Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 20 Feb 1990

Vol. 395 No. 9

Adjournment Debate. - School Facilities for Handicapped Pupil.

I thank you most sincerely, a Cheann Comhairle, for affording me the opportunity to highlight this problem. I will, of course, be in a position to supply the Minister with the name of the child in question, but I would rather not mention any names in the House.

This problem was brought to my attention when the mother of the child involved visited me. This woman's daughter, who is seven years old and has spina bifida, attends the Dalkey school project national school in Glenageary. I have to say at the outset that this is an excellent school which provides excellent educational facilities both from the point of view of the teaching staff and the board of management.

This child is in second class and the problem is that the second year classroom is located on the second floor. This child uses crutches to move around and her parents have been told by the school authorities that they cannot accept responsibility for the child when she is moving around the building. This means the child has to stay in the classroom during normal break time. During a fire drill a caretaker-gardener had to take the child from the classroom because no teacher was available to help the child down the stairs and out of the building. God only knows what would have happened if there had been a real fire in the building.

The mother of this child has to attend the school approximately six times a day to bring her child down the stairs during normal breaks. If the mother is unable to attend the child has to sit in the classroom and cannot attend such things as art exhibitions, dancing and other normal activities which go on in the school. Obviously this child feels isolated from the other children. Last week when her mother was ill the child could not attend school for two days.

If we adopt the policy, which I support, of integrating handicapped children into primary schools then we should have the facilities to see that those children not alone receive a proper education but become part and parcel of the school activities and are not made to feel unusual in the normal school context. As a society we should be ashamed that I had to come into the House this evening and outline this sort of problem. I do not know where the blame rests but there are suggestions I can make to the Minister and teachers.

At times all of us need to put certain things aside and think of the child involved. Obviously I accept that there is some sort of dispute in this case and that the teachers are concerned about the question of liability should something happen to the child. All these matters should be ironed out so that these unfortunate children do not suffer. If we pride ourselves on being a Christian society, and even if we have to pay a little extra in taxes and do without in some areas, I believe — I say this quite sincerely — those less fortunate than ourselves through illness or physical or mental handicap should be looked after properly and we should provide the necessary back-up services, particularly in the educational field.

I went through the normal channels making inquiries about this case before I raised it in the House. The official line was that as the child is attending a normal primary school rather than a special school there are no facilities provided or staff available for children to be looked after and, in fact, while at one time all special schools used to have child care assistance, there is an embargo on that now, although apparently in some cases help is recruited by the schools through the FÁS scheme. It is diabolical that young handicapped children are left without proper care and attention in our schools. Thanks to the Minister and her predecessor there is a special unit known as St. Angela's language and learning unit attached to a normal primary school in Baggot Street. I have seen the benefits one child attending this unit has gained from being part and parcel of a normal school and mixing with — I do not like to use this word — normal children. The struggle we had to persuade the officials in the Department of Education to set up this unit was unbelievable. Had it not been for the continuous fighting on the part of the parents the child I am talking about would still be in a home for the mentally handicapped. This child, who is not mentally handicapped, suffers from what is called a language disorder. This is a recognised illness throughout the United States and Britain where fantastic facilities are provided for such children. When I was in Government and that child visited my office she ran to the other side of the room and hid behind a chair because she was so frustrated at having been in a school for the mentally handicapped.

That child is now playing football with Broadford Rovers in Dundrum, bowls on Saturday mornings at the Stillorgan Bowl and is leading a normal life again. The locking up of that child in a mental institution would be a scandal and should not be tolerated in any civilised society. Not only does the mother, who has two other young children, one attending the same school and the other in secondary school, have to put up with the burden of having a physically handicapped child but also has to attend the school daily. Yesterday she had to attend the school from 10.45 a.m. to 2.30 p.m. If the child wishes to go downstairs she has to physically bring her down. If the child wishes to take part in any activity then she has to be there to help because, for some reason or other, which I hope the Minister will explain to me tonight, the teaching staff are not in a position to look after the child. As I said, this is a scandal which should not be tolerated in any civilised society.

I hope as a result of having raised this matter in the House we can ensure that handicapped children who wish to be integrated in primary or post-primary schools are allowed to do so without feeling that they are the odd person out, that teachers will have the necessary training and skills to teach them and if back-up services are needed that they will be provided.

I thank Deputy Barrett, with whom I have had a number of extensive conversations on this issue, for raising it on the floor of the House. First, let me say by way of an introductory remark, that the milk of human kindness is a great aid in circumstances such as these. I wish to correct one thing that Deputy Barrett said and that is that child care assistance in special schools is the responsibility of the health boards, not the Department of Education. We supply the plant, teachers and school transport and, rightly or wrongly, that is the position.

The Deputy dealt briefly with the policy of integration on which his case was based. We, in Ireland, have been to the forefront in seeking the integration of handicapped children. Parents, the Department and others feel that it is better to integrate young children and adults in normal schools if they are able to do so. There will always be a need for special schools — this is unfortunate but true — to cater for those children who cannot cope or who would not benefit, either socially or educationally, from integration in schools. This is a separate issue but the road that children with disability should take is that of integration if they are able to do so. Their parents want them to do so.

This is a beautiful two-storey school which I visited some years ago. A number of years ago, the Department of Education stopped building two-storey schools. This decision arose out of a desire to integrate handicapped children, in particular physically handicapped children, including those with spina bifida, who find it so much easier to manage if everything is provided on the one level. If any adaptations are necessary it is also much easier to make them if it is a one-storey school.

The child is attending classes on the second floor of the school. As the Deputy said, the mother of the child has to attend the school to bring the child both upstairs and downstairs. I find the facts of this case extraordinary. It is obvious that the health board will not provide one care worker to look after one child and therefore I intend asking an inspector from my Department who deals with special children in ordinary schools to visit the school within the next few days to speak to the principal, board of management and teachers to get an idea of the activities the child is engaged in and to see if any physical adaptations are required. Like the Deputy, I do not like using words such as "normal" or "not normal" but where ordinary schools have expressed a desire to integrate handicapped children the Department have given the go-ahead for any physical adaptations necessary to the school to allow the child go about his or her daily life in as normal a way as possible. That is the role parents want their child to play when they opt to have the child attend ordinary school.

I will ask somebody with a thorough knowledge of the needs of handicapped children, in particular those with spina bifida, to visit the school within the next few days. Within the past two days, officials of my Department, met with the executive of the Spina Bifida Association, not about this child, but about the association in general. They had a very encouraging meeting with them. The association was pleased to know that we would be in a position to provide services such as this. I will send this person out to talk to the board of management, the principal, the teachers, the mother of the child and the child to see if it is necessary to adapt the school as it obviously is to suit the child. This is the best road to take and I will give this matter my personal attention tomorrow and the day after to see if adaptations are necessary or if the rules of the school need to be rearranged so as to ensure that the child can be facilitated. That is another option. In that way, we will chart a course for the child.

We all hope that the child is brave enough to want to live as full a life as possible. After all, we live our lives to the full, are in full health and have full mobility. We should thank God for that. It is up to us to ensure that any child who has the determination and grit who wants to go to school to better themselves and move about with their peers gets every opportunity to do so. I will arrange for such a visit to take place and will be in communication with the Deputy.

The Dáil adjourned at 11 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 21 February 1990.

Top
Share