I should like to ask the Minister a question on this section. It does not relate to the strict text of the Bill. Our concern under section 5 is to promote, assist and develop Irish industrial design and the improvement of the standard thereof, which is a very laudable and admirable purpose. I do not know if the Minister's attention has been drawn to the imports into this country of objects manufactured in foreign countries which are of very doubtful aesthetic value and which are labelled in Irish, stating that they are manufactured in a foreign country. Inasmuch as the inscription declaring their place of manufacture is in the Irish language, I think the inscription is in fact designed to suggest to the casual purchaser that the article is of Irish manufacture.
The main purpose of this section is to raise the general standard of Irish design and doubtless to associate Irish exports with the general impression of excellence, which I think is perfectly right. Our hopes in the markets of the world must be based on excellence rather than on the prospects of mass production. I have the feeling that the circulation of objects of the kind to which I have referred interferes with the objectives we have in view in this Bill. I should be interested to hear from the Minister if that aspect of the question has ever presented itself to his mind and, if so, whether he feels it would be appropriate, in connection with this Bill, to consider what, if any, steps we could take to offset any damage which this kind of trade transaction might do.