Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 11 Dec 1984

Vol. 354 No. 10

Order of Business.

It is proposed to take Business in the following order: Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 12. Private Members' Business, No. 69, will be taken from 7 p.m. until 8.30 p.m.

By agreement and notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders the proceedings on items 6, 7 and 8 shall be brought to a conclusion not later than 5.30 p.m., 6.30 p.m. and 9 p.m. respectively and the Ministers for Justice, Industry, Trade, Commerce and Tourism and Fisheries and Forestry shall be called on not later than 5.20 p.m., 6.25 p.m. and 8.55 p.m. respectively to conclude the debates. The proceedings on the remaining stages of item 12 shall be brought to a conclusion not later than 11 p.m. by one question which shall be put from the Chair and which shall in relation to amendments include only amendments set down by the Minister for Agriculture.

Also by agreement the Dáil shall sit later than 9 p.m. today and not later than 11.30 p.m. and business shall be interrupted at 11 p.m.

Are the arrangements for today's business agreed?

Agreed.

May I ask the Tánaiste if he is in a position to give the House the date of the 1985 budget?

No, I am not in a position to give the Deputy that date, but we shall have it within a matter of days — in a week.

Will it be in January?

It will be announced in due course.

(Interruptions.)

Will there be a budget at all?

(Interruptions.)

Order, please.

May I raise a matter with the Tánaiste? I would refer him to the fact that there have been developments with regard to two important constitutional offices, namely those of the Chief Justice and of the Attorney General. Would he be in a position to inform the House of what exactly is the position in regard to these two appointments? I am sure he will be aware of the fact——

That does not arise on the Order of Business. I am ruling that it does not arise on the Order of Business.

The House as yet has no intimation of the situation with regard to these two appointments. Could the Tánaiste indicate to me whether it is proposed to make any announcement in regard to them in the House——

Deputy Haughey, I am ruling that that does not arise on the Order of Business.

But, a Cheann Comhairle ——

You must leave it to the Chair to make that ruling.

I submit that this must be announced.

Surely, then, it is in order for me to ask when, seeing that it must be announced?

The Deputy is not in order in making a speech about it.

I am not making a speech, a Cheann Comhairle. I am simply asking a very modest and unassuming question: when does the Tánaiste anticipate that he will be in a position to come before the House and give us some information about these two important offices?

I assume that these matters will be brought to the attention of the House in due course.

(Interruptions.)

I am sure that the——

If Deputies would——

A Deputy

—— behave themselves.

A Cheann Comhairle, I was endeavouring to inform the Leader of the Opposition that these matters will be brought to the House as soon as possible, in a matter of days.

The Tánaiste is aware of the fact that the position of the outgoing Chief Justice has been discussed in the newspapers. Surely it would be appropriate ——

I am sorry, Deputy. I have no control over the newspapers but I should have control of what is going on here. The Deputy asked a question and an answer has been given and I think it should be left at that.

I want to ask another question, with all due deference.

If it is anything similar to the last, it becomes something in the nature of a debate.

It is a very reasonable and logical question.

I am sure Deputy Haughey knows ——

Will the Ceann Comhairle listen to my question and then decide whether to allow it or not?

Nobody knows better than Deputy Haughey that I am forced to concede that if I were to listen to everything that every Deputy wanted to say I would have a one-sided debate and there would be nothing I could do about it. I am not going to fall for that little ——

I will tell you my question and then you can decide.

Will the Deputy put it in writing?

A Deputy

Will we go through your Office?

I want to ask the Tánaiste what is the position in regard to the present Chief Justice of this country? Has he, in fact, resigned his office? Has he taken up a new appointment in the European Court? If so, is that new appointment for a period of ten months, namely, the period that has to expire of Andreas Ó Cuiv's office? These are very straightforward questions.

To the best of my knowledge, the answer to both Deputy Haughey's questions is in the negative.

I take it that the Chief Justice has not resigned his appointment? Has he indicated to the Government that he intends to resign?

That is a different question.

I am not going to allow this debate.

When are we going to talk about it?

You will have to find a procedure in accordance with Standing Orders. I am sorry.

You will have this House destroyed.

Sorry, a Cheann Comhairle——

I am calling Item No. 6.

I submit to you that it is going beyond the bounds of all reason that the Opposition and this House cannot be informed as to the status of the Chief Justice, the third most important constitutional person in this country. The Tánaiste wants to answer.

An answer has been given in reply to Deputy Haughey asking certain questions. He was told that an announcement would be made in a matter of days.

Surely I am entitled to an elucidation of newspaper reports to the effect that the Chief Justice has indicated his intention to resign from his exalted office and to take up another appointment? Are you ruling that I cannot ask that question?

I am ruling that if I were to allow everything that appears in the newspapers to be debated in the House, I would have a very funny House, indeed.

This is not a debate. I am seeking information.

The Deputy has asked a question——

On a very important matter.

A reply has been given and I am not allowing any development.

A reply has not been given. Then, may I turn to another matter?

As obviously, the constitutional situation in this country is of no importance to your good self, or to this House, may I ask——

A Deputy

Withdraw that disgraceful remark.

Deputy Haughey, you may not realise what you have said. I am a constitutional officer of this House, No. 5. I think, in the present Constitution. The Deputy has just said that the constitutional position in this country appears to be no concern of the Chair.

Of this House.

No, you said of me, of the Chair.

I withdraw such an implication.

You should withdraw it.

Let me say — and I am sorry if I did not make it clear — that it seemed from your ruling that the position of the third most important constitutional person of this country is not of sufficient importance, in your view, to have it announced in this House.

That is not so, Deputy. I deprecate in the strongest possible terms that a new formula is creeping in for withdrawing disorderly remarks in this House which is not in fact a withdrawal but repeating the same thing in another way. It is not worthy of Members of the House and should be stopped forthwith. I ask Deputy Haughey to please give an unqualified withdrawal.

In so far as it seems to indicate that the position of constitutional persons was of no importance to your good self, of course, I unhesitatingly withdraw that. What I was trying to say was that it seemed to me from your ruling that you do not regard the present position of the third most important constitutional person as being of sufficient importance to have information given to us in this House. I accept your ruling.

It is a reflection on the Chair.

It is a reflection on your ruling.

It is a reflection on the Chair. I rule that it does not arise now in the House in this way at this time. That is as clear as it can be.

I have no choice but to accept your ruling. I deplore it but I accept it. In view of the indications that have been given publicly that the Land Commission is about to be abolished and that certain members of the staff are about to be made redundant, will the Tánaiste give some indication of when this matter will be brought before the House and the position in regard to this very important historical institution of the State clarified?

Is the Deputy speaking about a Bill?

I assume I am.

Is it about proposed legislation?

I am asking about the declared intention to abolish the Land Commission and make large numbers of staff redundant.

It was stated in the national plan that the Land Commission would be abolished. Legislation will be brought forward in 1985 to bring this into effect.

Is the Tánaiste aware that in the meantime, pending this legislation, indications have been given to large numbers of staff that they are to be made redundant during the month of December? Is that the position?

I am sorry I cannot be helpful to the Deputy. He asked a question about whether indications were given to the staff. I am not aware of them.

I deplore the treatment meted out to the people in the Land Commission. They have received redundancy notices irrespective of what the Tánaiste says. They are being made redundant from 28 December this year.

That does not arise on the Order of Business.

It is an absolute disgrace. These men are being removed from their jobs coming up to Christmas.

The Deputy is being disorderly.

It is disgraceful. The Tánaiste is not aware that redundancy notices have been issued. They have been issued and he should be aware of that particularly when he is acting for the Taoiseach. If he does not know it he is a disgrace to his office.

I am calling Deputy Gregory.

Shout louder.

The Deputy had better start shouting louder in County Meath because his shouting will soon be finished there.

As the Chair disallowed my Private Notice Question to the Minister for Justice regarding the source of the bogus document issued to the national newspapers regarding the LPG cavern storage project in Dublin Bay, I ask permission to raise this matter on the Adjournment.

I will communicate with the Deputy.

The Chair said that his reason for disallowing the question was because the matter was not brought to the notice of the Garda.

I cannot have my reasons questioned here.

I find it difficult to understand how the Garda were not aware of something which made headlines in the newspapers at the weekend.

The people of Clontarf are pleased.

(Limerick West): Since the Chair disallowed my Private Notice Question and since the Tánaiste is not aware of what is happening in the Land Commission, I wish to raise this matter on the Adjournment.

I will communicate with the Deputy.

Now that the Minister for the Environment is present, can he give us the present state of the negotiations between his Department and the National Association of Tenants Organisations about the Government's decision to increase the income from local authority rents by 20 per cent——

That does not arise on the Order of Business.

May I have a reply to that? They will also take into account overtime and other matters.

Order, please.

They are supposed to go from the beginning of January.

(Interruptions.)

I must have order. If Deputies are determined not to allow the business of the House to proceed, I will have no alternative but to adjourn the House.

It is not a question of interfering with the business of the House but of getting information about what is happening to thousands of people.

I wish to raise on the Adjournment the repercussions from last Friday's strike when millions of pounds were lost to the economy.

This matter was raised last week.

Will the Chair allow me to finish?

No. I have ruled that matter does not arise.

Millions of pounds were lost to the economy. The Border was left unmanned despite assurances from the Minister for Finance in this House. He cast aspersions on me when I said that the Garda would not co-operate.

That matter does not arise on the Order of Business.

The loss of millions of pounds is not important to the Chair.

I have already said that matter does not arise on the Order of Business. If I do not have order I will have no option but to adjourn the House.

In view of the increasing attacks on young and old people especially in Dublin city and in view of the fact that I received notification from Dublin Corporation telling me——

Has the Deputy a request to make on a specific matter?

Standing Orders require me to advise you of that which I wish to raise on the Adjournment. I am doing so.

They do not require the Deputy to make a speech.

I have received letters from Dublin Corporation telling me they are unable to provide public lighting in my constituency.

The Deputy can make a case if he gets permission to have this matter discussed on the Adjournment.

That is all I want to ask of you. I wish to raise this matter on the Adjournment.

I will communicate with the Deputy. Almost 20 minutes have been spent raising matter after matter, a great percentage of which are not in order.

They are important matters.

There seem to be about ten other matters. Does the House want the business of the House to proceed?

This is the business of the country.

It is the business of the House.

I direct Deputy Haughey to a speech he made in this House two years ago on 14 December when he spoke about obeying the Chair. I have had nothing in recent times but obstruction and it is not good enough.

I merely pointed out that what we are doing is the business of the House.

It is not the business of the House.

It is. It is perfectly in order to raise matters on the Adjournment.

Can the Tánaiste say if legislation will be introduced concerning the release of staff in the Land Commission to assess land for farm tax?

To the best of my knowledge it will be introduced in early 1985.

What is the position about the 40,000 acres in the Land Commission?

That is not in order.

I wish to raise this matter on the Adjournment.

I will communicate with the Deputy.

I wish to raise on the Adjournment the recent failure by the Minister for the Environment to sanction the southern cross route at the request of Dublin County Council. The subject matter is a letter from the Minister——

I will communicate with the Deputy.

Will the Tánaiste explain to the House why the Minister for Industry, Trade, Commerce and Tourism refused to meet the PMPS depositors protection group? Does he accept that the attitude of the Government to this group is nothing short of disgraceful?

It does not arise on the Order of Business.

There are 11 students for which the Minister for Communications had responsibility when he liquidated Irish Shipping. Those are 11 students of marine science at the Regional Technical College in Cork. I brought this to the Chair's attention last week. Is the Minister for Communications going to do anything about them?

It does not arise on the Order of Business.

In relation to your frustrating job, Sir, you may get some relief in 1985. I hope you take that in good humour.

I have got to the stage now——

I wish to raise on the Adjournment, in view of the widespread attacks on the elderly in rural areas, that the Minister for Communications will instruct Bord Telecom Éireann to give priority to the installation of telephones for the elderly in rural areas.

The Chair will communicate with Deputy Leyden.

Could I ask for some clarification on the Adjournment?

Then I could raise on the the Adjournment a question in relation to tender documentation for Castlebar general hospital?

The Chair will communicate with Deputy Kenny.

A Deputy

What was that? We did not hear it.

Castlebar General Hospital.

I am very interested in what happens in Castlebar.

Top
Share