Deputy Quinn asked what were the alternative administrative arrangements the Government have made to deal with the Presidency of the EEC in view of the postal and telecommunications dispute. I am not making any special point about this but this question was received at very short notice. If I were making any point about this I would be questioning the ruling of the Ceann Comhairle. It has never been my practice in this House to do anything like that and, on this occasion, it is also not my intention to query the ruling of the Ceann Comhairle. It is entirely a matter for the Ceann Comhairle whether or not he allows a question at late notice, short notice or long notice. The reality of the situation is, as Deputy Quinn has stated, that he raised this matter before. The Minister for Foreign Affairs is out of the country on national business at this time and that is the reason why I am standing in for him tonight. I make no apologies for that as that is one of the many roles of a Minister of State. I wanted to get on the record the reason for the Minister's absence from the House and the reason for him not being able to reply to this question.
Deputy Quinn raised the matter before and the Minister for Foreign Affairs stressed, in reply to that question, the absolute need—I am not quoting the Minister exactly—that a favourable view of the country, the people and the Government must be sent abroad. I believe the Deputy will support that view. His party leader and the leader of the Fine Gael Party have supported the need for Ireland to present a favourable national image during the currency of the Presidency.
The other point raised by the Deputy in relation to the aspiration of the Government to serve the entire community is also an achievable aspiration by a Minister who has distinguished himself in his role as our Minister for Foreign Affairs since taking office in 1977. I have no doubt, having regard to the Minister's dedication, integrity and his proven ability that he will be able to project a favourable image of this nation abroad. I believe each side of the House shares the aspirations of the Minister in that regard.
The Deputy asked me to reply unequivocably to a series of questions. A number of the queries he asked me to reply to, as he stated, are based on rumour; consequently, the questions which are based on rumour will receive no reply from me because it is not my practice to reply to questions based on rumour. I would like to make it very clear to the Deputy that the Department of Foreign Affairs at this moment and in the past have never been guilty of strike-breaking. It is equally false to suggest that the French president expressed concern about the possibility of this country not being in a position to discharge its duties as the presiding nation of the Community. There is no basis in fact, or, by definition, in rumour, in relation to that. It is absolutely without foundation.
Ireland, during the term of the last Presidency, had a very high reputation, both through its representatives and through the civil service. I am quite satisfied, again without any equivocation whatever, that the Government can do as good a job if not better, despite the problems, than the Coalition. I am not entering into the argy-bargy of politics; I am not denying that I have in the past entered into the argy-bargy of politics; I am a politician, and I am very proud of that fact and I will never, under any circumstances, deny the profession of politics. I do not want to enter into a controversy, despite the provocative questions based on rumour posed to me by the Deputy, requesting me to answer them.
In recent years the Department of Foreign Affairs have been improving their communication facilities in line with developments in telecommunications generally and with arrangements among our EEC partners. Those facilities, by definition, by the progress of modern technology, include radio communication. I am satisfied, and the Minister is satisfied, that it should be possible for us to discharge our obligations absolutely when we assume the Presidency of the EEC on 1 July. While the position is that if the Post Office strike should continue we would not be able to provide all the facilities we would have wished—I am sure Deputy Quinn shares with me the wish to provide the maximum amount of facilities possible in the circumstances—nevertheless the arrangements we can make, and are making, will be adequate. Like the Deputy, who has referred to hopeful developments in the postal strike, I am not without hope that the post office strike will end in time to enable us to provide all the facilities we have planned. This, in a sense, is an unreal debate in that we are dealing with a hypothetical question and also questions based on rumour.