The counties which will mainly benefit from the regional fund are counties Donegal, Sligo, Leitrim, Roscommon, Longford, Cavan, Monaghan, Galway, Mayo, Clare, Kerry, parts of Limerick and parts of Cork. There are a number of misconceptions circulating as to the nature and scope of the regional fund. They would be laughable if they were not so misleading. While certainly some of them arose originally through a misunderstanding we cannot now ignore the damage that is mischievously spread for base, partisan motives at home and also done with the malicious intent of doing harm to Ireland's position in Brussels.
The facts of the situation are that Ireland's share of the regional fund for the three-year period 1975-77 will be only £35 million. That is a greater share of the regional fund than, according to the criteria of the fund, Ireland was entitled to.
Actual receipts in 1975 will be only £4 million which is far less than 10 per cent of what the State will be paying by way of aid for development in those depressed areas to which I have referred but the fund will enable more projects to be tackled than would otherwise be possible.
Although the regional fund is theoretically in existence it is not yet in a position to pay out any money to member States. The reason is that as no money has been paid into the fund no money can be paid out. The Community supplementary budget has yet to be passed. It is at present, as Deputy Herbert acknowledged, the subject of dispute between the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament. The draft supplementary budget would enable the fund to approve this year only the commitment of £8 million Community support to projects sponsored by the Irish Government but actual payments from the fund to Ireland this year will not exceed £4 million.
The implication of this is that in 1975 assistance actually to be received from the regional fund will amount to less than 1 per cent of the 1975 public capital programme of £460 million. That is less than 5 per cent of the regional fund type projects already in hands in the areas to which I have referred. This, I think, puts the regional fund in its proper perspective. The public capital programme is the instrument through which the Government's investment strategy for promoting balanced growth, on a nation-wide basis, in employment and output is implemented.
While we welcome the availability of regional fund assistance it must be appreciated, on the basis of its present financing, that it will make little more than a minimal contribution to economic and regional development in this country. It will contribute far less to national investment this year than, for example, loans which we are obtaining from the European Investment Bank. We all hope that in time the regional fund will develop as the means by which significant capital flows will be channelled to this country in order to affect in a fundamental way the pattern of our development and to bring our living standards up to average European levels at least. The fund, however, as it is at present constituted, falls far short of what is ideal or far short of what is even practical help towards significantly lifting Irish living standards to European standards.
Fund assistance may be given, and may only be given, for investments costing more than £20,833 and which are of the following types:
(1) Industrial, handicraft or service activities which create ten new jobs at least or maintain existing employment.
(2) Expenditure of not less than £20,833 on infrastructure, which is either directly related to these activities or an essential pre-condition for them.
(3) Investment in infrastructure on mountain and hill farming and farming in less favoured regions, for instance, access roads to farms, electricity and drinking water and disposal of sewage.
In reply to Deputy Herbert I want to say most definitely that it is the Government's intention to expend portion of the regional fund on infrastructure and mountain and hill farming.