallon or less, you are asking them to do something that you would not ask people in the industrial world to do. I do not think it irrelevant to say that people are expecting too much of the farmers in this respect. I hold that the butter produced from milk bought at 4d. per gallon, and adding on the cost of production, imposes an impossible charge on the farmers of this country. If you develop the industry for the mutual benefit of the countryside, they will have to take on the responsibility of paying the loans for the erection of the buildings, the purchase of plant, etc. You can picture the difficulty where farmers supply 10 gallons a day, and the system is to collect back the loans at 2s. or 2s. 6d. per share for the five best months of the year. The deductions that have to be made from the small cheques at the 4d. rate from the farmers in some cases, eats up the whole amount received for the milk, with the result that the small farmers say to themselves, it is not worth their while sending out supplies at the low price, especially where farmers are placed a good distance away from creameries. I believe the experiment is a help to the industry, whether in this particular area or other parts of the country where it may be suitable, and is very good policy, and deserves support.

I believe that the creamery industry where the promoters have been cautious before the start off to see that the necessary facilities for development and success are there, has come to stay. I believe that this period of depression will go by. At the same time, I am satisfied that for the next few years the new creameries will require the very sympathetic help of the Department of Agriculture. They are the people who are directly concerned with the development of agriculture, and I think it very unfair for any section of the Dáil who are interested in other industrial projects to be too critical where a work of this kind is being attempted in the interest of the farming community. We are all anxious to help the industry, which is most in need of help to-day. Possibly, dairying is the one branch of industry which I believe is deserving of every possible co-operation from the Government and the farmers. We have seen in Denmark and other countries that the Government is helping the farmers when the farmers are, in the first instance, agreeable to co-operate.

In the West Clare district it was unfortunate that the development took place just at the time when the depression had set in, and the promoters were up against a serious handicap. It would be much easier developed in 1929 or last year. All the same, it is all the more reason now, when they have attempted the industry, that they should be helped. I am quite satisfied that the dairying industry has a future before it when the promoters are co-operative in outlook and when the farmers are active in co-operation. The creamery industry in the country as a whole will be glad to see that the Department in this particular instance is favourably disposed to help the whole industry, and I am quite confident that the experiment, when carried out with caution and when developing new areas, should be proceeded with carefully before the sites for our auxiliaries are selected, so that the milk supply will be adequate and the success of the industry assured.

Mr. Hogan

I propose to answer Deputy MacEntee's question first. The share capital taken up was £6,000 by about 150 people. They paid up about £600, that is one-tenth, at the first call. The assets include the central creamery, the auxiliary, stocks and other assets. The liabilities are about £9,100. Of the liabilities, £600 would go to the shareholders who have to be repaid. The working capital that would be required for a place like that would be about £5,000. It will be managed by the Dairy Disposals Board, who are already managing a number of creameries. They will be disposed of. That was a point which was also raised by Deputy Gorry. We proposed to dispose of them. The assets really will become the property of the milk suppliers. An arrangement will be made by which the milk suppliers will pay over a period of years by deductions from the money from their milk supply. We believe that we can pay them as good a price as we are now paying in Limerick after these deductions. That is to say, we will pay the interest and sinking fund and a competitive price for milk.

For what period?

Mr. Hogan

I could not really say. That would depend on a number of factors. It will depend on the price of butter for one thing. If the price of butter is good, obviously you can afford to make a good deduction from the milk supplies. If the present depression got worse, we would be obliged to go very slowly in the beginning. It varies in every creamery with the price of butter. The deductions for depreciation and sinking fund would vary in every creamery with the price ruling for the product. I should say that we should get it back in five or six years unless prices collapse. I think we can manage these creameries very economically. That is our experience in regard to creameries that we have opened already. Of course the manufacture of butter is an ideal commodity from the point of view of an experiment like this. It is more or less mechanical. The price of the raw materials, if the business is run in the way that a co-operative society runs it, and if there is no gambling in butter stocks, depends absolutely on the price of butter. If your mathematics are right you should never be at a loss. The reason they are at a loss sometimes is that, firstly, they try to give too much. Obviously, if they give too much, having regard to the price of butter, they will be at a loss. They may sometimes incur losses through causes connected with the personnel of their staff, and they may have losses on other occasions in holding butter and in gambling in stocks.

Deputy Allen made quite an important point that was also made by Deputy Gorry. Everything depends on the milk supplies in these districts. It is quite impossible to run a creamery unless there are economic milk supplies. What I want to point out is that the milk supplies in this area are absolutely ample. Yet it is an extraordinary thing that in Clare, where there are ample supplies, the creamery industry never flourished, for some reasons which I have indicated in the beginning, and for other reasons that are peculiar to the county. The milk supplies, however, are ample, and I believe even there the usual economic laws will operate. They have got there a first-class concern for manufacturing their milk into butter, rather than turning it into butter at home, and I believe the milk supplies will come in. If the milk supplies do not come in this experiment is a failure, but I believe they will come in. Anyway it is their asset; it has been purchased at £1 per share. The creamery will be resold, if you like to put it that way, to the same people, but if you say it will be resold to the same people it depends on what you mean by the same people. There are 150 shareholders in this creamery, but there will be over one thousand milk suppliers, and these milk suppliers are the people who will own the creamery if we succeed in deducting the interest and the sinking fund within a couple of years.

Deputy Ryan wanted to know why we had not acted in this area as in other areas. The trouble about the money is that there is no security. If it were a question of lending money to put up one creamery, costing seven or eight thousand pounds, then you would have a security of some kind in the seven or eight thousand shares. Here you have a creamery with seven or eight auxiliaries, capable of handling up to 30,000 gallons of milk. If we were to give the money without security, we might as well go the whole hog, and take the whole responsibility of running it. If we are to lose money at all, let us lose it ourselves, or let us have a good chance of not losing it. If we give it without security, we have no control over the body that is handling it. They may make mistakes or they may not, but we have no way of controlling their processes. We are parting with money without either security or without seeing that it is spent in the way we like, because when you give money without security, you should have the right to see how the money is spent. If you give money to start a business in that way, if you want to see how it must be spent, you must really take charge yourself, and we propose to do that.

With regard to the veterinary Estimate, of course, if Deputies take the line that this agreement should not have been made, and that there is no reason why we should have the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons acting in this particular way, it is quite logical to vote against the Estimate. If it is once admitted that it facilitates veterinary surgeons to have that degree, then in sheer self-respect what we must do is to refund the cost of the examinations. It is not an issue whether a man should be paid for the service he renders. Even though the expenses of the Royal College of Surgeons were £714 in connection with examinations, we settled with them for £500. We did not bargain with them, but it was suggested as a round figure. Once we were ready to agree that the Royal College of Surgeons should carry out these examinations, we had to pay. There is a fundamental difference, of course. Deputies opposite feel that there should be no agreement, and that there should be a purely Irish degree, that there should be no need to pay the Royal College of Surgeons for the examinations they carry out here. That being so, they are going to vote against the Estimate. If it is essential that there should be opportunities here for intending veterinary surgeons to obtain the degree of the Royal College of Surgeons, on that assumption you cannot refuse to pay the actual out-of-pocket expenses of the examination.

Perhaps I might be allowed to make a suggestion. Since I am in agreement that this experiment should be carried out, it is a suggestion that might be worth considering. It is in regard to the collection of the share capital from the shareholders.

Mr. Hogan

With regard to the collection of money from the shareholders, we propose to pay back the £600.

I mean in future. We find that in our district in the initial stages a certain number of shareholders have to take responsibility for the organisation, and do all the uphill work while a number of their neighbours are on the ditch looking on. When you make deductions at the outset from the value of their milk cheques, you are burdening them with the liabilities which possibly the whole people should carry, and in this particular instance, wishing to see these experiments getting a fair chance of success, I think no collection should be made further than what would cover the interest. I think they should start right away to collect the shares.

Mr. Hogan

It is quite obvious that if prices are as they are, you can hardly collect the sinking fund the first year.

Did I understand the Minister right that the suppliers will commence to pay off this debt? That means they will be given shares for what they pay off. At what stage will they be handed over to them? Is it when the pound is paid or when the ten shillings is paid?

Mr. Hogan

When they pay the full pound. I do not think this should be debated too much. I believe that if we get adequate supplies of milk we will be able to give a price for milk which is competitive, and that at some time in fact we will have to take it——

Without telling them.

Mr. Hogan

We will hand them the creamery.

The Government is very particular about handing over the creamery without security. Why should the shareholders buy it back without security?

Mr. Hogan

When the shareholders have paid what it actually cost us to establish the creamery, they will get it back.

In the meantime they do not know but that the Government, through bad management, might destroy the whole thing.

Mr. Hogan

They will not have any grievance against our paying as good a price for milk as they will get anywhere else. This is highly problematical and will require careful handling. I should say there is no chance of profits in the first year. You will have all the expense of putting up five or six big buildings, employing a staff and getting milk supplies. There will be heavy losses the first year as there would be in any business. These losses I would regard as part of the goodwill. Every business, while it is being established, does suffer losses.

How will the shares be allocated to the milk suppliers of the district? Originally there were 150 shareholders. Are they going to have any prior rights?

Mr. Hogan

No.

What would be the value of these shares?

Mr. Hogan

They are unsaleable. What is the value to any shareholder? What is the point about the remark?

Deputy Ryan's point is that you are confiscating the shareholders' property and I want to show that the shareholders have nothing worth while.

I said that they might be confiscated in five years' time, but not at present.

Mr. Hogan

We might have a failure.

I think they are entitled to some security. They are part owners.

Mr. Hogan

What security do you suggest?

They should be part owners when they pay 10s.

Mr. Hogan

It might be a good idea.

I wonder if the Minister has thought out this scheme?

Is the Deputy going to make another speech?

No. I want to be clear about this. The Minister told us in a sort of aside that when letting the milk suppliers in he was going to provide for interest and sinking fund out of the profits of the milk supply. The capital expenditure has been redeemed and interest paid, and there are assets amounting to £34,000. I presume that is what the Minister is aiming at. How does he propose to distribute £34,000 amongst the milk suppliers? Is he going to ask them to pay £34,000?

Mr. Hogan

Suppose all goes well, and that within five years we have recovered all, we will know what we deducted from each supplier, and some Christmas Day he will get his shares.

We want to have some record now of the Minister's ultimate intention.

Mr. Hogan

I may change my mind.

Not for the first time.

Mr. Hogan

In business people are always changing their minds.

We are not hidebound as the Minister's Party is in regard to some things. He said that he had £5,000 in assets, including £1,000 liabilities and £600 for shareholders.

Mr. Hogan

What I said was that there was £9,600 to cover central, auxiliary and debts.

Are there any debts owing to the company?

Mr. Hogan

I do not think so.

We have £20,000. Is it planned to erect new auxiliaries?

Mr. Hogan

There will be five, six, seven or eight new auxiliaries; the central will have to be extended, there will be working capital and loans made to farmers.

Will the loans to farmers be included in the £2,000?

Mr. Hogan

Yes.

For what purpose?

Mr. Hogan

For buying cows, perhaps.

Has the Minister made any provision for losses during the first year?

Mr. Hogan

Yes, £2,000.

So that the actual amount of expenditure will be £18,000, and £2,000 to cover losses.

Mr. Hogan

Yes.

Amendment put.
The Committee divided: Tá, 43; Níl 63.

  • Aiken, Frank.
  • Anthony, Richard.
  • Boland, Gerald.
  • Boland, Patrick.
  • Bourke, Daniel.
  • Briscoe, Robert.
  • Broderick, Henry.
  • Buckley, Daniel.
  • Carty, Frank.
  • Fogarty, Andrew.
  • Geoghegan, James.
  • Gorry, Patrick J.
  • Goulding, John.
  • Harris, Thos.
  • Hayes, Seán.
  • Houlihan, Patrick.
  • Jordan, Stephen.
  • Kent, William R.
  • Killilea, Mark.
  • Kilroy, Michael.
  • Lemass, Seán F.
  • Little, Patrick John.
  • Colbert, James.
  • Corkery, Dan.
  • Corry, Martin John.
  • Crowley, Tadhg.
  • Davin, William.
  • Derrig, Thomas.
  • De Valera, Eamon.
  • Fahy, Frank.
  • Flinn, Hugo.
  • MacEntee, Seán.
  • Moore, Séamus.
  • O'Connell, Thomas J.
  • O'Kelly, Seán T.
  • O'Leary, William.
  • O'Reilly, Matthew.
  • Ryan, James.
  • Sexton, Martin.
  • Sheehy, Timothy (Tipp.).
  • Smith, Patrick.
  • Walsh, Richard.
  • Ward, Francis C.

Níl

  • Aird, William P.
  • Alton, Ernest Henry.
  • Beckett, James Walter.
  • Bennett, George Cecil.
  • Blythe, Ernest.
  • Bourke, Séamus A.
  • Brodrick, Seán.
  • Byrne, John Joseph.
  • Collins-O'Driscoll, Mrs. Margt.
  • Conlon, Martin.
  • Connolly, Michael P.
  • Cosgrave, William T.
  • Craig, Sir James.
  • Crowley, James.
  • Daly, John.
  • Davis, Michael.
  • De Loughrey, Peter.
  • Doherty, Eugene.
  • Doyle, Peadar Seán.
  • Duggan, Edmund John.
  • Dwyer, James.
  • Egan, Barry M.
  • Esmonde, Osmond Thos. Grattan.
  • Finlay, Thomas A.
  • Fitzgerald-Kenney, James.
  • Gorey, Denis J.
  • Heffernan, Michael R.
  • Hennessy, Michael Joseph.
  • Hennessy, Thomas.
  • Hennigan, John.
  • Henry, Mark.
  • Hogan, Patrick (Galway).
  • Holohan, Richard.
  • Kelly, Patrick Michael.
  • Keogh, Myles.
  • Leonard, Patrick.
  • Lynch, Finian.
  • Mathews, Arthur Patrick.
  • McDonogh, Martin.
  • McFadden, Michael Og.
  • McGilligan, Patrick.
  • Mongan, Joseph W.
  • Mulcahy, Richard.
  • Murphy, James E.
  • Myles, James Sproule.
  • Nally, Martin Michael.
  • Nolan, John Thomas.
  • O'Connell, Richard.
  • O'Connor, Bartholomew.
  • O'Donovan, Timothy Joseph.
  • O'Higgins, Thomas.
  • O'Reilly, John J.
  • O'Sullivan, Gearóid.
  • Redmond, William Archer.
  • Reynolds, Patrick.
  • Rice, Vincent.
  • Roddy, Martin.
  • Shaw, Patrick W.
  • Sheehy, Timothy (West Cork).
  • Thrift, William Edward.
  • Tierney, Michael.
  • White, Vincent Joseph.
  • Wolfe, George.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies G. Boland and Allen; Níl, Deputies Duggan and P.S. Doyle.
Amendment declared lost.
Vote put and agreed to.
The Dáil went out of Committee.
Estimate reported and agreed to.
Top
Share