Deputy Mulcahy has referred to the importance of the work of the Folklore Commission. I should like to endorse what he has said, and welcome his appreciative remarks. This is the kind of work that is not, perhaps, as well known as it should be. There is scarcely any work that could be carried out, dealing with our cultural past and the lives of our people, that could be of more importance than this work is. The work has, as Deputy Mulcahy has said, acquired an unrivalled reputation. The workers employed, from the director down to the most newly appointed part-time collector, are all persons of special qualifications, several of them holding university qualifications as well. Their work is known, of course, in Sweden and elsewhere where special attention is given to folklore and folk tradition. The Government would like to assist the commission as far as they can, but I think it is not entirely a question of finance. There is the question of getting suitable collectors. These have to be specialists. They have to have a certain type of personality to make them successful in their work in going amongst the old people in collecting folklore, and I dare say the number of such persons is limited. Moreover, up to the present it has not been possible to arrange that the commission should be made permanent. When it was established originally it was thought that the work that it put before itself might be completed within a period of years. There was great urgency at that time as everyone realised that the old Irish speakers were dying out, and that there was the danger that the store of folklore which they had might be lost. Thanks to the work of the commission, to the energy of the director and of his collaborators and of the members of the commission itself, a great deal has been salvaged, but probably something has been lost. The Irish National Teachers' Organisation also gave valuable assistance. The teachers, when they were asked by the commission to help in the work, got the schoolchildren interested, and even in areas that were not Irish-speaking a great amount of valuable material was collected, not alone stories, but matter bearing on the lives of the people, and particularly upon the social history of the country during the past 70, 80, or perhaps 100 years.
The collectors, naturally, would like that their positions should be made permanent, but I think I would be correct in saying there is a difficulty, and there will always be a difficulty, in getting the fine type of worker required in an enterprise of this kind to remain on if opportunities are given to him to improve himself and to get a permanent position in some other walk of life which may suit him. At any rate, the present condition of the finances of the commission will enable them to do something more for the collectors. Leaving out the indoor staff, I find the outdoor staff are paid salaries ranging from £250 to £300 a year. In addition, they receive emergency bonus and, according to their circumstances, they are allowed certain maintenance and board allowance for the period when they are at work.
Before I pass from the general point, I should like to ask all those interested in the preservation of the records of the generation that is now ebbing so quickly from us, and which is the last of its kind that we shall have, to give us some assistance. I have in mind those people who, with not a great deal of formal education, nevertheless carry with them a great repository of old Irish legend and story. There are not very many of them left and it is necessary that every one of us who is interested should help the commission in its work to gather in what remains to be collected and also extend the work, not only through the Irish-speaking districts, but through all the other areas of the country as well.
As regards the housing of the commission, I agree the present accommodation is, perhaps, not suitable. It is in the upper part of the University College building and is not easy of access. On the other hand, I think from the point of view of the director, and probably the commission, they have the feeling that since they were associated with University College, Dublin, they would like to maintain the association. If the commission would be prepared to change, in view of the growth of their records and work, I would be very glad to examine the possibility of trying to provide accommodation for them elsewhere, subject to the fact that Government Departments, which are increasing in number and size, are also looking for accommodation. There is also a keen demand for accommodation by the public and by commercial firms, so it is not easy to get the accommodation, but I think it should be possible to secure alternative accommodation for them and it is a matter we will not lose sight of.
As regards the gramophone records, a number of these were made during the period of office of the previous Government. I understand they were not very satisfactory; perhaps it was that the technique had not been developed at that time, but, from the point of view of using them in schools, they were not at all what the inspectors would think the right material. If, on the other hand, we wish to keep the records merely as records, which is what the Deputy has in mind, I shall be very glad if a machine is provided and I think Radio Éireann is the organisation which ought to have the machine, which is a rather costly one. If they have not already procured it, I shall certainly speak to the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs and remind him that if he gets the machine he could also do work to assist the Folklore Commission and in that way we would have permanent records of old Irish speakers.
Deputy Halliden perhaps is not aware in the same way as I am of the difficulties in getting even Government printing done. The difficulties in that connection are at present very great. The printers seem to be altogether cluttered up with work. The Folklore Commission has a very large amount of material which they are preparing gradually for publication and recently I received a copy of a journal—I think it was the 1945 copy—that is published by a different body, but they are substantially the same persons—the Folklore Society—as the Folklore Commission. It is the same kind of material and the director, Professor Delargy, is responsible in both cases. It is a great achievement that they have been able to keep their journal and have it published, though not at regular intervals, in somewhat the same manner as we were accustomed to before the war.
As soon as the printing position improves, I am quite sure the material the commission has in hand will be published. The important thing, and what the commission itself has always stressed, is that the work of collecting is far more important and more urgent and all their efforts should be concentrated upon that. At the same time, they can make the necessary arrangements. They have a staff in Dublin which has prepared a good deal of matter for publication and if the printing difficulties are got over I am sure we will have a fairly normal stream of publications coming from them.
I do not know that there is anything else except as regards the Compántas going outside Dublin. Séard adubhairt siad féin i gcúntas i rith na bliana seo caithte ná: "Cé go bfuaireamar cuid mhaith cuireadh dul faoin dtuaith, níor éirigh linn freastal díobh ach teaspántas i gCeatharlach i nDeireadh Fomhair, 1945." There was no reference to the Compántas touring the country or going outside. The expenses that would be involved going down the country are very great and I do not know whether the members of the organisation could travel, unless at certain times, as they have their ordinary occupations to attend to. I will remind them, if it can be done, that the opinion has been expressed in Dáil Éireann that people in the country might like to see what they could do.