Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 12 Mar 1975

Vol. 279 No. 3

Meeting of Heads of Government: Statement by Taoiseach.

With your permission, I would like to take a little of the time of the House to give a brief outline to Members of what transpired over the last two days at the meeting of Heads of Government of the Nine countries of the European Economic Communities. The Foreign Ministers of these countries and the President of the Commission, with his colleague the Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, also attended the meeting.

This was the first meeting of Heads of Government under the new arrangements agreed in Paris last December. A characteristic of these arrangements is that there should be no formal communiqué after the meetings. Nevertheless, a number of issues before the meeting were of such importance and such complexity that it was found necessary to incorporate the decisions in formal declarations or statements. I have made copies of these statements available to the Leader of the Opposition. They have also been laid before both Houses and are available in the Library. I should say at present only stencilled copies are available but they will be printed at a later stage and put in the Library as usual.

A matter of great importance discussed at the meeting was the criteria by which the situation of a country could be examined to see if its membership of the Community was leading to unacceptable conditions, and how this situation might be corrected. This is a major issue of concern to the United Kingdom at present. There is, as Deputies will be aware, a document on the subject, produced by the Commission of the Community entitled "The Unacceptable Situation and the Correcting Mechanism". The meeting concluded that the correcting mechanism as outlined in that paper should be applied, with the following modifications:

1. The criteria concerning the balance of payments deficit and the two-thirds ceiling are dropped.

2. The following provisions will be incorporated into the agreed mechanism:

(a) The amount of the correcting mechanism shall be up to a ceiling of 250 million units of account. However, as soon as the amount of the Community budget exceeds 8,000 million budget exceeds 8,000 million units of account, the ceiling shall be fixed at an amount representing 3 per cent of total budget expenditure.

(b) When a moving average drawn up over three years indicates that the balance of payments on current account of the country in question is in surplus, the correction shall only affect any difference between the amount of its VAT payments and the figure which would result from its relative share in the Community GNP.

Because of the number of variables involved—like the rate of growth of the country concerned and of the Community as a whole, the state of its balance of payments and the composition of its trade over a period of years —it is quite impossible to indicate with any useful degree of accuracy how this new arrangement will affect Ireland. I can say, however, that whether we are beneficiaries or contributors under the arrangements, the amounts involved will be insignificant in comparison even with the monetary benefits alone, of our membership of the Community.

The question of British membership of the Communities is also affected by the decision arrived at by the Heads of Government on the review of the importation of quantities of New Zealand dairy products to the Community, in accordance with Protocol 18 of the Accession Treaty.

The protocol permits the importation, free of levy, of certain specified quantities of these products in the years up to and including 1977. Under the terms of the protocol, the arrangements are to be reviewed before the end of 1975. The meeting decided on certain guidelines to be given to the institutions of the Community in carrying out this review. The Commission's proposals on the subject are to be ready as soon as practicable and are to include special import arrangements as provided for in Article 5 of the protocol, after 1977. The proposals will provide for price reviews having regard to certain defined criteria. I cannot, of course, anticipate the outcome of the review by the institutions of the Community under the arrangements we agreed yesterday, but I do not think that it will give rise to any great difficulties so far as this country is concerned. The matter is dealt with in more detail in the declarations which I have had made available in the Library.

The subject of Energy and the price of Energy occupied the attention of the meeting for a considerable time. There was, in particular, a great deal of concern expressed at the inadequacy of the Community preparations and policy in this area—which is vital to its security and stability. The meeting agreed that under the authority of the Council (Foreign Affairs) a special high level ad hoc Committee composed of representatives of the member states and of the Commission should be established so as to co-ordinate the approach to this problem in the interests both of consumers and producers, and of economic stability in the entire world. The first meeting of this committee is arranged for 19th March. The Heads of Government have incorporated their views on this also in a declaration of which copies will be available in the Library.

We also discussed the world economic situation with particular reference to the problems of unemployment and inflation following the steep increase in oil and other raw material prices, and to the influence which the major economies of the world exert on each other and on the economies of other countries. There was general agreement that this issue and the views of the Heads of Government on it, should be referred to the meeting of Council of Ministers of the Community (Finance) to be held on 18th March.

On raw materials, there was an extremely useful discussion. Security and continuity of supply is a matter of vital and growing importance to the countries of western Europe. It was decided that the matter, which was coming before the Heads of Government for the first time, should be referred to the Council of Foreign Ministers on the basis of the proposals put before the Council by the Commission.

We also had a useful discussion on the Conference and Security and Co-operation in Europe which is currently taking place in Geneva. We have agreed on a statement on this subject which is also available in the Library.

On Cyprus, the Heads of Government and Foreign Ministers, recalling the statement issued by the Foreign Ministers following their meeting in Dublin on 13th February expressed the hope that in the context of the discussions currently being held at the United Nations in New York, there will be an early resumption of negotiations on the question of Cyprus. The Nine will, of course, continue to keep in close touch with developments as regards the situation there.

I was glad to have had the opportunity to preside over this Heads of Government meeting which, in addition to dealing successfully with other items, brought to a conclusion the prolonged discussion of the issues raised by the question of British membership.

First of all, I should like to thank the Taoiseach for responding so promptly to my request this morning for a statement on the conference held in the last two days. I should like to express satisfaction, on behalf of the Opposition, at the outcome of the conference, in so far as reasonable adjustments now seem to have been agreed in the areas which were causing some concern for the British Government, so that the opportunity of their continued membership is now brighter, I am glad, however, to note that during the course of some interviews at the conference the Minister for Foreign Affairs affirmed the view expressed so often by this side of the House that even if Britain does not wish to continue its membership that it would be in Ireland's best interests to continue even though we accept it would be even in our better interests if Britain were also a member. I should like also to commend all those responsible for the satisfactory arrangements made for the efficient working of the conference. I have had some experience of the extent of the task involved in hosting such a conference and in mounting the necessary facilities for visiting members of Governments, visiting officials, personnel and the media. In addition, in this case the building had to be adapted for the purpose and I should like to pay tribute to all those who worked behind the scenes to ensure the satisfactory working of the conference. Apparently this was commented on by visiting personnel.

There are one or two questions I should like to ask the Taoiseach but I do not know if he is prepared to answer them now. Will he state specifically what are the implications for this country, arising out of the correcting mechanism now to be employed which, apparently, will reduce the financial input of the British Government in certain circumstances?

Secondly, in relation to the statement on New Zealand dairy product imports which I was handed a short time ago, will the Taoiseach state what are the implications of the agreement made apparently yesterday in relation to New Zealand cheese? Protocol 18 provided for exceptional imports of New Zealand cheese up to the end of 1977 and I would ask the Taoiseach how this can be reconciled with the final paragraph in the statement which stated that in relation to Protocol 18 there is to be a further review of the import of cheese from New Zealand with the New Zealand authorities with the objective of promoting in their mutual interests an orderly operation of world markets? There seems to be the implication in the Taoiseach's statement that some arrangements would be made after 1977 for the continued importation of cheese to the market. Specifically I wish to ask the Taoiseach in the event of the market being self-sufficient in cheese by the end of 1977 whether the facilities for the importation of New Zealand cheese, to the disadvantage of market producers and particularly Irish producers, will be continued.

Finally, will the Taoiseach state if the statement made by the Minister for Foreign Affairs at a Press conference prior to the Taoiseach's own Press conference to the effect that nothing of real consequence for Ireland had been involved in the conference was a statement of the real position? In summary, my questions are: first, the implications of the special mechanism for Britain; secondly, the implications in respect of any change in the Protocol with regard to New Zealand cheese; thirdly, whether the statement of the Minister for Foreign Affairs was a correct assessment of the outcome of the conference.

First, I should like to endorse fully what the Leader of the Opposition said about the arrangements. In fact, I have already indicated that my thanks and the appreciation of the Government and the public should be conveyed to the people concerned. It is worthy of note that a number of favourable comments were made on the suitability, general competence and efficiency of the arrangements.

So far as the queries raised by Deputy Lynch are concerned, the estimate of the effect on Ireland of the correcting mechanism ranges at about £1 million and £2 million at the very outside. Of course this depends on a number of factors and it is not possible to give a precise figure but that is the estimated assessment.

So far as Protocol 18 is concerned, as the Deputy knows, cheese will be excluded after 1977 and the Protocol provides for a review by the Community before then. It is not possible to anticipate the result but it would require an actual amendment of the Protocol included in the Treaty of Accession if any change is to be made with regard to cheese. So far as butter and cheese are concerned, deliveries from New Zealand have been far below the figure already included and it is not anticipated the matter will have any effect so far as this country is concerned.

I wish to give notice that it is my intention to raise on the Adjournment Question No. 44 of 13th February.

I will communicate with the Deputy. I understand it is intended to resume on the Second Stage of the Wealth Tax Bill, 1975.

Top
Share