I propose to take Question Nos. 5 and 29 together.
The whole question of Government policy to tackle the recent increase in unemployment, including the establishment of an all-party committee on unemployment, was dealt with in the course of the debate in the Dáil on Tuesday, 21 May 1991.
In my statement I referred to the increase in jobs during the peiod of the Programme for National Recovery and to the wide range of measures, to which the Government are totally committed, to stimulate growth and to generate employment.
Job creation is the number one priority and the Government are determined not to be deflected from the current strategy, agreed with all the major interests, to achieve the programme's economic and social objectives.
I accept that due to the Gulf War, coupled with the recessionary difficulties in the United Kingdom and the United States and a general slowing down in world trade, there has been a disappointing but temporary rise in unemployment here. We have to resist the temptation, however, to resort to panic measures which, in the long run, can prove counter-productive.
Since Tuesday's debate the ESRI have published their quarterly economic commentary and the OECD economic survey of Ireland has also been published. Both independent studies have endorsed current policies and expect that GNP will continue to grow at a robust rate with a continuing low inflation rate.
There can be no jobs without growth. The Programme for National Recovery demonstrated what can be achieved when there is consensus on the broad economic strategy and employment targets. The Programme for Economic and Social Progress is based on the same consensual approach and, I have no doubt, will be equally successful.
The central review committee enables representatives of all the major interests to meet regularly with representatives of Government to review and to make recommendations on developments under the programme. In this way the social partners, who are at the forefront of action on job creation, have a direct, on-going input into the Government's decision-making process on economic and social policy.
I believe that the committee satisfactorily fulfil their role and I do not see the need for the setting up of further bodies such as a separate national forum on unemployment.