This is a Bill authorising the Minister for Finance to take shares to the extent of £1,500,000. It also enables him to give free grants to the amount of £500,000. While everybody in this House must welcome anything that will help to maintain Shannon Airport, I am extremely dubious that this Bill is the correct way to approach the matter. It is very evident that Shannon Airport faces considerable difficulties on account of overflying by jets. At the same time it is very evident that Shannon Airport is a necessary adjunct to the civil aviation of the world in relation to transatlantic flights. That has been quite evident in the past few months when it was necessary for planes coming from other areas that had overflown Shannon to return there.
As I heard the statement of the Minister yesterday, the principal purposes of this Bill appear to be to encourage the development of industries in and around Shannon Airport and to endeavour to advertise it as fully as possible throughout the world. I do not think anybody in any part of the world who has ever taken a flight in a plane or is in any way interested in flying has not heard of Shannon Airport. Therefore, the Minister's first suggestion that this Bill is for the purpose of aiding the advertising of this Airport really does not hold water.
I do not see that we require a Bill and all the costs associated with a Bill and all the extra State control that will come with this Bill for the purpose of advertising one of the best-known airports in the world. There is no doubt that were Shannon Airport to go into liquidation, which I know will not happen and would not be permitted to happen by this or any other subsequent Government, it is of such vital importance to the world as a whole that other countries or other air companies would, if necessary, intervene to see that such a state of affairs would not come to pass.
It is true that, with the overflying of the Airport, there will be a considerable hiatus in the employment given to the numerous employees who derive their living in and around the Airport. For that purpose, everyone will agree that it is necessary that any hardship that might be caused should be mitigated in every way. Again, I do not think this is the correct approach. I do not think it is necessary to have a Bill which, as I read it, is designed to provide a sum of £2 million to further and extend the activities of the Airport. If industries are to be set up, as I hope they will be set up, in Shannon Airport, I largely agree with Deputies Cosgrave and Russell that it would probably be more beneficial to our economy as a whole to set them up in adjacent towns such as Limerick and Ennis, where a large number of the employed personnel of the Airport live or, if not, in other residential quarters of the area. If it is necessary to do that, we have already the machinery and the facilities in this State for setting up these industries. We recently passed a Bill in which it was possible by State grants to assist any of these intended projects. Why must we have another Bill? Why must we have duplication of what already exists? We have An Foras Tionscal which I understand is for that purpose.
Any development that is necessary can take place without this Bill. We are getting too much into the system that practically every project, no matter what it may be, must have a Bill, a board and a company that is dependent on, and to a large extent controlled by, the Government. While it is necessary for the State to aid in every way the development of industries here, I do not approve of direct control. This Bill, putting the Minister for Finance into the position of being able to control £1,500,000 worth of shares in a company, is a retrograde step.
The Federal Republic of Germany, which has shown the most startling economic revival in the modern history of Europe having been reduced to ashes during the last war, are by legislation endeavouring to transfer back fully and completely to private enterprise anything that they intervened to support in the time of emergency. That should be our policy and outlook. I am not suggesting that the Government are entirely committed to State control but I do suggest that we are having too many of these Bills, too many boards and too much State interference. Although this Bill will undoubtedly be passed by the majority the Government have at their disposal, it is unnecessary. Shannon Airport can survive with the existing facilities in the State without all the expense of an extra Bill and the extra control by the State that it will imply.