Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 21 Mar 1990

Vol. 397 No. 3

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Milk Quota.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

8 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when he proposes to distribute the two million gallons of milk provided for new entrants to milk production; the method he proposes to adopt to select the successful 200 applicants; the criteria by which young farmers will be eligible to apply; if applicants will be debarred from the scheme if milk production is already carried out on holdings owned by parents of the applicants; and if he still proposes a lottery system to select successful applicants.

Emmet Stagg

Question:

9 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if the Government will agree to change the allocation procedure for the extra 11 million gallons milk quota to ensure that each person qualifying under the scheme will be entitled to an equal or proportionate share.

William Cotter

Question:

28 Mr. Cotter asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if he will give details of the formula to be used for the division of the 11 million gallons of extra milk quota; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

I propose to take Questions Nos. 8, 9 and 28 together.

The milk quota system introduced in Ireland in 1984 did not make adequate provision for small scale producers or new entrants into agriculture.

Within the limited degree of flexibility to me under the Community regulations, I have made a number of decisions since 1987 designed to redirect any quota available towards small scale producers. In 1987-88 I introduced a restructuring scheme restricted to producers below 50,000 gallons and of these the first priority category is confined to producers below 30,000 gallons quota. I also assisted these producers by giving them priority under the schemes for the temporary leasing of quotas and the allocations of flexi-milk.

In December 1987 I introduced a clawback system under which a percentage of quota transferring with a lease is retained in a national reserve, if the lessees total quota exceeds 50,000 gallons. One of the main objectives of this scheme is to give small scale producers priority access to quotas becoming available for leasing with land. The House will be aware that as part of the 1989-90 prices package I negotiated a reduction in the co-responsibility levy for small producers and the elimination of it in disadvantaged areas.

Finally in response to my specific request at the price negotiations in April 1989, the Commission agreed to introduce a reserve pool of 11 million gallons for small scale producers and new entrants into agriculture. This was consequently proposed by the Commission in August and finally adopted by the Council of Ministers in November 1989.

I recently announced guidelines for the allocation of this 11 million gallons of quota free of charge. I believe that these arrangements which have been approved by the Commission are fair and equitable taking into account the varied needs of priority category producers, co-operatives and dairies in all parts of the country.

As I have already announced, eight million gallons of the additional 11 million gallons are to be allocated to certain small scale producers with quotas below 12,800 gallons. A further two million gallons are being made available to young farmers under 35 years of age with appropriate training and educational qualifications. The remaining one million gallons is being allocated to other special category producers who have suffered hardship because of inadequate quotas and the Milk Quota Appeals Tribunal which I recently established will deal with these allocations.

The quota allocations to young farmers will be 10,000 gallons. This means that 200 young farmers will benefit from the two million gallons set aside for this category. The allocation of the eight million gallons to small scale producers will be carried out on a flat rate basis nationally subject to the constraints I have announced.

The allocation of quotas to the successful applicants will be made before the end of this month. Investigations will have been carried out before the allocations are made to ensure that only genuine bona fide young farmers with separate holdings, herd numbers and milking facilities will benefit from the allocations. A lottery system is being used to determine the successful applicants from this category.

In general, therefore, it is evident that since taking office in 1987 my concern under the quota system has been, where possible, to allocate additional quotas to small scale producers who would use them and not to grant them to larger quota holders who have already sufficient for their requirements.

The time for dealing with Priority Questions is well nigh exhausted. I shall hear two brief supplementaries from the Deputies in possession, Deputy Connaughton and Deputy Stagg.

Why did the Minister not divide the milk quota equitably among small farmers throughout the country? Why will some farmers in the south get 700 or 800 gallons while north Connacht farmers or those in the midwest are likely to get only 207 gallons? Will the Minister outline to the House how he managed to come to that arrangement?

That is not correct.

It is correct.

If a reserve pool had been made available in the first instance for the 4.5 per cent the Commission made available to this country in 1984 for those young farmers——

The Minister has made a hames of this scheme——

Let us not erode the precious time available for these questions.

Will the Minister tell us how he is going to divide the quota?

I have managed to get an extra 1 per cent which was never made available before. I am applying this quota equally and fairly to the benefit of those young farmers. Until such time as the Deputy sees the final allocation he should not make any inaccurate suggestions.

If the Deputy goes over all the schemes I have introduced since I came into office he will see that special priority has been given to farmers and dairies in the west and north-west.

They got nothing.

Anything which is being done now must be looked at in the context of that balance.

I am calling Deputy Stagg——

They got nothing.

——whose Question No. 9 relates, for a brief and relevant supplementary.

They got nothing.

The dairy industry will be very interested in what the Minister has said today——

Please, Deputy Connaughton.

I want to welcome the Minister back. I am glad to see he is in full and good health. Is the Minister aware that his attempt to share out the additional 11 million gallons mainly among smallholders will lead to a flaw in the scheme where large scale suppliers to large co-ops will get up to an additional 4,000 gallons while the small scale suppliers in the west will only get an average of 200 gallons extra? This will create an anomaly within an anomaly. The Minister should look at the scheme again in order to correct this anomaly.

I want to assure the Deputy and the House that the scheme will not have anything like that effect.

Everybody else thinks so.

The Deputies heard the figure——

The Minister's officials think so too.

They do not think so.

The co-ops and individuals think so——

Deputy Cotter should not intervene at all.

I want to thank Deputy Stagg for his welcome. I could not have got a message in the condition I was in during the past few weeks.

The Minister got it very quickly this morning.

The Deputy had better wait to see the actual allocation. There will be an equitable and fair distribution but the Deputy must take it in conjunction with all the schemes I have referred to.

It is a reversal——

I am calling Question No. 10.

Top
Share