Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 8 May 1991

Vol. 408 No. 1

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Services for People With Disabilities.

Michael Ferris

Question:

16 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for Health if he has reviewed the progress made in relation to the specific recommendations for action in the Green Paper Towards a Full Life; if he has satisfied himself with the progress made on all of these recommendations; if he intends to publish a White Paper on the subject of disability; if he intends to introduce legislation to give effect to these recommendations and to United Nations declarations on the subject; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

There has been substantial progress in the development of services for people with disabilities based broadly on the proposals outline in the Green Paper. However, since the publication of the Green Paper, there have been two fundmental reviews of the services — the "Planning for the Future" report in the case of psychiatric services published in December 1984 and the report of the review group on mental handicap services which will be published later this month.

The Programme for Economic and Social Progress envisages a seven year programme for the further development of community based services for people with disabilities, such as hostels, home help-nursing, day care and respite care facilities. Legislation is not required to give effect to the recommendations contained in these reports in or indeed to the United Nations declarations on disability. However, my Department are at present considering, in line with the commitment in the Programme for Economic and Social Progress, how best the rights of people with disabilities can be promoted. With regard to mental illness, and the protection of people with a mental handicap, I am reviewing existing legislation with a view to bringing forward a discussion document on this matter.

From the Minister's reply, he is obviously quite satisfied with the substantial progress made; I am not. Is he satisfied, for example, that the five year development programme to meet the residential needs of disabled people has been satisfactorily implemented? Is the Minister satisfied with the review of the transport facilities for disabled people recommended in the Green Paper? Has it resulted in any improvement? Is he satisfied with the programme of day care services for disabled people as recommended in the Green Paper? Has it resulted in any significant improvement? I do not think so, judging from the complaints which I get regularly.

At no stage in my reply did I say I was satisfied. I pointed out that there has been substantial progress over the years, particularly since 1987. I am satisfied with the Government's policy for the next number of years as outlined in the Programme for Economic and Social Progress and if the Deputy reads it he will see that a very substantial amount of new services will be provided for the physically disabled, the mentally handicapped or those with psychiatric illness. There will be up to £90 million more spent on the current side over the next seven years and £100 million will be spent over the same period on the capital side. I am very satisfied with that programme, which has been well planned by the Government for the coming years, to deal with the problems which I, and Deputy Ferris, know exist.

I must now call Question No. 17 as, if it is not replied to, it may not be disposed of.

May I ask a supplementary question?

Sorry, Deputy, as I said, I am fighting against the clock.

I had only one opportunity to ask a question.

I appreciate that, Deputy, but I repeat that if Question No. 17 is not responded to now it cannot be dealt with.

Top
Share