Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 30 Oct 1973

Vol. 268 No. 6

Committee on Finance. - Vote 27: Office of the Minister for Education (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That a sum not exceeding £10,742,000 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1974, for the salaries and expenses of the Office of the Minister for Education (including Institutions of Science and Art), for certain miscellaneous educational and cultural services and for payment of sundry grants-in-aid.
—(Minister for Education).

I should like to make a a few comments on post-primary education. The post-primary curriculum is not suited for many pupils. Of the numbers who attend these schools, how many sit for examinations or are successful in the examinations for the vocational group certificate? If a boy or girl does not sit for this examination it is obvious there is something wrong with the curriculum and we must consider what can be done to adjust it. The headmaster should be allowed to use his discretion in this matter so that he may adjust the curriculum to suit the majority of the pupils. This would ease much of the frustration experienced by teachers and I would ask the Minister to consider this matter.

For a considerable time I have been referring to the question of prosecutions for non-attendance at school. A fine of £2 solves nothing. We must have a more realistic approach. Much depends on the school attendance officers. They are rather like social workers advising the children and the parents. The Minister should encourage these officers to attend courses where they could be enlightened on the approach to this problem. This is a very important matter.

It is morally wrong to bring a child into a courtroom because of non-attendance at school and it will have a bad effect on the child. Such investigations should be held in community buildings or some similar buildings. I know the Minister is interested in this kind of approach to problems of this nature. Let us get away from the courtroom so far as children are concerned. It has a psychological effect. Accounts of the prosecutions appear on the daily papers and it is not nice for a boy or girl to have their name mentioned in the newspaper for not attending school. I am surprised that this has not been changed long before now. I ask the Minister to give it consideration.

Much emphasis is placed on academic education but social education should go hand in hand with that. Too much of the responsibility for this is placed on youth clubs, et cetera. They have a contribution to make because youth clubs should be centres of education, but there is an obligation on the school here. The Minister should give this attention.

There is a very poor choice of sports in some of our secondary schools. There should be a wide choice. Teachers should encourage pupils in the fields of mountain climbing, dancing and things of that sort. This would build up a very happy relationship between the pupil and the teacher. We should have that mutual understanding. This should be our approach to education.

We should have another look at civics. People with experience in certain professional fields should be invited to schools to speak on rates, income tax, politics and things of that nature. The Garda should be asked into schools to talk to pupils. This is very important where the teaching of civics is concerned.

The Minister did not devote much of his brief to adult education because he is waiting for the report of the speical committee. This is a report in which many people will be interested. I would strongly recommend to the Minister that where adult education is concerned there should be short courses, not running into a year or two years. Courses usually end up with perhaps a 50 per cent fall off in attendance. There should be courses on youth and community leadership but they should be short so that people would be encouraged to attend them.

If we are to achieve anything in the field of sport it is important to have sufficiently trained personnel available for coaching and organising training courses throughout the country. I am glad the Minister has placed quite a lot of emphasis on this. There is a crying need for this at present, for people who are qualified in their field to organise courses. There is quite a development now of community associations throughout the country. Many of them have erected buildings. Physical education could be taught in those buildings. The Minister might say that the cost of building would be a problem here but there is a wealth of facilities available in community buildings. Grants should be available to people who want to promote this kind of education so as to provide the necessary equipment in the buildings. I want to emphasise this because, now that people realise the importance of community associations, they should be attracted to these community buildings and every possible facility made available to them. I know that many associations would be delighted to provide this facility for young people.

We have the problem of early school leavers. A boy or girl may develop a taste for education a short time after leaving school but would be most reluctant to go back to a classroom atmosphere. Here again is an area in which we could use the community building. There is a tremendous opportunity here for the Department of Education to organise, with the co-operation of the vocational education committee of the area, classes for such people. It might be costly because it would mean night classes but many of our vocational schools are overcrowded at night and cannot facilitate all applicants. I am talking specifically about the early school leaver who might avail of this opportunity to improve his standard of education. We all know that it is after we have left school we can see opportunities lost. But people are reluctant to go back to the classroom atmosphere to continue their education. I would ask the Minister to consider this because I know that a number of community associations would welcome it and give it every possible support. School transport has been a problem down through the years. It needs reviewing periodically. I believe the Minister should allow school buses to convey children to places of recreation. Many boys and girls are deprived of the opportunity to participate in a particular field of recreation because of cost. As well as that there is not a regular bus service in all parts of the country. We could be depriving children here and I would ask the Minister to consider allowing school buses to convey children to places of recreation.

Parent-teacher involvement is of vital importance and should be encouraged. Community involvement in education will benefit all. Naturally parents should have a say where their children are concerned. I do not say they should be a dominant feature but, as I said earlier, education is the concern of all and all must play a part in it. The greater the involvement the happier the community relations.

I would emphasise again the need for two secondary schools in Cork. Some months ago, in reply to a parliamentary question, the Minister assured me he would give all possible attention to this matter. I think he acquired ground from the vocational committee in Cork for the Togher development. Since then the convent school in Blackrock are in urgent need of suitable secondary education facilities for their children. The Minister is fully aware of the situation. I ask him to treat this as a matter of urgency.

Once more, I wish the Minister well. I wish him success in his high office. His is a very important office because education is very important. I appeal to him to go on consulting the people, especially community associations. I advise him to give them every possible encouragement. They can make a contribution and they want to contribute. If we build the kind of atmosphere in which the Minister, his officials, parents, teachers, the local community and the children all work together for the common good, then we shall certainly achieve something and the Minister will be assured of a very fruitful period in office if he continues on the lines on which he is moving at present.

I would like to compliment the Minister on what he has done for education in the very short time in which he has been in office. He has made fantastic strides and he has projected a terrific image as Minister for Education. I wish him many long years in office. He has a great deal to contribute out of his own experience and out of his abilities. I am very proud to be associated with him.

Deputy Wyse very rightly dealt with those areas with which he is most familiar. I shall do the same. Speaking broadly for the moment, I believe enough is not being done in the schools for the student who has no aptitude for conventional subjects. In our new situation in the EEC, with new industries cropping up all over the place, requiring specialised skills, I am just a little worried that not enough is being done for the young people who will have to earn their living in these new industries. Instead of concentrating on academic subjects we should be concentrating on the development of particular skills and aptitudes. A great deal more should be done in regard to career guidance at a very early age so that children could be channelled into specific types of education designed to train them for their particular vocations.

Very little has been done in the way of formal education designed to train the farmers of the future in the very competitive field of agriculture in the EEC. Our universities do not recognise agricultural science as a subject for matriculation. Because of that the secondary schools have dropped agricultural science as a subject. The result is that young people spend up to five years in a boarding school and return home to their farms completely ignorant of farming.

In Cork we have been waiting for a long time for the new dairy science and food extension. I understand this has been sanctioned by the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries but there is some hold up in the Department of Education; it is too expensive. I would appeal to the Minister to use his good offices here. We cannot afford to have any cheeseparing. This new building must comply with the high standard of hygiene and so forth required by the general food standards in Europe. Nothing but the best will do. We must not delay too long in erecting this building. If we dally we may find ourselves in a situation in which we could lose a very substantial grant from the Kellog Foundation.

With regard to university education, I would like to see the New Zealand system in operation here. There you have the veterinary students on the same campus as the agricultural students. They have much more in common naturally with the agricultural students than they have with medical students.

I should like to compliment Macra na Feirme on the Trojan work they have done over the years in voluntary education. It is not enough, I admit. The agricultural advisers have done a great deal too. However, we must have formal education in agriculture in all schools. I would like to see the vocational side expanded.

A great deal has been said about school transport. It is inadequate and there is not enough flexibility. It is not right that buses which are not filled should pass by students on the road. If the parents of these children can make a contribution towards the transport so much the better.

Again on this whole business of transport, I was glad the Minister did something about these two-teacher schools, because in closing down all these small schools around the country, we have got a further problem, the problem of transport. I was often wondering if we really solved anything or if we created a bigger problem than we solved. Transport now costs in the region of £5 million, and it looks as if it could be double that in a short time. We closed a lot of very good small schools. I believe there is a lot to be said for these schools, where you had the children growing up in their own environment, in their own parochial, social-type surroundings. Results have shown that these children did quite well for themselves. I have often been wondering if all these services that the bigger school is supposed to provide is not something of a myth. Maybe time will tell. However, I have a very strong feeling that the bigger school is not always the answer and that we should be very reluctant to close any school that is in fairly good condition with sufficient pupils to justify two teachers, as we have been doing in the past.

I should like to compliment, too, the Irish Christian Brothers, the nuns and the teachers generally in that they have devoted their time and their lives to our education and the education of all our children. We should be proud of them. Our teachers, lay and religious, have been unfairly criticised of late. It is only right that they should be praised for what they have done. Our standards are as high as, if not higher than, anywhere else in the world. Our graduates are widely accepted abroad at the moment. A lot of this is due to the work done in the past by people like the brothers and the nuns who gave virtually free education when the country could ill afford to give it.

Again I wish to compliment the Minister and to wish him well. I hope he will continue his policy of consultation. He is the man who started real consultation. By consultation I mean that he takes into account the opinions of the managers, the teachers, all concerned, before any major step is taken in any area. That is vital in any democracy. I do not think any Minister should do anything without consultation. I am very proud that the Minister for Education, Deputy Burke, has made this his forte, that he regards consultation as of primary importance. I hope he continues to do that for many long years.

The previous speaker concluded by referring to the record of the Minister in the field of consultation with the education authorities. While I am familiar with the Minister, having served with him on the Dublin County Council since 1967, prior to his appointment, I must say I was bitterly disappointed with the record of the Minister in consultation having regard to his recent statement on rationalisation and regionalisation in the educational field.

The Minister sent out a notification to the vocational educational committees, on one of which it is my honour to serve, the County Dublin Vocational Committee, asking for the committee's views on a very important item affecting vocational and post-primary education throughout the whole country. We had the sum total of five to ten days in which to consider this very important item and, having considered it, to send to the Minister our recommendations on it. I think any reasonable person—and I know the Minister is a reasonable person—would give longer than that period of time for the consideration of such an important document which has implications for the educational sphere for years to come.

The Minister obviously gave this document a lot of consideration. The County Dublin Vocational Education Committee is probably the most rapidly growing educational committee in this country, and the Minister gave that meagre time for the consideration of this very important document. In replying to a question in the House the other day, the Minister assured us that next time round we would get a greater opportunity, but this should not have had to be done. I am not 100 per cent sure of the exact dates but the document was sent by the Department some time in the middle of September and the information had to be sent on prior to a meeting which was taking place early in October. The Minister may challenge me when I say the time allowed was for five to ten days, but anyway it was much less time than a month. The Minister is familiar with the situation which pertains to local authorities during the summer break. He is also aware that it is sometime into the middle of September before the committee of local authorities are fully operative after the summer break. The Minister should have given us more time to consider such an important document.

I wish to speak about the primary and post-primary schools in County Dublin. The problems in County Dublin are unique because never in the history of this state has an area expanded so much with such a large explosion in population. This expansion has taken place over the last five or six years. The Department of Education are lagging behind in the provision of educational facilities. Let us first consider primary education. The population of Swords, where I live, has doubled over the last three years. It is envisaged that over the next three years it will double again. We have one school which was completed two or three years ago. By the time it was completed it was already overcrowded. We have asked the Department of Education for sanction to construct a new school. We have received that sanction. Our main problem is finance. The Department of Education will give a grant towards the building of a school but they will not pay for the site. In County Dublin a major item in the cost of any school is the cost of the land. The land costs in developing areas are high because the land is needed for the building of houses, factories and schools. There is little point in the Minister giving a grant for the construction of a school and the provision of furniture therein without providing a grant for the site.

In Swords the county council are providing a site for a primary school but they are forbidden by the local government regulations to sell any land at less than the cost price. The only way that Swords will get a school at a reasonable cost is by the Department of Education providing a grant towards the cost of a site. At present they are not prepared to do this. This is wrong. History will chastise those in power at this stage because they did not accept such a reasonable proposal.

What applies to Swords applies also to similar areas in County Dublin. The Minister represents an area in South County Dublin. It is a rapidly developing area. It is developing so rapidly that we may all be out of jobs following the changes in the constituencies which we hear are coming. The Minister's constituency takes in places such as Tallaght. I believe the Minister will not be representing Tallaght when the constituency changes take effect. Tallaght has problems which are unique to County Dublin. It is a rapidly developing area which is badly in need of primary and post-primary schools. In areas such as Blanchardstown and Tallaght Dublin Corporation have purchased large tracts of land with a view to housing the people on the housing list. As the Minister knows, a family must have three or four children before they get a corporation house. When families are housed in a new area like Tallaght they must find schools for their children, some of whom may be five or six years of age. There are no primary schools in these new areas. There may be some mobile or temporary classrooms but they are inadequate for children in their formative years.

We need a dynamic approach to the problems of education. I had expected such an approach from the Minister. The Minister is in the enviable position representing such an area and being aware of its problems. I am disappointed at the progress made in regard to primary education.

I would like to speak now about places like Clondalkin and Blanchardstown which have problems similar to those in Tallaght. Corporation tenants are moving out into the county. There is also great expansion in the private sector with large numbers of houses being sold to people getting mortgages. These people have young children and are often unable to get places for them in primary schools.

I understand that the Department have a general policy for primary education covering the whole country. County Dublin is unique because of the tremendous expansion and development there. There was rapid development in the city which has been followed by development in the county towns. I would remind the Minister of what was contained in the development plan adopted two years ago. Cities of 100,000 to 150,000 people were envisaged. The solutions to the educational problems of these people have not come from the Department of Education. The Department's lack of foresight has caused problems. They should improve their records over the next few years.

In a town like Balbriggan there is rapid development and growth. People in Balbriggan are looking now for proper educational facilities at the primary level. Before the town expands any further, the Department, together with the reverend manager, should seriously consider the primary education facilities in the area with a view to rapid improvement because the facilities at the moment are, to say the least of it, inadequate.

I am nervous about mentioning Portmarnock. The position there is appalling. I never thought I would see the day when we would have to raise this particular problem in the Dáil. Over the last number of years Portmarnock has developed even faster than Tallaght. There are children in Portmarnock at the moment unable to go to primary schools because there are no schools available. Children of four and five years of age who are attending school spend their day in mobile, temporary classrooms situated at least one and a half miles from the centre of population. These children must walk to their temporary classrooms. If it is a wet morning they must sit in school all day in wet clothes and they are still wet coming home. How there have not been fatalities due to pneumonia or other causes I will never know. Portmarnock is crying out for justice. I appeal to the Department of Education to do something for that community. It is a diabolical situation and it is getting worse.

To anybody not familiar with the developments of the County Dublin area it is very difficult to explain exactly the problems. Portmarnock is ultra typical of what is happening. Young married couples with young families are buying houses in the area. There is no immediate demand for post-primary education, but there is an immediate demand for primary education. While the Department consider the problem these children are growing up, attending primary schools in temporary accommodation. If they are to start their education in life in such accommodation what chance will they have later? I would ask the Department to take an urgent look at the Portmarnock area and take rapid action to see that the situation is rectified.

What I said earlier about Swords applies also to Portmarnock. The grants paid by the Department are directed only to school building and not to the school sites. In an area— for example, Portmarnock—where the cost of the land for a school is higher than the cost of the school building, the Department can revise their scheme to include the cost of the site as well, as the cost of the buildings.

Site and playing-fields.

I agree. We should not have any schools without playing-fields. A healthy body means a healthy mind. We need playing facilities but we particularly need the classrooms.

I should like to make particular mention of the children of the 300 residents of the Arthur Griffith Park Estate. This is a county council estate situated approximately 1½ miles from the primary school in Lucan. I had a question down to the Minister regarding school transport and he told me very kindly that he would be prepared to discuss with CIE the provision of a school bus for which the pupils would have to pay the full CIE fares. This is a local authority housing estate. One of the conditions of securing a house there was that a person would be in a certain income bracket, and have a certain number of children. It was allocated on the points system of Dublin county council, but in practice the families have to be large before they can secure a house.

These people are not in a position to carry the massive burden quoted by CIE of £300 for the transportation of their children from Arthur Griffith Park to the primary school in the first few months to Christmas. I would ask the Minister to reflect on the decision he made with regard to Lucan and the children of Arthur Griffith Park and use his much publicised talents to see if he could devise some scheme whereby these children could receive justice, because they are not getting justice at this stage.

Skerries is a rapidly-developing area similar to the other areas I have mentioned. The residents are demanding proper facilities for their children at primary level. What I said for the other towns holds equally for Skerries. These problems are in the towns and the city fringe areas. We have them in Donaghmede, the Donaghies and Darndale right across to the Coolock fringe. This is a developing area which is straddling the city and county boundary. These fringe areas are entitled to special attention.

There is a new development in Darndale which the corporation envisage as a very large housing scheme. When these houses are being built a school should also be built. There is no use in families going into houses unless there are educational facilities as well. Thanks to the work of the late Donogh O,Malley there is a realisation of the need for education. Parents are aware of the need to secure proper educational facilities for their children. There is no use sending people to a housing ghetto, be it private houses, local authority houses or any other sort, because housing estates are mere ghettos until they have the facilities of schools, shops, churches, playing fields and proper community buildings.

It is important that the lessons of the past be learned by the Department. In Darndale and other developments primary schools should be built at the same time as the houses. The day the housing contract is signed should be the day when the first contract for building a primary school in an area should also be signed. Until we reach this situation we shall have problem after problem in regard to delinquency and associated troubles.

I should not like the Minister to get the impression that we have nothing but rapidly developing towns in County Dublin. We also have areas as rural as in any part of the country. The Minister was considering closing Oldtown National School until I put a question to him just after his decision on Dunquin. He backed off rapidly and changed his mind about Oldtown school. He assured me in this House that he had reconsidered the matter and was prepared to leave Oldtown school intact. This is just one of the many areas in north-west County Dublin which deserve special attention and which I am sure the Minister will give them. One very special area is St. Margaret's. Due to no fault of its own that village is situated close to Dublin Airport. Because of a decision by the Department of Transport and Power the runway complex at Dublin Airport is to be altered and the main runway, instead of running north-east/south-west will now be on an east-west orientation so that the end of it will practically arrive in the classroom of St. Margaret's school. That is no exaggeration and is admitted by the Department. If this does not demand special attention, what does? The people of St. Margaret's are very proud of their community spirit. They have a very active community council and are anxious to see their village complex retained but they are aware of the problems facing them following the Department's decision on the construction of the new runway. I should like the Minister to say what is in the mind of the Department about educational facilities in St. Margaret's because if ever a matter needed clarification this does. How many other areas suffer from the same headache of the noise problem that will affect the children in St. Margaret's? I should like some assurance from the Minister when he is replying on that situation.

I have so far spoken principally of the situation regarding primary education in north County Dublin. I shall now consider post-primary facilities, or the lack of them, in that area. The policy of the Department at present, to say the least, is muddled: in some areas or towns the Department is encouraging separate development of post-primary facilities with brothers, nuns and the VEC participating; in other areas the Department recommends community schools. I plead with the Minister and the Department to make up their minds so that the people will know where they are going. Just now there is separate development in one town, community development in another. In my opinion this is the first step towards the abolition of vocational education in County Dublin. In most areas where the vocational education committee have indicated an interest in the construction or expansion of schools they have been told by the Department that they cannot build or extend because a community school is being considered.

This happened in Lucan where some years ago the Dublin VEC decided to expand and build a new school. They were assured by the Department that they would get sanction but were shortly afterwards told they would not get permission for a vocational school, that a community school would be provided in Lucan. After what I consider legitimate pressure the wise decision was made to allow separate development in Lucan and not to amalgamate the existing institutions and facilities there. The Department decided to allow the Christian Brothers to build—they had a school there in the area already— they decided to allow the convent to expand and the Minister himself attended the opening of part of the extension. Now, belatedly, permission has been given to the VEC to build a new school at Lucan subject to securing a site. This is after much pressure and much waste of valuable educational time when the Lucan children in the existing vocational school have been striving under undue hardship because of the inadequate facilities in that school. Now that the Department have made up their minds I would ask that they do everything possible to facilitate County Dublin VEC in building as soon as possible a new vocational school in Lucan.

The Department have indicated that they are prepared to allow separate development in Swords, where a vocational school has existed for a long time. This school has a proud record of securing good employment for most of its pupils. For some years past there has also been an excellent Christian Brothers school in the area. If the Department are allowing separate development in Swords, the obvious separate development is the building of a convent school since there is both a vocational school and a Christian Brothers school in the area.

I put down a question to the Minister on this subject last week and, in answer to a supplementary question, he said he would be prepared to consider a grant towards the building costs of a convent school. I should like to press the Minister not only to consider but to consider favourably a grant towards the construction of a convent school in Swords. I would also press him to allow free transport in the meantime to the 100 children approximately who travel out of Swords to attend convent schools in the city of Dublin, in Rush, in Skerries or in Balbriggan.

I know the free travel scheme is so designed that, if there is a post-primary educational facility in an area, the Department will not consider the payment of a grant towards free travel. While there is in the area the vocational school about which I spoke, there is also a firm body of opinion on the part of many parents that they would like to have their daughters educated in a convent school and not in a vocational school. I will not give my own views on that one way or the other. I respect the views of the parents who want to do the best they can, as they see it, for their daughters. Until the Department give a grant for the construction of a post-primary school in Swords, they should seriously consider the provision of free transport for the young girls who have to leave the town to attend school elsewhere because there is no convent school there at the moment.

I now come to the post-primary facilities in Skerries. There is a De la Salle school in the area, a Holy Faith Convent and a small vocational school. The vocational school is small in numbers but very efficient and very active. It is small because it has been living under the threat of annihilation and extinction by the Department. In reply to a question I put down to the Minister last week, I was informed that he is prepared to allow only a single post-primary school to be developed in this area. He envisages the amalgamation of the De la Salle school, the Holy Faith Convent and the vocational school.

In reply to supplementary questions the Minister refused to inform me and the House of exactly what he had in mind with regard to the management structure of that school. A single post-primary school in an area incorporating the two religious orders and the vocational school is a community school to me. Is the management structure of this community school in Skerries to be the same as the structure in Tallaght or Blanchardstown? In reply to my supplementary the Minister insinuated that it would not be the same. He did not say that out straight but that was the insinuation.

When the Minister is replying to the debate on this estimate I would ask him to clarify the situation for the people in Skerries, for the parents of the children attending these three schools, and the parents of children who will be attending one of these schools in the future, because this is a rapidly developing area. He said last week that it was now envisaged that work on the construction of this school would start in 1975. We are nearly at the end of 1973 and, if it is to start in 1975, is it not about time the Minister appointed a board of management and a principal so that work on the facilities which are necessary and on negotiations with architects could go ahead?

What is the point in building a school and then appointing a board of management and a principal and saying to them: "Here you have a structure. It may not be adequate but do what you can." Would it not be better if the Minister appointed a board of management and let the board of management appoint the principal and let them decide on what facilities are necessary, what classrooms are necessary, whether there will be metalwork or woodwork and how much of each, what chemistry labs are necessary, what community facilities are necessary, what library facilities are necessary? All of these major policy decisions have to be made at this stage. They are even late at this stage.

No longer can the people of Skerries wait while the Minister goes thither and fro trying to make up his mind on what sort of management structure he will put in, in Skerries. The people of Skerries deserve better than they are getting from the Department of Education. I hope the Minister will clarify his intentions and announce immediately afterwards his management structure for the Skerries school. In any management structure designed or announced, representation must be given to the existing institutions in the area and to the parents of pupils attending the schools. In this day and age when parents are so aware of the education of their children, they have a democratic right to be involved in any decision which affects the education of their children. I should like the Minister to clarify the situation because no longer can it be left on the long finger.

A number of years ago a convent school was established in Malahide. It was decided by the Department to allow education in Malahide to develop in the form of a community school only. I was honoured to be appointed by the Vocational Education Committee in County Dublin as one of their two representatives on the board of management of that community school. What has happened since this board was set up in the spring of this year? We had a number of meetings. At the inaugural meeting we had representatives from the Department of Education who promised us the sun, moon and the stars. All we had to do was blink and we would have a brand new community school outside the door. I was afraid to go out in case my car had been in the way of some of the trucks bringing in the building materials. Alas and alack, therein lies a tale.

Since that meeting, and despite the fact that the board of management went on a deputation to the Department, nothing has happened. We have been instructed by the Department to open a community school at Malahide but how can the Department expect the board of management to comply with that instruction when they fail to co-operate with the board. When we made attempts during the month of July to get plans from the Department we were told that official "X" was on holidays and official "Y" knew nothing about the matter and when we contacted the Department in August we were told that official "Y" was on holidays and official "X" knew nothing in regard to the matter. That attitude is not good enough in relation to a rapidly expanding area such as Malahide. County Dublin has unique problems which need unique action on the part of the Department but we are not getting any co-operation from them. It is not possible for us to open a community school at Malahide in the time specified by the Department unless we receive from them the maximum amount of co-operation. My plea to the Minister at this stage is to ensure that his officials move rapidly in relation to this matter.

Adjacent to Malahide is the Portmarnock area. This is an area which has unique problems in relation to primary education but which has not the immediate problems of post-primary education. However, now is the time for the Department to make moves towards the acquisition of a site in Portmarnock for the erection of a post-primary school. There is no point in going out there in five years time to look for a site because by then every piece of available land adjacent to population areas will have been purchased. The same goes for any area in County Dublin in which the Department have not acquired land for post-primary education facilities. I ask them to purchase the necessary land now. They are aware that the price of land in these areas is doubling every 12 months. They must use foresight in this matter. If they are not prepared to buy the land they should authorise some other body to do so. I know from the VEC that on an occasion when approval of this type was sought, it was very slow in being sanctioned by the Department.

We all had, and still have, great hopes in relation to the Blanchardstown community school but it is operating under the severe handicap of lack of co-ordination and attention to detail. There was a large investment in respect of this school but the necessary equipment for the classrooms is not being provided. Compared with the large investment in land, structure, et cetera, the cost of the provision of this equipment would be small but its non-availability reduces the capacity and the possibility of teachers to give of their best to the pupils.

I appeal to the Minister to look into the situation in regard to this school and to effect improvements in so far as possible. It would not require a lot to make of it the ideal community school, if there is such a thing, but the Department have been very short-sighted in their actions to date.

These, then, are the main points I wish to raise. Once again, I would stress some of the very important ones. These are: the facilities necessary in a rapidly expanding County Dublin for primary education in such towns as Swords, Malahide, Portmarnock, Skerries, Balbriggan and the fringe areas; and the unique problem facing the community in St. Margaret's because of the decision that has been reached by the Department of Transport and Power concerning the airport runways. I should like to hear from the Minister what is the thinking in the Department in regard to St. Margarets. The people of the area are entitled to clarification on that point.

So far as school transport is concerned, the children in Donabate parish, where there are no post-primary facilities, must travel out of the parish to school and, consequently, they should be entitled to free transport. The same applies in respect of the children of Swords who, because of the lack of a convent there, must go elsewhere. Other points I wish to stress concern the post-primary facilities in North County Dublin, separate or community; the co-operation of the Department on community schools, and in relation to separate developments, whether they be convent schools, Christian Brothers schools or vocational schools.

I will conclude as I began by mentioning that, when the Department were releasing the statement regarding educational facilities more notice should have been given to the interested bodies. A circular was received on a date that allowed us between five and ten days in which to consider the far-reaching issues involved. In that time we had to make our views known and forward them to a meeting that was being held under the auspices of the Minister. This is not how education should develop. There should not be revolution but education should evolve. It will not evolve if the Minister is to be as short-sighted in the future as he has been in the past, in particular, regarding the amount of time which he is prepared to give to interested bodies to discuss such far-reaching documents as the one circulated recently.

At the outset I wish to correct a statement made by Deputy R. P. Burke. I, too, am a member of a vocational education committee and I can tell the House that the document to which the Deputy referred was circulated on July 27 and not on September 26 as alleged by the Deputy.

I should like to congratulate the Minister for Education on his appointment to that important post. I am confident he will carry out his duties with great success. His early schooling in North Tipperary, I am sure, will contribute to that success. He has accomplished many wonderful things in his first six months of office, among them the reopening of Dunquin school. To many that may have seemed a minor detail but to me it is an accomplishment which confirms one of the foremost aims of the Government, a genuine policy in regard to the language.

Listening to Deputies opposite since the reopening of the Dunquin school, one was reminded of the posing of Fianna Fáil as the watchdog of the national language. Since I was at school I have been listening to the one side of the dual purpose cow— Fianna Fáil's efforts to take the cream of the creameries' voters on the issue of the revival of Irish. After 30 years we can see the result of that homage to the dual purpose cow.

What is the result?

From the Minister's comprehensive introductory speech it is apparent he is concerned with the educational needs of the country. One reads some of the admirable aims in relation to equal opportunities for all and greater provisions for disadvantaged children. One can thereby see a mind which is aware of the needs of our children. In the National Coalition document on education one aim was put very clearly. It is that in education there should be genuine consultation with parents and pupils. This should be one of the Minister's guidelines.

I note that the Minister has recommended regionalisation in education. I, for one, am wary of regionalisation in any aspect of Irish life because I have lived through regionalisation in the field of health, the establishment of the health boards, and I realise the lack of consultation there between the Department, the regional boards and the local talkshops—the advisory committees. That has made me very wary of regionalisation in any other field, particularly education.

I should like now to come to some of the problems we inherited from the previous Government in my constituency. We had one in Borrisokane, where parents, pupils and the vocational education committee were at loggerheads for two years with the Department. Both parents and pupils were fooled by promises and more promises. Thanks to Mr. Burke, we have the problem resolved.

The Standing Orders of the House ordain that the Minister be referred to as the Minister for Education.

As another Tipprary man, perhaps I am entitled to be disrespectful. I am hoping that Mr. Burke——

I am hoping that the Minister will ensure that the Borrisoleigh Convent will continue to give the service it has given for so many years. In the primary school in Borrisoleigh there are many urgent needs to be met. The conditions are primitive in the national school there. There are plans for a new school and I hope this will commence shortly. The toilets in the existing school are so primitive that I doubt if an agricultural inspector would allow cattle to be let in there.

In regard to the vocational education needs in North Tipperary, I should like to pay a brief tribute to the CEO and the teaching staffs. In the past five years there has been an explosion in the school population in the area, particularly in Roscrea. Thurles and Templemore, where more "prefabs", what I might call chicken coops, are urgently needed. These chicken coops are only temporary measures: in the near future the Minister and the Department must have second thoughts in regard to such temporary measures which are not the answer to the expanding school population. When one reads the McCarthy Report in relation to North Tipperary one appreciates that the time has now come when the Department must get down to long-term planning for new permanent buildings rather than to continue to provide chicken coop expansion.

A lot has been said on both sides of the House for and against community schools. In my town, through bad planning in the past three years, £750,000 has been spent on new buildings which are scattered throughout Nenagh and in no way can I regard that type of community school as being a good plan. To have a proper community school one must ensure that all aspects of education are catered for in one campus and this is not the case in Nenagh. The new Christian Brothers' school in Nenagh is one mile from the vocational school. There is overcrowding in both. More accommodation is needed in the CBS. I thought the idea was to have a community school in Nenagh and I would ask the Minister urgently to have a look at the situation there.

Because of dilly-dallying in regard to Thurles we have a situation in which we have not got a school at all. Both the vocational school and the Christian Brothers' School are badly overcrowded. I appeal to the Minister to make up his mind about Thurles because the overcrowded conditions there are bad for the teachers and detrimental to the pupils, tomorrow's citizens.

Another aspect of the Minister's speech which I regard as extremely important is his proposal to have a re-think on the question of examinations. Having suffered myself at examination times, I believe there must be some substitute for the terror of three or four days at the intermediate and leaving certificate examinations following 12 months of intensive study. The students possibly blow up on the day of the examination.

They were not all that soft in Tipperary.

There must be some way to improve the situation. With regard to the junior community games, which have proved such an outstanding success this year, it is only fair that tribute should be paid to the man who was responsible for the organising of these games, Mr. Joe Connolly. The games of 1973 proved that all his work and effort were well worth while. I should also like to compliment the counties who participated in the games and interested the young children in such worthwhile pastimes. Competitive games are a tremendous development and contribute to the making of a good character.

A lot has been said, and can be said, about school transport but I do not envy the job of the Parliamentary Secretary in trying to deal with a map on which a black pencil was used four or five years ago to divide the country in catchment areas. We are dealing with children, and very personal problems, and for this reason there should be more flexibility. I am aware that this might raise complications but I have witnessed cases in my constituency where the child did not count and the only matter taken into consideration was the dividing line between the catchment areas.

I appeal to the Minister to have another look at the catchment areas to see if there are places where this flexibility could be utilised to improve the lot of the school children. I would like to compliment the Minister on giving university recognition and status to Limerick and I can assure him that the people of this western region who fought a hard battle with the former Government are grateful for this recognition.

With regard to the means test for university scholarships and grants I believe that the middle class are the section of the community hardest hit by this due to inflation. An upward adjustment is needed urgently if these people are to be assisted by the Department to ensure that their children receive an education of equal merit to people in other sections of society. Universities should contribute more towards society. A postal degree course for at least one college and extra mural courses are matters which the Minister should consider because we have people in our society who would avail of such courses. I also welcome the Minister's promise of a degree course for all teachers but I believe that a lot will depend on the standard of the training colleges.

Sílim gurab é an tAire Oideachais an tAire is tábhachtaí sa Rialtas. Tá go leor daoine nach n-aontaíonn leis sin, ach sa saol atá inniu ann go mór mhór tá obair anthábhachtach ar fad le déanamh ag an Aire Oideachais, agus teastaíonn gach cabhair uaidh chun an obair sin a chur i gcrích.

Ó tharla gur labhair mé faoin Aire úr ba mhaith liom comhgáirdeachas a dhéanamh leis an Aire a d'fhág oifig, an Teachta Faulkner. Sílim gur cóir dom a rá le fírinne nach raibh aon Aire riamh sa Stáit seo a rinne oiread ar son oideachais agus a rinne an Teachta Faulkner. B'fhéidir nach fear é a théann síos go breá nuair a théann sé os comhair na teilifíse. Ach mar dhuine a raibh dúthracht agus meoin oibre ann, sílim nach raibh a shárú le fáil mar Aire Oideachais. Tá a chrutú sin le fáil sna h-éachtaí a rinne sé nuair a bhí sé ina Aire.

Go deimhin, ní h-eol domsa aon rud atá ráite ag an Aire úr nach raibh idir lámha agus nach raibh tús curtha leis ag an Teachta Faulkner nuair a bhí sé ina Aire—mar shompla, an clár úr, rud an-shuimiúil ar fad. Ghlac gach múinteoir sa tír leis. Laghdaigh sé líon na ranganna anseo i mBaile Átha Cliath, rud a bhfuil go leor ráite faoi ag an Aire úr. Ins na bunscoileanna chuir deontaisí ar fáil chun gléasanna a cheannach chun cuidiú lena múinteoirí an clár úr a chur i bhfeidhm ins na scoileanna. Ní gá do mhúinteoir bunscoile a lámh a chur ina phóca agus rudaí a cheannach. Fadó, pé rud a bhí ag teastáil sa scoil, b'éigin dó é a cheannach as a phóca féin. Rinne an Teachta Faulkner rud éigin ar son na bpáistí malintinne.

Tá an clár ansin le feicáil os comhair an tsaol. Tógadh scoileanna ar fud na tíre, scoileanna a raibh lámh aige ina gcur ar bun. Rinne sé rud éigin dearfa, rud nár rinneadh go dtí sin. Níl á dhéanamh ag an Aire úr ach leanúint leis an obair a chuir an Teachta Faulkner ar bhun. Níl aon rud úr i ráiteas seo an Aire. Ní rud úr ar bith an clár i gcomhair na gcoláistí tréanála. Tá na múinteoirí ag iarraidh an rud sin a chur i bhfeidhm le fada agus thug an tAire a d'fhág oifig geallúint dóibh go gcuirfedh sé an cúrsa trí mbliain ar bun maidir leis na coláistí oiliúna. Mar adúirt mé, ní fheicim rud úr ar bith i ráiteas an Aire maidir leis na rudaí sin. Ach, ar ndóigh, is maith le lucht Fhine Gael ligint ortha go bhfuil rud a éigin déanta aige.

I have dealt with some of the matters which the previous Minister did when in office. I should like to congratulate the former Minister on the wonderful job he did in this Department. Even though he does not get credit for it, no Minister has done as much for education as Deputy Faulkner. Indeed, in this document which has been presented to us by the present Minister I do not see anything new. Every single item mentioned was initiated and many of the things the present Minister has mentioned were already under way during Deputy Faulkner's term of office. I refer in particular to the new curriculum which was initiated by Deputy Faulkner and his predecessor, Deputy Lenihan.

I appreciate the speaker does not intend any disrespect, but Members should be referred to as Deputy or Minister as appropriate.

The new curriculum gives a new dimension to the work of the teachers and Deputy Faulkner must be given credit for introducing it. Because of the curriculum pupils will have an opportunity of studying subjects that previously were not on the programme. I should like to refer to the teaching of art; anyone who visits a primary school will see the work of the children and will be aware of the pleasure they get in doing this work. All this will have the effect of making us a better people in the future.

Another development of the new curriculum is the teaching of music, with special emphasis on native music. This is already beginning to show in the volume of Irish music which we hear on radio and television, although probably we do not hear enough of it. We can trace this to the fact that greater scope is given to teachers because of the new curriculum and this has helped to improve the atmosphere between the teachers and the pupils. The students have an opportunity to express themselves freely and no longer are they entirely subject to the teacher in all things.

I should like to refer to an innovation introduced by Deputy Faulkner, namely, the general purposes room in schools. I regret it is not possible to have this room except where there is a three-teacher school. The Minister in his speech stated that no further one- or two-teacher schools will be built, either in replacement of existing schools or as new schools, the State grants will not be available for extensive reconstruction or improvement of such small schools. As most of the rural schools are two-teacher schools, this means the general purposes room available in larger schools cannot be provided for them. One could say there is discrimination against the rural community in this matter. There are many two-teacher schools that will not be amalgamated in our time—at least I cannot see it happening. It is my opinion that it would be a shame if they were amalgamated. Many of our best educated people were taught in this kind of school.

The Minister's decision not to replace or build any two-teacher schools is a harsh one. While amalgamation is desirable and while it is much easier to work in a larger school, many areas would die completely if they lost their schools. The school is the hub of the village or parish and the Minister should not make the flat statement that all two-teacher schools should be closed or that necessary improvements or facilities will not be carried out to them. Many people throughout the country are very annoyed about the Minister's decision in this matter.

With regard to subjects such as physical training, the rural schools are neglected. In the larger schools it is possible for teachers to do special training and subsequently to devote their time as PT instructors in their own schools or in a number of schools. Deputy Ryan mentioned the importance of games. We all agree with that, especially today when people have so much free time. I would ask the Minister to consider the position in the rural parishes. If a PT instructor were employed to serve one or two parishes it would make up in some way for the manner in which the rural areas are neglected in this respect.

Earlier this year I asked the Minister, in a parliamentary question, about the possibility of providing swimming pools. This may seem a rather ambitious programme to even contemplate—indeed the Minister told me that—but I maintain that, if the matter is tackled in a rational way and if we could have some type of programme prepared in conjunction with the Department of Local Government and possibly Bord Fáilte in some instances, moneys could be provided so that swimming pools might be made available. I live beside the sea and we are ashamed during the summer to see that our own children do not even know how to go into the water. We see youngsters coming from England, families of emigrants. They come from Manchester, from Birmingham, from London. They teach our children to swim. They have the PT facilities and they are taught to swim in school in England. We here have no training whatever for our youngsters. Perhaps I am going too far in mentioning swimming pools because there are areas where they would not be necessary. However, children should be taught the basics of swimming. I think it is very important.

The same applies to athletics and coaching of various kinds. People today have a great deal more free time on their hands. We find that the youngsters of 15 and 16 years of age who, a number of years ago, would find their way to the football or hurling field are inclined to be lazy and have not the same interest in sport. If we had a programme such as I mentioned, with a PT instructor in the different parishes where all forms of athletics would be introduced, we would be doing a very good job.

On the question of school building there seems to be no tie-up whatever between the Office of Public Works, the local manager and the school inspector. From the time something is initiated until we see the final result it can take years. I know a school where small repairs were supposed to be carried out, where the school yard was supposed to be improved.

The Office of Public Works engineer appears and goes off again. I do not know what is wrong but it is annoying and frustrating for everybody to find that a simple thing, which would cost only a few hundred pounds, can take so long to get finished.

I would ask the Minister to look at the position in Belmullet where there is a school in a terrible state of repair, where there is overcrowding, where there is a yard in which the children cannot even walk, with pools of water and stones sticking out. If we brought a television crew down to examine such a situation and if English television showed the conditions in which children and teachers have to labour it would show us up in a very bad light. I understand that a scheme of work is prepared for this school. I would ask the Minister to make an effort to have the work carried out early in the new year. While the work is going on the children will have to be removed to a hall or somewhere else in the area. If work is commenced in early January —I understand the job is likely to take about eight or nine months—it will mean that there will be the Easter and Summer holidays coming along and the children will be out of schools for the shortest possible time.

A matter which will be of great concern for future Ministers and for the present Minister is school transport. Today more and more cars are being used. The Department rule now is that a child under ten years of age living two miles from a school may avail of transport. A child over a certain age has to be three miles from a school. A new look will have to be taken at this because, with the car, people are not walking the distances they used to walk. Perhaps it is not good for themselves or not good for children either, but anybody teaching at present will agree that the children who are being transported to school— this is an argument for amalgamation, if you like—are the best attenders. I am sure the Minister will have greater headaches with this as the years go by.

With regard to school transport for post-primary children, there is a system of catchment areas for different schools. I suppose that at the time the scheme was introduced it was only right that the Department should have some yardstick in order to ensure that the transport services would be used to the best advantage for everybody, but very often the Department stick too rigidly to rules and regulations. If a family live at the edge of a catchment area they should have the right to decide whether the children should attend school A or school B. Their rights are being interfered with when the Department say: "You must go to this school if you want to avail of free transport."

There is a certain rueful amusement in the situations that arise. I saw a situation in which a bus carried children to a certain school and every evening the driver dropped the children at the end of the particular catchment area and drove on and the children had to walk or cycle another two miles to reach their own homes despite the fact that the school bus continued on past their own homes. It is very difficult to explain this situation satisfactorily. Reams of paper have gone into the Department on the matter but the situation continues. In matters of this kind there should be flexibility. Cases should be examined on their merits and reasonable concessions given.

Who is responsible for the children who board the school bus? Who is supposed to discipline them? Who is supposed to see that they behave themselves? This is something that will have to be looked into and action will have to be taken to ensure that these children conduct themselves properly on these buses. Could not a senior pupil or two be given authority to make the pupils conduct themselves on the bus? From what I hear the problem is becoming a rather serious one and some solution will have to be found.

I hate to be moaning all the time but the situation in Mayo so far as vocational education is concerned is a desperate one. The vocational school in my parish is in a shocking state. The teachers are talking about taking strike action and they are being encouraged by the parents. There are approximately 160 pupils on the rolls. There are two toilets for these 160 pupils and their teachers. There is no excuse for not having proper facilities. A regional water scheme passes right by the school. When representations are made we are told that a new school or a community school will be built. A vocational school was to have been built on a particular site but that has now been changed and the Department is talking in terms of a community school. A new school will have to be built for the vocational pupils and their teachers. There is some trouble about getting the present owner of the secondary school in Achill Sound to agree to handing over his school and, because of that, I think the new vocational school should be built immediately at Achill Sound. A site has been bought and everything is ready. It would not be a waste of money because the new vocational school could serve as a community school. The site is practically on the grounds of the secondary school and I cannot see any problem arising.

Unrest in matters like education is not a good thing. It is not good for the pupils and it is not good for the morale of the area to have people forced into taking a certain kind of action. I would ask the Minister to have a serious look at the situation and to take some positive steps to improve the position.

We always have a problem in Mayo in getting sanction for teachers. Each year the committee prepares a list for the various schools in the area but the Department never sanctions the number required. This year we were looking for a number of metalwork teachers. There were three young men from the county who had trained as metalwork teachers but we were told by the Department that they could not give us metalwork teachers in Mayo. The three young men got appointments elsewhere but they would have been very happy to have had the opportunity of working in their own country. It is the same story every year. There is talk of grandiose schemes and millions for this, that and the other. Then one gets down to basics and examines the position in certain areas and one finds the conditions under which people have to work and live and the way they are neglected. It is far more important to get involved in basics rather than talk of grandiose schemes and millions of pounds.

We do not have the facilities we should have for our boys and girls in the vocational schools and they are not able to do the extra subjects; that means they cannot avail of the AnCO training scheme. Indeed the AnCO training scheme hardly operates at all as far as children in the West of Ireland are concerned. Children in the larger towns have the first opportunity. If a teacher goes to the AnCO training centre and tries to have a boy taken in for training the answer he gets is that if somebody sponsors the boy he will for training the answer he gets is that if somebody sponsors the boy he will be taken in. In other words, if he is already serving an apprenticeship with a contractor or with somebody, say, in the radio business or in any of the other activities for which AnCO has training schemes, he will be admitted. I have had experience of this on several occasions. Where can a boy in the West of Ireland get an apprenticeship in anything, even carpentry or woodwork? I understand that the trade unions fix a ratio for apprenticeship. If there are four or five carpenters in a workshop, only one apprentice is allowed. I may not be entirely correct in that, but I think it is four to one. Circulars may be sent around to us as Deputies. Things are presented to us in a lovely fashion but when one tries to have the various schemes which one hears about implemented for the benefit of one's own area, it is just not on.

Another matter which is of great concern both to vocational committees and the CEO in counties is the manner in which the Department of Education hold back payments of money due to the committee. I know a case in which a CEO in a county was told by the bank manager that if certain sums were not forthcoming from the Department he would not honour the teachers' cheques. There may be a shortage of staff in the Department or there may be other reasons for that, but this kind of thing should not happen.

There are many aspects of life, especially for youngsters, which we have to look at closely. One problem which is causing serious concern is that of drink among teenagers. Many schemes were initiated by the Department of Education—for instance, the savings scheme. Things like this are a great help to children. It is time we had some kind of intensive programme in schools, under which people would come in and talk to children about drink and its dangers, and try to do something positive about this scourge. I do not know where youngsters get the money for drink, but I would ask the Minister to initiate a series of lectures and films which would be available to primary, vocational, and secondary schools in order to impress upon youngsters how serious this matter can be for them.

I do not intend to deal with the matter of drugs, because there are other people who are more competent than I to do so. However, there are other simple matters. Take the question of litter. If you go around any town near shops or schools it is terrible to see the mess children leave. Again the Department of Education, by having films made available to be shown in schools, should do something to solve this problem. The question of pollution is tied up with this. It should not be too hard to have some programme introduced which would help to put an end to this.

Tá imní orm go bhfuil faillí á dhéanamh maidir le ceist na Gaeilge. Tá daoine ann a deireann nach raibh aon mhaith san éigeantacht maidir leis an Ghaeilge. Ní aontaím leo chor ar bith. Cé nach bhfuil an Ghaeilge ró láidir agus ba cheart dí a bheith, san am chéadhna tá i bfhad níos mó eolas ar Ghaeilge ná mar a táimíd sásta a rá, ach an t-aon áit amháin go bhfuil laige sa Ghaeilge sílím gurb í i labhairt na Gaeilge. Níl fonn ar dhaoine an Ghaeilge a labhairt, agus óthárla nach bhfuil aon éigeantacht ag baint le Gaeilge anois le haghaidh scrúdaidhte tá faillí á dhéanamh ann. Sé an port atá acu anois: "Bhuel, ní gá Gaeilge bheith againn le h-aghaidh na h-ardteistiméireachta nó le h-aghaidh scrúdaithe" agus tá an port céanna ag na tuistí. Ní raibh an ceart ag an Aire i dtaobh na h-éigeantachta. Cuireann sé iontas orm féin gur ghlac na h-údaráis uilig atá ag plé le ceist na Gaeilge leis an rud atá déanta ag an Aire ach ar ball beidh a fhios againn cé aige a bhí an ceart.

Is trua go bhfuil faillí á déanamh sa Ghaeilge. Má chaillimid an teanga táimid ag cailliúint i bhfad níos mó ná mar a thuigeann cuid mhór daoine. Táan teanga agus an creideamj ceangan teanga agus an creideamh ceangailte le chéile agus tá cultúr ár ndaoine ceangailte léi. Ní ceart do dhaoine bheith ag scigmhagadh i dtaobh na Gaeilge nó ag caitheamh masladh leis an dteanga. Ní rud politiciúil é. Tá sé i bhfad níos mó, i bhfad níos airde ná sin.

Tá go leor cainte seinnte faoi scoil Dhún Chaoin. Más ceist scoile a bhí ann ní raibh ceart ar bith ag an Aire an scoil a oscailt. Más ceist theanga a bhí ann glacaimis leis ar chuma ar bith go raibh an ceart aige ach níl a fhios agam cé acu ceist theanga nó ceist scoile ceist Dhún Chaoin.

Tá súil agam nach ndéanfaidh an tAire faillí i gceist na teanga agus an áit is mó a bhfuil imní orm i dtaobh ceist na teanga baineann sé leis na daoine a théann isteach sna coláistí traenála agus na coláistí ullmhúcháin i láthair na h-uaire. Bímis cinnte de rud amháin. Bhí Gaeilge ag gach duine a chuaigh isteach sna coláistí traenála nó a chaith 4 bliana sa choláiste ullmhúcháin. B'éigin dóibh Gaeilge bheith acu i ndeireadh an tréimhse ach tá an-fhaitíos orm anois go bhfuil go leor daoine atá dul isteach ins na coláistí ullmhucháin agus atá a teacht amach ina múinteoirí nach bhfuil an Ghaeilge chomh láidir nó chomh líofa acu agus ba chóir.

Ba cheart don Aire a bheith cinnte go mbeadh caighdeán sáthach ard ag gach duine a thiocfadh amach as na coláistí traenála, caighdeán i leith na teanga. Tá a fhios agam go bhfuil scéim ann le daoine a chur go dtí na Gaeltachtaí chun tréimhse a chaitheamh ansin le cuidiú leo feabhas a chur ar labhairt na Gaeilge. Tá a fhios agam go bhfuil na scéimeanna sin ann agus tá siad ar fheabhas. Ach an leor an méid sin? Ba chóir, sílim, ins na coláistí traenála cúrsa fé leith a chur ar siúl do dhaoine atá lag i gcaoi go mbeimid cinnte go mbeidh na daoine a bheidh ag múineadh Gaeilge ins na scoileanna go mbeidh sí ar a dtoil acu. Mura mbí i gceann leath scór nó scór bliain ní bheidh aon Ghaeilge fágtha.

There are just one or two points to which I would like to refer with regard to education at the higher level. We have a situation where our taxpayers' money is spent to educate people for the professions. Every year we have a number of doctors, engineers and professional people of all kinds who get university education at the expense of the taxpayer. When they have received their education they emigrate and are of no benefit to the state. This is not their own fault. Often there are not opportunities for them.

Our natural resources have not been developed to the full. People could have training and be brought back to use that training in Ireland in the development of our natural resources. Let us consider fishing. I believe we are years behind in the way we approach some things. I do not want you, Sir, to think that I am digressing from the subject we are discussing at the moment. What I am about to say is tied up with education. I believe that we should have scholarships for young people to send them to Denmark, Norway and other European countries where they would learn a good deal about the basic skills in connection with fish processing and other matters relating to the industry. If a fishing co-operative want to employ a man at the moment they can get somebody who can do the accounts but he may have no practical experience whatever and may know nothing about how to handle fish or how to have it processed. He knows nothing about cold storage or other matters concerned with fishing. If we had scholarships for young people they could go to the Continent and get the necessary training. They could come back and use their skills to develop natural resources. This could help to build up our economy.

The Department of Education, in conjunction with Bord Iascaigh Mhara and the Fisheries Branch, might take a look at these matters. They could help the economy of the country. Employment could be given in many areas along the coast where at present it is hard to start an industry. Many fishing co-operatives at the present time could be processing their own fish rather than have the position which obtains in the West of Ireland where it is packed in boxes, despatched and auctioned in Dublin. Proper training for young people living along the coast should be made available by the Department of Education. This would do the industry a lot of good.

Sílim gur beag eile atá le rá agam. Traoslaíom leis an Aire arís. Tá obair an-thábhachtach le déanamh aige agus ní mór dó gach cuidiú d'fháil. Sílim go mbeidh sinne anseo sásta cabhrú leis i ngach slí.

I should like to congratulate the Minister on his appointment. He impressed me as one who has a proper grasp of the action necessary if we are to improve our education. I also congratulate the Parliamentary Secretary on his appointment. He is responsible for school transport I wish him luck in this very difficult job. The attitudes of parents, children and teachers towards primary education is very important and more important than most people imagine. People seem to think that it is just a matter of sending pupils to school and the teacher will teach them by whatever method he likes and everything will work out all right.

I also wish to congratulate everyone concerned with the formulation of the new curriculum. I understand it was introduced by the previous Minister and most things in it are very good. In most schools there is not enough time for the implementation of this curriculum in a proper manner. First things must come first. I have discussed this with many people who have years of teaching experience and they agree that the first thing children should learn is the three Rs. It is said that children learn to spell by observing but in my opinion that is rubbish. Teachers must teach the basics of education to the pupils. Pupils must know tables, spellings and do compositions. These are necessary to a proper education. I doubt if there is time for the teaching of these and other subjects in the school day, school week or school term.

I would ask the Minister to make sure that when a child leaves a primary school he will be able to continue his education. If he has not a grasp of reading, writing and arithmetic he will not be capable of taking a secondary education. This is happening at the present time. Children leaving national schools to continue in the secondary schools find themselves unable to grasp the more advanced education. While I agree that everything in the new curriculum is good and if possible should be taught, I would ask the Minister to ensure that the child leaving the national school has the rudiments of education so that he can continue his education. That is the important thing about national school education.

As I said in my opening remarks, the attitude to the national school seems to be that the child fears going to school and fears the teachers. There must be co-operation and a feeling of trust between parents and teachers if our education is to mean anything. That situation has developed over the years in rural national schools—I have not experience of any other schools but rural national schools.

I was very surprised to hear Deputy Power saying in this House last week that there was a place for the cane in the primary schools. While I agree that some form of correction may be necessary, I would not like to see a licence given to anyone in any walk of life to beat someone under their control. At present the teachers have a licence to beat children, in my opinion. Either they are given a licence or corporal punishment is done away with completely. I would have no objection to a child getting a stroke on the hand in punishment for wrong doing. Therefore, the sooner the Minister does away with the cane in the school the better for the mutual trust which should exist between the parent, the teacher and the child. Pupils can be stubborn. Teachers are capable of teaching, leading and organising pupils to do work and instill into them the desire to do it in response to leadership. If they are not, they are not fit to be teachers.

There should be career guidance in primary and national schools. Teachers should be available to guide the pupil along the lines his talents lie. If he has the makings of a brilliant student in university I believe he will show some of that brilliance in his primary education.

Would the Deputy sort the pupils at primary stage?

I would not sort them but they could be guided along the proper lines. If a child who stays in primary school until he is 13 or 14 years of age does not get career guidance at that time, he will have lost a lot.

I know a good deal about two-teacher schools. There is such a school close to where I live and fine education has been given down the years in that school. We should be very careful about saying that all two-teacher schools should be closed or that we should spend no money on them. The school of which I speak will have to be closed in the very near future if money is not spent on it. I know arrangements have been made to spend money on it. That area is four miles from the nearest centre and if there is to be amalgamation it may be possibly five miles away from the nearest centre, because I believe we cannot amalgamate where certain people are not in a position to get promotion or something like that.

If that is to be the position and if amalgamation involves five or six miles travelling I want to make the case, which I have not heard previously made, for the child of four who should begin going to school. In modern times if a child is to reach a proper standard of education at a proper rate he will have to begin school at four or four and a half. In most cases—I do not say in all—of amalgamation of schools a child of four or four and a half would probably have to start at eight in the morning to get a bus to go six miles, perhaps in a roundabout way, arriving at nine. That child would leave school at 2 o'clock while its companions on the bus in a class or two higher would not leave until 3 o'clock. The child would have to wait. In most country schools there is no school meals provision. The child would arrive home about 4.30 or 5 p.m. Would any Deputy like those conditions for his own child of four and a half years of age? We should be very sure of what we are doing if we decide that it is correct to close a two-teacher school.

These matters should all be taken into account, and when you take into account the child of four I think these small schools must be kept open. The child may be in a disadvantageous position compared with the child living much nearer to the amalgamated school. The small schools have produced some wonderful pupils, whether they were one- or two-teacher schools. I grant a case can be made to close all these schools but a case can also be made for keeping most of them open.

I am sorry to have to interrupt the Deputy. The further consideration of this Estimate must be postponed in order to take the division which has been challenged on Vote 34, Lands.

Further consideration of Vote postponed.

Top
Share