Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 5 Jul 1933

Vol. 48 No. 13

Agricultural Products (Regulation of Export) Bill, 1933—Second Stage.

When the Pig Industries Tribunal was set up, the members of it thought they would examine in particular one of the terms of reference with regard to the regulations of export to particular countries. They have submitted an interim report on the measures necessary for the immediate control of bacon exports. It is expected the control of the imports of bacon and live pigs and carcases for the manufacture of bacon into the United Kingdom will begin to operate at an early date, possibly about the middle of August. The Agricultural Market Commission set up by the British Government brought in a recommendation, which I believe has been adopted, to the effect that the supplies of bacon for British consumption should be stabilised somewhere about ten and a half million cwts. The plan they are adopting, so far as we can learn, is that they will find out exactly what the home production is likely to be for the year, and they will then give quotas for the import of the remainder. No quota will be given to any country that has not got the machinery to deal with it. In other words, unless there is a central authority or machinery to deal with the quotas in globo, no quota will be given. We have, therefore, to take powers to accept a quota and divide it into sub-quotas amongst people likely to export in the future.

The Pig Industries Tribunal set up by the Government have advised: (1) that it will be necessary to make regulations and to acquire powers to make the necessary sub-allocations of the quota allotted to the Saorstát, and regulate exports accordingly; (2) that exporters of bacon and live pigs and also exporters of carcases for conversion into bacon should be registered; (3) that for the purpose of tendering advice on all or any of the matters concerned, a consultative council should be set up, or perhaps consultative councils, and (4) that there should be power to re-allocate such quotas from time to time. It is impossible, of course, to anticipate, even in this one case of the export of bacon into Great Britain, what regulations will be required, and it will be absolutely impossible to anticipate future quotas either with Great Britain or any other country. Until we have got some experience of the working of these quotas it is felt that the only possible way to deal with them is to get power under a Bill such as this to make orders and regulations to meet each problem, as it arises.

We ought to be in position, after six or 12 months' experience, to bring in a Bill which will define more precisely what the regulations should be. Under existing conditions it is felt a Bill enabling the Minister to make the necessary orders and regulations is the only thing feasible. Deputies will realise that these quotas that many countries are adopting, Great Britain included, are very often allotted and there is not much time given to prepare to fill the quota. Orders and regulations have to be acted upon very urgently. It could never be done by the Department concerned making the necessary regulations and orders and acting on them, giving, if necessary, the power to the Dáil to object to or rescind these regulations or orders afterwards if they thought they were objectionable.

Under the Bill it is laid down that the Minister will proceed by order. He will proceed to register those who may wish to export. As soon as the quota is allotted in any particular instance the Minister would make the necessary order with regard to registration. Every person would be entitled to apply for a special quota, and if the total applied for did not exceed what was allotted there would be no great difficulty in dealing with the position from the point of view of applications, because when you know the proportion that came in, in a particular trade, and considered their capability of supplying the quota, they would get the quotas without further question. Having got the quota, the Minister would have power to issue an order specifying the amount they are entitled to export in a given period and the amount they are bound to export in a given period, because if an applicant were to make application for a quota with no intention of filling it he would be likely to do damage to the country as a whole. If the quota is not filled over the period, then it is permanently reduced; so no applicant should be allowed to apply for a large quota without the intention and determination of filling that quota.

There will be regulations, therefore, issued with regard to the filling of the quotas. There will be a definite quantity set for each period. Periods may vary in different cases. In the bacon quota for Great Britain it is thought the period will be a fortnight, that is that a certain amount must be sent each fortnight. There are countries giving quarterly quotas, that is for three months, when the quota must be filled in any period of that three months. We are not yet sure what the period will be, but whatever the period will be there must be an order for the amount to be exported by each applicant,

There will be penalties prescribed, also by order, in cases where the conditions are not carried out. There is also power taken by the Minister to fill part of the quota if that necessity arises. These powers, of course, would only be used to fill a deficiency. We might find a position, for instance, that towards the end of the period, whether a fortnight, or three months, or whatever the period, that there was grave danger of the quota not being filled. It might be necessary for the Minister, therefore, to go and buy the product, whatever it might be, and have it exported in order to fill the quota. That power would only be taken in a case of necessity such as that, and in fact would not be necessary, even in a case of that kind, because there will be a consultative council, and that consultative council will be particularly concerned with the allocation of quotas and dealing with quotas.

The consultative council will, I presume, have to meet very regularly, and have to be available for consultation if there is danger of the quota not being filled. They might find that while it is possible for some members to fill the quota that other members may not be able to do so. If it can be done in any other way by the trade the Minister does not intend to come into the business. He will only come in if it is found impossible for the trade to do it.

There is also power given to officers of customs and excise to deal with contraventions of the order. I have met the members of the trade in connection with this matter. I have met exporters of carcases—I will not say every exporter of carcases, because there are numbers of exporters of carcases that are producers themselves— but I have met the representatives of the exporters of carcases over the Border, and other substantial exporters of live pigs, who were asked to a conference on this subject. These particular regulations were discussed and, as far as we could get advice from the trade, we have, I think, drafted this Bill on the best possible lines. I also asked those representatives to send me a panel of names out of which I could select the consultative council necessary. There will possibly be two consultative councils, one for the export of bacon and carcases and the other for live-stock and the other for live pigs.

As soon as the Bill goes through, the consultative council will be selected, and then we can get their advice on the regulations before they are finally published. We will have to have regulations drafted and ready for submission to them, because there will be very little time to spare even if we get this Bill through in the ordinary time.

We expect the closest co-operation of the trade in this matter, that is with regard to the quota for pigs and bacon and carcases. We would have power, under the Bill, in case any other quota was allowed to us, to call in a similar consultative council to deal with the matter. We had an instance of this eight or nine months ago, when we got a quota for the export of butter to Belgium. The difficulty we found, at that time, was that if four or five different exporters went into the market they might cut prices in such a way as not to get the best advantage, because at the time the price was more attractive there than in Great Britain. On that particular occasion we called the majority, at any rate, of the exporters together. We made representations to those present and they voluntarily agreed to allow the export trade to be conducted through one channel, and, in that way, the best possible advantage was got from the market. We had to get voluntary agreement. If any one exporter stood out against us that would have injured our scheme very much. Under this Bill we would have power to deal with such a case as that. I may also say that I, personally, consider the Bill as a temporary measure to be used in the hope of getting more experience, and being able, in 12 months or so, to bring in a more extensive Bill than the present Bill, to remove, if you like, most of the powers from the Minister which he gets under this Bill, and to put into a statute, as soon as we have the necessary experience, all that is necessary to provide for a better Bill. Meanwhile, for the present, I think this is the only possible way to meet the situation.

May I ask the Minister a question? Section 2 gives him these powers in the case of any country which establishes any system of restriction. Would not an ordinary tariff be such a system? I am sure it is not intended and what I imagine is intended is a quantitative restriction as distinguished from a restriction by means of a tariff. Ought not that to be made clearer than it is made in the Bill?

Dr. Ryan

I only asked the drafts man for powers with regard to quantitative restrictions.

I suggest that that point should be considered.

This is a very important measure and one which deserves the support of every Deputy in the House, in my opinion. There may be some features in it, as the Minister himself admitted, which, perhaps, are a bit unfortunate; for instance, that he has to proceed by order; but considering the situation that exists I do not suppose there is any other way of dealing with it. It is very important from this point of view: that the pig population has fallen so rapidly recently that there is really a grave danger that the country might not be able to fill its quota. In that respect, I should like to say that, if the Minister is acting—and apparently he is—on the advice of this committee on the pig industry which he set up some time ago, I think the House ought to be placed in possession of whatever information those people have got. There ought to be an interim report because too much importance cannot be attached to this matter. Whatever information these people have ought to be placed before the country and ought to be placed before it at once. As I say, there is a possibility that we might not be able to fill the quota and, consequently, the House and the country ought to be placed in possession of all the facts which the Minister has got at the present time from this committee which he has set up.

There is one other matter to which I would like to refer. The Minister mentioned the allocation of certain quantities to certain parties and he mentioned the amount which they would be bound to export. That may be very severe. I see the Minister's point of view, but if the pig population drops any further, or if it continues dropping as it has been dropping for the past few years, I do not see how the Minister could bind anybody to supply the amount that would be required. Again, on that matter, I think it is most essential that we should have whatever information is at the Minister's disposal at the present time.

I should like to know from the Minister has he got a quota in any country for any agricultural produce? If he has, we should know it. If he has not, how is he going to allocate sub-quotas to exporters?

From the Minister's statement I understand that, in view of the possibility of the British Government establishing a quota system for the exports of bacon from this country, it is necessary to have certain machinery set up here to meet such a situation. The indications, certainly, at the moment do point to the fact that the British may establish a quota for bacon imports into that country. Already the Danes have succeeded in capturing 62 per cent. of that market and, no matter what arrangements we make in respect of bacon exports to that country, I am afraid our quota will be a very small one. I realise, of course, that a Bill of that kind is necessary because, bad and all as the present situation is, the Bill at any rate will help the Minister, in the new system the British Government proposes to devise, to maintain a certain proportion of that market for the people here who are raising pigs. I am sorry, however, that he has not been able to hold out any hope to the people raising pigs in this country that under such a quota system the prices also might be enhanced. Unfortunately, this Bill will not help in any way to increase bacon prices in this country.

I wonder if, under the Bill, the Minister intends to regulate the exports of pork as well as bacon and pig products, or does he include pork under pig products? It would be interesting, as Deputy Belton has suggested, if the Minister would be able to indicate to the House that there is a possibility of getting an alternative market for bacon exports in some other country. I got the impression, from a conversation I had recently with a certain official in Dublin, that the Minister was taking steps to find an alternative market for our surplus bacon products. It would be interesting to hear what progress he has made in that direction so far or if there is any likelihood at all of finding another market besides the British market for the bacon products of this country.

Exactly. It is true, as Deputy Brennan said, that the pig population of this country has been declining and is declining rapidly at the moment. The Minister may have a difficulty, certainly, in filling the quota allotted, however small, at certain seasons of the year and I realise that it is necessary that he should take some steps to come to the assistance of exporters or other people engaged in the trade to help them to fill whatever quota may be allotted to them. I understood the Minister also to say that in the event of the Government securing an alternative market in some other country it will be necessary to set up another consultative council. My impression was that for every additional market there would be another consultative council.

Dr. Ryan

For another product.

I see. This Bill expressly deals with the exports of bacon and bacon products?

Dr. Ryan

No, it gives us power to deal with any quota.

Under this Bill the Minister will have power to deal with the exports of any agricultural product. Is it the Minister's intention that the one consultative council will deal with the whole pig problem or will there be a series of councils?

Dr. Ryan

This council will deal with bacon in all cases.

This council will only deal with bacon. There is not much more to be said about this Bill. It is unfortunate that a Bill of this kind should be introduced. If the Minister and the Government had pursued a saner policy it would not be necessary, probably, to ask the Dáil to give its approval to a Bill of this character. If there were no economic war in existence, the question, probably, would never have arisen. However, as the economic war is in existence and as it appears that it is likely to be continued indefinitely, this is the best thing to do in the circumstances and for that reason we give our approval to the Bill.

Having listened to the Minister's statement in connection with this Bill, I think it is the most inconsistent statement made in this House for a very long time. The Minister speaks about the damage to the country that will ensue if we are not able to fill the British quota in the British market. What has the Minister been saying about the British market all the time, both inside and outside the House? Yet he comes here with a Bill bewailing the fact that this country is not able to fill the quota in the British market. We have been consistently telling him from time to time that the British market is indispensable to the farming community of this country. The Minister and his colleagues from time to time have said the opposite—that the British market was gone. Now he comes here with a Bill telling us the enormous damage that will be done to this country if the quota in the British market cannot be filled. The responsibility for agriculture rests on the shoulders of the Minister for Agriculture. I ask him to look facts in the face. Does he not know as well as I do that only for the economic war this Bill or similar Bills would be of great advantage to the farming community? I am sure, though he will not admit it, nor will probably any of his colleagues, he knows that we cannot do without the British market. I do not wish to go into details. I am sure that the Bill is necessary and that it is the best thing that could be done in the circumstances, as some sort of legislation must be passed. But when the Minister comes to the House and tells us about the damage to the country if the quota cannot be filled it is simply ridiculous in the extreme.

Arising out of the queries I put to the Minister, I cannot see any sense in talking about quotas and sub-quotas for export when we have not got a place in the importing sun in some other country. I agree with everything Deputy Curran said. The Minister is the one member of the Government Party who has told us that we can do without the British market. The organ of his Party told us in leading articles during the lifetime of the present Dáil that the British market is gone and gone for good. If the Minister has not a quota in the British market and no hope of a quota, it is the action of a baby to come in here to a Legislative Assembly and suggest quotas and sub-quotas for export when we have no quota in any country. The British, we are told, are about to adopt the principle of import quotas. The man who is buying can fix the amount he will buy from any particular person, but the man who is selling, unless he has a monopoly of the goods being sold, cannot fix a quota. Unless we have a contract in some country we cannot fix a quota or a sub-quota. The Minister did not tell us where he had the quota. I understand he informed the House last week that he has markets somewhere; that he will let the people of this country know about them some time—this year, next year, sometime, never. It is time that we knew, because we are not all overgrown babies. We have learned commercial geography. (Deputies: Hear, hear.) We have to live by the production of the produce we export. We are the producers and we have to live on it. We are not in the blessed position of being able to live like the Deputies behind the Minister who sneered “hear, hear.” If they were in the firing line of production it is not a smile that would be on their faces, but a frown.

Our export trade is going down and we know the cause. I am not going to deal with it now as it has been laboured sufficiently here. Any man engaged in agricultural production knows it. Some have the courage to express it. Most of them have not got the moral courage to speak out their minds. If the Minister had the moral courage, he would speak out as to the cause of the diminution in our exports. He introduces a Bill for the registration of persons engaged in exporting products to other countries. What do you want to register them for when the trade is going down and when the signs are that the country to which we are exporting our produce is shutting its doors against us? If we regulate and license every exporter to Great Britain will that do away with the 40 per cent. penal tariff on our produce there? There is no country in the world to-day or since the inflated price period during and after the Great War in which agricultural produce could bear a penal tariff of 40 per cent. While that penal tariff is there the Minister draws this Bill across the eyes of the Irish farmer. By some magic, by some regulation, by some consultative council, he is going to re-galvanise into life and make a paying proposition a business that is failing through causes indirectly produced by himself. It is ridiculous. I am surprised that Deputies have stated that this is the only thing that can be done in the circumstances. No matter what you do, is not your trade going down and is it not going down for one cause only?

We have no promise of a quota in the British market, and there is no other market in the world in a position to give us a quota. If the price of bacon and pork was not reduced by 40 per cent. for the last 12 months would the pig population of this country be reduced to what it is to-day? It is a question of price. It is a question of paying the labourer for his hire. It is a question of paying the man in production. If he is paid, he will keep in production and he will extend production. If he is not paid he will get out of production. The Minister and the Government have done all that was humanly possible to put the agricultural producer out of action. The Minister got into office on promises that he knew could not be fulfilled. If he thought that they could be fulfilled he was unfit to be on the Front Bench. These promises were not fulfilled. On the contrary, increased burdens were put on the industry and put on it at a time of world depression, when the level of wholesale agricultural prices all over the world is declining. We have to put up with 40 per cent. on that. The Minister who comes in here to talk about quotas is the very Minister who told us that he was approached by people to put a tariff on cattle being imported and smuggled from the Six Counties into the Free State. Did anybody ever hear such not from a grown-up human being—where you have a tariff of 40 per cent. against you going into the British market, that British market is exporting to this market cattle to be sold with the price of them artificially reduced by the Minister's own action and the action of his colleagues to 40 per cent. below the level of world prices?

Will Deputy Belton give the bacon prices for the last year, this year, and this time 12 months?

Deputy Belton is not going to come down to details.

Then do not make statements that are not true.

Deputy Belton will make his own case, and Deputy Gibbons, I hope, will try to make a case for the impoverished farmers of Kilkenny and Carlow. It is time, I suggest to Deputy Gibbons, that he did try to make some case for them, because this is the first time I saw him on his feet since I came into this House. It would be well if those people whose loud laugh bespeaks the vacant mind knew a little of the elements of economics. The simplest fact in economics is that no product will move from one place to another unless in that other place there is a better price for it than in the place of origin. Will any Deputy here deny that agricultural produce is leaving the Free State and going to Great Britain notwithstanding the 40 per cent. tariff? That shows unmistakably that there is a better price in Great Britain. Notwithstanding the 40 per cent. confiscation there is a better price to be got there than there is obtainable in this country. If not, who would go to the expense of sending that article to Great Britain, paying the penal tariff on it, and paying the cost of transportation? Would it not be sold here if there was as good a market?

I am asked what is the price of bacon now, and what was the price a year ago. I am dealing with international trade, not the cost of commodities now or a year ago or at any other time. If there is any Deputy opposite who can prove the impossible I invite him to prove it. The impossible that I invite him to prove is that a country is going to export its produce to another country, pay the cost of transportation, pay the 40 per cent. tariff, and sell it at a less price there than could be got at home. We had a lot of boosting of the mixture of grain, the market and the price that could be got for grain. What is the Minister now confronted with? He is confronted with a demand for a subsidy to enable people whose grains are in store here to send them over to England and get something for them.

The matter before the House is set out in the long Title to the Bill with which the Deputy is supposed to be dealing. It is the question of a quota of exports of agricultural products, and the regulations governing that quota. The Deputy was in order in referring to the repercussions of the economic war and its possible effects on such quota, but a discussion of the price obtainable for grain at present, a comparison of foreign and home markets, or an exposition of the fundamentals of agricultural economics is not in order.

Well, a Chinn Comhairle, I have not mentioned a single matter since I stood up except a matter relative to an agricultural discussion.

Quite so, but the matter before the House is not an agricultural discussion. It is a question of a quota, a restricted quota.

It is the Agricultural Products (Regulation of Export) Bill, 1933. I was just speaking, when you pulled me up, about the prospect of exporting our surplus grain. I bow to your ruling, but I submit that grain is as much in order when you are thinking of exporting it, as pigs are in order when you are thinking of exporting them.

Will the Deputy just read the words a "System of Restriction or Control of the Import"? That is the essence of the Title.

Its Title here at the back is "Agricultural Products (Regulation of Export) Bill, 1933." Of course it is a rather jocular title, showing that a country that wants to get money is going to restrict its means of getting it. I really do not know what we are coming to at all.

Neither does the Chair.

It is the Bill I am endeavouring to interpret, a Chinn Comhairle. Of any man who has any product to sell and wants to restrict his sale of it we would say here in Dublin that he is fit for Grangegorman. Of this agricultural country that wants to put through its Parliament a restrictive measure on exports I do not know what the old frieze-coated farmers will say, if there are any of them left by the time they read this. I know what they would have said 30 years ago if the British Government had introduced it. I am afraid Caithlin Ni Houlihan would be weeping again.

We have our own markets now, you know!

It would be a continuation of the 700 years' domination by the cruel Saxon. Now, it is not the Saxon, but the 100 per cent. full-blooded exclusive patriots who are introducing this Bill. Of course we are Britishers over here. If we introduced this Bill it would be said that there was an alliance with John Bull.

Dr. Ryan

You will never introduce another Bill over there. You are finished introducing Bills.

The Minister might be disappointed.

Well, introduce a couple more of these, and you are finished for all time.

Dr. Ryan

Not at all.

And it is not a quota for exports you will be looking for, but a quota to get back your deposit at the general election. Mind you, you only just escaped it the last time. You were very nearly found out. You will be found out fully the next time.

Dr. Ryan

You are speaking from experience.

The Minister and his Party may as well be juggling with quotas now, because they will find a difficulty next time they face the redhats.

Dr. Ryan

You are very cocky after getting in here once.

Every time I stood for a Party I got in here, and the Minister never got a representative position except when he was dragged in by a Party.

Dr. Ryan

I have always been in a Party.

You were cocky when I brought you in here.

Dr. Ryan

You?

Yes. You were singing songs of Caithlin Ni Houlihan for five years until I came across you.

That is not in the Bill.

I agree with you, a Chinn Comhairle, but it is appropriate anyway to the interruption of the Minister. And in so far, it is in order. The Minister proposes to set up a consultative council to register those in the export trade. What is the need for registering them? Is the Minister not satisfied that under the policy of the present Government we are marching quickly and blindfoldedly into Communism? Does he want to give the individual citizen in this country any individual freedom or any individual rights? He is going to issue licences only to those in the export trade. I would invite the Minister to throw his mind back to when he was a youngster, and look at the people who were in the various trades in any part of the country he knows. Have not those trades been revolutionised? Have not the men who only just started from scratch become what you might call the princes in the various trades to-day? Those whom they supplanted had supplanted others, and those who are the princes in those trades to-day will be supplanted by somebody else. The Minister wants to give a licence only to those who are in the trade. What chance is there for a young enterprising man coming along to develop a trade?

He will not have any trade to develop.

Of course he will not, thanks to the Minister and his colleagues. I will give the Minister a litany of "ifs." If he gets a quota in any country, and if the farmer has not become extinct in this country, if he can still produce something, and if that farmer has any confidence in the present Minister and his Government— with all that chain of "ifs" why does not the Minister let the trade go on in its natural way? If he gets a quota and he finds that trade is not filling the quota cannot he assume powers under Section 3, and go into the matter? I am glad that the Minister has taken the line that these powers in any circumstances are not going to be used if the Ministry can avoid their use. But why license all the exporters that are there in the various trades? Is there not a danger of victimisation there? Is there not a danger that the exporter who will not walk in step—I will not say with the present Government but, if this is to continue, with whatever Government is in office, may be victimised? The Minister should remember that any new principles introduced at any period in the Government of this or any other country no matter how they may be resisted, have a happy knack of remaining. If the Minister is going to discriminate as to whom he will give a licence—and mind you the Minister and his Government are not above reproach in that matter——

Dr. Ryan

Why are you saying that?

Because you are doing your best to get jobs for your followers.

Dr. Ryan

Is it not time for them to come in and get them?

Is it not time they got sense? You had plenty of jobs in 1922 if you had the sense. You had not sense then and you threw away your opportunity.

A Deputy

So did you.

As far as the job you are doing now is concerned, you are not acquitting yourselves well. If it is time, in the Minister's opinion, that his friends should get jobs, surely I may take that as an admission that he thinks they will get jobs under this Bill if it goes through. There is just one section in this Bill about licensing. The principle is a dangerous one. If we are to get a quota the Minister should have power to see that that quota is filled. This thing of licensing exporters is a thing for which there is no need. Every exporter, in the interests of his own business, will export all he can. He will compete in the market here, and he will give the keenest prices, and if you limit by statute, or almost by statute, the principle of exporting, you are laying the foundation for a ring. No matter what price the producer gets here, or what price he gets at the other side, that ring is going to secure safe trading profits for the people in the ring. In this matter of licensing, what the Minister is doing is setting up a ring. I would be entirely opposed to that section. Until the Minister has a quota for exporting, there is no need for the Bill. He has not got a quota, or at least if he has he has not disclosed it to the House. If he has got a quota then let the exporters get busy and let the most enterprising win the race. Let those who will not get up early fall out of the line, and let the others win. But by this system of licensing the Minister is going to put the man of enterprise in the same boat with the happy-go-lucky merchant. We all know that the strength of a chain is the strength of its weakest link. We were lagging behind in the international competition, but let us get our share in whatever market we may get that share, and let the best people win. Remember, the quota is not going to be given to us if we are not able to fill it at the right price and in the right quantity. If we gradually introduce this licensing system it will damage whatever position we may get in any foreign market. If the Minister has not got a quota, I do not see the need for him to interfere. If he has a quota, let the exporters fill it, and let him devise the machinery necessary to know in advance whether that particular quota will be filled within substantial limits. If the Minister is afraid it will not be filled, then he should have the powers that he asks for in Section 3 and use the powers of the Government to fill it. The whole thing falls flat until the Minister can assure the House that this country has been allotted a quota in some foreign markets. In the absence of that the whole Bill is moonshine.

I should like to put just one question to the Minister with regard to the export of corn from this country. I see by the Independent that a deputation waited on him yesterday on behalf of people who had stored corn. They stated they had 200,000 barrels of oats for which they could not find a market. They asked the Minister to subsidise that corn and find a market for it in England. Such a policy should be entirely against the policy of the Government. Their policy is to prevent corn coming into the country. We think it would be an extraordinary thing to subsidise corn going out and prevent corn from coming in. I think if the Minister is to subsidise corn the sensible thing would be to subsidise the feeding stuffs so that people could feed their animals cheaply and get the benefit of the subsidy.

I think we should be all agreed that if there is to be a quota on our export of animals or animal produce into England that it is necessary that we should prepare for it. In that respect I suppose this Bill is necessary. The Minister says this Bill is meant at the moment to apply only to pigs and bacon. Therefore, I do not think we ought to discuss it in relation to other things. If one were to discuss it in its possible relationship to the export of cattle, there would be a great deal more to be said for it, and very many more difficulties would face the Minister. Even as regards the export of pigs, I see a considerable difficulty facing the Minister.

One does not know what the quota is likely to be. We are lamentably aware that our quota is bound to be very considerably less than any of us would desire even two months ago. Owing to the economic war our exports of pigs and pig products have reduced considerably. It is almost certain that our quota to be determined by the British will be based on the proportion of pigs and pig products that we have been exporting within recent months. That is bound to reduce our quota to an extent nobody in the country would like to contemplate. Deputy Belton made some reference to a diminution in the pig population. Deputies opposite made a comparison between prices last year and this year. For a time pigs were at a higher price this year, but that was due to the diminishing pig population here. The Minister and his colleagues are apparently anxious to supply the home market. We have the home market in pigs and we are taking care of it. There is very little left to us outside the home market as a result of this Government's legislation and the breaking of agreements. The quota in respect of the Saorstát is bound to be small.

There is a greater danger facing us. The pig population in this country has diminished, and I am afraid it will diminish even further. I believe there will be difficulty experienced in finding sufficient pigs to supply the quota, small though it may be. For that reason I am particularly glad that Section 3 finds its place in the Bill. That section gives the Minister ample power to control the market, and I am afraid the Minister will have to operate this section at an early date. There is a certain element of danger in relation to the persons who will be engaged in the business of export. It may mean that the export of pigs and pig products will fall into the hands of a few large exporters and they will collar the swag, while the smaller exporters will be gradually worked out of the business. If there are to be temporary or alternating restrictions and the Minister has power at certain times to say: "You must export a given quantity," then the smaller man will not be in the position to supply. The larger exporters will have made provision for such an emergency. They will have capital. Altogether, this Bill plays into the hands of the large exporters as against the smaller exporters. Once this Bill commences to operate the smaller exporters might as well go out of business.

I referred to certain restrictions and a possible cessation of exports. It may be possible for the Minister to stop the export of pigs or bacon suddenly. What will be the consequences? One finds it difficult to envisage what the consequences will be if there is even a temporary stoppage of any market. If we were in a position, but I am afraid we will not be, to have big supplies available, once the market is opened there will be a swarm of people rushing to obtain their share of the quota and there will be a drop in price. So far as pigs are concerned, I do not think that is likely to happen, but it might happen if the Minister extended this Bill to other products. The Minister said he had a new market for certain other exportable products, but he did not say what they were. Possibly this Bill, as well as relating to pigs, is intended to apply also to the other agricultural items which the Minister proposes to export.

The Minister has not given us any evidence that he proposes to establish another market for pigs outside the market we have in Britain. Deputies opposite apparently consider it satisfactory that pig prices lately have risen, but they fail to recognise that that was largely due to a diminution in supplies. There was naturally a great demand for pigs and prices rose. Deputies opposite are finding some consolation in that. They expressed no regret at the fact that in the later months of last year, before people got out of pig production, it so happened in some places that young pigs were drowned. People were hard put to find a market for young pigs, and they drowned them rather than go to the trouble of bringing them to a distant market where they would get only a few shillings for them. That is within the knowledge of many Deputies. In many cases young pigs were sold for a few shillings, and it would not pay a man to take them to a distant market. The people got out of pig production, and for that reason there was a temporary increase in price. If the people come back to normal production there must be a drop in price.

If by any chance this economic war with England ceases and the 40 per cent. tariff is removed, there will be an increase in the production of pigs. I hope we are near that solution of the problem. Until we arrive at the time when the 40 per cent. tariff will be dropped, Bills such as this will have very little effect on farmers' economies. The only saving section is Section 3, which gives the Minister power, if we get a fair-sized quota, to fill it. It will be impossible even for large exporters to supply pigs to meet the quota if the 40 per cent. tariff continues. The Minister will then have to do it himself, and it will cost him something. I suppose some portions of the Bill are necessary if the Minister has to meet circumstances that unfortunately will arise. We all regret the probability that our quota will be a very small one, smaller than what it would have been if we were sane people and retained the great market we possessed. It does not look as if we will be able to recapture our market for a considerable number of years.

Dr. Ryan

Deputy Brennan and some other Deputies opposite wanted to give the impression that the number of pigs has fallen as a result of the economic depression. That is not so. Take the first five months of this year and last year. The pigs sold for killing in the first five months of last year were produced during the Cumann na nGaedheal Government. The pigs sold in the first five months of this year were produced after the economic war, and there is an increase this year as compared with last year.

An increase this year. That is an actual contradiction of the figures given by the Minister for Industry and Commerce.

Dr. Ryan

The number of pigs exported for the first five months of this year were 31,029. They went down from 121,375 in 1932. The number of carcases went down from 49,000 to 37,000, and the number of cwts. of bacon went down from 87,000 to 72,000. Taking for the purposes of calculation the cwts. of pigs the number of pigs would be down for export by 116,000.

Would the Minister take the figures this way: the number of pigs bought in the first five months this year as compared with last year, whether for home curing or for export as live pigs? Would the Minister take them that way? According to the figures of the Minister for Industry and Commerce they were down 48,000 this year as compared with last year.

Dr. Ryan

What about the bacon imported?

I am talking of the pigs produced in the country.

Dr. Ryan

Unfortunately I have not these figures now. I have the figures of exports and imports and you will find that while the number of pigs exported is down by 125,000 the number imported is down by 153,000.

May I ask the Minister——

Order! There seems to be a growing idea that a Minister when he rises is not allowed to speak without continued interruption. That is a very erroneous idea, I must point out.

I did not mean to interrupt the Minister. This is merely a matter as to the correctness of figures.

You think you know all about pigs in Roscommon.

We know what we are talking about in Roscommon.

Dr. Ryan

The only real test of net figures is to take the exports and imports, provided the consumption of bacon remains the same. That is the only place where a mistake could be made. After another few weeks, however, we will be able to fix the number of pigs in the country in June this year and last year. These figures will be available in a few weeks.

Deputy Roddy drew attention to the fact that Denmark secured 62 per cent. of the quota for Great Britain. Our supplies of pigs to Great Britain were only somewhere about 8 per cent. of Britain's imports. If Denmark got 62 per cent. I do not believe she got more than what she is entitled to considering her proportion of the bacon sent into Britain. Sixty-two per cent. for Denmark may look a huge figure, but when we examine the exports of bacon into Britain for the last three years we find it is not out of proportion. Deputy Roddy also asked would pork be regulated. It is not the intention to regulate pork or the production of pigs for pork to Great Britain, but there is power in the Bill. It might be found necessary to regulate the export of pork and pigs for the production of pork. For instance, in a slack season we might say we will allow no pigs out for the production of pork and we might find it necessary to regulate that. In the Bill there is provision for dealing with that if necessary. Deputy Roddy and other Deputies gave the impression that but for the policy we have pursued there would be no economic war, and that if there were no economic war this Bill would not be necessary. That is not a fact at all. Whether there was an economic war or not this Bill would be necessary. Quotas are being allotted in Great Britain. We have not the final recommendations of Great Britain yet, but a commission has made recommendations to the Government to the effect that every country should be allotted a quota and that no country should be allotted a quota unless it had Government machinery to deal with quotas. We take it for granted that the Government of Great Britain will adopt these recommendations and will allot quotas to other countries, whether within the British Commonwealth or not; so that the economic war has nothing to do with it, and this Bill would be necessary whether there would be an economic war or not.

Deputy Curran stated that I was most inconsistent because I was bringing in a Bill in order to hold the British market. I would like to hold the British market if we could get good prices in it, or if we could get a penny more there than anywhere else. But I said I was not prepared to pay £5,000,000 in order to hold the British market, and there was general agreement on that. Nobody was prepared to pay £5,000,000 for the purpose of holding it. Does not the necessity for this Bill justify what we said, that the British market was going? Britain is setting out now under these restrictive quotas. She hopes, in years to come, to be able to produce enough bacon and butter for her own home needs. That is the reason she is bringing in this restrictive quota.

That time is a long way off.

Dr. Ryan

Every year she hopes to import so much less.

That need not trouble us. We will not be there to see it.

Dr. Ryan

I hope the Fianna Fáil Party will be there to see it. Britain hopes the time will come when she can produce for her own markets and keep the foreigners out.

You won't live to see that.

Dr. Ryan

How does the Deputy know that? I certainly hope to live to see it.

Some one would have to capture their industries first.

Dr. Ryan

Perhaps so. Deputy Belton made a speech on this matter. He has a habit of making the same speeches on every Bill. He talks about fundamental economics and things of that kind, and declines to come down to details. He seems to be suffering from a sort of megalomania to the effect that he brought every one into this House. He pretends he brought the Fianna Fáil Party into it, and one day he declared he brought the Central Party into it. In fact, he seems to think that he created this House. He says that in his view it is not necessary to register the exporters. Deputy Belton and others admit that it is rather important to maintain those quotas, but how are we to know that quotas have been filled unless we first register the people by getting their names and addresses and asking them to make returns to us of how much they have exported in each period? We must commence by making them register, and by telling them: "You have a licence to export so much. You must let us know daily or weekly the amount you have exported," so that we may know towards the end of the period whether the quota has gone out or not for that period. We must register them to commence with. That is the way all these things are done, and it appears to me to be the most sensible way to do it. The best way is to put their names down first, give them their sub-quotas and ask them for their returns. Then, when we see the quota has not been filled we can get in touch with other exporters and say: "Can you do a little more?" And perhaps they will be able to do so. If that fails, the Minister comes in and does it himself.

I am delighted to hear that Deputy Bennett and other Deputies are pleased that the Minister can come in. They objected to me coming in as a maize miller, but it is all right, evidently, for the Minister to come in when it is a question of pigs. Deputy Belton thinks that this matter of licensing will bring about the creation of a ring. As I explained, if we get a quota we will ask people to apply for sub-quotas. We do not care whether they are existing exporters or not. If the amount they apply for does not exceed the quota we have got, then we say: "Go ahead and supply it." If the amount is in excess of the quota, the only way in which we can go on, that would be fair to everybody, would be to take the exports of the last three years. If we take any other course, I am sure that Deputy Belton would accuse us of favouritism. We would be told that the person in question was a supporter of Fianna Fáil. In any case, we would not do it because he was a supporter of Fianna Fáil. Accordingly, the only fair way, where the applications exceed the quota, is to allot it on some sort of percentage of what their exports have been for one, two or three years. As a matter of fact, I got the advice of people in the trade. Some said three years, and some said two years. Some said the first five months of this year. At any rate, we got general agreement that the fairest thing in the end was to take two years. So we have the advice of the trade on that matter.

Deputy O'Leary asked about a subsidy on corn. I do not think it arises here but I agree with him as to the subsidy. At any rate, the economic war is not responsible there either. The tariff in that case is only 10 per cent. which is 10d. a barrel and the deficiency which they are meeting is 4/6 a barrel.

Some Deputies talked about the number of pigs decreasing in the country and said that we could not fill a quota. Others said that if we were in better relations with England we would get a larger quota than otherwise. I should like to know what would be the considered opinion of Cumann na nGaedheal in that matter—whether we should get a large quota or a small quota from England. Some argue that we could not fill the quota because the pigs are not there; others argue that if we had friendly relations with England we could fill it. Deputy Bennett talks about the price of pigs going down so that people even went to the extent of drowning them. I should like to ask him where that happened. I have been buying pigs for the last three or four years but I never got that price. I would have been willing to save them from drowning at any time. In fact, I would have gone into the business for myself and not as a Minister for Agriculture in that case. There is not any other question, as far as I know, that has been raised on this Bill.

I should like to ask the Minister one question. He mentioned, I think, that there were four distinct headings on which the Committee, which is sitting at present, have made recommendations. Would the Minister tell the House what the recommendations are and whether or not he is going to act on them?

Dr. Ryan

I meant to deal with that point. I shall look through the interim report but my impression is that it is not going to give any more information to the House than I have given already. I will be able to tell on the Committee Stage whether or not it is advisable to lay it on the Table but at the moment I cannot say.

Question—"That the Bill be now read a Second Time"—put and agreed to.
Committee Stage ordered for 12th July.
Top
Share