Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 18 Feb 1992

Vol. 415 No. 8

Request for Adjournment of Dáil under Standing Order 30.

I had been given notice of motions under Standing Order 30 from a number of Deputies, initially, from Deputies De Rossa, Spring and John Bruton. I have been informed now that Deputies Spring and De Rossa are withdrawing their motions. Therefore, I call on Deputy John Bruton to state the matter of which he has given me notice.

I am not withdrawing my motion because, as I understand it, the alternative format of debate proposed by the Government does not allow provision for a Government reply, to the points made, whereas Standing Order 30 would so allow. For that reason I request you, a Cheann Comhairle, to adjourn the Dáil under the provisions of Standing Order 30, so that the Government may make a comprehensive statement on the consequences of the High Court judgment yesterday in the tragic case of a 14 year old rape victim, in particular the possibility that the judgment may lead to a number of results, not claimed at the time to be intended by those proposing the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution, namely, (1) the creation of a disincentive to report rape and incest cases, and (2) a system of enforcement of law in this area that will be uncertain, arbitrary, impractical and intrusive to an extent that may actually increase the numbers of women taking a precipitate decision alone to seek an abortion abroad rather than examine other options through open discussion with family and friends.

I have received notice that Statements will be made on this matter after the Order of Business. Accordingly, the Dáil will discuss the matter today. Consequently, I cannot grant leave to move the motion.

Top
Share