Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 4 Jul 1974

Vol. 274 No. 3

Shannon Free Airport Development Company, Limited (Amendment) Bill, 1974: Second Stage.

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

The purpose of the Bill is to provide for the further financing of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company, Limited by extending the limits contained in the current legislation. The Bill provides for:

(1) An increase from £17 million to £25 million in the aggregate of the amounts which the Minister for Finance may subscribe in taking up shares of the company;

(2) An increase from £10 million to £17 million in the aggregate amount of grants, voted annually, which may be made to the company, and

(3) An increase from £10 million to £17 million in the existing statutory limits on repayable advances by the Minister for Finance for the provision of houses and community services.

The Shannon Free Airport Development Company, Limited, was set up in 1959 to promote the increased use of Shannon Airport for passenger and freight traffic and for tourist, commercial and industrial purposes in order to offset the prospect of the diminishing importance of Shannon as a transit airport because of the transition to longer range aircraft. Successful industrial development at Shannon in the succeeding years and the promotion of substantial tourist traffic through Shannon resulted in the company's original aim of maintaining the airport being modified to that of using the airport as a major asset in regional economic development. In April, 1968, the industrial development functions of the company were extended to include the adjoining Clare, Limerick and North Tipperary region (the Mid-West Region). The company's present aim can be summarised as being the economic development of the entire region for which the continued development of Shannon is an essential feature.

Share capital subscribed to the company is used for capital expenditure on the industrial estate at Shannon, on factory buildings and ancillary works in the mid-west region and a small percentage is used on projects relating to tourism.

Repayable advances are used for capital expenditure on housing and community services at Shannon. The houses are provided by the company to rent or to purchase and developed sites are also made available for persons wishing to build their own houses and for speculative building.

The grant-in-aid moneys are applied towards meeting the company's running expenses and providing financial assistance to industries including grants towards factory buildings, new machinery and the training of workers on the Shannon Industrial Estate. A substantial part of the company's running expenses arises from tourism promotion and this is met by a special grant-in-aid for which the Minister for Transport and Power is accountable but which, nevertheless, comes within the overall limitation in section 3 of this Bill.

The finances provided to the company under existing legislation, SFADCo Ltd. Acts 1959 to 1970, up to 31st March, 1974, were as follows: Share capital £14,604,500; Repayable advances £10,000,000; Grant-in-aid £8,360,150.

The balances available for further issue on 31st March, 1974 under existing statutory provision were: Share capital £2,395,500; Repayable advances Nil; Grant-in-aid £1,639,850. The existing limit of £10 million for repayable advances has been reached and there are no funds available under this heading to meet requirements for the current financial year. The balances available in the case of share capital and grant-in-aid will be sufficient to meet anticipated expenditure under these headings in the current nine-month period to 31st December, 1974, only. It is accordingly necessary to introduce new legislation to raise the existing limits.

The normal practice when submitting proposals to increase the limits under the statutory heads is to relate such increases to the amounts required to cover the company's operations for a reasonable period ahead, so as to afford a further opportunity of reviewing the activities of the company at a relatively early stage. The present proposals have been drawn up on this basis.

It is essential that the company should be provided with the financial resources up to the limits now proposed to enable it to consolidate the progress already made and to provide for further orderly development in the future in the various activities assigned to it by the Oireachtas.

I recommend the Bill for the approval of the House.

The provision for share capital, additional benefits by way of grants and repayable advances come under three headings. The question of repayable advances is a matter of urgency and, according to the Minister, the items in the other headings also demand urgent attention in that the available limits are sufficient only until the end of the current financial year. I do not propose to impede the progress of this measure through the House so that the necessary provisions may be made as quickly as possible.

The Bill comes immediately after the Córas Tráchtála provisions. I think the Minister for Finance, later today, will be making further provision for the industrial credit operation. They are all very much in the same group; tending towards the same purpose and arising out of the same causes. As everybody can understand, the extra money is necessary due to inflationary trends and the more costly budgeting resulting therefrom, and to provide for expansion and increased activity.

Shannon Free Airport was a unique experiment in this country; it was one viewed by many people with a good deal of misgivings at the time. With hindsight one can say it was justified; it was worth trying and I think we must have learned a lot from it. I think I am correct in saying that most of the firms setting up at Shannon were foreign. Many of them brought to this country a type of production hitherto unheard of. We had the pleasure of being conducted on tours over the SFADCo organisation or complex of projects a number of times. It was really revealing to see the variety of goods produced there, from textiles to pianos and various other things far removed from anything that I would say home enterprise or any of our own entrepreneurs would have thought of, particularly in so far as we would certainly lack the know-how and perhaps the necessary capital and marketing organisation to justify their production here.

Some doubts have been cast recently on the percentage of foreign industry and of foreign investment coming in. All of us were interested in Father Sweeney's publication, based on university graduate research, into foreign investment in the country and the extent to which foreign industries are rooted here. I never really had any worries about foreign industries coming here. The worst that can be said about them is that a certain amount of outflow of capital results from foreign investment. That is inevitable but the important thing is that they do generate industrial activity which is bound to rub off on local enterprise. Many of these generate a lot of ancillary industries which would not have come into being were they not here. On the whole, I think we have nothing to worry about regarding the influx of foreign industry or foreign capital into this country. In fact, our industrial development might not be nearly as rapid were it left entirely to our own industrial adventurers, who did an excellent job.

Father Sweeney tends to argue in his publication that the fact that they were coming in here in reasonably large numbers had the effect of our own people sitting back and saying: Well that has been done; the need to expand the others was not so evident; necessity, very often, creates a good deal of activity and tends to seek answers; the necessity not being there, the void is being filled by other people coming in. That was the line of reasoning taken in Father Sweeney's report.

Professor Fogarty had a further publication on the same lines which had, I think, very much the same summing up as regards foreign investment. I think Shannon Free Airport, or SFADCo, as the company has come to be known, is a typical example of the benefit to be derived from foreign investment. On the whole, I think foreign industrialists coming into this country did have the effect of getting our own people—who are devoid of any industrial background or tradition—to appreciate what it was possible to do. Irish workers proved to be adaptable in any job at which they were put and this encouraged many of our people who heretofore might not have believed it was possible for people engaged in farming to be adapted to industrial development.

I never had any doubts about this. One of the wonders of my life has always been that our emigrants—I have seen it in my own county where there is perhaps a greater example than in any other; many of my own relatives, immediate and others—when they left the small farms, emigrated to the United States or Australia and went into the highly industrialised towns hardly ever settled down on land. Few of them even took the free acreage offered to them in the bush in Australia in the old days; they preferred to go right to the heart of the industrialised cities. They did prove they were adaptable and many of them became highly skilled. Fortunately, most of them made good and are of tremendous benefit to the countries concerned. I mention that merely as one of the early examples of how Irish labour could be adapted to the skills required in industrial production.

But skills in industry have tended to become more and more technological as time progressed. In setting up the AnCO training centres, we recognise the necessity for more and better training; more "on the job" training, as is being carried out by AnCO, in order to train people in these skills and enable them play their full part in the new industrial development of our country. The time has long since passed when there is much place in our economy for a non-skilled worker. I am not sure if it is in Professor Fogarty's or in Father Sweeney's monograph that there is development of the point that our educational system is based still too much on the academic rather than on technological type training. It has been said so often here, in other Estimate debates where it can be discussed more appropriately, that there is still over-crowding in professions; the old status symbol seems to be attached, unjustifiably, to academic training and the seeking of professional careers rather than the more profitable— much more open, and where many more opportunities exist—technological world. I think our universities and those in charge of our educational system would be doing an excellent job were they to ensure that the slant was towards the technological rather than the academic in our training and, particularly, on the managerial side.

I do not think many professional people find their way into industry and the number taking a science degree is indicative of the demand there is for that type of employment in industry. They have not always the managerial training which is essential and which should be part of their training if they are to apply their professional training to the life they take up in industrial development.

When we talk about a lot of foreigners coming in here to set up industries we should try to ensure that the executive grade is available here, as far as is possible and that the many openings which must inevitably develop and multiply as time goes on are made known and provided for in the training in our colleges and universities. It is in this way that we will have the necessary executive personnel who must be of a very high standard to take their place in the competitive world of manufacturing. By that means only can we provide the necessary personnel to ensure that we will have the people to take over the jobs being filled by foreign enterprises at present. I do not say that foreign enterprises are unwelcome.

This country lacked an industrial know-how and they did not have the capital necessary to develop as we would like. One of the most important things about foreign companies and they are usually companies which are established in different parts of the world, is that they have the marketing organisation to handle any new projects which they set up. That is a tremendous advantage. An Irish company often has to spend a lot of money on market research although they are getting good assistance from the different agencies established here. Nevertheless the fact remains that there is a tendency to grumble about too many foreigners coming in.

The two publications to which I have referred are based on the possibility of an outflow of capital by way of profits from foreign industry and foreign investment which does eventually affect our own balance of payments. If we are to reduce that to the minimum we must prepare our own personnel to take part in industrial development to the maximum extent possible. Too frequently we hear it said rather glibly about the IDA that they are prepared to give grants to foreigners but are not prepared to give grants to locals. This is completely wrong. In fact, the opposite is the truth. When a new industry is being established it has to be screened to the extent that some assurance is obtained that it will not flare up for a time and, after the value of the grants has been exhausted, it will collapse.

Such industries must have a product which is saleable, be capable of producing it and have the marketing organisation to sell it. Sometimes all these qualities are more readily available when a foreign concern moves in and for that reason they seem to get their grants and incentives easier than a native enterprise. It is probably that which has given rise to the feeling that foreigners are treated better than our own people. We have many notable examples of all-Irish sponsored industries doing well here. They are sufficient in number to prove that we have reached the stage of having broken through the question of doubt that sometimes applies to our ability to deal with large-scale industry. This was one of the features we had to fight against in the past. That has been dispelled and there is no doubt any more about the capability of Irish management and the skill of the personnel to make a success of an industry.

The Minister, with his colleague the Minister for Labour, has a very important task and duty to ensure that skilled personnel are made available for new industries. Apart from all the grants and tax reliefs this is one of the greatest incentives to new industries to set up here. They should get it through to the people, young people in particular, that if they do not develop a skill there is very little place for them in the economy of this or any other country. Whenever new centres of training were opened there was criticism from people who rather cynically asked what were we training these people for; was it for emigration. My answer to that was that even if it came to the worst and they had to emigrate they were leaving the country skilled and able to do a better job.

The more we train the better we fit our young people for life. It would be much better than the scramble there is at present in the professions if young people directed their training towards technological training for which there are many more openings and for which many people are better suited.

The Shannon Free Airport Company is mainly a foreign industrial complex and speaking on this gives one an opportunity to refer to the question of training. Those industries came to this country with good reputations throughout the world and this has encouraged others to set up elsewhere in this country. If they were not native they came with skills which were useful. They gave good example which resulted in the training of others here. Generally they gave a much better industrial atmosphere than was here in the early days when we were struggling to get the industrial arm organised.

The increase in industrial exports of manufactured goods has risen from a very low percentage of our total exports to take its place with agriculture and tourism as one of the most important branches of the economy we have. We can look forward to the time when it will fully absorb all the surplus labour that will be available particularly the school-leaving labour force which is the most in demand by new industry. It should be obvious to the unemployed people of this country now that when a new industry moves into an area where there is a large number on the register of unemployed, the number of people signing on at the local exchange is depleted very little as a result of the new industry moving in. The younger people and the skilled and semi-skilled are most in demand.

We made a lot of noises for a time about the importance of getting unemployed people to train in various skills. I do not think we have made much progress in that direction. I tried to get something going in my time and the present Minister has been talking about it. One of the services we can give our unemployed is an opportunity to train in particular skills. There is a shortage of skills in many areas. I was often quite annoyed to find that we had to import welders from abroad for heavy engineering. We went to the unions here, asked them to provide them and they were not available and we had to issue the necessary permits to Europeans to work here on engineering and construction work for which we did not have sufficient qualified personnel. The question of apprenticeship is tied up with this, the number of people admitted to apprenticeship each year, and it is something in which the trade unions have a very important part to play.

The success of Shannon Free Airport was most encouraging to industrail development in the country generally. I would not expect the Minister to tell us off the cuff now but some time perhaps he would let us have information as to the effect of industrial concentration in an area like the Shannon. The Buchanan Report recommended industrial poles and areas of industrial concentration. Many of us from the West of Ireland were not enthusiastic about that suggestion. We believe we have reached a stage where we should consider the social aspect of industrial development just as much as getting men working, machinery moving and exports passing across the sea. There is the question of a livelihood in the areas and environment in which people live and I always felt that, even though it might not lead to rapid development of industry, industry should be brought to the people rather than people brought to the industry. Buchanan stressed the importance of the self-generation of industry by having a concentration of industry in a particular area, that everything grows much more rapidly and the different industries tend to assist each other like a lot of people living in a shanty town where one assists the other. Some time, the Minister might tell us to what extent the Buchanan theory is borne out by the complex of industries at Shannon. Has there been the effective generating of ancillary industries and other services that might not otherwise have come about or have the industries just existed as separate units? The answer would not change my own conviction that industry should, as far as possible, be brought to the people rather than the people to the industry.

I always thought it was a crime to see houses in the West of Ireland being closed up and the people coming into Dublin, going into the building industry here, getting married, living in flats and creating a housing problem in Dublin when many of the concerns they came to work in could have been brought to the west. Sufficient have been brought to justify what I am saying. I was interested in publicity given recently to a scheme in Kerry where a special effort was being made to create off-farm employment. They were aiming at having small farmers coming to work, even part-time, in local industry. If you have an industry in a rural area you can have a sufficient labour force recruited from the local small farms. What they earn in industry, while cutting turf and doing some tillage at week-ends, makes the farms self-supporting. Wherever this is being carried out the small farms seem to improve simultaneously.

Research was done into that by two professors in two towns in Ireland, Tubbercurry and Scariff. Their report was very interesting and enlightening showing the effect which industry has on a small rural village. Industrial development along those lines is something which I would encourage and in which I would like the Minister to take a deep interest. We have a culture of our own in the west of Ireland. We have a beautiful environment. We do not want to send our people into the cities if we can bring employment within reasonable reach of them. I know that many industries that come here must be in a particular area. Perhaps if we insisted on only the type of development I am talking about we might slow down our industrial development and the expansion of industry generally but there is no reason why both things cannot be done side by side. Let those who insist on being in the large provincial centres and the cities remain there but as far as possible a greater incentive should be towards the underdeveloped areas. The 1945 Underdeveloped Areas Act was orientated towards doing that. After a time it was extended to cover other areas and eventually there was almost as much encouragement given to set up industries on the east coast as there was to set them up on the west coast.

There has always been a drift away from the west. The last two census of population showed that population in the east and in the south had greatly increased but while the position had greatly improved in some of the counties on the western seaboard the best we could say was that the decline was less than it had been. This proves the need for decentralisation of industry, and greater incentives given towards encouraging people to bring industry to the west. The Shannon Free Airport Development Scheme was a gigantic effort in that direction. The purpose was to keep Shannon Airport alive but the time may now have come when we should have a few further experiments of a similar type. If the complex of industry is self-generating, and it has all the virtues that Buchanan would attribute to it in his examination of the problem, then it might be worth while trying a few more experiments. I do not wish to deny the east coast of anything they have but we would like to see industry concentrated in other areas.

In many parts of the country we are a little envious of Shannon but we are delighted to see how successful it is. We are all parochial in our outlook and we regret we have not a Shannon Free Airport Development Scheme in our areas. I would like the Minister to let me know if any significant development in industry has been evident in the new area added to the original concept of the Shannon Free Airport area. This takes in all the county of Limerick, Clare and part of Tipperary. I do not know if that has had the effect of more concentration of industry in that area.

The building of new towns in the Shannon area and the facilities for providing houses was a very interesting experiment. When I toured this area I thought better planning could have gone into the siting and greater imagination could have been used in making the town and the built-up areas more attractive. The social side of industry is very important. We might sometimes be blinded by the need to get the wheels turning, the industry going, the exports and a better balance sheet for the nation but the family life of our people and their social life are factors which cannot be overlooked. We have now reached the stage in industrial development where these should play a very important part in any future development of industry so long as it is not overdone to the extent of placing obstacles in the way. As I said, we will not impede the passage of this Bill through the House which makes better provision through the three financial heads for the Shannon Free Airport area.

Os rud é go bhfuil mo Dháil cheantar suite i réigiún na Sionainne is mian liom cúpla focal a rá ar an mBille seo. Ar dtús cuirim fáilte roimh an mBille seo. Bille a léiríonn go soiléir an dul chun cinn atá déanta ag Cumann Forbartha Aerphort na Sionainne ó chuireadh ar bun é. Tá dul chun cinn an mhaith déanta ag an gcomhlucht seo, ní amháin san tionscalaíocht ach comh mhaith leis sin san gcuairtaíocht agus forbairt go ginearálta ar fúd réigiún an mheán iarthair. Dá bhrí sin tá an áthais orm an deis seo a ghlacadh chun Comhlucht Forbartha Aerphort na Sionainne a mholadh as ucht na dea-oibre a tá déanta agus atá á déanamh acu faoi láthair.

As a Deputy who has the honour to represent the constituency situated in what has come to be known as the Shannon Region I feel it is only right and appropriate that I should avail myself of this opportunity to say a few words on this Bill, which has very major implications, not merely for the mid-western region but more particularly for the constituency which I have the honour to represent. This new Bill introduced by the Minister for Industry and Commerce indicates the progress which has been made by the Shannon Free Airport Development Company, particularly in relation to the generation of industrial development throughout the region. The scope of this Bill, of course, does not permit a discussion on the question of aviation vis-à-vis Shannon so I do not propose to break the rules by referring to aviation matters.

There is no doubt whatsoever since the Shannon Free Airport Development Company was given additional responsibility for promoting industry, not merely in the Shannon Industrial Estate but also in counties Limerick, Clare, North Tipperary and Limerick city that great progress has been made. I do not know the figure for the number of jobs which have been created but I know it is several thousand. I also understand that the projected employment targets for the five-year period between 1972 and 1977 was fixed approximately at 5,400 new jobs and all the indications now are, particularly in view of some very major industrial projects which have come on the pipeline in recent months, that this target will not merely be achieved but will be greatly exceeded.

I wish very sincerely to compliment the Shannon Free Airport Development Company on the dynamic and aggressive manner in which they tackled this additional responsibility of promoting industry in Limerick, Clare and North Tipperary. I would particularly like to pay tribute to the Board of SFADCo, and to the management and staff, on the tremendous success they have achieved in securing the Alcan industry for the Shannon Estuary. This is a very large industry. It is of tremendous significance not merely to the region itself from the employment point of view, but also from the point of view of the future development of the greatest natural asset in that region, the Shannon Estuary.

Now that SFADCo have made this major breakthrough in relation to the development of the Shannon Estuary, I am confident that further industry can be attracted to the Estuary and, more important still, that the Estuary as a deep sea port can be exploited and developed to its fullest potential. I know that the Shannon Development Company are looking at the potential of the Estuary very carefully at present.

I should like to draw attention to a matter to which I referred on many occasions in this House down through the years. There is no doubt that the Shannon Estuary, which is probably one of the greatest natural deep sea ports in Western Europe, offers tremendous scope for careful, imaginative developments. I believe that Alcan will pave the way and will be the first step on the road to developing a major transhipment port in the Estuary.

I should also like to refer to the fact that the Shannon Development Company have been involved in another major industry. Some days ago I had the honour and the privilege of turning the first sod for the major industrial complex at Clarecastle, of a major international pharmaceutical company, Syntex Limited. Throughout Clare, Limerick County, Limerick City and North Tipperary there is adequate evidence of the successful work of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company backed up, of course, by the Industrial Development Authority and the Department of Industry and Commerce.

I welcome this Bill very sincerely on behalf of the people I represent in my constituency. It is another milestone on the road forward for the Shannon region and the Shannon Development Company. This Bill illustrates clearly, beyond yea or nay, the determination of the Minister for Industry and Commerce and the Government to ensure, as the Minister put it very well in his concluding sentence, that the progress made to date will be consolidated and that further progress will be assured.

As Minister for the Gaeltacht I should like to avail of this opportunity to publicly thank the three members of the executive staff of the Shannon Development Company who formed part of the working group which produced the excellent report on Gaeltacht development Gníomh don Ghaeltacht. I thank them for their work in the preparation of this very important report which has now been adopted as Government policy and which will take the shape of a new development authority, Udarás na Gaeltachta.

The impact of the industrial development at the Shannon Industrial Estate, and the industrial development which is taking place throughout the mid-west region, has been very great. In fact, there has been a tremendous transformation in the life of the whole region, with new opportunities for employment being created, and opportunities being given to the young people in this region to obtain gainful employment which, in turn, is providing them with a decent standard of living. It is the overall objective of Government policy, not merely to create employment, but to create employment of a kind which will ensure that our young boys and girls will be able to find a livelihood in their own region and enjoy a standard of living comparable to what they could get elsewhere.

While aviation is outside the scope of this Bill it has relevance vis-à-vis another important aspect of the work of the Shannon Development Company in relation to tourism development. In the field of tourism development the Shannon Development Company have displayed the same types of imaginative, dynamic approach as they displayed in the question of industrial development. The castle tours were an imaginative concept and they have proved to be very good money spinners. Even during the difficult period through which the Irish tourist industry has gone in recent years, the numbers attending the entertainments at the various castles administered by the Shannon Development Company have shown a continuous upward trend.

I would hope that at this stage the Shannon Development Company which traditionally looked to the North American market as its main tourism market will look—as I know they did look last year and the year before—to the UK and to Europe. In 1972, in 1973 and again this year, SFADCo have been involved with the Shannonside regional tourism organisation and Bord Fáilte in operating a number of charter series from European centres into Shannon. These charter series have been highly successful and have generated a new tourism traffic into Shannon. I would respectfully suggest that more attention might be given to developing tourism traffic from the UK and from the Continent of Europe into Shannon.

The traffic figures from North America which, as I have already said, formed the backbone of the tourism traffic into Shannon over the years, continue to be of very great importance. I know that difficulties have been encountered in that market in recent times. I am aware of the efforts made by SFADCo to counteract the various difficulties which arose. I am very hopeful about the future of the Shannon region. I have no doubt that the foundation for industrial development which has been laid by SFADCo, and the fact that they have succeeded in recent months in securing industries of the size of Alcan and Syntex, will lead to a prosperous future for the Shannon region. I am sure that the prospects for the airport are quite bright.

I have always held the view that the future of Shannon Airport depended on the development of the industrial and tourism and other potentials of the mid-western region. It is valid to say also that the future of Shannon Airport is tied up not merely with the future of the Shannon region, the mid-western region, but also with the future of the west. I regard Shannon as a key point and a major factor in the future development of the western seaboard.

Ba mhaith liom fáilte a chur roimh an Bille seo agus comhgháirdeachas a dhéanamh leis an Aire agus le Cómhlucht Forbartha Aerphort na Sionainne. Tá súil agam go n-eiróidh leis an gCómhlucht an dul chun cinn céanna a dhéanamh ins na blianta atá romhainn amach.

As a Deputy for Clare, based on the mid-western region, I too, welcome the introduction of this Bill and I would like to express the thanks of the people in my constituency for the work that the Shannon Free Airport Development Company has done for the constituency and for the whole area. We in Fianna Fáil have always been committed to the development of this region and I am glad that this Government are in their way showing their commitment and I hope that they will push ahead with the development which we have always stressed as important in the Shannon area.

I should like to put on record the sentiments expressed by the chairman of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company. He said about a year ago that the overall objective of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company is clear. It is to ensure the growth of Shannon Airport in trade, passengers and services and to create a healthy prosperity in the mid-west region through sound industrial development harmonising the necessary activities in industry, tourism and airport promotion and in town development so as to make the greatest possible contribution to the economy and the well-being of Ireland. This sums up in a few sentences the philosophy of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company and the commitment of this Government and of previous Governments to the development of this area.

As many of the problems surrounding Shannon Airport have been resolved to my satisfaction. I should like now to direct the attention of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company to the western part of the county and especially to the western part of my constituency. Down through the years there has been a genuine concern that many of the smaller towns in the west have been allowed to fall down and decay while a new town was being built in Shannon Airport. There are places like Miltown Malbay, Kilmihill, Curraciare, Ennistymon, Kilrush—not so bad—Crossan, Carrigaholt, which were allowed to fall down while the town was built in Shannon Airport. I welcome the development of Shannon Airport but the development of the smaller towns could proceed simultaneously. I would like the company to direct its attention more vigorously to the development and improvement of these poorer regions.

One complaint has been that the infrastructure for the transportation and carriage of goods and telecommunications has not been good and that it is, therefore, difficult to induce industrialists to set up industries there. The shortage of a water supply was a problem. With the completion of the West Clare regional water scheme that problem no longer exists.

Many of us looked to the EEC regional fund. It was one of the planks in our platform for entry to the EEC that grants could be obtained from the regional fund to extend the development that has taken place. I am rather disappointed that the fund has not been available in the way that we would like. The Shannon Free Airport Development Company should consider the possibility of getting extra allocations from the regional fund. They should be in a position to make demands on that fund when the allocations are being made.

I am glad that the Minister for the Gaeltacht has mentioned the estuary because this is an area of tremendous potential. I am glad that the Shannon Free Airport Development Company with others have carried out a survey and have issued a report showing the areas of potential growth in the next few years.

I should like to draw the attention of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company to the problems of pollution that may arise and to ask them to keep this matter very much in mind. We need industry and new jobs but not at any price. The question of pollution should be kept in mind. Every effort must be made to prevent polluting our most important waterway which could be spoiled if the problem of pollution is disregarded and if there is widespread industry from Limerick City to Loop Head.

The Minister also referred to the possibility of further development of the tourist areas. I would like to direct the attention of Bord Fáilte and the tourist organisations to the seaside resorts on the western coast, for example, Kilkee and Lahinch. These areas have suffered because of the decline in tourism. There is a major hotel in Kilkee which has not been open for the past two years because it would not have been an economic proposition to open it. I should like SFADCo and Bord Fáilte to examine these areas and to see if tourism can be developed there and to try to get tourists into the areas in far bigger numbers than has been the case in the past few years.

I agree with Deputy Brennan in regard to the training of workers. Investment in training is as important as investment in new machinery and techniques. This is a matter which has not been fully investigated. Money is available from the Social Fund. I understand that AnCO have applied for funds. If funds are available I would like SFADCo with AnCO and the other agencies to see that we get an adequate return from this fund.

I should like to compliment the Shannon Free Airport Development Company, the IDA, AnCO, the regional development organisations, the county development teams and all the agencies who have played a tremendous part in the development of the area. I would like to assure the Minister and the Government that we will give any support they need to facilitate the development of the mid-west region, which is a pilot area which can be used as an example for other areas.

It is a pleasure to us who live in the west, particularly to those of us who live in Clare, to welcome this Bill which provides for an injection of an increased amount of capital. We are glad that the Government have made this decision. We welcome the initiative of the Minister for Industry and Commerce in seeing the necessity for making this provision because to date, despite the expansion which has taken place in the Shannon industrial estates and the triangular development of Shannon, Limerick and Ennis, which are termed growth areas, industrial expansion has not penetrated sufficiently into those areas where employment is needed more than in areas where the land wealth is greater.

I welcome the Bill particularly because the imbalance which has shown itself can now be corrected. The mass emigration from areas of high population which can now be described as areas of depopulation can now be arrested. I welcome the Minister's intention to diversify and to permit a greater distribution of the fund which is now available to the Shannon Free Airport Development Company who are the promoting agency in this mid-western region covering Clare, Limerick and Tipperary. The success which this company has had over the years has been noted by people outside this State and advantage has been taken of the expertise and the particular knowledge which the officers and executives of the company have in relation to the promotion of industry, the training of workers, the establishment of industrial estates and the development of factory sites and matters of this kind. Even some of the Asiatic countries have sought the advice of the SFADCo officers and this in itself is testimony to the value placed on the expertise which these men in SFADCo have.

I am hopeful that this additional money which is being made available and which the Minister is determined will be distributed fairly will penetrate into the areas to which I refer and which were referred to by my colleague, Deputy Daly. Both of us are only too familiar with the long tale of woe which has bedevilled the western and northern part of our country over many years, resulting as I would say in a lack of confidence in agencies which heretofore have not been able to correct this imbalance and I look forward to a quick reaction to and a quick distribution of this money. I can assure the House that the Minister has his eye on development in retarded areas and has a particular interest in seeing that undeveloped areas get their just share of moneys when they are available. The opportunity is now there. The agencies for promotion are geared and I look forward to seeing small industries, and even larger industries, in all the towns of north and west Clare, in the areas which to date have not shared in this national reindustrialisation.

It is a fact that now that we have water schemes and adequate water supplies through all county Clare, and particularly to the west out to Loop Head area, there is no good excuse why industry could not be channelled right out to Loop Head. The Minister for the Gaeltacht referred to the great potential of the Shannon Estuary for industrialists. This is quite true and I would like to see that should industry come there and should industrialists decide to invest their money in major industrial development there, men in public life, men who are on local authorities, will give full necessary support to any such future developments, because I, as a member of a local authority and of Clare County Council, had the experience of looking on and seeing that where planning permission was given for industrial development in the Shannon Estuary and where adequate assurances were given by the county manager and Clare County Council that no pollution would take place and that the highest standards, higher than those demanded by the World Health Organisation, would be observed to ensure that no pollution would occur, that planning permission was reversed. I am glad to say that the Minister for Local Government decided to see to it that that permission was upheld. I feel it is necessary that in public life we have people who are able to decide what is for the benefit of the people, people who will not be influenced by those who sit on the fence and who are very often pretty wealthy in their own right but who dictate to those who have families and an interest in making provision for employment for these families, and who will see to it that that dictation is not listened to in future.

I want specifically to make this point that, while I certainly acknowledge the right of any member of a local authority to make a protest but when members of local authorities unanimously give their views and make certain decisions, they should stick by the advice given by the technical advisers within that authority because if they do not, they are depriving their county of the benefits which are needed there. They are definitely impeding the work which the Government, and in particular the Minister for Industry and Commerce, would wish to see channelled down to every level and every corner of the country.

I am very familiar with the work of the Shannon Free Airport Development Company. For some years I have been a member of the regional development organisation for the promotion of industry in Clare, Limerick and Tipperary, but even being a member, industries still seem to evade the areas I have referred to, despite the fact that time and again when the opportunity was given to me I loudly and clearly voiced my views about this imbalance. I hope that in future I will not have to refer to this pet hobby of mine and in fact I have complete confidence in the determination of the Minister and of SFADCo to go ahead and do the job, possibly with moneys from the Regional Development Fund which we hope will be available, and even much larger sums of money for development. We are not yet quite certain about the amounts of money for these areas but in the meantime we have adequate funds now to do the job I suggested.

The members of the executive of SFADCo have done their best over the years to attract industrialists and have gone abroad on several occasions to establish contacts and they have succeeded. I should not let this occasion pass without referring to the county development teams of the three counties which are benefiting from the SFADCo promotional efforts, Limerick, Clare and Tipperary and I refer particularly to the one I have most experience of, the team in Clare. It is very difficult to know exactly where the work of a county development team stops and the work of a promotional agency like SFADCo starts. I have seen the work of both bodies and I would like at this stage to see some clear guidelines set. I would prefer to see at this stage that much greater scope would be given to county development teams who display energy to promote industry, big and small, in a particular county. I understand they are confined to the promotion of smaller industries, but where they can make contact I would like that the work would not be restricted and that they would be given every encouragement to attract industry and developers into the county.

As regards tourism, the Minister for the Gaeltacht has referred to the many advantages we have in attracting charter flights into the Shannon Airport area. Some people whose geography might not be as clear as that of others might think that because of the troubles in Northern Ireland we were a nation at total war. They are not aware of the fact that it is only a small corner of our country that is embroiled in that turbulent situation. SFADCo should— and I am sure they are doing this— make it quite clear through their agents and their officers in different countries that there is perfect harmony in all areas under our jurisdiction. SFADCo must continue to play an important part in tourism because we cannot afford to lose our second best money spinner, as tourism undoubtedly is.

I should like to congratulate SFADCo and all their officers on the work they have done. However, I would like to see a complete change, that is, much greater thought being given to the smaller town within the region, particularly the areas where there is the highest emigration in Ireland, namely west and north Clare, second only to County Leitrim. I cannot understand why this has been overlooked by previous Ministers for Industry and Commerce, and I often wonder if the Shannon Free Airport Company have the necessary scope and freedom which would permit them to spend money in the areas of greatest need.

Sílim nárbh olc an rud é dá gcuirfeadh Teachta ón oirthear fáilte roimh an mBille seo agus roimh na gcuspóirí atá ag SFADCo. Is féidir a rá, is dócha, gur maith an cruthú é, an chéad iarracht a deineadh, gur féidir cuspóir fiúntach a bhaint amach má tá misneach ag daoine tabhairt faoi. Ní fíos a riamh conas a d'éireoidh le rud mura dtugtar faoi.

Rinne an Teachta Brennan tagairt don tuarascáil a chuireadh amach roint blianta ó shin ar ionaid nó ceantair fáis, mar a thiúrfá orthu, agus an tairbhe ab fhéidir teacht as ceantar a phiocadh amach agus tionscail nó monarca a bhunú sa cheantar sin, cuidiú leis, agus go dtiocfadh fás as an ghníomh féin. Sin é an rud a thárla le blianta anuas sa cheantar atá i gceist i gContae an Chláir. An Teachta deireanach a labhair ó Chontae an Chláir rinne sé tagairt don cheist is tábhachtaí, measaim, a thagann as seo, nuair a lua sé Contae Liathdroma. Dá ndéanfaí iarracht ar rud éigin den sórt seo a dhéanamh b'fhéidir i gcontae cosúil le Contae Liathdroma, níorbh fhios dúinn cén tairbhe a thiocfadh as. D'éirigh leis i gContae an Chláir agus b'fhéidir roimh Chontae an Chláir gurbh é Contae Liathroma an áit ina bhfuil an gá is mó le forbairt ann.

Is fiú aontú le hAire na Gaeltachta san méid adúirt sé i dtaobh SFADCo. Tá an-ghníomh déanta acu. Is sampla maith é den rud a thárlaíonn nuair a thugtar an t-údarás do dhream daoine agus nuair a chuirtear cúram orthu agus nuair a deirtear leo: "Lean ar aghaidh leis seo anois. Déan job de". Is íontach an tairbhe is féidir a theacht as sin. Tá an deifríocht seo idir cad a thárla i gceantar na Sionainne agus iarrachtaí eile a deineadh nár éirigh chomh maith leo toisc nach raibh an oiread sin neamhspleáchais ag an bhfoireann forbartha agus a tugadh i gcás ceantar na Sionainne. Ag tagairt don mhéid adúirt Aire na Gaeltachta, tá fíor-mholadh ag dul don fhoireann sin agus do na stiúr-thióirí a bhí i mbun SFADCo. Ní hé amháin gur dheineadar a gcuidgnótha go héifeachtach ach choiméadar ós a gcomhair féin na prionsabail shóisialta is fearr a bhféadfaí smaontiú orthu, sé sin, go bhfuil sé an-thábhachtach, má táimíd chun ár neart a chur i bhforbairt go ndéanfaimid é i gceantar, fé mar adúirt an Teachta Brennan go bhfuil daoine ann agus nach bhfuil obair le fáil ann, ceantar ina bhfuil fás agus forbairt ag teastáil go géar.

Maidir le foireann SFADCo a chuir le chéile an tuarascáil i dtaobh na gceantar Gaeltachta ní hé amháin gur chuireadar le chéile tuarascáil an-thábhachtach ach choiméadar ós comhair a n-aigne go raibh sé tabhachtach nach ndéanfaí dearmad ar fhealsúnacht agus ar chultúr mhuintir na Gaeltachta. Tá sé tábhachtach bainisteoirí agus stiúrthóirí éifeachtacha a chur i monarchain ach, níos tábhachtaí fós, daoine go mbeadh tuiscint acu ar an fhealsúnacht agus ar an gcultúr sin agus iontaobh aca astu. Maidir leis an Ghaeltacht, tá an baol ann i gcónaí go nginfí éadóchas imeasc na ndaoine muna mbeadh meas ag bainisteoir ar bith ar an bhfealsúnacht agus ar an gcultúr sin. Tá sé an-thábhachtach dóchas a spreagadh imeasc mhuintir na Gaeltachta.

In a sense this Bill belongs with the one that went before it and also with the one that is coming after it, the one about CTT and the one about ICC. The opportunity was taken by Deputies, in an interesting and constructive way, to broaden the debate very considerably. When I introduce my Estimate I shall have an opportunity of indicating my mind to the House in a more detailed way and in a more prepared way in relation to the fundamental problems raised on the question of the balance between the Buchanan type growth centre at one end of the spectrum and the uniform spread of industry throughout the whole area at the other end of the spectrum. Since I present it as a spectrum with two things at each end that is an indication of my thought and optimism coming in the middle.

Deputies expressed a great deal of interest and confidence in SFADCo and approval of what it has done and is doing. It is a pleasure for me to hear this because it supports my own opinion. I was asked about the growth of the industrial estate at Shannon. Up to 31st March, 1970, there were 25 industrial projects. Four years later the figure has risen to 33. Warehousing services have risen from 17 to 28. The total has risen from 42 to 61. That is a growth in round figures of practically 50 per cent in four years, a growth of half as much again. That seals something which gave us a great deal of worry on both sides of this House, something which is now a thing of the past. It seals a difficult patch for the industrial estate in the period between the middle of 1970 to the middle of 1972. In that period there was a decline in jobs of between 600 and 650. There was a decline from 4,500 to less than 4,000. Happily that decline has been halted and the position has recovered in terms of total employment. Indeed, it is a little better than it was, though not markedly better. There has been fair progress. The job loss has been taken back and there is consequently a small net gain because employment on 31st March, 1974, was 4,580, whereas it was 4,508 four years previously. That is a small net increase on 1972. The growth is resuming. If one takes the difference between exports and imports, the export surplus rose from £13.7 million in 1969 to £23 million in 1973. I am merely fleshing out the picture with some figures. It is, indeed, a source of pride and pleasure to everyone and I am using these figures to show agreement with the assessment that it was the correct thing to do. Happily, it is a successful enterprise. The original decisions must have been taken with much heart searching. There were, as usual no doubt, plenty of people to say one should not take such a risk but, none-the less, the risk was taken and the decision was the correct decision.

The same sort of growth is evident in the mid-west regions, if we take new firms and expansions of existing firms, and deduct some losses, because there are no risks taken without some of them coming unstuck. In the five years up to the end of March of this year 43 new firms were established; there were 90 expansions and 12 ceased to exist. In that five years, in the three months from the end of March-April, May and June —there were four more firms. That is an annual rate of 12 firms a year. If you spread that over a five-year period it would be 60 firms a year. I know that sort of arithmetic is extremely perilous, but it does indicate the rate of progress is not declining. There has been a very gratifying creation of 3,785 new jobs in the mid-west region in the five years. One could go on with figures but I do not propose to do that. I refer Deputies to the annual reports of the activities of SFADCo which are packed with information, most of it heartening but also indicating that there was the down turn and a perilous time but we are on the up-grade again.

I do not wish to enter into a lengthy speech on the interesting and fundamental issues raised by Deputy Brennan and others. Firstly, I should like to say something about foreigners and foreign industry in Ireland. It has been suggested that there are too many foreign firms in Shannon and too many foreigners coming here. The core of our industrial progress over the last decade or so has been the attraction of foreign capital, foreign marketing know-how, foreign designs and so forth. We have a consensus that that was desirable and produced a good result. I have been continuing that policy wholeheartedly and, I hope, with some success.

I do not think the issue is: is it desirable to have foreign investment? Of course people will grumble. That is to be listened to but perhaps not too much notice need be taken of it. The question for the future is: how does that foreign sector of our industry slot into our total industrial development? At a time when the only industry we substantially had was the very old food or drink industries or the industries which had developed behind protection walls which were not very competitive or efficient we had to get expertise quickly and this worked for us.

We must all be concerned about the role of multi-national companies world-wide. This is one of the great problems for nation States and for the European Economic Community, which is much bigger than a nation State, as to how you see that these great multi-national companies are made aware of the susceptibilities, responsibilities and, indeed, even the identity and sovereignty of nation States. There is a conflict between the multi-national and the nation States, but it is not impossible to resolve. The multi-national companies are welcome but they must accept the rules of the ball game and fit in with our aspirations. We will not chase them out; we will not penalise them; we will not vilify them; we will not give them complete carte blanche to behave as they wish. One of the great objects of inviting overseas industry was to get skills on the factory floor, management skills with money, management skills with marketing and management skills in the general sense, into the brains and the hands of Irish people, hopefully that they would then have the entrepreneurial flair and courage which they are developing to do their own thing.

The whole problem about foreign industrialisation is not that it is there, or whether it is desirable, but to slot it into a long-term general industrial development where our particular identity, genius, sovereignty, history and culture are not swept away under global considerations or decisions which are made on economic grounds 3,000 or 10,000 miles away. In fact, small, distinct, very proud and individual countries are able to go on being themselves in the face of the huge concentration of what is happening in modern industry. There is a potential for real conflict there. If we spot it, think about it and strengthen our own indigenous industry, skills and sense of identity and confidence, then it can be contained and made fruitful. But there are also dangers in letting what was once necessary become the most important part of our industrial development. We have to balance it.

I will say more about that another time. Perhaps I am prejudging a speech which might be more appropriate on my Estimate. I merely wished to show some reaction to the interesting comments made by Deputy Brennan. With regard to job training and our traditional balance between academic and economically useful subjects, I agree with what has been said. Deputy Brennan knows more about AnCO than I do because he was in the Department of Labour during its formative times. I do not want to make comments on what are properly the responsibility of the Minister for Labour but I know it is the attitude of the Government to expand training in the industrial sector as fast as the structure can be made to grow without actually breaking down and without having the defects of mushroom growth. We recognise the immense value of skill; we recognise the potential bottlenecks which can so quickly and so damagingly occur through lack of skill and training; we recognise even the defensive quality that if our people have to go away they will not be doing unskilled work around the world as they have been condemned to do for so many generations.

The balance between academic, university and other third level subjects, has been distorted in the past by the desire of newly emancipated people to get doctors and lawyers into their families. They did not respect skills whether it was of the engineer, the agriculturalist, the technologist. That is changing as, indeed, the relevant social standing as reflected by the income of these different sectors is changing too. As we develop, our industrial experience is curing that distortion.

Deputy Brennan also referred to the Buchanan Report and a book about industrial development in Ireland. While that book dealt with Scariff and Tubbercurry we have not an analysis like that on Shannon. I am not going to enter in detail, or with any prepared text, into a discussion of Buchanan versus an even spread of the butter over the whole slice of bread. It seems to me that the economic arguments of Buchanan have truth if you define the objective of development as to maximise profit and maximise industrial efficiency. I do not believe in private enterprise. We have a mixed economy and we must moderate the exigencies of modern capitalism with social considerations, especially in a country like Ireland. On the other hand, if we do not have some growth centre benefits, we can saddle ourselves with industry which is not profitable or, at least, breaking even in boom times. Transport costs may be high and a lot of the infrastructure is dear, and with the support services of the kind high technology industry needs, we may saddle ourselves with a cost structure that will not be competitive in bad times.

Simply saying that there are two ends to the spectrum, let me indicate that I think we need growth centres. If there is a town which is already developed with houses which are not fully utilised, with roads that are there for historical reasons that could take more traffic, with water and sewerage that is not fully utilised, it is obviously cheaper to put a factory there than to have to build new houses, new infrastructure and new everything to cater for that factory.

It is also a very good mix to get people who have small farms starved for capital into industrial jobs. There have been beneficial results from this all over the world. What do these people do with their pay packets? They put them into the farms to make them better. That is done uniformly around the world with great benefit.

That is a way of getting capital into capital-starved agriculture. Many small farmers who go into factories have proved to be flexible and adaptable workers. Most countries have too many people. We do not. We have half the population we had a century ago. We can stand growth centres. We can stand a big influx of population. We can stand to have a major city grow in Shannon. I agree with everyone who has spoken about the tremendous potential of the Shannon Estuary. We can stand putting little factories with low infrastructural costs throughout the countryside, provided we do not say that every little town must get one. Then it can really be spread too thinly. Nowadays the catchment area with four or five fellows getting into a motor car can be bigger than it was 30 years ago when a car was a rarity. The purely economic argument that says growth centres are the best and tell us to forget the rest is inhuman and ridiculous—not that there is much advancing of it in that naked form——

There was some.

On the other hand, what might be called the totally political argument that says that every aggregation of houses at a crossroads is entitled to a factory is mistaken and is wasteful of resources. One can get a balance between the two points given some planning and forward thinking. Regional planning is a great need. I share the regrets of Deputy Daly and others who were sad and disillusioned about the Regional Fund. Personally I never thought it was going to be as big as it was held out to be and I said so. However, it does not remove my disappointment that there is not any of the fund. As someone who attends the Council of Ministers meetings and has participated in the discussions on the Regional Fund, it would not be right to say there is no hope of it. It will be later and smaller than we thought. If we are going to get an ongoing social democratic community with a social conscience as well as business ethics, let us take what regional fund we can get in the near term as an indication of the will of the Community to have a regional policy. Let us not take it as the end of the road or the final fund. There will be some money, and structures such as SFADCo are extremely useful for expenditure of those regional moneys. Deputy Brennan spoke about the success of Shannon producing some jealousy——

I think the Deputy said "envy".

They are both deadly sins.

That may be but they are natural sins and they are the most sincere compliment the non-advantaged areas can pay to the advantaged districts. May I say with enormous pleasure that recently on the front cover of Business and Finance the characterisation that was given to what was happening in the north of Mayo was “too much, too soon”. That kind of characterisation of industrial development gives me intense pleasure because we have had decades when it was a case of “too little, too late”. I do not look on Shannon as a specially favoured growth centre. What is happening in North Mayo will provide another major pole of this kind. Hopefully, if our industrial development goes on we can spread them out on the west coast. I listened to Deputy Brugha on this point with pleasure. I also speak as a representative of an eastern constituency but I do not think either of us would yield place to anyone from a western constituency in our concern for the health of the west of Ireland and the culture it embodies. It is something of which I am well aware. If industrialisation is humane and controlled, it will be a stabiliser of regional culture rather than a destroyer.

With regard to Alcan, it is a source of personal pleasure to me that, at a time when the whole project was at an uncertain stage, I was able to meet the Alcan people in Ireland, Canada and the United Kingdom and I hope I made an intervention that was relevant in regard to their decision to reactivate the whole project and to go ahead with it. I am happy it is in Shannon partly because there are jobs, although it is a tremendous investment in relation to the number of jobs, and also because it will generate the infrastructural investment that can begin the lift-off of the entire area of the Estuary. Money will be spent there that will benefit not only Alcan and their production but other companies also.

I have indicated broad outlines but not detail. I am pleased with the general welcome this Bill has received and by the general approbation the efforts of SFADCo have received Mention was made of different agencies, SFADCo, the IDA, county development teams and so on. I do not have strong opinions at this moment but we must examine structures that grow up at a particular time in particular circumstances to see that there is not duplication or competition and to keep them rational. I do not purport to know whether, for example, the county development team/IDA/SFADCo relationship is an optimum one or whether we could make it better. It is something that needs continuing and ongoing scrutiny not only from the Government but also from the Opposition whose relations at Deputy and local representative level are just as intimate as the Government's relations. They would be just as aware of anomalies and duplication if they were to arise.

I am happy to see the growth of the town of Shannon. It has been a bit piecemeal. There is some lovely architecture; it is a good location with little hills, the water nearby, and it also has some trees. Perhaps some things could have been done better and I agree with Deputy Brennan on that. I hope we will get the stability that will enable planning to be carried out, not in a piecemeal fashion but coherently. It is nice to build a city in an agreeable place. I am convinced it will be a major city but it will be nice to have it a beautiful and non-polluted one and it is quite possible to do that.

With regard to conflict between Shannon and the smaller towns on the periphery of the mid-west region, there will always be a bit but the effort of SFADCo is spreading and is producing results. On the other hand, while I affirm my commitment to spreading industry, that does not mean that every place that asks for a factory will, or should, get one. One has to balance social need on the one hand with the building of structures that will not be viable in bad times. It is a delicate balance. It means a commitment to pushing industry into areas where it is not in existence, but in the end the growth and future of our industry and our exports and the things growing industry buy for us— our whole structure of social welfare and growing wealth—depends not just on industrial volume but on industrial viability and competitiveness.

We exist as a mixed economy in a world where most of the countries near us have mixed economies. We cannot depart too radically from the rules of the ball-game as it is evolving in the EEC, in the United States and elsewhere. That means we cannot violate the ordinary rules of competitiveness, of efficiency, of unit costs and so on. Therefore, our decisions have to be a balance of commercial hardheadedness and social concern. That does not mean growth centres to the exclusion of all else, but neither does it mean that it will be possible to locate a factory every place where 50 people could benefit by employment in it. It is necessary to have a balance and that is the way it will continue to evolve.

Question put and agreed to.
Top
Share