I may say a word or two, perhaps. The intention there to permit of the body taking a gift is simply that some individual may wish to make available a sum of money, or what can be turned rapidly into money, for this body to distribute in accordance with the terms of this Bill. I do not think it would be right to forbid that. I had hoped that this might be regarded, for the time being anyhow, as a benevolent fund to deal with whatever sums of money might be made available and, of course, everything would depend on how the scheme works out in practice.
If it works satisfactorily it is quite possible that in a very short time some individuals who might like to make a sum of money available might do it. Leaving aside the argument of making the board permanent, every argument against the making of gifts would be against any benevolent fund of any kind. The existence of these funds will not prevent a group of individuals who may be interested in a particular case in their neighbourhood from coming together and giving such personal assistance as they might deem desirable. I do not think that will in any way dry up any funds which might be made available in the sense suggested by Deputy Dillon. It is sometimes useful to say: "Very well, if you cannot investigate the case, why do you not try that fund?" If, for instance, Deputy Dillon found in a particular case, that, because such a fund was in existence, personal contributions were not readily available, I do not think that he would put up the argument that he put up here. He would say: "I know that there is such a fund but, after all, the person concerned would appreciate it very much more if a number of friends came together and made this gift." They could do that. There is nothing to prevent them. I think it would be undesirable to rule out gifts to the board.
Perhaps I should say, with regard to the permanency of the board, that I do not think the sum is sufficiently large or that it is likely that it would last over a considerable period. I am afraid that the costs will leave only a relatively small sum. The only point in that, as far as the Government is concerned, is whether that money should be spent in law costs or whether it should be used for a better purpose.