Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 10 Jun 1987

Vol. 373 No. 5

Urban Renewal (Amendment) Bill, 1987: Second Stage.

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time." The primary purpose of this Bill is to provide for the extension of the Custom House Docks area. The present boundaries of the area are defined in the Schedule to the Urban Renewal Act, 1986, and the Act makes no provision for their alteration. There is an immediate need to extend the area to include the River Liffey quays immediately adjoining it and I propose to extend the area to the centre of the Liffey as soon as the Bill is enacted. I also propose to extend the area eastwards once development of the existing area has got underway. Extensions in an eastward direction will take in lands lying between the Liffey and Sheriff Street, Upper and Lower. The Bill accordingly provides for the extension of the Custom House Docks area by order made by the Minister for the Environment with the consent of the Minister for Finance. The Bill deals also with other matters which arise or will arise as a consequence of the extension of the remit of the Authority.

The Government are committed to securing the early redevelopment of the Custom House Docks area in a manner which will rebound to the benefit of our capital city and of the economy as a whole. Indeed the whole thrust of the present redevelopment effort has its origins in legislative proposals put forward by the Fianna Fáil Government in 1982 in the Urban Development Area Bill of that year. That Bill lapsed with the dissolution of Dáil Éireann on 4 November, 1982 and it is regrettable that it took until March, 1986, almost three and a half years later, before the Coalition Government revived those proposals and presented them to Dáil Éireann in the form of the Urban Renewal Bill, 1986. It is a pity that this time was lost in securing the redevelopment of the area. This Government are determined to ensure that there will be no more delays in securing completion of the task. I made it clear to the Authority last March that early and sustained progress was expected and I am pleased to say that the Authority responded by bringing forward their target dates for completion of the necessary stages of preparation, planning and development. Deputies will be aware that an important milestone was reached last week when the Authority presented a planning scheme to me for approval. I will make a decision in relation to this scheme as soon as possible, taking account of any objections that may be made by Dublin Corporation within the period of one month allowed in the Act.

For my part, I have given an undertaking to keep under continuous review the legislative framework and other constraints under which the Authority operate and to bring forward any necessary legislative proposals, or make other appropriate arrangements, to deal with any factors that might hinder the Authority in securing the redevelopment of the area. I have been in frequent contact with the chairman of the Authority in this regard and, arising from these contacts, I believe that the present Bill is both necessary and timely.

The basic purpose of the Bill, as I have already said, is to extend the Custom House Docks area and I have indicated the extensions which are proposed. The purpose of these extensions is not to expand the Authority's jurisdiction to lands which are separate and distinct from the existing area. Instead, the purpose is to expedite the redevelopment of the existing Custom House Docks area by providing potential developers and investors with an assurance that the Government intend to see to it that the entire dockland area is progressively renewed and redeveloped. In addition, the Bill will enable redevelopment of the existing area to be carried out in a manner which relates well to its surroundings and which re-incorporates the site and the quayside into the life of the city. This is essential, because of the importance of the site, the nature and scale of the development and the impact it will have on the whole fabric of the city centre.

The southern boundary of the area at present lies along the Custom House Quay but does not include the road, the quayside or any part of the River Liffey. It quickly became apparent that this situation was unsatisfactory and would restrict excessively the options available to the Authority in relation to roads and traffic arrangements, pedestrianisation schemes, environmental improvement and amenity works necessary to exploit fully the potential of the river and the quayside. One of the most important objectives of the redevelopment of the area must be to maximise the quayside and the river as an integral part of the fabric of the city and to exploit its value for the purposes of communication, recreation and amenity and as a unifying link in the appearance and structural organisation of the city. The present boundary of the area militates against this objective. For this reason, the Government decided that the area should be extended to the centre of the River Liffey as soon as possible and I made an announcement to this effect on 10 May, 1987 so that it could be taken into account by the Authority in the preparation of their planning scheme.

In addition to the riverside frontage to the south of the existing area it is important that redevelopment enhances and relates well to other adjoining areas. Deputies will be aware that the area is bounded on the western and northern sides by the Custom House, Bus Aras, the Postal Sorting Office and Connolly Station, all of which are unlikely to be the subject of major redevelopment in the foreseeable future. However, there is considerable potential for improvement and redevelopment to the east of the area, where a good deal of land is in the hands of public bodies. The extension of the remit of the Authority in an easterly direction is, therefore, a logical and necessary step and provides the best means of realising the full potential of this area. The local authority housing complex at Sheriff Street is already the subject of review by a special working party drawn from Dublin Corporation, the Department of the Environment and the Authority. This does not imply, however, that any decision has been made about the future status of this housing area, much less that it is to become the responsibility of the Authority.

Section 3 of the Bill will increase the number of ordinary members of the Authority from four to seven. This increase is needed to broaden the range of expertise available on the Authority and to include, for example, persons who have direct experience in the financing and carrying out of large-scale development proposals.

Section 4 provides that the chairman of the Authority will have the statutory duty of ensuring the efficient discharge of the business of the Authority. A similar provision applies to the chairman of An Bord Pleanála under the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act, 1983, and it is desirable that an express requirement on these lines should apply to the chairman of the Authority who is, of course, a full time executive chairman.

Sections 5 and 6 confer necessary powers of land acquisition by agreement and the special powers of transfer of land by ministerial order under section 13 of the Act relate only to land in the Custom House Docks area held by the Dublin Port and Docks Board. All such land in the existing area has already been transferred to the Authority. While these powers were adequate in relation to the existing Custom House Docks area, they would neither be appropriate nor adequate in relation to the areas to be added on the eastern side. Sections 5 and 6 reflect the considerable differences in terms of land use and land ownership between the present area and the areas now to be added.

Section 5 confers powers of compulsory land acquisition on the Authority. The intention is that the Authority will have the same powers in this regard as a housing authority under Part V of the Housing Act, 1966. This section does not apply to land held by statutory bodies, but will enable the Authority to acquire any other land that is situated in the Custom House Docks area, as defined for the time being.

Section 6 enables land held by a statutory body in the Custom House Docks area to be transferred to the Authority by order made by the Minister for the Environment, with the consent of the appropriate Minister and the Minister for Finance and after consultation with the body concerned. Consequential matters, including the assessment of compensation and any necessary application or modification of other enactments are provided for. As with section 5, this section will apply only to land which lies within the Custom House Docks area as defined for the time being.

Section 7 extends from two years to five years the period within which grants can be made to the Authority under section 14 of the Urban Renewal Act, 1986. The existing period of two years from the establishment of the Authority is unrealistically short and needs to be extended, having regard especially to the provision for an extension of the remit of the Authority.

The Bill as a whole is a reflection of the responsive and supportive role of the Government in relation to the redevelopment of this important area. The potential for redevelopment in this part of the city is immense. I believe that the redevelopment of this site, and future extensions of it, will contribute substantially to renewed growth in the building industry and the general economy.

Of course, within the overall framework there is great scope for imaginative and innovative design. The area offers a unique opportunity to exploit the relationship between buildings and water and to create a visually dramatic and at the same time attractive place to live and work in, and to enjoy as a leisure and recreational amenity. In other cities it has emerged that a dockland development of this kind becomes a major attraction for visitors who come just to look and wander around, as well as serving as a major focus of commercial and social activity for the residents of the city.

One of the most important elements of this development will be the establishment of the new international financial services centre. Arrangements for this development are well under way under the guidance of a special committee appointed by the Taoiseach and on which the Custom House Docks Development Authority are represented. Already, on the recommendation of the committee, special tax provisions to encourage the development of the international financial services centre have been included in the Finance Bill. These incentives are in addition to the incentives already available for other development on the site. The latter include rates remission and taxation allowances in respect of the capital costs of commercial buildings, the rent payable by traders and "section 23" type allowances for rented residential accommodation. These allowances add up to a very keen incentive package and should not only encourage primary development on the site, but also allow rental costs to be held at very competitive levels compared with those obtaining in other centres. This will be particularly important in the case of the international financial services centre.

Financial services is one of the fastest-growing sectors of economic activity in the world and our aim is to put Ireland into the mainstream of that growth. The south west corner of the site, adjoining the Custom House has been earmarked for the centre. All the indications are that this centre will be an outstanding success. Major financial institutions from all over the world have expressed interest and a major marketing campaign is underway. In addition to the centre and other commercial activities, it is envisaged that the site will contain retail, cultural, residential and amenity facilities.

The important thing now is to ensure that every possible effort is made to achieve the objective of getting the right kind of development under way quickly, and that the momentum for progress is sustained. The Bill is an important step in this direction.

This is a strange little Bill, appearing at a strange time and ostensibly for a purpose which had not been very apparent or in demand prior to its appearance. The Minister has laid great emphasis on the primary purpose of the Bill as being the necessity to extend the area which would be developed by the Custom House Docks Authority. Of course, it was always an objective of the proposers of the intention of the Authority that they might extend their activities progressively and hopefully, as had happened in other cities, that there might be a regeneration of the entire obsolete dockland area. However, the initial area of 27 acres was chosen carefully for a variety of reasons, one being that it was all in the one ownership of the Dublin Port and Docks Board.

The intention clearly was outlined that the successful development of those 27 acres would then dictate the pace and size of any extension which might take place. Now, for some strange reason which perhaps we can explore at greater length later, the Minister has chosen, before any specific development has been decided upon in relation to the original area of the Custom House Docks Authority, to seek from the Dáil the authority to allow him to extend the size of the Custom House Docks Authority site in an ill-defined way and one which is very difficult for Members of the House to assess.

At the time when the 1986 Urban Renewal Bill was being presented to the House, the then Minister of State, Deputy Fergus O'Brien, who was handling it at that time undertook to place in the Library of the House maps of the area which it was intended would be covered both by the Custom House Docks Authority and in relation to the development areas in other cities.

Sitting suspended at 1.30 p.m. and resumed at 2.30 p.m.
Top
Share