Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 14 Oct 1992

Vol. 423 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Toxic Discharge into Lough Foyle.

A Cheann Comhairle, I propose to give some of my time to Deputy McDaid.

My intention had been to table a Private Notice Question to the Minister to ascertain what action he proposes to take to ensure there will not be a recurrence of this awful leak of toxic matter into Lough Foyle.

I take grave exception to this because the Minister of State at the Department of the Marine, a Donegal man, should have made clear to all and sundry that the white fish being caught by the Greencastle fishermen — involving three hours steaming north of Inishowen Head or seven hours to Tory Island — and which constitute a major fishing industry in Greencastle, were tarnished by the overspill by Du Pont in Derry. The Government did nothing to clarify that position, which I hope the Minister of State will do this evening.

The discharge from the Du Pont plant calls into question their control over storage of the chlorobutedane acid that spilled into Lough Foyle. The spillage of 1.5 tonnes of this substance into Lough Foyle was hidden for three or four days because they thought the amount was smaller. To the surprise of everyone on both sides of the Border a major statement was made. One wonders how safe are the containers at Du Pont.

I understand the authorities in Northern Ireland have given the all-clear to the Lough this evening. The Minister of State might comment on that.

The shellfish industry in Lough Foyle started from nothing 10 years ago and is now a major industry. Many families earn their living from it and they are at the mercy of a multi-national company like Du Pont, who should have some regard for these matters. They should be more concerned about accidents than they appear to have been on this occasion. I protest about this matter and I ask the Minister to take it up directly with Du Pont. I would also ask him to clarify the position regarding the white fish being caught by fishermen at Greencastle and to assure the shell fishermen of Lough Foyle that their industry will be protected in the future. A better relationship between the authorities on both sides of the Border and Du Pont, together with more regular inspections, might be to the benefit of all.

I thank Deputy Harte for allowing me to share his time and to express my concern at this unfortunate spillage into Lough Foyle. I am glad to hear Deputy Harte state that testing to date has been clear. I hope this will continue to be the case. In view of the toxicity of the spillage I would ask the Minister to ensure that his Department exercise caution. They should not allow the Lough to be opened up and then find they have to close it again.

The Foyle has had a rather turbulent history because of its geographical situation. It is controlled by the Foyle Fisheries Commission which consists of two people from Northern Ireland and two from the Republic. Those from the Republic are based in Dublin. The Minister might consider whether it would be more satisfactory if somebody from the area were appointed as one of the commissioners, somebody who knows the history and problems of the area. I also express my concern at the delay by Du Pont in this serious matter.

I thank Deputy Harte and Deputy McDaid for their contributions. I fully share their concern in relation to the discharge of this substance into Lough Foyle last Tuesday.

My Department were not officially informed by Du Pont of the spillage on Tuesday, 6 October into Lough Foyle from its factory in Derry. I understand that the Northern Ireland authorities were not themselves informed of the incident until Friday morning. My Department were alerted by the Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture on Friday afternoon, but the full significance and scale of the incident did not become apparent until late on Friday night.

As a result of urgent inquiries by my Department on foot of the report, the following steps were taken on the morning of Saturday, 10 October: As a precautionary measure, harvesting of shellfish on the Donegal shores of Lough Foyle was stopped; samples of shellfish were taken from the Lough and sent for detailed analysis, the result of which are expected tomorrow. Sampling will continue for as long as may be necessary. I established that no shellfish from the Lough had been placed on the market from the date of the incident on Tuesday, 6 October. I directed that the ban on harvesting should continue until we were satisfied that it was completely safe for it to be lifted; the Department of Health in Northern Ireland have lifted the ban this evening, but we will not do so until we are satisfied that it is fully safe; we can take this a step further when we have full details of the samples which were taken by officials of the Department of the Marine over the past few days. The North-Western Health Board were informed by my Department through the local environmental health officer.

The perception may have been that all fish were involved. Only shellfish are harvested there. There is no question of white fish, demersal or pelagic fish being affected since they are caught quite a distance away. I hope there will be no doubt about that.

I made immediate direct contact with the Chief Chemist, Donegal County Council, as soon as I was advised of the matter on Saturday morning to ensure maximum co-ordination of monitoring efforts. The council set in train a monitoring programme on marine life along the shore of the Foyle and are in close daily contact with my Department. In statements issued on Saturday and Sunday, 10 and 11 October, the Minister and I expressed serious concern that the Du Pont company did not notify the authorities here about the pollution incident. The salmon and shellfish industry in Lough Foyle is a valuable source of jobs locally and this pollution incident could have had serious economic and public health consequences.

So concerned were we by the failure of the company to notify us of this incident that arrangements have been made for a special meeting of the Foyle Fisheries Commission tomorrow, together with technical officials of my Department, Donegal County Council and the Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland. The Foyle Fisheries Commission is a joint North-South body with representatives from both administrations and has responsibilities for administering fisheries in the Foyle area. My officials will meet representatives of the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment to establish the cause of the pollution and to seek to prevent a repetition. The Minister has also been in contact with his Cabinet colleague, the Minister for the Environment, to see what measures can be taken to prevent pollution of Lough Foyle in the future.

Both my Department and the Department of the Environment have well-established working relations with the Department of the Environment in Northern Ireland. In relation to the Foyle, the two Departments of the Environment and Donegal County Council liaise on water management and protection for Border areas. They are currently engaged in drawing up cross-Border water quality management plans.

What disappoints me is that there was a structure in relation to the Foyle and there was no reason why the company could not have informed their Department of the Environment, who in turn could have informed Donegal County Council and the North-Western Health Board. The structures are there and we want to ensure that nothing like this will ever happen again.

In relation to the water quality management plan, a contract for the preparation of the Lough Foyle plan is expected to be placed shortly. In the light of the spillage, a review will be undertaken of the channels of communication between the respective authorities, North and South, in incidents of this kind. There is a discharge licence from the DOE in Northern Ireland and I would be very disappointed if there were not a condition in that discharge licence whereby the company involved in a spillage should immediately alert the local authority or the health board in the area. That should have happened on Tuesday of last week. I hope there will never be a recurrence but if so, there should be an early alert.

As regards compensation for fishermen, it is a matter to be pursued directly between the fishermen concerned and the company. I have noted reports to the effect that the company is prepared to listen to compensation claims if damage to the fishing industry can be proved.

I can assure the House that I will do everything possible to protect the fishing industry in Lough Foyle. The incident which occurred last week in the Foyle will be fully investigated and whatever measures are needed will be taken to protect this valuable marine resource.

Deputy McDaid referred to having a local person on the commission. I will deal with this at a later stage because I would not want to give the impression that the presence of a local person on the Foyle Fisheries Commission could have averted this incident. I will consider the matter at a later stage.

Top
Share