Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 4 Dec 1985

Vol. 362 No. 6

Private Members' Business. - Mallow (Cork) Factory: Motion (Resumed).

The following motion was moved by Deputy Noonan(Limerick West) on Tuesday, 3 December 1985:
That Dáil Éireann calls on the Government to request the Board of Siúicre Éireann Cpt., to review its decision to close Erin Foods at Mallow, County Cork in view of the loss of employment involved and the serious consequences for the whole horticultural industry and the future of food processing in this country.
Debate resumed on amendment No. 1:
To delete all words after "That" and substitute the following:
"Dáil Éireann notes the reasons why Siúicre Éireann Cpt., has found it necessary to terminate its food processing operation at Mallow and supports the efforts being made to obtain an alternative activity for the area."
—(Minister for Agriculture).

Ba mhaith liom cúpla focal a rá i dtaobh an dúnadh síos seo i Malla agus i dtaobh na fostaíochta atá á tabhairt ag an monarcha seo, Erin Foods. Tá mé ag iarraidh ar an Rialtas gach aon chabhair gur féidir a thabhairt chun an fhostaíocht sin a choimeád ar siúl i gCorcaigh thoir-theas agus i gCorcaigh thiar-thuaidh. Os rud é go bhfuil an oiread sin daoine dífhostaithe sa dúiche seo, féachann sé an-olc ar fad dúinn go bhfuilimid chun 164 daoine eile a chur as obair ansin.

The closure of Erin Foods would be a disaster for Mallow which has the highest unemployment rate in the country with 1,300 people already out of work. Erin Foods are a valuable industry for employment-starved north Cork. Over the past few months this area has lost 400 to 500 jobs with cutbacks in Golden Vale, Charleville, and the closure of Apple Computers in Millstreet. If Erin Foods close it will be an economic disaster for the whole area and especially for the 164 people whose jobs are threatened. The Coalition are doing this in the name of bookkeeping but they will be the losers. If they have any consideration for these unfortunate people, some with large families, they will realise that they are all entitled to a job and a decent standard of living.

The cost of closing Erin Foods would be greater than the cost of keeping them open. The cost of closure will be almost £9 million and running costs over the past three years were £2.5 million. Another year of production would have allowed them to recoup their losses. We should also remember that the interest on loan repayments is the main loss factor at present. Financial losses at Erin Foods have been diminishing in the past number of years and there is no doubt that with proper management the factory were and are on their way to profitability. This would have been the first year that Erin Foods operated to full capacity and it is a shame not to give them a chance. If we want to progress in agriculture we should plan ahead and the closure will have a damaging effect on the economy because £1 million worth of dried vegetables will have to be imported annually. Surely the Government are not stupid enough to allow this to happen after all their talk about imports and buying Irish? Closure would mean that we will import many goods which could be produced here and to close the factory would be a backward step.

This factory paid £4 million in wages annually and farmers benefited to the extent of £1.8 million. If they can put that amount into the north Cork economy they deserve to survive. Agriculture is our greatest resource industry and is a natural asset. Food processing has a great potential and any factory engaging in it should not be threatened with closure. It will be a scandal if we increase our imports of vegetables and horticultural products further, at a time when the Government are setting up the National Development Corporation at a cost of £300 million to create jobs by exploiting natural resources. Obviously, Government Departments are pulling in opposite directions. We call on the Government to request the board of Erin Foods to rescind their decision. I call on the Government Deputies for Cork North and Cork West to say publicly if they agree with the board's decision to add so many people to the already unacceptable level of unemployment in north Cork. If they agree let them take the blame but if they do not it is their duty to vote against the motion. Now is the time for these Deputies to stand up and be counted so that we will present a united front to save jobs. We must not add to the suffering of these people. For God's sake keep Erin Foods open.

There are 1,500 post-primary pupils in Mallow and seven leaving certificate classes will have completed their course next year. Erin Foods would give employment to some of those people and the young people would like to think they could get a job at home. I again call on the board of Erin Foods to rescind their decision and to keep the factory open.

It is with sadness and regret that we have this motion before the House tonight. The closure of five factories by the Sugar Company in recent years, Tuam potato plant, the plant in Carlow, Fastnet, Mattersons' Canning and East Cork Foods, all under Fianna Fáil Governments, and now the threat of closure over Erin Foods, Mallow, raises fundamental questions about our food industry. Certain questions must be asked of politicians and management. Why have the management not changed the product line in the last 25 years? Why have they not invested in new machinery? When the workers implemented the rationalisation policies asked of them why did this not suffice? Why are the workers always knocked on the head while the management seem to get off scot free?

When Midleton plant closed in 1983 the problems were identified as those of products and machinery which were out of date, and bad marketing. I am mesmerised and baffled that two and a half years later the same problems have been identified in Mallow. They tell us that the product and the machinery are out-of-date and that the marketing strategy has not been good enough. What has been happening for the past few years? Why is this all coming to a head now?

The workers in Erin Foods in Mallow have more than played their part. Many of these people have been with the company for the past 25 years and have given good and loyal service. When they were asked to implement rationalisation plans they co-operated. The evidence of their perfect record is that there has not been a strike in Erin Foods, Mallow, since the factory was founded 25 years ago. Surely that record speaks for itself.

It now appears that the workers are the people who will suffer. In this case that involves 164 workers, their wives and children. Many of them are in their mid-forties, a critical age so far as employment is concerned. Where will they find alternative employment? Mallow and the north Cork area suffer from a grave unemployment problem. The unemployment figure for Mallow town alone is 1,530 and by adding another 164 there will be nearly 1,700 unemployed. Mallow is an area that is designated 40 per cent for industry but it is obvious that the percentage should be increased to 60 per cent and I ask the Minister for Industry, Trade, Commerce and Tourism to do that. It is very important for the future of Mallow.

As was pointed out by the Minister of State, Deputy Moynihan, students from seven leaving certificate classes will leave school this year. Where will they, their fathers, brothers and sisters get work? We must not forget the consequences of unemployment. There is no substitute for work in our lives. We are conditioned to work and we find it difficult to cope when we find ourselves without work. The people in Mallow want work, not redundancy payments or social welfare payments.

Let us look at the history and the decision of the Irish Sugar Company to close Erin Foods in Mallow. In the past few years there have been losses and this year the loss was £700,000. That is not only a turnover loss. Interest rates and overhead losses are also involved and some of those overheads have been incurred in Dublin. The Sugar Company must give Erin Foods, Mallow, a capital injection because it is their industrial base. Mallow has served the company well and has made many profits for them but they are now willing to let part of the workforce go on the dole queue. I say to the company that they are unfair. They know they should give Erin Foods, Mallow, a capital injection to allow it to become viable in the long run. The Mallow area has a lot more in its favour than other areas. People with the necessary skill are in the area. It is an agricultural district and it has producers who have grown vegetables for a long time. In addition, it has a well-educated young population. Other areas have not all these advantages and I ask the Sugar Company to take note of this.

I know the Minister for Agriculture has found the action committee and members of Mallow UDC to be intelligent, rational and constructive. He does not say that of all groups. They have pointed out where solutions could be found. What the people do not want is the door of the factory to be closed. I appeal to the Minister at this late stage to see if the factory could be kept open.

If all else fails, it is incumbent on all of us to make every effort to ensure that there is a vegetable plant in the Erin Foods complex in Mallow and that it will employ many people. There is no point in thinking other jobs are available. It is not as though Mallow people can go to Cork to find jobs because they are not available in the city. Neither can they go to Fermoy because that town has an unemployment figure of 1,000. Therefore, I make a last appeal for a capital injection for Erin Foods, Mallow, to make it a viable industry. I believe it can be done.

The workers in Erin Foods, Mallow, who are in the majority members of my union, the ITGWU, are deeply concerned at the announcement by the board of CSET to close down the Erin Foods vegetable plant at Mallow with the loss of 164 jobs. This is the latest in a series of closures which reflect the company's failure to maintain successfully viable vegetable processing operations in spite of the considerable and positive advantages which undoubtedly exist in this area of production. Previously the company abandoned vegetable processing operations in Carlow, Midleton, Limerick, Skibbereen and Tuam. In each of these areas there were Government promises of replacement factories, none of which has materialised to date. According to the company, the current vegetable processing campaign is the final one and employment will be terminated at the end of the campaign at Christmas and early in the New Year.

From being an industrial boom area some years ago, Mallow has declined to the point where it has the unenviable distinction of having the highest unemployment rate in the north Cork area. Its mainstream industrial activity, namely, dairying, is rationalising. Golden Vale are implementing a redundancy programme with a loss of 230 jobs and the Ballyclough Co-op have shed some 200 jobs in the past few years.

The population response to the industrial good times has produced a profile where one in three of the unemployed are under 25 years with little or no prospect of finding employment. The labour force in Erin Foods is a comparatively youthful one with young families and extensive commitments. In these circumstances the closure decision will have devastating consequences in human and family terms and the withdrawal of State investment with the abandonment of Erin Foods will represent a crushing blow to the local community.

In his last review of the company's affairs, the chairman expressed confidence in the company's industrial and branded products achieving permanent viability from a sound base. In Mallow there has been a continuous process of rationalisation and reorganisation involving product, working time and pay. The Irish Transport Union and the workers in the company have co-operated fully in all that activity.

The Mallow factory processes vegetables for industrial use and for its own branded products. In the latter case the added value activity takes place in the Thurles plant. The industrial product is mainly exported and this should be noted by the Minister. Thus, national policy is doubly served, that is, in respect of exports on the one hand and import substitution on the other, not forgetting the considerable value of this activity at the level of the primary producers.

The trade union movement, the ITGWU in particular, has long advocated the tremendous potential for wealth and job creation that lies virtually untapped in this section of agriculture. Indeed we believe that if Erin Foods did not exist they would require to be created as part of the process of exploiting this extremely valuable resource. With the advent at long last of the National Development Corporation, Erin Foods represent an essential vehicle for the development of this vast potential.

Accordingly, having regard to Government policy and commitment to the development of our natural resources in the interest of the first national priority of job creation, the decision by CSB Teo is impossible to justify and must be rescinded. The closure will generate massive negative costs for the State. In the company's announcement of closure, costs of over £40 million, including a projected £1 million for imported processed vegetables, have been mentioned. There is, of course, in addition, the costs of social welfare and the loss of tax revenues and the depressing costs in human terms for those immediately affected, their families and their communities.

In response to the campaign to keep the plant open, which was launched by the workers at local and national level, I am strongly urging the Minister to use his good offices to reverse the closure decision. This is an ideal project for inclusion under the umbrella of the NDC so that the company can be kept going and the workers kept in employment.

In supporting the Government amendment to the motion now before the House I want to say at the outset how regrettable to me as Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture with responsibility in the area of food and horticulture the closure or discontinuation of any food activity would be. As a Deputy representing the area affected by this decision and including in my constituency both those involved in the factory operation and those who supply products to the factory, I fully appreciate that there are those in the Mallow area who must now be experiencing a deep sense of trauma and anxiety, and I sympathise with them in their present difficulties. As the Minister said last night, it is particularly unfortunate that the closure should occur in an area of Cork which has suffered other closures and job losses. Therefore, in discussing this problem I would like to ensure that as far as possible Deputies and the people of the area, particularly those directly affected by the closure, are made fully aware of the background and circumstances of this decision to close and will be kept up to date on the possible more hopeful developments currently taking place. This is not a time for recrimination but for co-operation and working together for progress.

I would first of all like to assure Deputies of my continuing commitment to vegetable based enterprises in County Cork. Indeed, it is now almost a quarter century since I was involved in the setting up of East Cork Foods at Midleton, an operation in which the Sugar Company also became involved. I gave my support and assistance to the venture and we succeeded in getting together in record time what amounted to a very substantial amount of the capital required to get the ECF under way. Other enterprises have failed and have been forgotten but when the East Cork Foods closure was announced and when I had come into office, the closure having been acceded to by the previous administration. I immediately set about getting a rescue package for the Midleton area and after considerable effort and negotiations with various potentially interested parties we got an alternative operation going. This had not happened with any previous closure, and I can assure Deputy O'Keeffe that Midleton has not gone into oblivion. Although it is early days yet, the operation in Midleton has proved quite successful. We have some 2,000 acres of crops, an efficient factory and, most important of all, a ready market for the produce. We can in fact readily learn from the Midleton experience in our approach to Mallow.

A major problem with Mallow is the scale and type of operation carried out there. Deputies opposite have alleged that the equipment is old and technology out of date. I would suggest that their knowledge is rather out of date. The Mallow plant has some most up to date technology; it is the first food operation to produce no-cook products, but the company have been unable to achieve a satisfactory price volume market combination which would make this type of operation viable.

There are, however, other types of operation which could be viable and I have been looking into the possibilities for some time now.

It is appropriate to point this out to Deputies Noonan, O'Keeffe and Reynolds and any other Deputies opposite who believe that one should wait for the evil day and then cry loudly but do nothing. I have not cried although I have every sympathy for those affected by the closure. In fact it is because of my appreciation of their position that I have been doing something — I have been particularly active in pursuing the possibility of a new arrangement for Mallow. In doing this my first priority has been to ensure that there is a ready market for the product.

It is no good whatever producing something for which there is no market or for which the market available is not such as to allow for a viable operation. One first has to identify the market and then get an operation under way which will meet the requirements of that market. I believe the scene is now set for such an operation, but if it is to be successful it will need the co-operation and support of all those involved.

This is not a time for sniping or making irrelevant but smart debating points. It is a time when there is a need for everyone to work together to get an alternative operation off the ground and to make a success of it. This will require the involvement of all, the relevant State agencies such as IDA and the National Development Corporation, the Sugar Company as current owner of the plant and property, the Mallow workers whose commitment to any new operation will be essential for its success, and the local growers to provide the basic input material. Also required of course, is the involvement of a relevant marketing company. This is the essential element which I am pursuing. Even at this stage I can report I am quite confident that a viable alternative activity can be achieved.

Another point raised by the Opposition relates to the high level of food imports coming into the country. The Minister has already commented adequately on this and pointed out that in a free trade situation it is the consumer in this country who determines the amount and type of product imported. In the case of what are statistically classified as food imports it is quite clear that a very large proportion of this £800 million consists of animal feeding stuffs and that the customer for this product is the very person who is responsible for the agricultural product on which our huge food export business is based.

One of the principal reasons why such levels of feeding stuff imports take place is a direct reflection of the very high degree to which our agricultural industry is based on the output of livestock and livestock products generally especially cattle, beef, milk and dairy products.

I will reply briefly to some of the points made by Deputies. I wish to congratulate them on their dignified, constructive approach to this matter. The Horticultural Development Group were referred to and it was said they had gone into oblivion. That organisation made a number of very good suggestions which are being acted on, such as the setting up of a national potato co-operative. This has been set up with a marketing arm. Evidence of its effectiveness will be seen as it grows from strength to strength.

Last week we set up a national vegetable horticultural co-operative, again with the help of the farming organisations and ACOT, in order to bring some rationale into the market. For far too long we have been growing things and just hoping we could sell them. Of course the right approach would have been to go into the supermarkets, find out what products people are buying and produce them. Thanks again to the recommendations of the national horticultural committee we have decided to grant aid the glasshouse industry. Many of the food imports we have been talking about come about because the glasshouse owners were not able to heat their premises and we were consequently importing. Our grant aid is for the conversion of heating from oil to solid fuel. These grants are being taken up.

I have spoken about the fallacy of imports. Most of our imports are composed of off season produce such as tomatoes and peppers. We can do much in that regard and I suggest that Mallow is the kind of place where it could be done, as was pointed out last evening. We have a big climatic advantage on the south coast but we are not taking full advantage of it.

As Minister of State with responsibility for food production, my responsibility is to knuckle down and try to do something about Mallow. This I am prepared to do, but if I am to do it I will need the co-operation of everybody, Members of the House, those who are working in Mallow and the growers there. We need the co-operation of everybody.

I have been around for a long time. I have been growing crops for East Cork Foods for 25 years without a break. I know something about the problems of the company. Neither in the case of East Cork Foods nor in the case of Erin Foods has there been any inherent problems in the factories nor in relation to growers. So far as Midleton is concerned we were lucky to have succeeded in attracting an overseas company to become involved there, admittedly in a small way, but that involvement has convinced me that we have the best pea growing land in the world. That company were so pleased that they are now considering further development in Ireland.

One of the main reasons for the Mallow plant and East Cork Foods not succeeding was our failure to gain access to the market place. Our own market is pitiably small, so small that one small plant would flood it. Therefore, we must concentrate on exports. The horticultural market in the UK is very much a closed shop. Our weakness was always that we were depending on brokers and the very haphazard type of arrangements when we put our crops into the ground. This is not sufficient because these are high cost crops and we must know whether at the end of the day we will be able to sell them, and if so, what prices we can command for them. We were always prepared to settle for modest profits and that was important. I have been having discussions with a company who have a big share of that market and, with the help of everyone concerned, we hope to have that sort of involvement in a new operation.

That has been in the air for a long time.

For that achievement we need the help of the IDA and, possibly, the help of the National Development Corporation but, more than anything else, we need to take a hard look at the whole food market. Ten years ago in Sainsbury's in London or in any of our supermarkets one would hardly find a fresh vegetable, but the swing now is back to fresh vegetables, to chilled vegetables or to vegetables with a long shelf life. That is the area we should grow for. It is one in which Mallow would have a role.

There is no point in waiting around for something to happen. The time is opportune. I have much less time in relation to Midleton because in the month of March I had to go out seeking growers. Fortunately I was successful to that extent. There is enough time to turn that operation around.

There are only three workers there now.

The factory there is doing very well. The number employed there is 25 and the Deputy will be welcome to visit the plant, should he so wish.

What about Erin Foods in Tuam?

I doubt that Deputy O'Keeffe has ever been to visit the plant. I was the first Minister to attempt to turn around one of these operations. Fianna Fáil were in power when the Carlow factory was closed. There is nobody there now. I may not have made a great job of what I attempted to do, but I was prepared to plunge into uncharted waters, something that no Minister in any Fianna Fáil Government had the courage to do.

The Minister is forgetting about Tony O'Reilly's involvement.

Do not mind Tony O'Reilly. There are 2,000 acres under crops in the Midleton area. The farmers there are happy with the position. They are making a profit. If we could do the same at Mallow we would be achieving something very real. We made mistakes at Midleton and we must not repeat those mistakes. We can profit from them. I repeat that I was the first Minister to turn one of those operations around. Successive Fianna Fáil Minister failed in this respect.

Is an employment level of three an achievement?

There were 60 people employed there during the campaign. There are now 25 people working there. The Deputy is free to come and visit the factory.

He is too busy with the Doneraile conspiracy.

Unlike the Minister, I have never run away from problems.

The Deputy would be better off doing a little work for his constituents.

As a small nation we have our role to play in the whole business of horticulture, of the growing and processing of horticultural products. We have many climatic advantages but our competitors also have such advantages. One of our problems has been that in the past we were not organised sufficiently. The Dutch, the British, the French and the Germans have been years ahead of us in technology and in organisation. We have a very substantial job to do. My appeal to the Deputies opposite is that, instead of criticising what I am trying to do, they should ask their county committees of agriculture to support the potato co-operatives so that for the first time we might have some level of rationale.

The Minister has been successful only in terms of promises.

I am talking about achievements, not promises.

The Minister promised £1 million. That promise was made here in the House.

I promised adequate funding and that promise has been fulfilled. Deputies opposite might even join their county committees of agriculture. It is interesting to note that at the opening of the horticulture co-operative last week the chairman said that this Government were the first to support an horticultural co-operative.

Deputies

Hear, hear.

Some of the people opposite were invited to that function but did not consider it worth their while to attend.

One of the Minister's own performed the opening ceremony. The people opposite are very interested in TV appearances.

Jealousy will not get the Deputy anywhere.

What is important is that we are making steady progress.

Obviously, Deputy Myra Barry does not agree. She told the truth tonight.

(Interruptions.)

The Minister is supposed to be talking about Mallow.

I was about to come to that, but I am not being given an opportunity to develop the point. What is important in regard to Mallow is that in any type of horticultural operation there will be surpluses, products that will not be suitable for the fresh market. In other words, there will be second and third grade products. Consequently, it is inevitable that there should be a processing facility available so as to take up the slack. If we organise in the area of horticulture we will need that sort of operation. It would be very easy for this side of the House if they adopted the same attitude in regard to Mallow as Fianna Fáil adopted in regard to the many closures over which they presided.

Was the Minister not anxious once to join Fianna Fáil?

I sat here last evening during Deputy O'Keeffe's contribution and I did not interrupt him once. The Deputy has not stopped shouting since I began my contribution. He is bad mannered and not fit to be in this House. I have not let the grass grow under my feet since the board decision was taken. I am convinced we can turn this plant around and I am confident that there are sufficient committed people around to help me. What is needed is a factory that will have access to the market place for its products, that will have at its disposal committed growers and workers. We are prepared to do our part in bringing that about.

Deputies

Hear, hear.

We put down this motion because we are witnessing another sad saga in the continued demise of our vegetable processing industry. In 1983, in the same constituency East Cork Foods and Midleton closed down. I grant that the Minister did Trojan work and managed to get some substitution, but at that time worry was expressed about the future of Erin Foods in Mallow. Those doubts were dispelled and we were told there was no fear of Erin Foods in Mallow being in trouble. Yet two short years later, here we are.

For 164 workers and their families this will be a bleak Christmas and their foreseeable future will also be bleak. The impending closure will change the lives of all connected with Erin Foods, and not for the better. As has been stressed time and time again by speakers on both sides of this House, the number unemployed in Mallow town and the region is approximately 3,000 at the moment. As has been stated, many school leavers will be coming on the market in the near future, and now we will be adding the people who are working in Erin Foods and ancillary industries and the unemployment number will be greatly increased.

With Deputy Barry I must call for a review of the grant system, not only in disadvantaged areas but in areas like Mallow which is also disadvantaged, and consideration should be given to increasing the grant to 60 per cent. Not only will the effect of this closure be felt by the immediate workers but the whole area will be affected, psychologically as well as economically. Farmers will lose one of their options and in this era of quotas — milk quotas, grain quotas and beef problems — farmers will not have a market for peas and will have difficulty in finding alternative paying projects. It is estimated that spending power in the area will be reduced by around £3 million and this will have a devastating effect on the economy.

The manner in which the closure of the factory was announced was particularly callous, especially in the light of the chairman's statement less than 12 months ago. When reviewing the food operation he said that an ultimate decision must not be reached until after the most careful evaluation. The results of such an evaluation have not been made public and I call on the Sugar Company to give a detailed statement on their reasons for closing Erin Foods.

We were told last night by the Minister that losses of £800,000 were sustained in 1983, £500,000 in 1984 and the projected loss of £1 million in 1985. It is not unknown, especially where there is a group of companies involved that figures can be played around with to give the desired result. I do not think it is any secret that the board of the Sugar Company were anxious to divest themselves of the food division and over the past number of years they have proceeded to do this.

During the debate on the closure of East Cork Foods it became clear that head office costs — for the St. Stephen's Green office — contributed enormously to the overruns. Although I do not have the figures, I have been led to believe that a sizeable amount of head office costs is also included in the accounts of Erin Foods — this cost is for marketing. When we were discussing the Midleton operation, it was accepted by most people that marketing was being done from the central office in Dublin and that many people there seemed to be out of touch with what was happening on the ground. I thought they would have seen reality at that stage and changed their plan of action, but this did not happen. I attribute this closure to the desire in head office to get rid of the food processing section at all costs.

The Minister also said that the situation internationally in the food processing business, and particularly in the industrial food processing sector, is one of intense competition. This is true of all businesses but when we look at the response of senior management, the decision makers, over the years to the development of Erin Foods in Mallow those responsible for this closure can be identified.

Over the past 25 years there has been little or no capital investment to re-equip the factory to meet the changing demands of the times. The market for dehydrated vegetables is out of date and it was known over the past year or so that demand has been for fresh vegetables, but no attempt was made to channel into that market. In not doing so I have no doubt head office believed that in the longer or shorter term the company would make losses and that would give them a cast iron excuse for closure.

Many years ago a large international firm — Heinz — joined with Erin Foods and struck up a very favourable relationship. They identified and got into the market but at a certain stage they departed and I believe it was then that Erin Foods lost out.

Why did they pull out?

This highlights the necessity for the hard sell which is missing in a number of semi-State bodies. As long as we continue to promote people sideways when they are not making a success of their jobs, we will not be successful in business.

With Fianna Fáil's interference.

The cost to the State of the closure of this plant in the coming year will be in the region of £5 million, and will continue at £1.5 million per annum after that. We have been told of the projected loss of £1 million for 1985 but account should be taken of the exceptionally bad summer and allowance should be made for it. Would it not make more sense to pump some capital in to enable the company to update, to review their marketing strategy and to set up a new marketing and management structure and not close the place down? If one breaks up an institution and disperses the workforce it is very hard to get it back on an even keel. If the management were restructured in the light of marketing and so on, it would be a recipe for keeping this business going. Substantial import substitution will be necessary, contrary to what the Government are preaching daily. We have been listening to what this Government will do about imports of fruit and vegetables for the past three years and in this case words are speaking louder than actions.

The Deputy has five minutes.

(Interruptions.)

Deputy Ahern without interruption, please.

I and a delegation from my party visited the fruit and vegetable market in Dublin where we were sad to see so many foreign vegetables and so few Irish vegetables on display. We must make an effort to make the indigenous vegetable industry successful and put a stop to this scandal. The producers, who are the farmers, must accept that producing vegetables is not a pastime but a business. They will have to produce quality goods and give a regular supply so that we can compete with foreign importers.

The National Development Corporation was proposed last night as a likely answer to the problem. The Minister said that he had £300 million ready for investment. That is not true. The £300 million is authorised share capital and the corporation has not got a brown penny at the moment to invest. The Minister should acquire some of the £18 million which was voted as part of a larger amount, but not used by the Sugar Company in 1982 and use it to ensure that Erin Foods in Mallow will not close. Deputy Barry said that the Sugar Company should pay the money into Erin Foods. The House can be assured that the Sugar Company have no intention of putting money into Erin Foods. It is up to the Minister to tell them to do so. The Minister is where the buck stops. It is up to the Minister to decide on the future of Erin Foods.

Deputy Séamus Kirk, to conclude at 8.10 p.m.

It is a pleasure to contribute to this debate. It is a matter of considerable regret that this motion has had to be put down for debate. We have been discussing the serious plight of the processed vegetable industry and contributions from all sides of the House illustrate that there is a serious lack of commitment by the Government towards supporting the food processing industry. When we examine the economy and look for development potential to generate national wealth and much needed jobs at a time when unemployment is increasing rapidly, the food industry comes immediately into focus. At a time when the consumption of processed vegetables has been increasing rapidly, the processing industry has been in steady decline. Surely it is time for the Government to examine the situation.

Because of changing attitudes towards diets and a greater emphasis on health foods a greater percentage of the household budget is being spent on both fresh and processed fruit and vegetables; yet the processed vegetable industry is in serious decline. The Government cannot allow that situation to continue. We cannot allow the tremendous potential for national wealth creation and invaluable jobs creation which exists in this industry to wither away without being utilised for the benefit of the country.

Erin Foods has been a major processor of vegetables. The closure of the Mallow plant marks the almost total cessation of the Sugar Company's involvement in the production and processing of vegetables. That is a sad commentary on the Government. We must see this closure in the context of an ever-increasing volume of food imports, in the context of a serious loss of spending power in the Mallow area and in the context of very high unemployment in the area. Erin Foods provided invaluable employment. Apart from the jobs involved in the plant, there were jobs on the farm and in the distribution and sales area. Approximately 160 jobs have gone in the plant and perhaps up to 100 farmers are affected. Are the Government prepared to allow this saga to continue without making some effort to consider the implications for everybody involved? Are the Government prepared to give the necessary support to allow the plant to be kept open and to be put on a profitable footing again and are they prepared to give a real commitment to providing the necessary support for the vegetable processing industry?

Where are the Governments' priorities in this matter? Despite what the Minister of State, Deputy Hegarty, said earlier that there was not the amount of vegetable imports that some commentators would lead us to believe, when we examine the figures we see immediately that the import figures for fruit and vegetables are very significant and cannot be dismissed. If we have hundreds of millions of pounds worth of imports at a time when every effort must be made to ensure that wealth is kept in the country, it is surely an area which requires urgent attention. It is not good enough for the Minister to tell us that it is not all that significant.

In relation to fresh vegetables, there has been a considerable increase in the volume of imports. I had a Parliamentary Question down last week to the Minister asking him if he was satisfied with the progress that has been made since he took office in the development of the horticultural industry generally in this country. The replies I got were very unsatisfactory. The measures taken to improve the situation were few and far between. Those measures are very insignificant where very significant measures are needed to get the industry on a proper footing to bring the necessary cohesion and co-ordination into the marketing area to ensure that imports of fruit and vegetables will be stemmed where they can be stemmed and where a real industry can be developed, where national wealth creation and the significant number of jobs that can be created will be set in train immediately.

I am asking tonight that the Minister for Agriculture or his Minister of State will tell us what measures they have in the pipeline to get the processed vegetable industry and fresh vegetable and fruit industry on a proper footing so that we can go out and tell those involved that there is a future for them. Those involved in growing must yearly commit considerable resources, in certain instances, to high cost crops and must plan for the future. If the Minister or the Minister of State could assure such people that they are concerned about their plight and that they will give them sufficient backing to allow them to develop their industry, to supply the needs of the consumer and to ensure minimum imports, that would be a very worthwhile step. I am afraid over the past three years that sort of commitment and confidence boosting were not forthcoming for the industry. It is time the Minister and his Minister of State got together a proper co-ordinated policy for the development of the horticulture industry.

I regret the closure of Erin Foods in Mallow for a number of reasons. Mallow has probably one of the finest work forces that could be put together. They have technical know-how and skill unparalleled by any other group of people and we cannot allow this country to lose that skill. We must make sure that there is some way, somehow, somewhere an opportunity to harness this skill and technical know-how. When one speaks about vegetables and about the closure of the Sugar Company, one can speak about their history also, and it is extremely difficult to believe that, in a country such as ours with the climate and facilities we have a facility such as Erin Foods should close.

I am convinced that the decision to close Erin Foods in Mallow was not taken last week or the week before. It was taken some years ago. If you go back on the record you will find that Comhlucht Siúicre Éireann made the first decision to get out of the vegetable industry in 1978 when the factory in Tuam was closed. In 1980-81 the Carlow premises was closed as was Fastnet at that time. Obviously, a careful decision was made that vegetable processing would not be part and parcel of the Sugar Company. I believe that that section of the company was over managed and badly managed and that the workers on the ground had not the opportunity to make their knowledge and expertise available.

The marketing of the products was totally unsatisfactory and as a result we have reached this stage. The Minister, Deputy Deasy, and the Minister of State, Deputy Hegarty, with their knowledge and acknowledgement of the position in Mallow whether with the IDA, the NDC or a combination of both, will bring in a new industry, be it private, semi-private or whatever, and the skills of the workforce will be harnessed once more. I do not accept that in a country such as this we can allow that facility not to be developed.

Deputy Kirk mentioned the enormous amount of vegetables coming into this country. Have we not got the vegetables and the marketing skills to present products in such a way that they are acceptable to the Irish housewife? Maybe we are all at fault in that area, politicians, workers, management, everybody. I have no doubt that the amount of money made available to Erin Foods in Mallow in particular has been totally inadequate. The facilities for picking the peas out in the field have been antiquated and some of the machinery in the company has not been changed for years. In effect the work force did not contribute to the situation they are in now.

Management were and are wrong in this case, and I do not say that lightly. Considerable amounts of vegetables are imported and we have no one but ourselves to blame for that. There is no point in saying that one or other group is wrong. We have failed as a race to provide what the Irish housewife requires and is seeking. The Minister of State, Deputy Hegarty, spoke about the national potato board. Carrying that to its logical conclusion and providing a framework and facilities for the provision of vegetables, there must be a future for us to survive as a people. There is no point in people across the House telling this Government that they are wrong.

We keep telling them so.

There is no future in that, and I will tell Deputy Lyons why. He stood over the closure of Fastnet, Glencolumbcille, Carlow and Tuam.

You closed half the country.

I am sad to see these people who have come up from Mallow having to listen to the hypocrisy from across the floor last night and tonight.

(Interruptions.)

Look at the record for the past three years.

I will talk to the Opposition on their record on fruit and vegetables.

The Deputy can talk if he likes tonight.

What have they done for it? God knows, they were in power for long enough. We are talking about food processing and I am speaking about their record on it. It is sad, and it is time they faced that reality and told the people up there what the difference is between Erin Foods, Glencolubmcille, Tuam and Carlow.

(Interruptions.)

You tell them.

I am stating the facts as I see them. I will not be a party to telling the people up there tonight what they want to hear. I have never done so and I will not start here tonight.

Two wrongs do not make a right.

I do not want to see Erin Foods in Mallow closed but I will not blame the Minister or the Government. I will put the blame where I feel it should be. Insufficient money was provided in the late seventies and early eighties for food processing.

(Interruptions.)

Why did they not provide the money for it?

There is no problem with me. I have plenty of information that might be of benefit to the Opposition. If they want to speak about preserved vegetables and export of mushrooms, Deputy Hegarty became involved in that and it has come to fruition and is an enormous success in some areas. It was mentioned in the House tonight and last night.

He will soon be taking over from Gay Byrne on television.

He may or may not do that but what he says will be accepted by the public and he will not be wanted in Doneraile or anywhere else because of his record. This is not something that we should be fighting about across the floor of the House.

The Government side started it.

We are just telling the truth. If it does not suit the Opposition that is fine with me.

The truth is bitter.

It is all out, like Tom King.

Tonight we should all be trying to ensure that the vegetable industry not alone survives but prospers. This problem has been with us for years and for far too long we have been going in the wrong direction.

Tell us about Tuam. We saved it.

In 1978 Fianna Fáil closed the food processing industry in Tuam.

If the Coalition can save the Tuam sugar factory they can save Mallow.

What Deputy Connaughton did for Tuam I hope Deputy Hegarty can do for Mallow.

Would Mallow be closing now if they did not have to face the interest rates in Tuam?

With low interest rates and inflation, the environment is right to encourage outside interests to set up industries here. In the Mallow area we have an expert work force and I have no doubt that a replacement industry will be found for the town. Expressions of interest have been made about Mallow and I am convinced that whether under the aegis of the Sugar Company or the NDC we will get an industry. I do not wish to see Erin Foods closing in the town and my heart goes out to those who may lose their jobs. However, I am convinced that the efforts of Deputies Deasy and Hegarty will not go unrewarded. They are committed to Mallow where we have all the necessary facilities to expand the industry once more. For too long we permitted companies that did not have proper knowledge or commitment to remain in operation. That has been arrested. It is because of wrong decisions down the years that we have to face this sad decision.

I am supporting the decision of the Government because at the end of the day it will be the correct one. It is preferable to support the Government tonight rather than putting off the evil day for six months or until after the next general election. We have an opportunity to obtain a replacement industry and if our efforts bear fruit the workers in Erin Foods can look forward to the future with considerable confidence.

Ní mór dom cuidiú leis an rún atá molta aréir ag mo chairde ar an dtaobh seo den Teach and say that I totally reject the Government's amendment, unlike the last speaker. I want to underline that I do not support the Government's amendment. Our motion which has two elements in it deals specifically with the position in the Erin Foods factory in Mallow and mentions the serious consequences for the horticultural and food processing industries. There can be no doubt that a new approach to the development of food processing is needed. There are many reasons why the industry has not kept pace with demand and why it is not making the progress it should. There are many factors inhibiting the development of that industry. However, the cost of energy and communications is causing serious problems for the food industry.

The impact of technology on the development of new products and on food processing can be considerable. The application of micro-electronics and biotechnology is expected to grow rapidly in the remaining years of this decade and we should address ourselves to those matters. The ability of the food manufacturing industry to use new technology is the function of the scientists and technologists working in such firms. As far as I can ascertain, the food industry recruited about 60 new graduates in science and technology annually in recent years, while the chemical and electronic industries recruited about four times as many. That is an indication of our approach to the food industry. In our RTCs and universities we are training and educating scientists and technologists for such work. Are we to allow their skills to drift off somewhere else and not be used for the benefit of our own industry?

The food industry recruits about one-fourth of the number of science and technology graduates who leave our third level institutions compared with the chemical and electronic industries. There is a direct relationship between investment in highly skilled technological manpower and the capacity of the food processing industry to expand rapidly through the development of new products and processing. Current difficulties should make us more determined to create favourable conditions for the development of a thriving food processing sector. However, it is important to point out that conditions here will not encourage investment in any industry, including the food industry. The Government should be addressing themselves to that problem. We cannot get people to invest in our industries and that is clear when one considers the limited amount of money that has been contributed to the trust funds for industry.

There is a need for greater co-operation between the food processing industry and agriculture. There must be greater co-ordination between those related activities. Those in the processing industry hold the view strongly that the Government must reflect the changed emphasis that has been forced on them by market development and changes in EC policies. No single Minister has a clear mandate to promote the development of the food industry. Food manufacturers have to relate to a series of Government Departments and a large number of State agencies. The absence of a co-ordinated approach, making due allowance for the importance of processing, is a significant constraint on the development of the industry. The Ministers responsible must address themselves to the problem.

A single Government Minister would have responsibility for the co-ordination of Government policy at any particular time regarding all aspects of the food industry, but placing particular emphasis on creating the conditions of adding value profitably to this country. That we are not doing at this time and we must address ourselves to that aspect. I want to emphasise for Ministers and Members of the Government and everybody else who wants to take note, that we must create conditions which can be met by the majority of firms in the food sector.

I want to refer to the Government White Paper on Industry published in July 1984. In chapter 7.4 it is indicated that a group of Ministers of State — Foreign Affairs to be the chairman, from Industry, Trade, Commerce and Tourism, two people, Agriculture, two people, Fisheries and Forestry, one person — are to review the involvement of Government agencies in the food industry. They were sanctioned to engage a person of international experience to help them. The urgency was indicated at that time and the situation was identified, but the evidence so far of any action by this group is not apparent to me. If it is apparent to somebody else, I should like to know about that. I could justifiably say that this group of Ministers of State, without being derogatory to them in any sense, and the person with international experience have dithered, reminding us of Nero fiddling while Rome burned.

In chapter 1 it is stated very clearly:

The state of the Government finances does not allow for any real expansion of expenditure on job creation.

Therein lies the message from this Government. It was initially hoped to have a processing plant in every county in Ireland, but this ambitious aspiration was never realised. It is well to note that after M.J. Costello stepped down as General Manager of the Irish Sugar Company and Mr. Tony O'Reilly came on the scene, the latter cut back operations and consolidated and did deals with people. He did not take risks. His deal with Heinz prevented Erin Foods from being independent in marketing. Vegetable consumption across Europe is on the increase, but our acreage has declined dramatically. The lesson of Erin Foods is not that food processing is impossible, it is that if one approach fails another should be tried. If necessary, links with larger multinationals should be forged, but it is important to ensure, from the experience we have gained in the past, that all the benefit is not on one side.

Having dealt briefly with the general aspect, I turn to the local matter of the plant at Mallow. In addressing myself to the Minister's contribution last night I have to say that the weakness of it was epitomised by his reasoning — to allow Mallow plant to close because of closures in the past. I do not accept that. He also stated:

Competition from external suppliers who supply to the Community is virtually free of levies and taxes, whose input costs are far lower and whose level of production is geared for a far wider international market.

The Minister also said that there are no barriers within the EC. I want to know which it is. Government policy should accord with what the Minister of State has said regarding levies and taxes. Some effort should be made to redress any imbalances which he has discovered.

On the possibilities of job creation in the development of food processing in all its aspects as an agriculturally based industry, we are, by the proposal of the board, diminishing our ability to create an outlet for the produce of the land. The figure of £800 million of imports has been constantly referred to. The Minister suggested last night that figure should be £200 million. The £800 million of imports stands but there is £200 million worth of food imports which could and should be produced here and would be if we were committed to producing it.

It has been said already in this debate that the workforce in Mallow are second to none. There has never been an industrial relations problems at that plant. I ask both Minister present and their colleagues to show faith in this work force, to change the stance indicated in the Minister's speech last night and again tonight. I ask them to accept the motion, save the plant and the jobs. Direct job losses amount to 160 and the numbers of people affected with regard to suppliers and growers are not enumerated. The value to the growers is £.8 million and there are the staffs and the service industries. The Government are closing the whole lot for £1 million and that is the value of the produce to be supplied to Thurles in the event of the closure of the Mallow plant. I pose the question: "From whence do you get that £1 million worth of produce that you will direct to Thurles?". The cost of the closure is given as £3 million to pay for more redundancies. Wages at present going into the economy in Mallow would be £1.5 million per year. At the eleventh hour of the Coalition Government, I appeal to them to change from the hallmark of their term of administration of closures, liquidations, increasing unemployment and a depressed economy. I ask the Government to request the board immediately to defer closure.

Mallow down through the years was a boom town, based on agriculture. With close to 1,400 people now unemployed, that is not the natural order of things for that town. It is becoming like all the other locations up and down this country as long as this Government stay in power. I ask what of the remaining equity due to the Mallow plant of £18 million? Is it not true that the £240,000 overhead charge is related to the headquarters? Is it not true that the research and development charge of £60,000 on the Mallow plant is not a fair assessment of the amount due from that plant? Is it not true that losses were generally kept to £1 million per year during the seventies in Erin Foods? In the year 1983-84 the losses there were said to be £.25 million as against £1.5 million for the year 1982-83.

(Interruptions.)

The Minister of State, Deputy Hegarty, has given a lot of sympathy, mentioning that twice or three times in his statement. He has given promises. We have enough of the Government's promises and their programmes for Government. We have been hearing about them for three years. That goes for people on this side of the House, the people in Mallow and people up and down the country. The Minister has asked us to identify the market. He says that the Opposition Deputies have alleged that the equipment is old and technologically out of date.

(Interruptions.)

What is the position there? We know, and the Minister can contradict me if he wishes at another time, that much of the plant at Mallow was taken from Midleton. There is a lot more new plant needed at Mallow. A former worker director recently indicated in Mallow at an urban council meeting that there would be no problem for Erin Foods in Mallow. Does the Minister now agree with what he said?

What did Deputy Brian Lenihan say in 1982?

We got more sympathy from Deputy Crowley, but sympathy will not pay the piper in Mallow.

(Interruptions.)

I ask the Minister not to let the Mallow plant close, to prepare a plan for restructuring, if it has to be done, to invest the necessary capital. The net result will be a saving of millions of pounds otherwise paid out in redundancies and the benefits in the future will be so great for the economy as to be almost immeasurable.

He is not noticing any more.

I call on the Ministers of State, Deputy Creed and Deputy Hegarty, Deputies Crowley and Barry to agree to our motion and vote for it, to keep the plant open.

(Interruptions.)

Deputy Sheehan has joined the team all the way from west Cork. I offer him the opportunity to vote with us and save the Mallow plant.

The Opposition closed the factory.

Order, please, Deputy Sheehan. Item 36, motion in the name of Deputy E. O'Keeffe and others. On that motion amendment No. 1 has been moved by the Minister. I am putting the Question: "That amendment No. 1 in the name of the Minister be made".

Question put.
The Dáil divided: Tá, 72; Níl, 66.

  • Barnes, Monica.
  • Barrett, Seán.
  • Barry, Myra.
  • Barry, Peter.
  • Begley, Michael.
  • Bell, Michael.
  • Bermingham, Joe.
  • Birmingham, George Martin.
  • Bruton, John.
  • Bruton, Richard.
  • Coveney, Hugh.
  • Creed, Donal.
  • Crotty, Kieran.
  • Crowley, Frank.
  • D'Arcy, Michael.
  • Deasy, Martin Austin.
  • Desmond, Barry.
  • Donnellan, John.
  • Dowling, Dick.
  • Doyle, Avril.
  • Doyle, Joe.
  • Dukes, Alan.
  • Durkan, Bernard J.
  • Enright, Thomas W.
  • Farrelly, John V.
  • Fennell, Nuala.
  • Flaherty, Mary.
  • Glenn, Alice.
  • Griffin, Brendan.
  • Harte, Patrick D.
  • Hegarty, Paddy.
  • Kavanagh, Liam.
  • Keating, Michael.
  • Kelly, John.
  • Kenny, Enda.
  • L'Estrange, Gerry.
  • Burke, Liam.
  • Carey, Donal.
  • Cluskey, Frank.
  • Collins, Edward.
  • Conlon, John F.
  • Connaughton, Paul.
  • Coogan, Fintan.
  • Cooney, Patrick Mark.
  • Cosgrave, Liam T.
  • Cosgrave, Michael Joe.
  • McGahon, Brendan.
  • McGinley, Dinny.
  • McLoughlin, Frank.
  • Manning, Maurice.
  • Mitchell, Gay.
  • Mitchell, Jim.
  • Molony, David.
  • Moynihan, Michael.
  • Naughten, Liam.
  • Nealon, Ted.
  • O'Brien, Willie.
  • O'Keeffe, Jim.
  • O'Leary, Michael.
  • O'Sullivan, Toddy.
  • O'Toole, Paddy.
  • Owen, Nora.
  • Pattison, Séamus.
  • Ryan, John.
  • Shatter, Alan.
  • Sheehan, Patrick Joseph.
  • Skelly, Liam.
  • Spring, Dick.
  • Taylor, Mervyn.
  • Taylor-Quinn, Madeline.
  • Timmins, Godfrey.
  • Yates, Ivan.

Níl

  • Ahern, Bertie.
  • Ahern, Michael.
  • Andrews, David.
  • Aylward, Liam.
  • Barrett, Michael.
  • Brady, Vincent.
  • Brennan, Mattie.
  • Brennan, Paudge.
  • Brennan, Séamus.
  • Briscoe, Ben.
  • Browne, John.
  • Burke, Raphael P.
  • Byrne, Hugh.
  • Byrne, Seán.
  • Calleary, Seán.
  • Collins, Gerard.
  • Conaghan, Hugh.
  • Connolly, Ger.
  • Coughlan, Cathal Seán.
  • Cowen, Brian.
  • Daly, Brendan.
  • De Rossa, Proinsias.
  • Doherty, Seán.
  • Fahey, Francis.
  • Fahey, Jackie.
  • Faulkner, Pádraig.
  • Fitzgerald, Liam Joseph.
  • Flynn, Pádraig.
  • Foley, Denis.
  • Gallagher, Denis.
  • Gallagher, Pat Cope.
  • Haughey, Charles J.
  • Hilliard, Colm.
  • Hyland, Liam.
  • Kirk, Séamus.
  • Kitt, Michael.
  • Lenihan, Brian.
  • Leonard, Jimmy.
  • Leonard, Tom.
  • Leyden, Terry.
  • Lyons, Denis.
  • McCarthy, Seán.
  • McCreevy, Charlie.
  • McEllistrim, Tom.
  • Mac Giolla, Tomás.
  • Molloy, Robert.
  • Morley, P.J.
  • Moynihan, Donal.
  • Nolan, M.J.
  • Noonan, Michael J. (Limerick West)
  • O'Dea, William.
  • O'Hanlon, Rory.
  • O'Keeffe, Edmond.
  • O'Leary, John.
  • Ormonde, Donal.
  • O'Rourke, Mary.
  • Power, Paddy.
  • Reynolds, Albert.
  • Treacy, Noel.
  • Treacy, Seán.
  • Wallace, Dan.
  • Walsh, Joe.
  • Walsh, Seán.
  • Wilson, John P.
  • Woods, Michael.
  • Wyse, Pearse.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies Barrett(Dún Laoghaire) and Taylor; Níl, Deputies V. Brady and Browne.
Question declared carried.
Question put: "That the motion, as amended, be agreed to".
The Dáil divided: Tá 72; Níl, 66.

  • Barnes, Monica.
  • Barrett, Seán.
  • Barry, Myra.
  • Barry, Peter.
  • Begley, Michael.
  • Bell, Michael.
  • Bermingham, Joe.
  • Birmingham, George Martin.
  • Bruton, John.
  • Bruton, Richard.
  • Burke, Liam.
  • Carey, Donal.
  • Cluskey, Frank.
  • Collins, Edward.
  • Conlon, John F.
  • Connaughton, Paul.
  • Coogan, Fintan.
  • Cooney, Patrick Mark.
  • Cosgrave, Liam T.
  • Cosgrave, Michael Joe.
  • Coveney, Hugh.
  • Creed, Donal.
  • Crotty, Kieran.
  • Crowley, Frank.
  • D'Arcy, Michael.
  • Deasy, Martin Austin.
  • Desmond, Barry.
  • Donnellan, John.
  • Dowling, Dick.
  • Doyle, Avril.
  • Doyle, Joe.
  • Dukes, Alan.
  • Durkan, Bernard J.
  • Enright, Thomas W.
  • Farrelly, John V.
  • Fennell, Nuala.
  • Flaherty, Mary.
  • Glenn, Alice.
  • Griffin, Brendan.
  • Harte, Patrick D.
  • Hegarty, Paddy.
  • Kavanagh, Liam.
  • Keating, Michael.
  • Kelly, John.
  • Kenny, Enda.
  • L'Estrange, Gerry.
  • McGahon, Brendan.
  • McGinley, Dinny.
  • McLoughlin, Frank.
  • Manning, Maurice.
  • Mitchell, Gay.
  • Mitchell, Jim.
  • Molony, David.
  • Moynihan, Michael.
  • Naughten, Liam.
  • Nealon, Ted.
  • O'Brien, Willie.
  • O'Keeffe, Jim.
  • O'Leary, Michael.
  • O'Sullivan, Toddy.
  • O'Toole, Paddy.
  • Owen, Nora.
  • Pattison, Séamus.
  • Ryan, John.
  • Shatter, Alan.
  • Sheehan, Patrick Joseph.
  • Skelly, Liam.
  • Spring, Dick.
  • Taylor, Mervyn.
  • Taylor-Quinn, Madeline.
  • Timmins, Godfrey.
  • Yates, Ivan.

Níl

  • Ahern, Bertie.
  • Ahern, Michael.
  • Andrews, David.
  • Aylward, Liam.
  • Barrett, Michael.
  • Brady, Vincent.
  • Brennan, Mattie.
  • Brennan, Paudge.
  • Brennan, Séamus.
  • Briscoe, Ben.
  • Browne, John.
  • Burke, Raphael P.
  • Byrne, Hugh.
  • Byrne, Seán.
  • Calleary, Seán.
  • Collins, Gerard.
  • Conaghan, Hugh.
  • Kirk, Séamus.
  • Kitt, Michael.
  • Lenihan, Brian.
  • Leonard, Jimmy.
  • Leonard, Tom.
  • Leyden, Terry.
  • Lyons, Denis.
  • McCarthy, Seán.
  • McCreevy, Charlie.
  • McEllistrim, Tom.
  • Mac Giolla, Tomás.
  • Molloy, Robert.
  • Morley, P.J.
  • Moynihan, Donal.
  • Nolan, M.J.
  • Noonan, Michael J. (Limerick West)
  • Connolly, Ger.
  • Coughlan, Cathal Seán.
  • Cowen, Brian.
  • Daly, Brendan.
  • De Rossa, Proinsias.
  • Doherty, Sean.
  • Fahey, Francis.
  • Fahey, Jackie.
  • Faulkner, Pádraig.
  • Fitzgerald, Liam Joseph.
  • Flynn, Pádraig.
  • Foley, Denis.
  • Gallagher, Denis.
  • Gallagher, Pat Cope.
  • Haughey, Charles J.
  • Hilliard, Colm.
  • Hyland, Liam.
  • O'Dea, William.
  • O'Hanlon, Rory.
  • O'Keeffe, Edmond.
  • O'Leary, John.
  • Ormonde, Donal.
  • O'Rourke, Mary.
  • Power, Paddy.
  • Reynolds, Albert.
  • Treacy, Noel.
  • Treacy, Seán.
  • Wallace, Dan.
  • Walsh, Joe.
  • Walsh, Seán.
  • Wilson, John P.
  • Woods, Michael.
  • Wyse, Pearse.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies Barrett(Dún Laoghaire) and Taylor; Níl, Deputies V. Brady and Browne.
Question declared carried.
Top
Share