I would like briefly to recap on what is being sought to achieve by amendments Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in the names of Deputies Nealon, Ryan and myself. We want to expand on what is currently permissible under section 2 (1) as issues to be dealt with by any representative association as already established. The section as drafted by the Minister, allows for the issue of remuneration only and such other matters if any as the Minister may specify in the regulations. The position of the Deputies on this side of the House is that as the Minister has taken the regulations away from us and because this House will have no further say, good, bad or indifferent on the content of those regulations and on the basic structure and terms of reference of any representative association once established, we are anxious at this stage to write into the legislation the features we consider to be important and essential to the proper working of such a structure or scheme once in place. The Minister has adopted a very curious and, perhaps, misguided formula for laying down the terms of reference because of the primary emphasis being placed on remuneration. The Workers' Party believe that there are many other concepts and issues such as welfare, health, education, housing and related matters that should be specifically in the remit and terms of reference of any representative association be it for officers or other ranks.
In the guiding Act that has been borrowed for arguments on the Government side, the Garda Síochána Act, 1977, they have used a different and far wider formula allowing the Garda representative associations to deal with all matters concerning their welfare and efficiency. Even the concept of welfare could embrace a far wider range of issues and bring it out of the narrow define. In relation to efficiency it would allow for debate and discussion and the better ordering and running of particular barracks or commands, the better deployment of personnel, the better scheduling of hours of duties and any number of matters that would improve on the standard of performance, if that is possible, of our Defence Force members. Remuneration is a much too narrow concept and the Minister is allowing us to have no say in any of the other matters he might consider, because they are for the regulations, and for that reason it is important that we stamp our imprint in some way on the legislation. We must go beyond the issue of remuneration. Certainly the issues of welfare and efficiency are an advance on what is contained in the 1977 Act but the concepts outlined by Deputy Nealon in amendment No. 5 where he goes beyond welfare to talk about medical and family support systems and in amendment No. 7 where Deputy Ryan talks about conditions of service and my own amendment which deals with health, education and housing, are matters that can easily be accommodated and should, as a matter of record and principle, be written into the legislation at this stage.