Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 20 Mar 1991

Vol. 406 No. 7

Adjournment Debate. - Sligo School.

It is usual to begin by thanking the Ceann Comhairle for the opportunity to raise an item on the Adjournment. On this occasion, a Cheann Comhairle, I sincerely thank you for allowing me to raise this matter because of the long list from which you had to choose.

St. Edward's national school, Forthill, Sligo, has 230 pupils and nine teachers, including the principal, a remedial teacher and a resource teacher. The school building is no longer of a standard acceptable for the purpose of learning or of teaching. Today it could be seen at its worst with the rain water coming down along the walls following the downpour of the past few days. The toilets are outdated, the corridors have been designated "very dangerous" in an IIRS report, the windows are partly rotten, the heating is deficient and the playground inadequate. These are just some of the problems but the unsuitability of the building is not in dispute and the Department of Education and the Minister for Education accepted that long ago.

Since the mid-seventies negotiations have been taking place with the Department of Education for a new school situated in the Forthill area and with success — on paper. In April 1987 the Department agreed to grant-aid the provision of a new school located at Ballytivnan to cater for the children in the Forthill and Ballytivnan areas. In February 1988 outline planning permission was received but then there seemed to be an indication that the Department were reconsidering their agreement to build. An election intervened — fortunately perhaps — and on 13 July 1989 a fax was received from — of all places — Fianna Fáil headquarters with the following message:

The Minister for Education, Mrs. Mary O'Rourke, has now agreed for provision of essential classroom accommodation to replace St. Edward's National School, Forthill, Sligo. The new school will be situated in Ballytivnan and will consist of eight new classrooms. The Minister has further agreed on the planning of the project to proceed immediately. The Minister has also said that there will be no undue delay within the Department in the planning and the provision of the school.

In August 1989 the Department finally gave the message everyone wanted, the building of the school was to start in the summer of 1990.

Therefore, in April 1987 a new school was officially sanctioned, in July 1989 we were told there would be a new St. Edward's with no undue delay and in August of the same year we were told that the building would start in the summer of 1990. What happened? St. Edward's has not yet got from the Department of Education the sketch plans to enable them to apply for full planning permission. Is it any wonder that among the parents, pupils, teachers, board of management and local residents there is disillusionment, frustration and outright anger at what they regard as little better than deception from Dublin? Is it any wonder that St. Edward's parents' association, with virtually 100 per cent backing, decided to withdraw their children from the school for one day in protest? That protest was to have taken place on 12 March but it has now been postponed for two months and, if the Department of Education have not delivered the sketch plans to Sligo in the meantime, they will strike on 15 May.

There was full agreement on the site of the new school and there will be no problem of planning. Repeatedly, from 1987 onwards, the Minister and the Department said that they will build; what everyone involved now wants to know from the Minister is very stark and simple, when will the building work commence on site? The preliminary processes can be drawn out or done at high speed, it is all up to the Minister. Anything other than a firm date for the start of work on the school, which the Minister undertook to build in 1989 with no undue delay, will not wash at St. Edward's.

What fun I had going through files in my Department and reading the letters dated late 1982 to 1987. What fun I had reading all the promises Deputy Nealon made in those years to do something about this school. I will not embarrass the Deputy in the House but I have the days, dates and times of various letters and commitments which the Deputy gave. Deputy Nealon's party were in Government from December 1982 to 10 March 1987 and he did not do anything for the school about which he spoke tonight.

He never sent a fax.

Deputy Nealon's representations were a holy show in regard to that matter, he walked himself into it tonight and I can provide him with the day and dates of letters if he likes. The Deputy represented that constituency for four and a half years and he did nothing about the school.

The Deputy may have forgotten that just before Christmas I met the principal of the school, Fr. Devine, and a range of parents; at that meeting we set out our schedule of accommodation and how we would go about our business. I understand that a letter issued to the parents, enclosing a letter of mine, which were very favourably received. I do not know if the Deputy ever had a meeting with the people concerned but when I met them I clearly said that I was going ahead with the school. However, I asked for a quid pro quo. I asked that the multi-denominational school would receive favourable consideration from the Catholic diocesan authorities where there would be an exchange of spare school buildings in the Catholic diocesan trust and under their aegis. At that meeting Fr. Devine undertook to use his good offices to do that. He is a grand man and most approachable and, as I am keeping my side of the bargain, I hope that he, with the episcopal authorities and the bishopric, will look after the matter. There is a need for the multi-denominational school to be looked at as it is all part of the overall school needs for this area.

I am very much committed to St. Edward's national school. I met the principal, Fr. Devine and the members; I reiterated in a letter that the architectural planning for the project is in hands and all is proceeding according to arrangement. As I said, during the Deputy's time in office nothing was done about this school. I thank him for raising it on the floor of the House tonight.

Will the Minister say when work will start on the site? It was supposed to be in the summer of 1990.

The Minister's reply concluded the debate.

Top
Share