Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 20 Jul 1961

Vol. 191 No. 9

Committee on Finance - Vote 2—Houses of The Oireachtas. (Supplementary)

I move:

That a supplementary sum not exceeding £2,000 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1962, for the Salaries and Expenses of the Houses of the Oireachtas, including certain Allowances and Grants-in-Aid."

This Supplementary Estimate covers allowances for certain Deputies and Senators. The House will recollect that last year we passed the contributory scheme which applies to both present and future members of the Dáil and Seanad. That, however, drew attention to the fact that there are some people of advanced age who gave long service to the Dáil and Seanad and who are now in poor circumstances. A plea for those people was made to me by members of all Parties in both Houses when we were putting that Bill through and afterwards and, as a result of my meeting with representatives of the two Houses who were taking an interest in this matter and who had gone into it in great detail, they made certain recommendations to me which I have accepted practically in full in this Supplementary Estimate.

The scheme will apply to those ex-Deputies and ex-Senators who have served in either House of the Oireachtas for at least ten years and whose membership ended before the 1st May, 1960. That of course means membership ended before the contributory scheme came into operation. They must also have reached 60 years of age. The general idea is that if they have means exceeding £350 a year they are not considered. If they have no means they are entitled to a maximum of £350, while, if they have some means, it will be a sum in between.

I wish to mention the names of the Members who worked on this scheme. It is well Deputies should know I have taken recommendations from a Committee composed of Senator Michael Hayes, Senator Ted O'Sullivan and Deputy Thomas A. Kyne. They have examined the applications they thought should be considered so far. There may be others but applications should come from those people when they hear there is such a scheme in operation.

I am advised legally this can be brought into operation for this year by a supplementary estimate provided there is the intention to make the matter right by legislation as soon as an opportunity offers. There may be an opportunity in the Superannuation Bill that is coming along in the next session of the Dáil.

As I have said, the present Members are covered by the contributory scheme. As the number who retired before that will be a dwindling number, it is only to be expected that the amount to be provided will be less as the years go by. I have been advised by the Committee that £2,000 will probably cover the Estimate for this year and I am asking the Dáil to vote that amount. I should say my intention is not to accept anybody not recommended by the Committee, not to give more than is recommended by the Committee in any case, but to reserve the right to give less.

This is a very small matter which deserves the sympathy of the House. Though it will be a diminishing sum every year it can be fairly described as once-for-all principle because the contributory pension arrangements made subsequently will cover all other cases. The people concerned, in certain instances at any rate—I am not quite sure of the names—played a vital part in the building up of this Dáil. I do not wish to mention any names in particular but the Dáil could never have functioned without the immense amount of work a certain Member put into it. If it were not for his assiduous application to the business of the House and the fact that he gave the best years of his life to the service of the House I do not think this Dáil would have functioned properly. He does not belong to my Party but, at the same time, it is only right and proper that that tribute should be paid to him. He is a very old man now, 89 years of age, as well as I can remember. As regards those people who did give service of that sort in the early years, particularly on the establishment of this House when we were going through the formative period, it was only right we should see they are able at least to exist in their old age.

I welcome this proposal. However, we ought be a little more equitable in our compassion. When we were dealing with the contributory scheme, I pointed out to the Minister that there was the case of the person who might be over 60 years of age, having served this House for 7, 8 or 9 years, and who might fail to be re-elected. Not only does he receive nothing but he loses all his contributions. Would the Minister not include that kind of case in the proposal now before the House? If such a person is defeated in an election he may be in great need. Would the Minister consider such a case?

It does not seem to arise.

It may not arise but the Minister could agree to include that type of case in this Bill.

We are not interfering with the contributory scheme. That is a different matter.

I wish to go on record as welcoming the scheme for which this Supplementary Estimate is being proposed here to-night. I also wish to acknowledge on behalf of the Labour Party the tribute and the expression of gratitude that has been forthcoming from Deputy Sweetman in respect of the unnamed person whom, nevertheless, most of us know. I should like to thank Deputy Sweetman for that tribute to him.

Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share