Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 8 Jul 1992

Vol. 422 No. 4

Written Answers. - Nuclear Industry Loans.

Roger T. Garland

Question:

66 Mr. Garland asked the Minister for Finance if, in regard to the decision in April, 1990 of the EC Finance Ministers, which the then Minister for Finance approved on behalf of Ireland to increase low-cost loans from 2.8 billion ECUs to 4 billion ECUs to the nuclear industry which includes loans for the reprocessing of nuclear waste which is largely done at Sellafield, he will outline the conditions, if any, which exist or are insisted on by the Irish Government; and whether the Government insisted on any measures to protect the health and bodily integrity of the Irish people.

Mary Flaherty

Question:

82 Miss Flaherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will outline the circumstances under which major loans were approved for the nuclear processing industry.

Brendan Howlin

Question:

83 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for Finance whether he signed and approved the increase from EC funds for the nuclear industry in April 1990, when he was Minister for Finance; if he will outline his present attitude to EC support for the nuclear industry, particularly reprocessing and storage of nuclear waste; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Bernard Allen

Question:

84 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for Finance if he will make a statement on recent reports that European financial support for the development of Sellafield Nuclear Reprocessing Plant was sanctioned during the Taoiseach's term of office as a member of the European Council of Finance Ministers.

Eamon Gilmore

Question:

101 Mr. Gilmore asked the Minister for Finance if he will outline his response to the recent claim by Greenpeace that the Taoiseach as President of the EC Council of Ministers on 23 April 1990, agreed to and signed an agreement to increase EC loans to the nuclear industry, and to extend the application of these loans to the nuclear reprocessing industry which includes Sellafield; and if he will confirm the way in which he can reconcile this action with the Government's policy on Sellafield.

I propose to take Questions Nos. 66, 82 to 84, inclusive, and 101 together.

I can confirm that the Minister for Finance, in his capacity as President of the Council of Finance Ministers, signed the decision to raise the ceiling on borrowing by the European Commission under the Euratom Treaty from 2 billion ECU to 4 billion ECU in April 1990. This is a matter of public record and, in his capacity as President of the Council, the Minister had no discretion once the matter had been agreed by the Council.

Ireland has continually pressed for a greater emphasis on the health and safety aspects of the Euratom Treaty in relation to EC funding for the nuclear industry, and for a stronger role for the EC Commission in overseeing the implementation of the highest possible safety standards. Ireland stressed this concern with safety at the Council of Finance Ministers when this proposal was discussed in December 1989.

I should make it clear that the decision related to the nuclear industry across the Community. In addition, the decision to increase the ceiling did not widen the range of activities for which loans could be made. The original decision in 1977 included both industrial production of electricity in nuclear power stations and industrial fuel cycle installations. The Commission proposal for the increase stressed that it would contribute to safety-related investments which had been called for by member states and Community institutions as well as to reprocessing and waste storage. The Irish Government will continue to emphasise the need to give priority to such safety-related investments.

Government policy in relation to Sellafield was set out in a speech made by the Minister for Energy during the debate on a Private Members motion on 30 June and 1 July 1992. In the interest of maintaining all-party opposition to Sellafield's operations and plans, the Government accepted the Labour Party motion calling for a campaign of representation through every possible international forum with the object of securing the closure of Sellafield.
Top
Share