Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 5 Nov 1974

Vol. 275 No. 6

Vote 9: Office of Public Works (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That a sum not exceeding £14,981,000 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the period commencing on the 1st day of April, 1974, and ending on the 31st day of December, 1974, for the salaries and expenses of the Office of Public Works; for expenditure in respect of public buildings; for the maintenance of certain parks and public works; for the execution and maintenance of drainage and other engineering works; for expenditure arising from damage to the property of External Government and for payment of a grant-in-aid.
—(Minister for Finance.)

When the debate was adjourned on the 29th May last I had been replying to various matters that had been raised in respect of Leinster House accommodation—for instance, the provision of a stand-by generator and air conditioning as it affected us in this building. Many Deputies made reference to the type of heating used in Government buildings. Deputies Callanan, MacSharry, Geoghegan and Coogan were critical of the type of fuel used and were anxious that native fuel should be used. In this connection I would remind the Deputies that both gas and electricity have been classified as native fuels. Obviously this is because both sources are generated here and, consequently, they have been used extensively down through the years for the heating of State buildings. I might add in passing that the classification was not determined by the Office of Public Works.

It has long been the policy of the Commissioners to use turf whenever possible for heating those buildings which are their responsibility and it is only for sound technical reasons that they depart from this policy. For example, in the case of telephone exchanges it is vital to avoid in so far as possible the creation of a dust laden atmosphere. This is because of the sensitivity of the telephonic instruments.

Deputy MacSharry was critical of the use of gas, electricity or oil in some 96 Government offices throughout the country. This point has been covered by my reminding the Deputy that these fuels have been classified as native.

Deputy MacSharry, too, was under the impression that turf is burned in only one Government building in Kildare Street. The building referred to is heated from the central heating station in Kildare Place, which heats also Leinster House, Government Buildings, the College of Science, the Departments of Industry and Commerce and Transport and Power, the National Gallery, the National Library, the National Museum and the National College of Art. The fuel used is turf brickeens and this station is the largest turf burning system in the country. It uses about 5,000 tons of fuel per year.

Regarding accommodation for Government staff, Deputy Fitzpatrick mentioned in particular the new building in Kildare Street. The fitting of this building, in which will be centralised the headquarters staff of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, is now almost complete and the occupation of the building, which is taking place in stages, should be completed before the end of April next. The building, which was constructed by a private concern, is being acquired by the State by way of a sophisticated form of hire purchase. Initially the State paid a capital contribution of £500,000 towards the cost of the project. In addition an annual rent is being paid, but in accordance with long-standing practice details of the rent are not disclosed. In accordance with normal practice the cost of fittings and furnishings is being borne by the tenant—in this case, the State— and the total cost of this operation will be in the region of £1 million. In addition to accommodating the staff of about 1,000 of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, the building will accommodate also about 250 personnel from other Departments.

Deputy Enright suggested that in many cases civil servants are expected to work in substandard accommodation where there is substandard furniture. While I accept that there are many offices in Dublin and throughout the provinces where conditions could be better, this is a situation to which, down through the years, adequate attention was not paid. However steps are now being taken to set up within the Office of Public Works a unit whose task will be to make improvements all round. It is a task that is formidable: it will take a good deal of time, effort and money if we are to bring the accommodation concerned to a satisfactory standard.

Deputy Tunney was critical of the locations in Dublin of Government offices and he commented on the imbalance as between north and south of the Liffey. If such an imbalance existed up to now, we are presently in the process of having it rectified. Deputy Tunney will be glad to hear that. The State has rented a very large building in Marlborough Street. A fair amount of space has been rented, too, in the Phibsborough tower building and plans are in hand for a new building for a meteorological office on the site of the former Marlborough House, Glasnevin. Consideration is being given also to a proposal for the erection of another large office block to house about 700 members of staff on the north side of the city.

Deputy MacSharry inquired about the number of staff from the Departments of Lands and Education who would be transferred to Castlebar and Athlone and asked when the transfer would take place. Selected sections of the staffs of both Departments are to be transferred to Athlone and Castlebar. The building in Castlebar was designed to accommodate between 200 and 300 people while the building in Athlone will accommodate between 100 and 150 personnel. Present indications are that movement to Castlebar will commence in the latter half of 1975 and to Athlone in early 1976. At this stage it is not possible to be more definite.

Deputies White and MacSharry raised the question of the decentralisation of Government staff. This question is being considered as a matter of Government policy.

In my opening speech I stated that work is proceeding on the erection of new office buildings for the Departments of Lands and Education at Castlebar and Athlone, respectively, and that later there may be buildings erected in other places. Deputy McLaughlin suggested the centralisation of Government offices in one building in provincial towns. I accept the desirability of that idea and this has been achieved already in a small number of centres such as Carlow, Drogheda and Letterkenny. The process will be continued but, of necessity, it will take a long time to centralise all Government staffs in one building in each town. It will happen in Castlebar and, perhaps, Athlone.

Deputy MacSharry inquired also about the position of the stand-by generator at Leinster House. It has been decided to provide a generator for emergency use at Leinster House and Government Buildings. Planning of a suitable scheme is under way.

Deputy Lemass referred to houses occupied by the Department of Lands in Upper Merrion Street. These buildings have been occupied by the Department for a long time. They are like a labyrinth, with connection from one building to another. These buildings have been joined together, and one could go astray if one were not guided from one office to another. The development of the properties, with a view to providing proper accommodation, is under consideration.

Deputy MacSharry wanted to know on what the sum of £1,200,000 for telephone capital would be spent? This money will be spent on more than 75 works in all, comprising new telephone exchanges, extensions to existing exchanges, engineering headquarters and engineering depots. I have a huge list here, but if the Deputy wishes to get a copy of the list it will save me reading it out.

I should like to have a copy.

Mr. Kenny

Deputies Lemass, Enright and Tom Fitzpatrick (Dublin Central) referred to the shortage of accommodation in the National Library. This is being dealt with in conjunction with the Department of Education and steps are being taken to improve the position. As the House should know, we have already possession of a building in Kildare Street— I think it is No. 4—and negotiations are proceeding for the acquisition of another one further down at Leinster Lane. With the final acquisition of that place we will be able to arrange for an extension of accommodation within the precincts of or around the present site of the National Library.

Deputy McDonald referred to the need for the provision of proper facilities for the EEC meetings in Dublin from January to June, 1975. This matter is being dealt with in conjunction with the Department of Foreign Affairs and we believe that adequate facilities will be available in good time.

The programme for national school buildings was queried. Some suggestions were made and some Deputies were critical of the rate of progress of buildings. Expenditure from State funds on national school buildings in the financial year 1973-74 was approximately £3,832,000. In the current financial year the figure will be in excess of £6,500,000, which is the largest amount ever expended for this purpose. A large proportion of the money is being spent on the erection of new schools in new areas in towns and cities. The provision of school accommodation in these new housing areas is an urgent necessity. Thirty-six new schools, including five for mentally handicapped children, have been completed since April last and in the same period major improvement schemes were completed at 15 schools.

During the financial year it is expected that permanent places for 16,000 children will have been provided and that some portion of the extra expenditure can be attributed to increase building costs. There has been an acceleration of the school building programme. There are now more than 100 new schools in the course of erection and approximately the same number of major improvement schemes in progress. A type of school is now being built to provide for the requirements of the new curriculum. New features include shared teaching areas, general purpose areas, recreational and gymnastic facilities. Where improvement schemes are undertaken the schools are up-dated to present-day standards.

Over recent years a programme for the provision of an increasing number of schools for the mentally handicapped has been undertaken. In addition to the five such schools which have been completed during the current financial year works are in progress on 11 new schools and on two improvement and extension schemes. A number of others are at various stages of preparation. These schools have to be specially designed with extra facilities and more space per pupil. In a number of cases the Department of Health are associated with the progress in providing a day centre for the care of the more severely handicapped.

I want to deal with some of the suggestions and some of the criticisms Deputies made during the course of their remarks. Deputy MacSharry suggested that there may be duplication of work between the Office of Public Works and the Department of Education. There is no duplication. In brief, the Department of Education are the policy framers; the Office of Public Works are the executors of that policy. The Department of Education make the policy and the Office of Public Works carry out their instruction.

The position as regards construction of schools is that the smaller schools are designed by the Office of Public Works architects and the contract arrangements for those are made directly by the Office of Public Works. The remainder—admittedly the great bulk nowadays—are designed by architects employed by the managers who make the contract arrangements themselves. The operations involved are monitored by the Office of Public Works. The Department of Education are not involved in this monitoring at all. Once a decision is taken to build a school and the amount of the grant determined, it is necessary to involve the Department of Education only in the event of some question of policy arising. Generally speaking, Deputies will appreciate the importance and desirability of having an organisation backed by long experience in the administration of contracts and of avoiding the proliferation of departmental units which could handle such work.

Deputy Geoghegan, during the course of the debate, referred to the question of the removal of trees which might be a danger to schools with particular reference to a certain school in his own area. The reply to him on the 29th May was:

A new school is at present being erected on the site of the old school at Tiernakill which had to be demolished at the commencement of operations.

Deputy Geoghegan was informed by the former Parliamentary Secretary, Deputy Lemass, on the 3rd November, 1972, that demolition would be necessary. Before the old building was demolished it was damaged by a falling tree during a severe storm and alternative accommodation was sought by the managers. The possibility of making available the married quarters at Maam Garda Station was investigated but this could not be done as the premises were required by the Garda for official purposes. The manager provided accommodation for the older pupils in a private residence, which, it is understood, belongs to a teacher. No other premises were available. It is hoped that the new school will be ready pretty soon.

On the general question of removing trees which might be a danger to schools generally, this is primarily a matter for school managers or for the county councils, if the trees are near the county roads. If there is a problem about identifying trees which might be dangerous, they might consult with the local forestry inspectors.

I thank the Parlamentary Secretary.

Mr. Kenny

I did not know the Deputy was there. Deputy John Ryan suggested that closed-down national schools should be made available for community purposes. A great majority of national schools are not owned by the State but by local trustees. So far as State-owned schools are concerned it is settled policy that the Office of Public Works will negotiate the sale of these buildings, wherever they are a surplus to other State needs, to local groups for the purpose of community halls. Several such sales have already taken place.

Deputy Taylor asked about the closing down of national schools and by whose authority they were closed down. The closing of national schools is decided by the Department of Education. The Office of Public Works are not consulted and they have no function whatsoever in the matter.

Deputy Enright referred to the urgent need for the provision of a new school at Shinrone, which I understand is his own native parish. He asked a question about this on 28th May. Tenders for this work have been received and the contract will be placed immediately the local contribution is lodged, which the manager has been asked to do. He was reminded by phone to expedite the lodgment and the contract was placed two days later. That was very good timing by Deputy Enright.

It was not inspired?

Mr. Kenny

Not inspired. We do not do that. Deputy Leonard mentioned that some contractor had bills unpaid by the Office of Public Works for works done. This may happen on rare occasions but only on the final instalment, or it may have been retention money. If the Deputy has any such case in mind and if he lets me know I shall have it expeditiously finalised.

Is the Board of Works up to date in paying out at present?

Mr. Kenny

That is a very general question. If the Deputy gives me a specific case we shall have it expedited if the matter is finalised on the contractor's side. We do not like to owe money.

The impression abroad is that they are a bit slow. Perhaps the Parliamentary Secretary would use his good offices to speed it up.

Mr. Kenny

If the Deputy gives me a specific case we shall expedite it.

In regard to the building and improvement of Garda stations throughout the country, Deputy MacSharry wanted to know what new stations are to be built this year and what stations are listed for improvement. I have a list which is not very long and which I shall read out. It gives the new stations and stations with work in progress as: Skibberreen Country Cork; Multyfarnham, County Westmeath, Ballinahowan, County Westmeath; Ballinacargy, County Westmeath; Knockcroghery, County Roscommon; Bunbeg, County Donegal; Clonroche and Rosslare Strand, County Wexford; Rosmuc, County Galway; Enniskerry, County Wicklow; Shannonbridge, County Offaly; Raphoe, County Donegal; Cooldaff, County Donegal. Centres at which work is expected to commence during 1974: Croom, County Limerick; Kiltullagh, County Galway; Corofin, County Clare; Limerick divisional headquarters; Ballyshannon, County Donegal, district headquarters; Kanturk, County Cork, district headquarters; Castleblaney, County Monaghan, district headquarters; Granard, County Longford, district headquarters; Fenit, County Kerry; Bruree, County Limerick; Inchigeela, County Cork; Emly, County Tipperary; Kilkelly, County Mayo; Millstreet, County Cork; Broadford, County Clare; and Swords, County Dublin.

Improvement schemes at existing Garda stations—works in progress— Store St, Dublin; Blanchardstown, County Dublin. Stations where work is expected to commence during 1974 —Mountjoy, Dublin; Emyvale, County Monaghan; Midleton, County Cork; Geashill, County Offaly; Minor improvement schemes at existing Garda barracks—number where work is in progress, 33; number where work is expected to commence in 1974,40.

Deputy White mentioned Ballyshannon and suggested that instead of building a new district headquarters there we should try to buy a building known as the "Brothers Residence" which is vacant or about to become vacant. I have asked for a report on this building and when it comes to hand the position will be considered. It is only very rarely, however, that a building erected as a dwelling is found to be really suitable for a purpose such as a Garda district headquarters or divisional headquarters.

Deputy Geoghegan, who seems to have covered a very wide ambit in the debate although he did not speak for very long, referred to the poor condition of Garda stations in County Galway. While buildings in exposed locations, such as in Connemara, suffer more than others from severe weather, I agree that many of the stations are not in as good a condition as I would wish. The Office of Public Works are finding it extremely difficult to recruit the professional and technical staff required to look after all their buildings. Special efforts are being made to secure extra staff and I hope that as a result it will be possible to give the attention required to Garda stations and all other buildings for which the Office of Public Works are responsible.

Deputy Enright also mentioned Portlaoise Garda station but as this was the subject of a question last week I think all the information required has been given to Deputy Lalor and Deputy Enright.

Deputy John Ryan suggested that married members of the Garda should have the right to purchase the official houses they occupy. This matter was previously considered in consultation with the Department of Justice. The position generally about applications by members of the force to purchase houses is that they cannot be granted because it is necessary to maintain a supply of officially-owned quarters to facilitate the transfer of members. If Garda members bought their houses and were then transferred the gardaí coming to replace them would not have accommodation. Up to now it has not been possible to devise a scheme to allow gardaí to buy out their houses.

Deputy McLaughlin referred to the Garda stations at Sligo and Manorhamiltion. One scheme of improvement has been carried out in Sligo and a further more expensive scheme is being planned. The legal formalities for the acquisition of a site at Manorhamilton for a new district headquarters are almost completed and plans for the new station will be put in hands as soon as possible.

An improvement scheme costing approximately £23,000 is being carried out at present. The works include central heating, a new sanitary block, modernisation of cells and public office including the provision of booths for telex and radio. Progress is slow mainly due to the inability of the contractor to secure skilled labour.

Deputy Leonard sought information about a customs station at Monaghan. Plans are ready for a customs road station at Monaghan but problems have been encountered about foundations because of the nature of the site. Tests have been made and the results are being examined. It is hoped to have the problems resolved and construction work put in hand in the very near future.

Among all the rural Deputies the question of arterial drainage was one which was not laboured by them but they expressed their own views and the sentiments of their constituents. I know that all the rural Deputies, especially those whose territory includes rivers, are being belaboured at meetings on the vexed question of arterial drainage. It is a problem that must be solved by getting more money for the implementation of these works. Deputies Callanan, MacSharry, McLaughlin, Taylor and Ryan in their speeches to the House expressed their own personal views and the sentiments of their constituents, and I know from my own constituency and from every constituency in Connacht that this question is foremost in every farmer's mind. What the powers that be do not understand is that by implementing arterial drainage we are extending an industry, one of the greatest industries in the country, agriculture, and it is my fervent desire that the Minister for Finance would grant us more money every year.

I share in the sympathy of Deputies for the many farmers who have to wait so long for the benefits of arterial drainage. The national drainage problem is a very great one indeed and it can best be approached in an orderly way, in particular by keeping to the settled priorities. Even then each scheme must be preceded by painstaking, protracted and specialist investigation. The cost of a scheme generally runs into several million pounds, and takes a number of years to carry out. Because of the great demand for and shortage of capital, arterial drainage must measure up to other investments by the State for public benefit, and it is for this reason that a cost benefit study for each proposal has to be made.

Deputies have mentioned certain catchments: the Fergus, Corrib/ Mask/Robe, Dunkellin, Mulkear and Nore, the Owenmore, and these are all priority catchments. They will all reach their due turn and I am happy that in the current budgetary period it has been possible to provide a substantial additional amount for the drainage programme. Mention has been made of the desirability of continuity of employment for men on drainage maintenance. I will concern myself with the matter to see how far it can be achieved, but this sort of operation is mostly confined to the summer season, when water is low and weeding can be seen and eradicated. The reply to specific questions about the Mulkear catchment is that a scheme would be of the order of £2 million and an acreage of 7,600 in Limerick and 3,260 in Tipperary suffers from lack of drainage. As I stated, this will be dealt with in due course, having regard to its order on the priority list. However, this is one of the most important items in the budget and I shall do my utmost to ensure that more finance will be provided because I know the problem as well as any other Deputy.

Deputy MacSharry did not understand three items of information in the Book of Estimates. Deputy John Callanan raised this matter also. Deputy MacSharry said that under subhead G.1 only £2,000 has been provided for comprehensive drainage surveys. This provision is to cover expenses, apart from salaries, and so on, which are met out of subheads A and B. The £2,000 in subhead G.1 is only what is known as a contingency fund; suppose, for instance, a squad of men were employed just for a few days. It might also be used for entertainment or some item like that. It might not be used at all.

Is the Parliamentary Secretary telling us people work in this regard all the time?

Mr. Kenny

The money in subhead G.2, £1,035,000, is paid to labouring men. It has nothing at all to do with A and B. The £1,035,000 is what is estimated to be spent on the actual job.

There is no duplication of salary between A, B and G.2?

Mr. Kenny

No, there is not. I can tell the Deputy that I found it difficult enough to understand the method of book-keeping employed in these matters.

Deputy Enright asked for information regarding the Shannon drainage. In February, 1965, the then Government announced that special steps were to be taken with a view to the preparation of a drainage scheme for the Shannon Basin. In July, 1965, the investigation was postponed because of the difficult financial position. In 1967 the investigation was resumed, but on a tiny scale. Trial borings have been carried out on part of the main channel and the results plotted, but no subsequent field survey was made because the engineering staff and the necessary funds have not been available. The hydrometric survey being made of the country generally includes, of course, the Shannon catchment. With the restricted funds being allocated to arterial drainage it is not possible to say when the Shannon proposal can be resumed in a serious way. It may be taken that the progress made so far is very small in comparison with the amount remaining to be done upon this enormous project.

Since the Shannon drainage scheme was mooted in 1965, the potential of the river Shannon as a recreational cruiseway and for other aquatic sports has projected itself. With the growth in the world-wide demand for aquatic sports generally and our membership of the Common Market these resources must be assessed and taken fully into account in the cost/ benefit analysis of any possible arterial drainage schemes for the Shannon.

Deputy Callanan and Deputy MacSharry raised the matter of the Owenmore drainage. The Owenmore catchment has an area of 160,000 acres and is situated mainly in County Sligo with some small areas in Counties Leitrim, Mayo and Roscommon. The main channel is the Owenmore river and the principal tributaries are the Unshin, or Arrow, and the Owenbeg. It is estimated that some 21,000 acres of land and 5,000 acres of bog would stand to benefit from a comprehensive drainage scheme.

An engineering survey of the catchment was commenced in 1963 in conjunction with the survey of the adjoining Bonet catchment of County Leitrim. The field survey of the Owenmore, including the Lough Arrow catchment, has since been completed and the plotting of data and design of a scheme is proceeding, with a view to ascertaining whether a scheme, under the Arterial Drainage Act, 1945, would be feasible. This work will not have progressed to the stage where a preliminary engineering report and estimate would be available for some years.

If this report indicates that a scheme would be feasible and economic, the proposals would then be subjected in due turn to a cost/benefit analysis to determine their worth as a capital investment. Assuming a favourable outcome, a formal scheme would then have to be prepared and the various statutory requirements met.

I am aware of the considerable demand for this drainage and I recently received a deputation consisting of public representatives from the area and members of the Owenmore and Arrow drainage committee who pressed the matter very strongly.

Deputy Crinion approves the new approach to spoil disposal as evidenced on the Boyne arterial drainage scheme. I am glad that note has been taken of the new approach by our arterial drainage engineers in this vexed question. The success of Trim in the "Tidy Towns Competition" was a great tribute to the success of this approach on the Boyne. It is in keeping with the current concern of the public and the State in relation to the protection of the environment and helps to indictate that given the will, the policy and the money, arterial drainage does not necessarily damage our scenic areas.

Deputy Taylor said that the Office of Public Works should again have a function in rural improvement schemes and bog development schemes. We have not had any function whatever in regard to those for the last seven or eight years. The rural improvement scheme has been replaced by the local improvement scheme. This is a contributory scheme. I do not know whether it functions at all in County Clare.

It does and the Parliamentary Secretary did not give us enough money to administer it. The previous Administration did not give us enough money and this Administration did not give us enough money.

They have no roads down there.

Mr. Kenny

Deputy Leonard asked whether we could do a piecemeal job on arterial drainage. We are not allowed by law to do that. When a statutory declaration is made to carry out an arterial drainage scheme it must be finished. When it is finished, it is signed, sealed and delivered and nobody can introduce new works after the scheme is sealed. That leads to a lot of misinterpretation. When the scheme is finished it is finished and by law no new works can be done. The maintenance then is done by the Office of Public Works with the contribution of the full amount from the local authority.

Deputies, especially from the maritime counties, mentioned coast protection. The difficulty here is not wholly financial. Each proposal for a scheme may have its own peculiar problems involving study of the conditions over a long period. The work is of a very specialist nature and adequate, competent staff are not available to deal with the work load as rapidly as I would like. I am keeping the service under review to see if progress can be accelerated.

In regard to the case of Enniscrone mentioned by Deputy MacSharry, I am pleased to say that a scheme will very shortly be sent out for consideration and for the views of the county council and other interested local parties. The scheme in Enniscrone has been going on for quite a while. To get a scheme of coast protection off the ground is a most complex thing. The regulations and conditions safeguard not alone the Department of Finance but also the local authority because they have to contribute to it and then look after it when the work is finished. In regard to this scheme, Department of Finance sanction was sought on 2nd September, 1974, for a 50 per cent grant towards a scheme estimated to cost £150,000. This was a big increase on the original estimate of £85,000 due to additional work, with increase in prices. Notwithstanding reminders sanction has not yet been received. We have reminded them verbally again—and by verbally I mean verbally because I have been in Enniscrone and I have seen the conditions. It will be a loss to Sligo County Council, to the people concerned on the actual ground and to the Department of Finance because it will take more to do it.

It is very dangerous at present.

Mr. Kenny

It is very dangerous for people passing along the road. So far as Deputy Geoghegan's area is concerned and so far as Inishbofin is concerned, no proposal has been received and it is for the local authority in the first instance to submit to the Office of Public Works cases which they consider should be dealt with under the Coast Protection Act, 1963.

Mention has been made of the necessity for a scheme of grants to enable local authorities to do small jobs without reference to the Office of Public Works. It takes careful, expert study to establish whether a coast protection problem exists and is remediable economically and if such be the case it would clearly be a job that should be done under the Act. When local authority engineers or Office of Public Works engineers look at a scheme they might have the best intentions in the world but they cannot anticipate the reaction of the sea against something that is man-made. I have seen that in many places. There can be an excellent piece of work against the water but the sea reacts in a different way. I have seen places where piers and harbours have been built, at an enormous cost and they were not successful. The same applies to coast erosion. When one tries to defend the land against the sea the sea has a different reaction. The best laid schemes of engineers are apt to go wrong and the sea still wins.

Surely we should get more technical experts?

Mr. Kenny

They are very scarce in Ireland.

We should be looking for more.

Mr. Kenny

We are. Since I have come into office we always ask for local knowledge from fishermen and people who are used to the reactions of the sea.

It is becoming a great problem.

Mr. Kenny

I know that. The Act has only been in operation since 1963 and the Office of Public Works have done a fair amount of very good work. Coast protection is a costly operation and should be embarked on only after full and adequate consideration of all available facts and information.

I must refer again to that man of endurance, Deputy Geoghegan. The Office of Public Works, except in a very few special cases, have no responsibility for the upkeep of the smaller fishery piers and landing places around the coast. They may, however, carry out schemes of improvement which may be initiated by other Departments, Agriculture and Fisheries, Gaeltacht and so on.

A question has been raised of a survey of all such structures with a view to having them repaired. This question was raised by Deputy Geoghegan. Such a survey has been carried out, county by county, by the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. It is representative of county councils, Roinn na Gaeltachta, Bord Iascaigh Mhara and the Office of Public Works. The west coast has been surveyed from Donegal to west Cork and already the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries have in many cases implemented the recommendations made.

Is that the survey team I established?

Mr. Kenny

As far as I know it is not. Anyway, the west coast has been surveyed. The harbour at Inishbofin in County Galway is a transport rather than a fishery one. However, a survey has been made with a view to a scheme of improvement. Deputy Taylor raised the matter of harbour dredging. Dredging near piers and in harbours is maintenance and is the responsibility of the local authority.

Deputy Coogan mentioned a crane and slip on Innisheer, County Galway. In April last Roinn na Gaeltachta approved the execution of the following works at Innisheer: the provision of a slip and a road recently constructed by the county council; a hand-operated winch to serve the slip; and a light on the quay.

Deputy Lemass inquired about Dún Laoghaire harbour mooring facilities. All space available in the harbour for the mooring of yachts has been allocated. In May, 1972, Deputy Lemass, who was then Parliamentary Secretary, met representatives of the yacht clubs and the position about moorings in the harbour was explained. At that meeting it was suggested that if the demand and potential was as great as represented by them, the proper course would be for all yacht clubs in Dún Laoghaire—there are four— to get together, assess their long-term requirements and make a case for the development of separate facilities outside the harbour. The commissioners are not aware that such a case has been made and policy matters would not rest with them.

One solution would be to build a marina at Wexford. It could be arranged. It is a good natural harbour.

Mr. Kenny

Time will permit me to reply only briefly to the remaining points. Deputy Lemass asked if I could give a brief outline of proposed developments for the creation of a new national park at Glenveagh in County Donegal. As negotiations for the acquisition of the estate were concluded only recently and as the legal formalities have yet to be finalised, there has not been sufficient time to formulate a scheme of development. I will make an announcement at the appropriate time. I have not time to go through all the miscellaneous items that were raised——

Meet all the requests and let it go at that.

Mr. Kenny

I should like to express my appreciation of the worthwhile suggestions made by Deputies who contributed to the debate. I should also like to place on record my appreciation of the general atmosphere of goodwill, efficiency and co-operation that is evident throughout all the division of the Office of Public Works. I want to pay a particular tribute to the commissioners and their staff for the invaluable work they have done and are continuing to do. Their task involves every social category in the country in even the most remote townland.

I should like to ask a question in regard to the upper Mask. I mentioned the river leading into the upper Mask and said it had taken a different course.

Mr. Kenny

I went specially out to see that place and I ended up in a bowl with no road leading out of it. Unfortunately, I placed that for consideration with the arterial drainage people but they refused my request. Perhaps we will have another attempt to get it done.

The river has taken a different course and it has destroyed valuable arable land. They are carrying out a huge drainage scheme on the upper Mask and this should be included.

Mr. Kenny

I will do my best.

Would the Parliamentary Secretary like to elaborate on his remark that when one seeks to defend the land against the sea the sea reacts in a certain way?

Mr. Kenny

I said it acts in an unanticipated way.

Is he attributing some particular qualities to the sea——

Mr. Kenny

Some mysterious quality. I will tell the Deputy more about it when we come to discuss my next Estimate.

Vote put and agreed to.
Top
Share