Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 31 Oct 1962

Vol. 197 No. 2

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Letting of Lands.

91.

asked the Minister for Lands if he is aware of the great uneasiness that exists amongst people who, because of special circumstances, must set their lands by conacre; and that many of these people are now afraid to set their lands, thus leading to a worsening of their financial position; if he will explain what notice and how long the Land Commission propose to give in all such cases before action is taken by the Commissioners; and if he will make a statement which will remove the uneasiness which has been created in the minds of such landholders.

92.

andMr. McQuillan asked the Minister for Lands whether it is proposed to increase the powers of the Land Commission to enable them to acquire holdings which have been vacated by their owners and let to neighbours; and, if so, whether these proposed new powers are to be used solely in the West.

I propose, with the permission of the Ceann Comhairle, to take Questions Nos. 91 and 92 together.

Speaking to the Agricultural Science Association on 21st September, 1962, I said:

"With the extent of rural congestion as I have described it, it goes without saying that, in future, every acre of land which becomes available for acquisition must be acquired to cope with it. It will be recalled that the Report of the inter-Departmental Committee made special reference to the number of western holdings vacated by owners and let to neighbouring farmers. This pattern, however, may not be entirely peculiar to the West. While undoubtedly there may sometimes be justifiable and compelling reasons for temporarily letting lands, there can be no justification for allowing land to be vacated indefinitely. The Committee recommended that where holdings are let and not properly worked or left vacant they should be acquired by the Land Commission for relief of congestion. The Government believe that, in the interest of relieving congestion, promoting proper land utilisation and preventing sizeable areas from falling into a derelict or semi-derelict condition, the Land Commission's statutory powers of acquisition will have to be more earnestly directed towards such lands in future.

Land of that kind is rarely looked after well and the trouble is that it tends to become more unproductive as time goes on, yielding nothing like it should to the sum of goods. The Government cannot tolerate that and owners will simply have to make up their minds to opt in or opt out. My directive to the Land Commission will be to adopt a stiffer attitude towards the owners of vacated lands. I have recently given public notice that I propose to direct the Land Commission to compile a Register of vacant and derelict holdings and lands that have been let for a period of 5 years or over. These people will receive an offer from the Land Commission to purchase their lands; if they do not sell or, alternatively, return, live on and effectively work their holdings, then I feel the Land Commission will have full support in using their wide compulsory powers for the acquisition of these lands. This country can no longer afford absentee landowners; they are just as detrimental to the common good as were the absentee landlords of former times."

It is not proposed that these measures be restricted solely to the West; and let me say also that the Land Commission will continue to consider on its merits the application of a landowner who, by reason of special circumstances, has to make a merely short-term temporary letting of his land.

May I take it from the Minister's statement, therefore, the proposed policy of the Government refers also to the man whom the Minister mentioned in his address to the Agricultural Science Association, for example, the gentleman who owns the broad acres in the Midlands and who, according to the Minister, has no time to go to the fairs because so much of his time is devoted to attending race meetings and other sporting events? Does the Minister propose to include such gentlemen in the Land Commission's projects for the acquisition and division of holdings?

What I said on that occasion I meant.

I hope the Minister meant what he said.

Top
Share