Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 2 Aug 1934

Vol. 53 No. 16

Supplementary Estimate. - Industrial Alcohol Bill, 1934—Second Stage.

I move: "That the Bill be now read a second time." This is a measure designed to confer the legal powers required to carry out the experimental development of the industrial alcohol industry, of which the Dáil has already approved and for which the necessary funds have been voted. The actual provision of the necessary money for the erection of distilleries, the purchase of plant and the carrying on of the operations of distilling industrial alcohol is not sufficient, because the Department has not got the legal authority required to enable it to enter into agreements and to undertake commercial trading in the refined spirit and, consequently, it is necessary to have a measure conferring these powers on the Minister for Industry and Commerce. It is also necessary, of course, in accordance with the general scheme, to take power to require, compulsorily, an admixture of industrial alcohol with petrol for sale as motor fuel in whatever proportion may be considered necessary, having regard to the consumption of petrol and the quantity of industrial alcohol available and at whatever price may be fixed, having regard to the cost of production. One part of this Bill gives the necessary powers in this regard.

When I outlined the general nature of the scheme on the occasion of the adoption of the Estimate I stated that it was intended to erect a group of five distilleries with one refinery plant and that the group would be located in the north-eastern corner of the Saorstát: in North Louth and in the adjoining counties. Since then, however, certain investigations have been carried out, and as a result of these investigations a modification of that proposal is under consideration. It may be that, instead of proceeding with the original intention of erecting five distilleries and a refinery in the North Louth area, the refinery will be established in Dublin, which is the centre of railway communication, and the distilleries located partly in Louth and Monaghan and partly in County Donegal. The Bill, of course, does not affect that position, but I think it is desirable that Deputies should be so informed. That alteration of the plan would permit of an extension of the industry later, if it were so decided, by individual distilleries, rather than by groups of five, as was originally contemplated. The refinery which it is proposed to establish in Dublin gives very little employment and its transfer from the area originally intended to the City of Dublin does not affect the interests of that area to any extent. The industry is one which does not, in any event, give a very large amount of employment, the benefits which it is expected to confer by its establishment being enjoyed mainly by the agricultural community that supply the materials for it.

The Bill empowers the Minister for Industry and Commerce to undertake the manufacture, distillation and sale of industrial alcohol. The Bill, as it stands at the moment, is slightly defective in so far as it does not contain any definition of industrial alcohol. That will be remedied by an amendment on the Committee Stage. It will define industrial alcohol as "alcohol which is of a strength not less than 50 degrees over proof whether de-natured or not." Section 4 of the Bill is the operative section in respect of that part of it. It enables the Minister to do all things necessary to construct and operate these distilleries: that is, to acquire land, to purchase materials for the buildings, to purchase or hire machinery, to enter into contracts for the supply of raw materials, to employ persons, to sell the spirit, and to do anything else necessary for the purpose of carrying on the distilleries as commercial undertakings. Sub-section (2) of the section authorises the Minister to enter into an agreement with persons who are experts in relation to this industry for the purpose of securing their advice and assistance to the preparation of plans, the preparation of contract forms and in the examination of tenders, the operation of the distilleries, the appointment of a manager and of biological engineers, including guarantees by the contractors in respect of the performance of the distilleries erected and the payment by them of penalties in the event of the distilleries having a performance less efficient than the plans contemplate, and so forth. The various matters, which may be the subject of such an agreement, are set out in sub-section (2) of Section 4. There is provision also for the payment to the persons with whom a contract is made of whatever fees may be agreed on in return for their services.

Part III of the Bill provides special powers for the compulsory acquisition of lands and for the construction and operation of transport works. That part of the Bill is similar to sections in corresponding measures, such as the Act under which the beet sugar industry is now being developed. Part IV of the Bill is the part which provides for the compulsory purchase of industrial alcohol by importers and refiners and is, I think, in accordance with the general description I have already given of it. The operation of that part of the Bill will, of course, depend on a number of factors. There is a market, admittedly a limited market, available here for industrial alcohol as such. It is possible that the market may be expanded with the development of other industries in the country, but it is intended that a large proportion of the industrial alcohol to be distilled in these experimental plants will have to be disposed of as motor fuel, mixed with petrol in the same manner that industrial alcohol is mixed with petrol in a very large number of Continental countries at the present time.

Part V of the Bill provides for the prohibition of the manufacture of industrial alcohol by any person except under licence. There is included under that part also provisions for the establishment of an industrial alcohol advisory board. Although the Bill as drafted confers the powers of establishing and operating those distilleries upon the Minister for Industry and Commerce, it is intended that those powers will be exercised on his behalf by the advisory board. The legal authority and the legal responsibility will rest with the Minister, but the actual work will be performed by the board, which will consist of certain officers of the Department of Industry and Commerce, representatives of the Department of Agriculture, and outside technical experts. There is power taken in that part of the Bill also for the sale of land, and for the sale of the goodwill, stock-in-trade, and other assets of the undertaking, if that should be necessary; for the laying before each House of the Oireachtas of a report on the working of the industry, for the payment of expenses in connection with the operation and establishment of the industry, and the disposal of the moneys received from the sale of industrial alcohol and any by-products.

I do not know if it is necessary at this stage to re-state the considerations which prompted the Government to undertake this experiment. We are aware that in a number of European countries the Governments have adopted various measures requiring the compulsory mixture of home-distilled industrial alcohol with imported petrol for transport fuel purposes, in order to provide an additional market for the agricultural products of those countries. The position was examined here, and it was at first considered undesirable to proceed with the development of the industry on any large scale, because it did not seem, judging by the experience of Continental countries, that industrial alcohol could be produced here at a price which would permit of its incorporation with petrol for motor fuel purposes except by a considerable increase in the cost of motor fuel, or a considerable loss of revenue to the State. As examination of the problem proceeded, however, it became clear that there were unknown factors in the situation, and that those might well operate so as to reduce considerably the price at which industrial alcohol could be distilled here, as compared with the price at which it was actually being produced in other countries. Climatic and other conditions prevailing here seemed to indicate that it might be possible to establish the industry here under conditions which would produce a more favourable result than had been produced elsewhere. Those matters were, of course, matters of assumption and speculation. No one could say with certainty what the results would be unless and until some experimental development had taken place. We decided that in view of the speculative nature of the enterprise it was desirable that it should be undertaken by the State, rather than that we should seek to enter into an arrangement for the subsiding of some commercial firm to carry out the experiment for us.

When I say that the development is an experimental development, it is, of course, clear that there are many factors in relation to the experiment which are well known. Potatoes are the raw material of this industry as we propose to establish it. It is known that we can grow potatoes here with certain qualities and with a certain yield per acre for different varieties. The actual process of making industrial alcohol from potatoes is, of course, in no way experimental. It is being done in many parts of the world at the present time. The matters upon which we hope to gain information as a result of this experiment are firstly, the possibility of developing here a type of potato with a very high starch content, which would permit of a reduction in the costs of the raw material to the distillers, while at the same time giving an adequate return to the growers; secondly, the possibility of reducing manufacturing costs by reason of the fact that a longer campaign period may be worked in this country than is possible in most European countries. There are certain other matters also upon which it is possible to form at least the hope that the difficulties which had been experienced in relation to this industry in other countries will be less formidable for us, and that we may be able to get down to a commercial basis in relation to this industry. As this experimental development stands there is not likely to be anything like a substantial increase in transport fuel costs in consequence of the compulsory admixture of the comparatively very small quantity of industrial alcohol that will be available in relation to the quantity of petrol used. Also by reason of the fact that this development is being financed in a particular way the only items of cost that will come into account in determining the selling price will be those that are absolutely essential. The position in respect of the transport users and the price they will have to pay for their fuel will not be materially changed as a result of this development, but on the experience gained from this development we hope to be able to determine whether or not it would be wise from every point of view to proceed with a much wider development of the industry than is now contemplated. I do not know if there is any other factor to which I need make reference at this stage. The matter has already been before the Dáil both on the occasion of the Supplementary Estimate at the conclusion of the last financial year, and on the main Estimate for the present year. In consequence of the adoption of that main Estimate by the Dáil a considerable amount of work has been done in the preparation of plans, the examination of sites and the preparation of information in relation to the whole matter, but the actual work of proceeding with the development of the industry cannot be undertaken until the legal powers proposed to be conferred by this Bill are actually available to the Department.

The Minister has said that this has been three times before the House. It has. On each occasion we got different statements as to the final cost of the production of a gallon of this industrial alcohol. The Minister first brought this up on 23rd February of this year, as reported in Volume 50, No. 7 of the Official Debates. I am going to summarise what the Minister then said. He said that we are going to have a number of small distilleries. Potatoes were to be the raw material. There was to be a production of what he at first said was 120,000 industrial gallons, but he later corrected that to mean per factory—600,000 gallons all told. Those are all to be in the Cooley area. Donegal can congratulate itself on having done so badly in the local election from the Fianna Fáil point of view as to have got some of the factories transferred. We were told by the Minister that he was counting on using 25,000 tons between all the distilleries, and that the price for potatoes would be 35/- a ton. "Our calculations were made on the basis of an 18 per cent. starch content," although we have not heard whether the people who were then advising on the matter ever fulfilled the Minister's hope. He was led to believe on 23rd February:

"That it will be possible to introduce and secure the development of potatoes with a starch content of 21 or 22 per cent.

"It is also proposed that for a period, at any rate, the by-product of the alcohol, which is a cattle feed of considerable value, should be purchased from the distilleries at a commercial price by the Government and distributed to the farmers for use in cattle feeding."

Negotiations were going on and in the end we got a price fixed. They were provisional figures. We had brought in, of course, everything about a campaign season which the Minister referred to as one of the great assets, without explaining how he worked out the assets. We had that in the provisional figures, and came to the amazing calculation that we could sell alcohol at present substantially less than the price at which it is sold in other countries. Questioned on that the Minister said:—

"The price at which we contemplate that industrial alcohol will be available, allowing for potatoes, labour, coal and barley will not, in our opinion, exceed 1/9 and 1/10."

I remarked that that was a little over one-half of what it has cost everywhere else, and I was told by the Minister that taking the yield of alcohol per ton of potatoes and the labour involved, "we think it certainly can be produced well below 2/-." Later, on resuming after an interruption, the Minister said:—

"Taking into account that it is proposed to purchase from the distilleries at ½d. per gallon the cattle food produced as a by-product—"

The Minister tied himself there, certainly well below 2/- in one statement, to 1/9 and 1/10. On 29th May, the Minister told Deputy Mulcahy: "I am certain I never committed myself to 1/9." After another interruption the Minister said:—

"I made no prophecy on the subject. I said that the purpose of the experiment was to find out how much we could do it at. We hope to produce it at 1/9. We may produce it at less."

That is the best the Minister could say, rather definitely 1/9 and 1/10 on 23rd February, but he had learned so much on 29th May that he wanted rather to avoid being tied to 1/9. I spoke on the Finance Resolution and gave certain calculations and I will read briefly the answers given by the Minister for Finance, which appear in Vol. 52, No. 3, column 1124 of the Official Debates. I had quoted from a report written by a certain professor, a chemist, "who had been engaged in this particular industry 16 or 18 years ago." I was reviled "because I had no eyes to see that 16 or 18 years have passed since this professor to whom he refers was engaged in this particular industry, and that there have been 18 years of mechanical and chemical progress since then."

I notice in this Bill that there is to be an advisory committee set up, and that these people are to be paid. I remember when the Minister introduced the Vote he talked of an industrial research council, and I understood that amongst that body was included this professor, who had been in the industry 18 years ago. I suppose I can take it that he has forgotten more about this industry than the Minister for Finance ever knew. He was 18 years at the business but was derided by the Minister for Finance. I wonder if the Minister would say if that man was ever consulted by the Minister for Industry and Commerce on the subject.

Probably he was.

Did the Minister ever see the article which was published in Studies? Did he not see it before it was produced in Studies? Did he not ask the professor to change some part?

I did not.

Did he ask that professor about the advisory body?

Will the Minister for Finance agree to the payment of money to a man who was in the industry for eighteen years and who has forgotten more——

The Deputy has forgotten.

If the Minister wanted to say that he did not put it properly. Here is what he said:

"This Professor to whom he referred was engaged in this particular industry and there have been eighteen years of machanical and chemical progress since then."

The article I quoted was written for Studies, a very weighty and learned publication, for March, 1934. If the Professor had been eighteen years associated with the industry, at any rate he was thought so up to date as to be approached by the Editor of Studies as the only man actively associated with it from the practical as well as the scientific point of view. Let us pass on to this question of producing industrial alcohol at 1/9, and to the sugar content. The Minister was full of hope that we were going to get a greater yield of potatoes to the acre and a starch content of at least eighteen per cent. hydrocarbide, and up to 21 and 22 per cent., at 35/- per ton. An enormous yield was to be got for the specialised brand of tuber.

35/- for 18 per cent. potatoes.

The calculations were made on a basis of 18 per cent. starch content. That would not do for anyone with the flamboyant hopes of the Minister who said: "Those who have been advising us believe that it will be possible for us to introduce and secure the development of potatoes with a starch content of 21 or 22 per cent." Let us get back to the 18 years. Let us get back to March of this year. Professor Joseph O'Reilly of University College, Cork, was approached by the Editor of Studies as a scientific and practical man. Here is what he says in the article:

"My first impulse was to judge the whole product as so unfeasible as not to warrant further consideration. My opinion was based not on any doubt regarding the scientific aspect of the problem, which is perfectly straightforward, but on the cost of the product."

He goes through a lot of material and the various facts that have entered into the consideration of the calculations he made, the raw material to be used, and brings himself down after going through the wood and straw which he puts one side, after talking about molasses from sugar beet and about beet as a material to be used directly for industrial alcohol, to the potatoes. The average yield here being five tons per statute acre,

"With suitable selection of plant, proper manuring and tillage this figure, it is claimed could be raised to eight tons or even more per acre."

Does the Minister stop at eight tons in his calculation?

I think we get a higher average yield than eight tons at present?

All over the country?

The average.

That matter can be easily decided. The Irish potato contains about 14 per cent. of starch content. In this connection I note that the Professor puts all this as an estimate, as a calculation.

"In this connection again experts claim that a different variety of potato could be grown which would give a much higher carbo hydrate content (18-20 per cent.). Such potatoes might, on account of flavour, etc., be unsuitable as food, but would be eminently utilisable as raw material for fermentation."

He goes on:—

"Under the best conditions therefore we might calculate eight to ten tons of potatoes to the acre with an average starch content of 18 per cent. A ton of this material would give 24 gallons of absolute alcohol under practical conditions."

The Minister's calculation was 18 to 22 per cent. There is not much difference between them. The article was written in March of this year.

"It is claimed that such potatoes can be found in certain areas of this country at a figure of 45/- per ton. In any scheme of development we are assuming that the supply will continue at this somewhat low figure."

At the somewhat low figure of 45/-, and if the best conditions prevail, and if we get eight tons to the acre, and if we get 18 per cent. average starch content, he works out that the price is going to be something—and he says the low figure of 45/-. The Minister thinks the farmers are going to be well satisfied with 35/- and that is what this is based on. That is the raw material to start with—the potato producing starch—and the starch material then being sufficient to give as from the ton up a certain starch content for a gallon of this alcohol. The Professor continues:—

"Some years ago the conversion of starch to concentrated alcohol was generally calculated to cost about 9d. to 1/- a gallon under the best manufacturing conditions.

Some years ago.

Sixteen or eighteen years ago.

Is the Minister for Finance trying to defend himself in this rather foolish statement of his?

The Deputy has let the cat out.

Will the Minister let me continue to read the article, because the Professor's reputation can stand against the amateurish point of view of the Minister? He says:

"Possibly under present day conditions this figure might be lowered."

He continues:

"Let us assume an average figure of 8d. per gallon for conversion under the best conditions."

The Minister will agree that anybody in industry 18 years ago knows more about it than the Minister who has not been in it 18 minutes.

At any rate, the writer makes an assumption now.

The Professor says:

"Let us assume an average figure of 8d. a gallon for conversion under the best conditions. There is still another charge, namely, capital charges and depreciation, say, 3d. to 4d. a gallon."

He works out that the cost of the gallon of absolute alcohol at the factory is 3/-, and he continues:

"For the first few years the figure for production will probably be much higher than this: for it will take time to determine the best conditions for growing high starch yield crops in high concentration."

Then he goes on to think of a mixture and he took a mixture of a gallon of absolute alcohol to nine gallons of petrol and following out these calculations of his and adding on merely a penny for bringing in the alcohol and petrol to the same place for mixing, he reaches the conclusion that if you have no selling charges in respect of the new mixture, over and above the charges for petrol at the moment, this mixing of one in ten will add on 4d. a gallon to the price of petrol. That is what I might call his most liberal view of all this, and he sums up by saying:

"Under proper conditions and using very modern fermentation methods, it should be possible ultimately to produce industrial alcohol from potatoes in this country at from 3/- to 3/6 per gallon. This will require legislation to modify Excise laws."

And, of course, he does not take into his calculation at all—he alludes to it merely in order to put it aside—the point that if you produce, say, 500,000 or 600,000 gallons of this alcohol in the country and use it to mix, it means, with the present tax on petrol, that the revenue drops £20,000. He let that pass. That can be made up by something extra on beef or cattle or something like that.

However, there is the account of a man who was, as I say, in charge of what, I think, was the only industrial alcohol plant which the exigencies of the war situation forced England to establish and he recommended, at the end of the war, that the factory should be pulled down. As the losses were so great, he suggested that if it could not be pulled down quickly, it should be blown up. Considering the whole thing with his scientific knowledge and with his capacity for bringing things up to date; showing in that article that he has read the most recent literature on the subject, because he refers to papers read before the Institute of Chemists in the early part of this year; having all the best conditions; and assuming that we will get what the experts claim with regard to yield and everything else, he says 3/- or 3/6 a gallon—at, of course, 45/- a ton. We make a corresponding reduction if you are going to pay this 35/- a ton. He considers 45/- and he is native of the soil. Anybody who knows him will certainly say that. He knows farming conditions and the conditions of the ordinary rural community here as intimately as any man can and he, in this article, thought fit to say that if this relatively low price of 45/- can be continued, you will get certain things.

However, we are going to spend £100,000 on factories and we are going to have, in the end, as the biggest bait in the whole thing, the matter which the Minister decided to leave out of his calculations to-night—the 4,500,000 gallons of wash as a cattle food for the better propagation of the beef of the country for the better feeding of our enemies, the English, Professor O'Reilly speaks in this article of other countries which have gone into this business and he talks about its being carried on everywhere by subsidy. He refers to an article written in The Economist of January 13th of this year. I have quoted it already and I do not want to delay the House, except to say that the writer pulls out of the whole world situation two examples. He takes the French situation and shows that there the cost of the subsidy, as between direct payment and loss to the State, amounts to 566,000,000 francs. He takes a view of the American situation and he makes a calculation, showing it in all its details, that, producing from maize, as is the system out there, and producing so as to give them a certain percentage mixture, the cost to the State at the moment is 573,000,000 dollars. To buy the maize which is used from the farmers and to burn it would cost the American authorities 275,000,000 dollars. They incur an extra loss of 3,000,000 dollars on this performance. The only thing that we can regard as satisfactory in our case is that it is on a very small scale and probably will not matter one way or the other, but it will be interesting to see—and it is the only thing one, can really be interested in following—what happens to the 4,250,000 or 5,000,000 gallons of this grand cattle feed.

The Minister dealt with the material from which he proposes to manufacture this product. I am not going to go into the manufacturing processes or the cost of manufacture. I do not intend to go beyond the production of the raw material for the industry. Does the Minister accept that the average percentage of starch in Irish potatoes at the present time is 14 to 15 per cent. and that, by selection of varieties, it might be possible to go to 18 or 20 per cent., and that it would be a high average to have potatoes available in this country with an average of 18 per cent. starch content? The Minister claims, if I heard his remarks properly, that we might be able to get a variety of potatoes to grow fairly prolifically in this country with a starch content of 21 or 22 per cent. Obviously, it was not an accident which prompted the Minister to fix his standard price for potatoes of 18 per cent. starch content.

On the face of it, it looks as if the starch content of 18 per cent. given by Deputy McGilligan as a good average was in the mind of the Minister when he fixed 18 as the percentage on which to base his standard price. That being a high average, I take it that if the starch content does not reach that, the standard price of 35/- per ton cannot be given, or otherwise his whole costings are out of gear. The Minister did not indicate—at least I did not hear him indicate—what price he would give, say, for 19 per cent. starch content. The Minister will remember, when the beet factory was established, that for a 15½ per cent. sugar content there was a standard price for sugar beet and that for every one per cent. over that the producer got 2/6 a ton more. I did not hear the Minister graduate his percentages of starch that the potatoes might yield. Taking the information we have that 18 per cent. starch content is a high average and as much as we can expect from the potatoes we are accustomed to grow, let us come down to price and see how the Minister is starting off; because all his expenditure to set up factories will be useless and his whole scheme will fall to the ground if he cannot get the raw material to run his factory. He will not get the raw material unless a price is given that will induce people to grow potatoes for this purpose. I am sure the Minister is not basing his figure on the off-chance of a bumper potato crop and a bad market for potatoes in the ordinary way so that they will be dumped on him. There will not be a bumper crop every year and, in order to get his raw material, he will have to pay, on the average, a pretty stiff price.

How does 35/- per ton compare as a remunerative price for potatoes? I doubt if people in the ordinary way of growing potatoes average, say, 12 tons an Irish acre. That would not be eight tons per statute acre. Even ten tons a statute acre would be a very high average—an average that will not be maintained all over the country. You can, of course, grow 20 tons per statute acre. In Germany they have more than 36 tons per statute acre. You cannot, however, grow 20 tons per statute acre at 35/- per ton. Twenty tons per statute acre would mean £35 gross price. It would cost more than that to grow them. You cannot broadcast potatoes and expect them to spring up like mushrooms. A potato crop is one of the most expensive crops to grow, if you except strawberries and crops of that kind. From the day potatoes are set until you pick them out you want men and horses in the potato field. I can speak with a little experience, as for a number of years I believe I was the largest grower of potatoes in the Free State.

What average did you get?

We could not go upon my average, because I seldom allowed my potatoes to mature. I kept an eye on the market and sold them when it paid me. The yield of the potatoes did not matter to me. So long as the yield in money paid me I went for the money. By sending out a half crop at the right time you will get three times the price for it that you will get for the whole crop when it matures and you have only half the cartage upon it. My yield would not relate to the average yields. When I allowed my crop to come to maturity I took 30 tons of market potatoes out of an Irish acre. I only did that one year and that was in 1922, which was an exceptional year when we had a second growth and a double crop. It would suit the Minister if we could have a second growth and a double crop every year. Taking the average crop, I do not think that a fixed price of 35/- per ton for the present varieties of potatoes will induce anybody to grow potatoes for this particular purpose. I am considering the matter entirely from the point of view of yield.

Speaking from the standpoint of agriculture and the supply of raw material to these factories, I would suggest that the Minister should seriously consider the growing of that type of potato that he mentioned that would yield a high percentage of starch, be a prolific yielder and not be suitable for table purposes. All the points that he mentioned in reference to that potato recommend it for this purpose. The first recommendation is that it has a high starch content and the second that it is a prolific yielder. The best recommendation, however, would be that it is not a good table potato and that it must be used in this way. If potatoes suitable for the table are grown the Minister cannot rely upon a supply of raw material for this purpose when there is a small crop, as the crop unfortunately promises to be this year with the price keeping up to twice what it was at this time last year because of the shortage. The Minister will have to double his price if he is relying on a potato which has an alternative market—for instance, the potato for table use.

I doubt if it is a wise experiment for the Minister to embark on now. When this was debated before, I also spoke from the agricultural standpoint. I think if the Minister proceeded slowly and cautiously and co-operated with the Minister for Agriculture it would be more advisable. He should devote one year to experiments in various districts throughout the country. The committees of agriculture are available to carry out acre experiments in different parts of each county. It costs nothing; no new organisation is required. You have a trained staff there at the service of the Minister for Agriculture, and I am quite sure he would consent to allow these committees to carry out the experiments. I am sure that the committees all over the country would loyally co-operate in carrying out the experiments as they did in 1925 in the case of sugar beet, and in 1926-27 in the case of the Yeoman No. 2 wheat. They could have a special type of potato grown. An inspector could visit the plot, take a drill or two, and measure it accurately as was done in the case of beet. In the case of beet they selected a drill or two, topped it and cleaned it and took it to the Department and analysed it for sugar content. Why does not the Minister do the same with the potato in order to find out the yield per acre and the starch content? He would then have some basis upon which to work. If that potato leaves a margin of profit to the farmer, at 35/- a ton, it will suit the Minister for the purpose of this industrial alcohol factory. He will then have some justification for spending public money, but now he has none.

He has not a single material fact to put before the House. He cannot show definitely that he will get potatoes at 35/- a ton. He will not get them at that price. He could not even bank on getting them at 50/- a ton. If, however, through the medium of experiment, he grows a potato that will be suitable for this business but unsuitable for table use, then he may have some opportunity of purchasing at the price he mentioned, because the potatoes will have to go into the factory as they have no other outlet. Of course he would always be able to get the rubbishy potatoes, the pig feeding potatoes, to help him out if he comes to a year when the potato crop would be a light one.

Is it intended to continue this discussion into to-morrow? I would like to be clear on that point.

If the Second Reading of this Bill is not concluded to-night, the House will sit to-morrow.

I have made my point. I do not know anything about industrial alcohol, but I do know something about the supply of the raw material. The Minister for Finance may well laugh. He knows nothing about the raw material or the industrial alcohol.

What is the average yield of potatoes over the last ten years?

The average yield of potatoes in the country as a whole is of no importance in relation to this question. I will admit at once that there are many parts of the Free State in which it would be completely impracticable to establish any industry upon the basis of getting potatoes supplied at the price I have mentioned or even getting them in sufficient quantities. A lot depends on the nature of the farming carried on, the suitability of the soil for potatoes, etc.

Can the Minister say what is the average yield?

We are proposing to establish these distilleries in the North Louth area and in the Donegal area. What matters is the average yield in those areas and the average price secured for potatoes there in the past. The average yield, as the Deputy is aware, varies considerably from year to year. It may be up one year and down another year. There are people, including the very eminent professor whom Deputy McGilligan has quoted and who is, I am glad to say, actively co-operating with us in this experiment, who have expressed the opinion that the figures for the average yield shown by Departmental statistics are really inaccurate and indicate an average yield much less than the actual yield secured. I would not have time now to detail the various reasons supporting that opinion, which is definitely held by various people.

If this Second Reading is unopposed, the Minister could continue after 10.30. May I take it that a division will not be challenged.

No division — it will be unopposed.

In County Louth, taking the year 1932, which was a good year for potatoes, the average yield as shown in the statistics was ten tons to the acre.

Would that be a statute or an Irish acre?

A statute acre. In Donegal in the same year the yield was 10.3 tons to the acre. Having regard to the fact that this industry will utilise large, small and broken potatoes, the actual yield would probably be much higher in each case.

As regards the yield of 10 tons and 10.3 tons, was it the entire yield or the marketable yield?

Very probably it was the marketable yield.

I think it would represent the entire yield, so far as I know the Department's methods. I have weighed and measured potatoes and I know they have always taken the actual bulk. I take it that is so in this case, too.

As for price, the Deputy says we will not get potatoes at 35/-. I am quite satisfied that the farmers in the two districts I have mentioned will consider 35/- a ton a much better price than they have been getting.

Did the Minister get any guarantee that they will grow potatoes at that price—just as happened in the case of beet?

In the Cooley area in 1928 the average price was 40/- a ton; in 1929 it was 17/6; in 1932 it was 21/-, and in 1933 it was 34/-. These were the actual prices in the Cooley district.

Of course, the Minister is aware of the handicap placed on the Cooley district owing to the black scab?

It is for that reason that I believe we will have no difficulty in getting potatoes in that area at 35/- a ton. I agree that in the neighbouring counties it might not be possible to obtain them at that price. It is proposed, however, to establish the industries in these areas.

Has the Minister considered what will be the position when the Cooley area will become immune from black scab?

I do not know what the anticipations of the experts are.

If they were immune from black scab in the Cooley area they could send their potatoes to the Dublin market—what they cannot do now.

Possibly it might come to the point where the potatoes would be sold at more than 35/-, in which case I expect we will have to shift the distilleries elsewhere. Let us take the case of Donegal, which is not a black scab area. I will give you the price obtained in Donegal, and this represents the price for selected potatoes other than seed potatoes. There is a variety called Up-to-Date and in 1932 the price averaged between 17/6 and 33/4. One was the lowest price and the other the highest price. For Kerr's Pink the price averaged the same, and in the case of Arran Banner the price was from 15/- to 25/-. In 1933 the prices were somewhat higher, but the average price was well below 35/- in each case for each variety. I mention these figures to indicate that there is no reason to anticipate that at the price I have quoted any difficulty will be experienced in obtaining a supply. It is possible that a higher price will be obtained. It is not yet possible to visualise all the factors that are going to determine the price. We do not know what it is going to cost to work the distilleries. We have taken a figure which seems to be fairly accurate, but that figure may be considerably reduced. On the other hand, if we manage to purchase the equipment reasonably and get the buildings on more favourable terms we may be in a position to reconsider the question of the price for potatoes. There are many considerations which may, perhaps, permit of a higher price being paid.

In that connection I might mention that it has not yet been decided whether the price will vary with the starch content of the potatoes. It probably will not be decided for the first year or two, when those conducting the distilleries will be in a position to enter into contracts for the supply of a particular variety of potato. It will then be possible to determine whether the price will vary with the starch content. Deputy McGilligan, when quoting the article to which he has referred, was taking into account a number of factors which might enter into the selling price of industrial alcohol produced in France or America under the conditions operating there, but which, at least in respect to some of them, certainly will not enter into the price here. I gave Deputies the information upon which our calculations are based. We assume that to produce 22 gallons of industrial alcohol it requires 18 cwts. of potatoes with 18 per cent. starch content, 4 cwts. of coal, and 6 cwts. of barley. Assuming the price is 35/- for potatoes, 20/- for coal, and 10/- for barley, we estimate the cost of the alcohol at 2/0½ per gallon. There has to be added to that a certain additional cost.

Is that the estimate for the raw material?

No, the alcohol.

You have not any conversion charges in that?

The conversion charges are included. You add a certain amount for transportation and for amortisation and we have to deduct the price obtained for the wash. You get ten gallons of wash for every gallon of industrial alcohol and at ½d. a gallon that means a deduction of 5d. We may get the alcohol at perhaps 1/9 or 1/10, but we do not anticipate exceeding 2/-. If we get it at that price it will be possible, first, to secure the sale of a much larger quantity of the product as industrial alcohol than the present import figures would lead one to anticipate, and secondly, to make it available for admixture with imported petrol at a price which will not permit of any noticeable increase in the price of petrol, and possibly much lower than the price at which similar spirit is obtained for admixture purposes in other countries.

The whole thing is experimental. It may work out much better than we hope. It may work out much less satisfactory than we expect. We have, however, taken all reasonable precautions and we have endeavoured to secure the information that would enable one to form some sort of a decisive opinion on the various matters upon which a difference of opinion might exist. As a result of our calculations we decided it was worth while going ahead with the experiment, even though it may mean subsidising the industry for the time being until we have more definite information about it to enable us to come to a conclusion whether it is worth while developing in the interests of the agricultural community, whether its development would not proceed beyond the step we are now contemplating or even whether the whole project should be abandoned at some later date. After two or three years we will be able to arrive at some definite conclusion as to which line is best.

The Minister apparently has considered the cost of the alcohol, but he has not considered whether 35/- a ton will pay the farmer. Surely the Minister is not acting on the basis of the 17/- or the 15/- he has quoted?

In these districts, for various reasons, the farmers have been growing potatoes in considerable quantities and they have continued growing them even though the prices they obtained were lower than the price we are proposing to pay in relation to this industry. That is due entirely to conditions which are purely local. What applies in Louth may not apply in North Monaghan, even though it is an adjoining county, and may not apply in Cavan. Having regard to the type of potato that is required and to the fact that the potato most suitable for this industry is not of a very high standard, and having regard to the fact that the whole produce of the area can be utilised and not merely selected potatoes, I think it will be found that at the price I have mentioned it will be possible for the farmers in these districts to grow the potatoes at a profit.

I hold that they are not going to produce an average of over ten tons to the acre. At the price the Minister is quoting, that would amount to £17 10s. to the acre. You cannot produce potatoes at that price—it is not economic.

Where did Deputy O'Donovan get his figure of over ten tons to the acre?

That is the average indicated. The manure and seed will cost at least £7.

In these areas they have continued to produce potatoes, even though they have got prices lower than I have mentioned.

Is it proposed to pay the members of the advisory committee?

The technical members of it.

Is there to be a chairman?

The chairman will be a civil servant.

Will he be paid for this work?

He will not be paid for this work.

Who will be on the Committee?

Certain officers of the Department of Industry and Commerce and an officer of the Department of Agriculture. We have asked Professor Nolan and Professor O'Reilly of Cork University.

Which Professor Nolan. Is it the State Chemist?

Yes, the State Chemist, and Professor O'Reilly, of Cork. In addition, there will be a Managing Director appointed in accordance with the contract mentioned in the Bill. He will probably be an expert from outside the country.

I notice the Biological Chemist is to be appointed by the Minister but nominated by the Manager.

For three years.

That applies to most of the technicians mentioned in the Bill. They are to be appointed by an outsider and approved by the Minister.

It is intended to enter into a contract with a firm of engineers who are experts in this industry. Under that contract, they will advise as to the plant and they will supervise its erection and operation for a period, under penalty. They will be required to indicate what output they hope to get per ton of potatoes, what the price will be, and so forth. They will be under penalty to compensate us if they do not actually produce the quantity of alcohol they estimate to produce. It is proposed to permit them to appoint, for the period under which they will be under penalty, the essential officers. They will include the Managing Director and the Biological Chemist.

Most of the technical posts?

I presume it is the intention of the Minister to limit the membership of the Advisory Board. I think it should be set out in the Bill that the board should have so many members.

The board will consist of five or six members, but if it is deemed desirable to add a representative of some other Department of State in order to deal with some special problem, that should be possible. I see no sense in limiting its membership.

I would like to have a guarantee from the Minister that the farmers of Donegal and the Cooley area will have their interests considered. Perhaps the Minister might go into the cost of production of the potatoes and ensure that the farmers will be guaranteed a fair price—that they will not be getting the 15/- a ton that he mentioned in the course of his statement.

Why did not the Deputy display some interest in that connection when his own Party were in power?

The Deputy will have every opportunity of discussing that point on a later stage of the Bill.

Question: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time"—agreed to.

Bill read a Second Time.

Committee Stage fixed for Tuesday, 7th August.

The Dáil adjourned at 10.40 p.m. until Tuesday, 7th August at 6 p.m.

Top
Share