Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 20 Apr 1944

Vol. 93 No. 9

Report of Committee on Procedure and Privileges.

I wish to put the report of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges before the Dáil:—

The Committee on Procedure and Privileges has been considering the most effective means of meeting the situation that has arisen owing to the repercussions of the curtailment of rail facilities to and from Dublin on the meeting of the Dáil for the next few months and has unanimously decided to recommend the adoption by the House of the following temporary arrangements:—

(1) The Dáil to meet on Tuesdays and Wednesdays only, in order to enable Deputies from country constituencies to avail of the rail services on Mondays and Thursdays; and the sitting on those days to be from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m., continuously;

(2) In connection with the debates on the outstanding Estimates for Public Services this year, maximum time-limits to be imposed on the speeches of all members taking part in the debates, as follows:—

(i) Concluding speech of the Minister or Parliamentary Secretary in charge of the Vote—45 minutes.

(ii) One member of each Party or Group in the House (other than the Government Party)— 30 minutes.

(iii) All other Deputies—20 minutes.

Ordered that the report do lie on the Table.

I will oppose the adoption of that report with all the resources at my disposal. I beg Deputies, particularly those recently elected, not to be misled by the Parliamentary Secretary——

The Deputy seems to be under a misconception. This is the adoption of the report of what did happen. Before the recommendation can be put into operation there must be a motion which will be set down for Tuesday next.

That motion has not been moved now?

The Parliamentary Secretary is now giving notice that it will be on the Order Paper for Tuesday.

It has not been moved?

It will not be under discussion until Tuesday. I take it there is some opposition?

Yes, vigorous and protracted, if needs be.

I beg to move the adoption of the report now.

Could we get a clarification of this point? The proposal is that the House should sit at 10 a.m. next Tuesday.

The proposal of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges that the House should sit on Tuesdays and Wednesdays of each week from 10 a.m. until 9 p.m. was unanimous.

The point I want to make is this. I understand from the Parliamentary Secretary and from the discussion at the meeting of the committee that this scheme was to be operative as from Tuesday next.

The proposal is that the House should meet at 10 o'clock on Tuesday. When are we going to discuss the motion which assembles the Dáil at 10 o'clock on Tuesday next? I take it that, as the motion is not moved, the Dáil will not meet until 3 o'clock on Tuesday.

There could be agreement on that, but on the question of the curtailment of speeches there is disagreement.

We have no evidence of that. Deputy Dillon has not developed his point as to whether his objection is to the hour of meeting or to the restriction on the duration of speeches.

If this new arrangement is to come into operation on Tuesday it must be apparently as a result of some act of this House. My objection to the proposal of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges is exclusively on the ground of the limitation of the right of Deputies to speak in this House, and in defence of that I will use every Parliamentary resort I can avail of.

That will arise on Tuesday. The question now is whether the House will meet at 10 a.m. on Tuesday by agreement.

You are dividing this Report into two parts, then?

I took it that there was no opposition to meeting on Tuesdays and Wednesdays.

Yes, there is; I oppose it on behalf of my Party.

On behalf of those who have to travel very long distances to attend the Dáil, I should like to say that the proposal to sit on two days a week is ridiculous. I would agree that the Dáil should meet every morning at 10 o'clock. I believe that we should sit for five days on each alternate week: that we should meet for five days in one week, adjourn for the next week, and then come back again, because by coming here for two days in each week we are depriving other people of transport facilities—people who might have very important business to attend to in the city.

To put the matter in order there should be a definite motion to sit at 10 o'clock next Tuesday morning.

I understand that before these recommendations can be put into operation there must be a motion before the House, and it appears to me, from what I have heard here, that that motion will be put before the House next Tuesday. Accordingly, I take it that Deputy Norton's point is whether next Tuesday's meeting is to be held at 10 a.m. or 3 p.m.

That is my point also. The question is when the motion will be put before the House.

What is wrong with disposing of the matter at once now? Could we not dispose of it now?

To dispense with the four days' notice, the Chair would require the unanimous consent of the House.

If it were the unanimous decision of the House to do so, would the Chair permit discussion now, in lieu of the four days' notice?

Certainly, if that is the unanimous wish of the House.

Deputies

Agreed.

In accordance with the unanimous desire of the House, the motion may proceed now.

Top
Share