I move that the Committee agree with the Seanad in the following amendment:—
Section 8. In sub-section (1), page 4, all words from and including the word "and" in line 41 to and including the word "Government" in line 44 deleted and the words "it shall be lawful for the Minister to" substituted instead; and in line 46 the words "such referendum" deleted and the words "the referendum on such proposal" substituted instead.
In the discussion here on the Bill and also in the discussion in the Seanad, the point was made that Section 8 and Section 10 of the Bill, as originally drafted, contained a provision which might be held to be repugnant to the Constitution, in so far as it gave to the Government the power to determine whether or not a referendum on a proposal to amend the Constitution would be held or not. Consideration was given to the arguments which were advanced both here and in the Seanad and as a result amendments Nos. 1 to 4 were brought forward in the Seanad and were accepted by that House. Amendment No. 1, of course, is the principal amendment, the others being more or less consequential upon it. If No. 1 is accepted, it merely means that it would be lawful for the Minister for Local Government, who is considered to be the appropriate Minister in the matter, to fix a date for the taking of a referendum and, accordingly, there will be no question of a determination by the Government as to whether a referendum should be taken or not. Naturally, the Minister being a member of the Government, and having collective responsibility, would, no doubt, be guided by the advice of his colleagues in a matter of that sort.