Austin Deasy
Question:49 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if the State recognises Tibet as either (1) an independent and sovereign state or (2) its annexation by China.
Vol. 407 No. 1
49 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if the State recognises Tibet as either (1) an independent and sovereign state or (2) its annexation by China.
75 Mr. Barry asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he has informed the Chinese Ambassador that it is not a matter for an official in the Chinese Embassy to say who is or is not welcome to Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
101 Mr. T. Kitt asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will outline the Government's present policy on Tibet.
102 Mr. Dempsey asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will outline the Government's current position on Tibet; and if the Government have abandoned their previous commitments to Tibet with particular reference to resolution 45/131.
I propose to take Questions Nos. 49, 75, 101 and 102 together.
In 1979, when Ireland established diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, the Irish Government recognised the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China. Diplomatic relations are conducted with China on that basis. At that time, Tibet was recognised internationally as part of the People's Republic. That situation remains unchanged. The question therefore of recognising Tibet as an independent and sovereign state does not arise.
One of the purposes of the United Nations, to which Ireland fully subscribes, is to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples. Consistent with that principle, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 45/131 on 14 December 1990, entitled, "Universal realisation of the right of peoples to self-determination". Ireland joined in the unanimous adoption of the resolution which does not make reference to any particular territories.