Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 25 Nov 1948

Vol. 113 No. 4

Adjournment Debate—Dublin Housing.

I put the question to-day to the Minister for Local Government asking him if he will state the number of new dwellings needed to solve the present housing problem in Dublin City; the plans, if any, he has made for the provision of these dwellings and the period of time he estimates it will take to provide them. In his reply the Minister stated that:

"It is estimated that there is at present need for at least 20,000 working-class houses in Dublin City. A programme has been prepared by the housing authority of the Dublin Corporation, in consultation with the Housing Consultative Council, which aims at completing this number of dwellings within a period of ten years, and at providing within the same period a further 10,000 dwellings which, it is assumed, will be needed because of deterioration of existing dwellings and to meet additional needs arising during the course of the programme. The corporation hope that building by normal methods will be stepped up to yield an output of 2,000 dwellings per annum in the immediate future, and the corporation are examining the possibility of supplementing this output by the provision of dwellings by other methods. The housing needs of Dublin City continue to receive my special attention and I am giving the corporation every possible assistance and encouragement to enable them to realise their programme."

With your permission, Sir, I would like to call attention to the fact that there is not a quorum in the House.

It is not necessary on an adjournment debate.

I do not care whether there is a quorum or not. Housing is very important to my constituents and I intend to avail of this opportunity to place on record my views in regard to it. If any person thinks he can stop me speaking by this kind of intervention he is mistaken.

Deputy Dunne is quite entitled to draw attention to any matter if he thinks it is irregular.

Deputy Cowan is always very quick to draw attention to the fact.

I realise that the Deputy is really drawing attention to the fact that there is only one member of the Fianna Fáil Party in the House. At the moment we are discussing a very important measure in this Assembly. We are discussing a republic for the country. Everybody, including the 23,000 people who are living in slums and in insanitary dwellings in this city, is anxious to see that republic established. There is as much pride in the declaration of that republic in the slums as there is anywhere in the country. I am speaking here this evening on behalf of these unfortunate people. The Minister says that the housing programme will be solved in 10 years. Deputy Alfred Byrne represents the same constituency as I do and he is equally concerned in the solution of this problem. He is active and energetic in regard to it. I believe the Minister has every sympathy with these unfortunate people. I believe this problem has been one of grave concern to him since he took office. So far as the country is concerned outside of Dublin City, the Minister is doing a good job. But I am also satisfied that the method of approach to the solution of the problem in Dublin is entirely wrong.

When the Minister comes to reply I invite him to tell the House whether or not he is getting the co-operation and help that he should get from every official concerned in this problem. Deputy Fitzpatrick will agree that this method of housing is causing very serious anxiety throughout the whole city.

I am not speaking to-night as someone who has become suddenly interested in this problem for the first time. I can refer the House to the records of the House. Since I came into this House I have raised this matter on every conceivable opportunity. I raised it by way of question last March when I asked the Minister if he was satisfied with the administrative machinery of the Housing and Supplies Department of the Dublin Corporation to tackle this problem. The Minister replied on that occasion that the whole question was receiving his serious consideration and that he was in discussion with the corporation and that he proposed to establish a new post of Chief Housing Officer in regard to it. I returned to the matter on the 14th April when I asked the Minister if he was yet in a position to announce plans for an immediate drive to provide houses for the citizens of Dublin living in insanitary and overcrowded dwellings; and the Minister replied that it was his aim to remove every obstacle in the way of an immediate drive to house the occupants of insanitary and overcrowded dwellings in Dublin and he indicated that he intended to have a discussion with all the interests concerned.

On the 13th May I again asked the Minister if he was in a position to announce plans for an immediate drive to provide houses for the citizens of Dublin living in insanitary and overcrowded tenements; and the Minister replied that he had announced details of the arrangements made by him for dealing with the housing problem in Dublin City and County by the appointment of a Director of Housing and a Housing Consultative Council.

On the 22nd July I asked the Minister to indicate how many houses had been built from the 1st January and how many houses would be built by the end of the year; and the Minister gave me figures which showed that a total of 626 houses would be built by the Dublin Corporation from the 1st January, 1948, to the 1st January, 1949. I was not satisfied with that position and when the debate on the Estimate for Local Government was before the House I referred to the fact that tens of thousands of citizens of this city would die if this problem was not tackled immediately. I put it to the Minister then that the target should be one of 5,000 houses within a year. A few days later, addressing a Labour Party meeting in the Mansion House, the Minister said —I am sure sincerely and honestly— that it was his policy to endeavour to build 5,000 houses in the City of Dublin within a year. In the debate not only did I refer to the difficulties and to the necessity for these houses but I pointed out to the Minister that in my opinion new legislation was required to enable him to overcome the difficulties. I had made a study of the problem and I had come to the conclusion that the Minister had not sufficient legislative authority to enable him to build 5,000 houses within a year. I returned to that problem on every opportunity. When the debate on the Taoiseach's Estimate was before the House on the 23rd July I again dealt with the problem. And while stating there my appreciation of the difficulties facing the Government, I said this: "In the City of Dublin we have 23,000 people needing houses." I asked the Minister for Local Government how many houses the Dublin Corporation intended to provide before the 31st December next, and the Minister gave me figures which suggested that approximately 400 houses would be built between this and the end of the year. I am sure the Taoiseach realises that that number is totally inadequate to meet the very dangerous situation in this city arising from the shortage of houses.

I went on to refer to the fact that this Dáil would be adjourning for a considerable period and that in my view new legislation was necessary to enable the Minister to solve the problem. I indicated to the Taoiseach that the period of the adjournment should be availed of to prepare that legislation and later to bring it before the House. On the 6th August the Dáil adjourned for the summer and autumn recess, for a period of 15 weeks, and I availed of the debate on the adjournment again to bring before the Taoiseach and the Government this serious problem of housing and the need for houses in the City of Dublin. I said in the debate on the Taoiseach's Estimate that this Government should introduce legislation to enable the Minister for Local Government to solve the housing problem within a reasonable time. I said: "I am satisfied that the Minister has the best will in the world, but I am equally satisfied that under the present legislation he has neither the power nor the authority to solve the housing problem. The introduction of that legislation is a matter of the greatest urgency and, therefore, I oppose an adjournment for 15 weeks."

The Minister and the House will appreciate that, so far as I am concerned, when I complained of the unsatisfactory nature of the Minister's reply to me to-day, I was not doing it out of caprice but because I have been continually pressing this problem since I came into the House and I will keep pressing it until such time as this House gives the Minister the power that he needs to enable him to solve the housing problem. Now, what are the difficulties?

May I ask for an assurance that I will get an opportunity of making my case? Half the time allocated for this discussion has now passed.

I understand I am entitled to 20 minutes to put my case and that the Minister has ten minutes in which to reply.

Mr. Murphy

Does that mean that my reply in this case will be limited to ten minutes? Could I be referred to the Standing Order that prescribes that?

There is no Standing Order governing it.

Mr. Murphy

I thought so.

There is a practice that the Deputy making the case gets 20 minutes and the Minister replying gets ten minutes. I suggest the Deputy should give as much time as possible to the Minister.

Certainly, that is what I intend to do. I shall make my remarks as brief as possible. I have no intention of endeavouring to keep the Minister from giving his reply. Although I am only a short while in this House, I am glad to say that I am familiar with this little part of the procedure. One of the obstacles that might be regarded as in the way may be termed finance. The Minister for Finance has stated that there is no obstacle there, that all the finance we want is available. The next obstacle is materials. It has been stated that there is no shortage of materials for the purpose of tackling this problem. Then there is the problem of workers and it has been stated by Deputy Byrne and others in the House that over in England we have our own workers who would be quite willing to come back if they are guaranteed work and decent wages, if they are guaranteed continuity of employment and are recruited, as they ought to be, into a labour force to build the houses needed in the City of Dublin.

They have all these guarantees.

I want these guarantees to be given to them—continuity of employment from 1st January to 31st December and reasonable wages.

They have guarantees superior to anything they can get in England.

That is one of the problems that can be solved by the organisation of a labour force. I suggest that efforts should be made to have that labour force recruited under the Dublin Corporation. Then there is this other matter that has caused us concern—housing sites. The Minister knows—he has long experience of it— that under the law as it stands, by the time all inquiries and investigations are made a period of approximately two years elapses before a site can be acquired by the corporation for the purpose of building houses. The law must be changed so that these sites may be acquired more quickly and so that they can be built upon while inquiries into title and compensation are being dealt with.

There is one other point. Yesterday the Minister said that it would take five years to complete the sewerage out in the Howth direction. The corporation have sites for 5,000 houses in my constituency, but they cannot build these houses because they have no sewerage. For years that position has been neglected. I say that by putting men to work three shifts a day, eight hours to each shift, and with electric light if necessary, that period of five years could be made much shorter. All the men needed must be put on that work just as the Germans would do it, just as the men who built Mosney Camp would do it, just as Mr. Rank and others of his type would do it. I want the Minister to do something like that.

I am raising this matter in no spirit of personal criticism of the Minister, but in a desire to be as helpful as I can to the Minister in pointing out whatever legislative authority he wants this House will give it to him and give it to him quickly. I want him to appreciate that and at the same time to appreciate that so far as my constituency in Dublin is concerned—and Deputy Byrne will bear me out here— the people who need houses should not have to wait ten years for them, nor will they wait that long.

Mr. Murphy

I do not object to the fullest possible discussion on this matter. I would have wished that the time at my disposal was more considerable than it is in order that that discussion should have the fullest scope possible. I would have preferred if the contribution to which the House has listened were devoted more to the subject than to a justification of the attitude of one member of the House since he entered it. In view of the nature of that contribution, I am entitled to suspect the bona fides of the contributor.

This subject of housing in Dublin for me is a subject of painful anxiety. I do not hope to derive any particular advancement or any particular selfadvertisement from pushing forward towards its solution. I am sincerely interested in that solution, as is every person of good-will in this country, but, because I have certain responsibilities here, I must have regard to facts, and if one could dismiss facts as matters of airy fancy, solutions could be found very quickly and very numerously. Let me try to remind the House of what has happened in this connection in the period during which responsibility has fallen to me. I want to repeat that, since I first came in contact with this major and terrible problem of housing in the city, it has been a source of ever-present anxiety to me.

The lowest estimate of present requirements in Dublin, as I have already stated in reply to the question, is 20,000 houses, with a further 10,000 required for the next ten years to meet obsolete existing buildings, growing families and so on. During the period of seven years from April, 1933 to March, 1940, the Dublin Corporation provided 9,000 dwellings. If the estimate of the time required by the Dublin Corporation for the building of 20,000 houses is based on that rate of progress, it would indicate that the immediate requirements of Dublin would not be met for about 18 years, and this alarming fact made it necessary to take the readiest and most effective steps that could be devised for the purpose of shortening that period and bringing the measure of relief and succour desired for these people to them in the shortest possible period.

The steps taken in connection with this problem include the setting up of one housing authority for the City of Dublin, for the Borough of Dún Laoghaire and the County of Dublin, the appointment of a housing director and the association with that housing director of a housing consultative council, representative of the various interests in this city with specialised knowledge or means of approach to the problem. In addition, arrangements have been made to increase substantially the administrative and technical staff of the corporation and a new post of chief housing officer has been created. In other words, a separate organisation in the corporation has been set up to devote the time and the ability of the officers in that section to this one problem, and I feel that that, in itself, is a departure from any practice which has obtained hitherto and bears on the face of it evidence of and material for a much readier approach to a solution of this problem.

One of the first problems confronting the local authority in this matter was the acquisition of sites and I know that the House will be interested to learn what the present position is. At the moment, the building of about 2,600 dwellings is in progress. Sites for 700 more will shortly be in the hands of the builders, by contract and direct labour, and sites for a further 2,000 dwellings which have been developed or are capable of early development are available. Other sites required, or listed for immediate acquisition, will accommodate about 3,500 dwellings, but these sites cannot be developed for some time because of the difficulty of obtaining early drainage services. I think it is obvious from these figures that very substantial progress has been made, and it is also obvious that that progress will have to be maintained in order to meet the problem to the extent to which plans have been made to meet it. I should say also that a survey has been made by the corporation which indicates that a substantial number of sites are available in Finglas, Sarsfield Road and Dundrum.

These sites, together with those already acquired or listed for immediate acquisition, will, it is intended by the corporation, provide for 9,000 dwellings, and a further 1,500 dwellings can be provided by conversions and new buildings in central city areas. It is the intention of the corporation that the later years of the programme should be concentrated in the area to be served by the Howth main drainage scheme or in the fringe area. In other words, the housing in the area which is concerned with the Howth main drainage would have to be deferred until that work is executed, but in the meantime, in other areas, such as those I have mentioned, provision would be made for the development of sites and the provision of houses thereon, so that, by the end of that programme, the drainage work would have been completed in the Howth area and the programme of housing in that area would fit naturally into the end of the completed programme in the other areas I have mentioned.

In order that Deputies may have a ready picture of this position, I think it well to give the following figures. The corporation's proposals may be summarised: (a) to provide for 5,000 dwellings within two years on sites already available; (b) to provide an additional 9,000 dwellings in five years, including the first two years, on sites acquired or listed for acquisition; and (c) to provide 1,500 dwellings from conversion and new buildings within the central city area. This gives a total of 15,500 dwellings which is the programme for the coming five years. The corporation aim at completing a programme of 30,000 houses in 10 years. The 14,500 dwellings which must be undertaken in the second five years will be sited as follows: 3,500 in the Howth main drainage area; 7,500 in the fringe area; and 3,500 in the central city area. There is very much more information I should like to give the House if it were possible within the time available, but unfortunately it is not.

Mr. A. Byrne

What is the position with regard to "pre-fabs" for newly-weds?

Mr. Murphy

I have not had an opportunity of coming to it. I think I have said enough to show that this matter is not being treated casually and not being regarded lightly. The question of providing houses by other methods is also under consideration, as is also the question of reserving a certain number of houses for newly-weds. I can only say in reply to Deputy Cowan that I wish it could be regarded as a practical possibility to increase the number of houses planned for each year. There is no difficulty that I have ascertained up to the present in the matter of finance; the difficulty in regard to materials is diminishing; but there is the difficulty of manpower, and especially skilled manpower, for the purpose of undertaking this work, and I am not going to be responsible for raising hopes in the minds of the people of Dublin which might result in deep and bitter disappointment for these people later on. Other people with a sense of airy responsibility can provide ready-made recipes, but I am prepared, and confidently prepared, to be judged on what I believe will be the solid achievements of these years.

I have no magic method of providing houses quickly. I want to try to keep faith with these people. I want to try to make these people realise that we have determined in the time before us to bring this problem up to a point nearer to a practical and readier solution than it has ever been brought to in the 50 years during which it has been the legacy of municipal government in this city. I hope I may be helped and sustained in doing that work. All contributions made in this House or outside it which are designed sincerely to help me do that work will be welcome, but I have no patience with these people who use problems of this kind merely for the purpose of advertising themselves and getting whatever miserable notoriety comes to them as a result.

You have no sympathy with the people living in the slums—inefficiency and incompetence.

The Dáil adjourned at 10.30 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Friday; 26th November.

Top
Share