I move amendment No. 1:—
Before sub-section (10) to insert a new sub-section as follows:—
(10) This section shall apply in the case of an illegitimate child whether such child is being nursed and maintained for reward or not.
The section represents a desirable advance in so far as it provides that those who take children for nursing and maintenance for reward or promise of reward must now, up to the age of 16, give the necessary notification, from which notification inspection, and so on, may follow.
The purpose of the amendment, however, is to direct the attention of the House to the fact that the procedure envisaged in this section applies only where the nursing is for reward or promise of reward. I have had experience of quite a number of cases where children, particularly illegitimate children, are taken in circumstances in which it is not possible to establish an undertaking to provide payment or where, to all intents and purposes, the maintenance is entirely free.
As the Minister is probably aware, there are many children who are placed with a view to adoption but who, in fact, are never legally adopted and in respect of whom no charge or reward has been demanded or accepted. Once illegitimate children can be placed with foster parents in those circumstances, without any question of reward, it does seem that there is room for abuse.
The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that, in the case of illegitimate children, notification should be given, whether or not the nursing or maintenance is for reward. This matter has been the subject of inquiry in this country and also in other countries by those interested in the welfare of children. I should like to quote an extract from a U.N.O. study of the subject. It appears in a work dealing with children deprived of normal life. The extract is as follows:—
"Other free foster homes are those where no payment is made, but legal adoption is not possible or desirable. Without the proper kind of supervision this kind of foster home care may be very dangerous for the child, as he may not always be wanted for his own sake but because his labour is considered important. In many cases foster homes without remuneration, or free foster homes where the child is placed directly by his parent for instance, with relatives, are not included in the legislative provisions nor in the statistics concerning children cared for outside their own homes.
"It would appear wise, however, in countries where licensing of all foster homes is not required, to apply to free foster homes the regulation of compulsory notification to the local authority if a child has been received for care, so that the proper supervision can be applied."
That is an opinion expressed in a study of this problem carried out under the auspices of U.N.O. and it does emphasise the kind of gap which would be left in this desirable legislation, were an amendment of the kind I have suggested not included in this Bill.
I would emphasise for the Minister that free fosterage, if excluded from this Bill, may leave considerable openings for abuse and there may be cases of unfortunate illegitimate children being taken into homes, with a view to adoption and no adoptions taking place, and the circumstances of the children may be very bad indeed. In those circumstances, I can see no objection to providing that a person who undertakes nursing and maintenance of children should notify the local authority of the fact, so that at least the whereabouts of the child will be known and proper inspections can be carried out.
May I remind the Minister that, in the case of free fosterage, it may often happen that the presence of the child in the foster home may not be discovered until the child begins to go to school and until the school medical service is availed of? Often, it is only then that the presence of the child in the foster home is discovered. I believe that in most cases nothing undesirable may have taken place, but in a few cases a lot of medical difficulties may arise which, by the time the child appears in school for the first time, may have become permanent. Some of these difficulties might have been avoided if notification were compulsory and if an inspection had been carried out on behalf of the health authority. I would urge the Minister to consider this amendment with his officials and advisers, and, if he feels it possible to accept the amendment in principle, to deal with the matter on a later stage of the Bill.