Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 21 May 1992

Vol. 420 No. 1

Adjournment Debate. - Mullingar (Westmeath) School.

I thank you, a Cheann Comhairle, for giving me the opportunity to raise the important matter of the pending industrial action at the CBS primary school, Mullingar, County Westmeath on the Adjournment.

On Tuesday next week 500 pupils at St. Mary's primary school, Mullingar, will be deprived of their education because of industrial action by the INTO. They have taken this serious decision because of the action of the Department of Education in not recognising certain pupils attending that school. This is just the beginning of action on the part of teachers which will spread nationwide unless the Minister does something about it now. He has a chance to act now to prevent a further escalation of this industrial action.

Children repeat sixth class in primary schools in many schools nationwide for a variety of reasons, principally on the grounds that they may be too young to commence secondary school. Many children finishing primary school may be 11 years of age who, if they continue straight into second level, would be sitting their leaving certificate at age 16, which is far too young. Therefore, many of them wish to repeat sixth class in primary school, affording them another year before entering second level. In addition, parents of pupils may wish them to repeat sixth class because, in some cases, the children may be too immature to commence second level. We must remember that second level is a tremendous change for pupils, with additional teachers, requiring them to move about from one class to another, taking a totally different set of subjects, when some find it very difficult to adjust. Accordingly, many pupils leaving primary school are not sufficiently mature, when their parents and teachers may well decide they should repeat sixth class.

Some children may repeat because they have fallen behind in their education to date. There are, for example, overcrowded classrooms, a lack of remedial teachers which means many children finish sixth class without having the requisite competence to enter second level, another reason they may decide to repeat.

It is interesting to note that the Department of Education appear to have changed their rules between this year and last year. For example, at the school in question, Scoil Muire CBS, Mullingar, there were something like 22 pupils repeating sixth class, a number of whom had worked through their own school and a smaller number, approximately ten, who had come into that school from outlying schools to repeat sixth class. The Department wrote to the school last year stating that only the pupils from outside that school would not be counted for numerical purposes. However, within the past month or so the Department have contacted the school stipulating that not alone those pupils coming from outside the area but also those from the school itself repeating sixth class would not be counted for numerical purposes. This is a retrograde step on the part of the Department. It raises parents' rights to decide where their children should attend school. Article 42.3.1º of our Constitution stipulates that parents have the right to decide what school their children should attend. I must now ask the Department: is this right being taken from them? If parents want their children to attend a particular school to repeat a class does this mean that the Department will now force them to send their children to the school stipulated by them, or indeed to change schools at a time they may stipulate?

I might point out that comprehensive documentation was prepared in the case of each pupil who repeated sixth class at this school, comprised of a letter from the parents requesting that their child repeat; a letter and report from the school teacher who had taught the child in addition to a letter from the principal of the school involved. Surely that indicates that these were not rash decisions taken that children should repeat but rather logical ones taken on educational grounds? It appears to me the Department have decided, on financial grounds only, that children must be rushed through primary school, thereby saving a number of teaching posts nationwide which seems totally irresponsible. I appeal to the Minister to do something about it before there is strike action nationwide.

Scoil Mhuire CBS, Mullingar in the past two school years have sought to have pupils repeating sixth standard recognised by the Department for the purposes of appointing an extra teacher. The position of my Department in relation to this issue is quite clear. The Department operate a policy of discounting, for staff appointment purposes, pupils who are repeating sixth standard unless those pupils are repeating for exceptional reasons, for example, in the case of a pupil who may have missed a large portion of the school year through illness.

The Department have emphasised repeatedly to boards of management and principal teachers — by means of circulars in 1989, 1990 and twice in 1991 — the need to keep the retention of pupils to a minimum, contending that their retention in sixth standard should take place in exceptional circumstances only.

Departmental policy on the promotion of pupils in primary schools was set out originally in circulars in 1967 and again in 1989. The normal procedure should be that a pupil is promoted to a higher standard at the end of each school year. This is to ensure that all children have the opportunity of having three years post-primary education before reaching the minimum school-leaving age. However, there may be cases where a principal teacher considers that a pupil would benefit educationally by being retained a second year in a class. In such cases it is felt, by reference to educational principles — they should be minimal — that no pupil should be held back for longer than one year throughout his or her national school education period; that usually the retention of a pupil in a class for a second year should take place only in the third or fourth standard.

But the Department are not refusing that.

In the case of pupils who have completed sixth standard in a national school, it would be in accordance with accepted practice that they transfer to a post-primary school. In exceptional circumstances such pupils would only, if retained in a national school, be considered to be validly enrolled for staffing and other purposes.

How does one decide?

The school authorities applied for sanction to appoint an additional assistant for the school year 1991/92 based on the enrolment in the school of 489 pupils on 30 September 1990. A valid enrolment of at least 485 pupils was required on 30 September 1990 in order to qualify for the appointment of a fifteenth assistant from 1 September 1991.

An examination of the circumstances by the Department revealed that a number of pupils, 20 in all, were repeating sixth standard at that school, that ten pupils had completed sixth standard while ten others had completed sixth standard in other schools in the area. All of these pupils were expected to be repeating at their parents' request on the basis that some were weak academically while others were considered to be immature. In line with Departmental policy my Department refused to sanction the appointment of an additional assistant to Scoil Mhuire in the school year 1991-92.

Another investigation of the enrolment in that school in September, 1991 revealed that there were 15 pupils repeating sixth standard in that year, four of whom had completed sixth standard in that school and 11 others who had transferred into that school to repeat. This class of 15 repeat pupils is being taught by the principal teacher.

The Dáil adjourned at 5 p.m. until 10.30 a.m., Friday, 22 May 1992.

Top
Share