Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 12 May 1994

Vol. 442 No. 7

Order of Business.

It is proposed to take Nos. 12, 3, 7, 8 and 9. It is also proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders that: (1) Nos. 12 and 3 shall be decided without debate; and (2) the proceedings on the Report and Final Stages of No. 7, if not previously concluded, shall be brought to a conclusion at 4.45 p.m. by one Question which shall be put from the Chair and which shall, in relation to amendments, include only those set down or accepted by the Minister for Finance.

The Select Committee on Enterprise and Economic Strategy shall commence consideration of the Select Committee Stage of the Casual Trading Bill, 1994 and the Select Committee on Legislation and Security shall consider the Estimates relating to the Department of Defence on Tuesday next.

Is the proposal that Nos. 12 and 3 be decided without debate satisfactory and agreed? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with No. 7 agreed? Agreed.

I take this opportunity to congratulate Steve Collins, who is no relation, on winning the world title in Sheffield last night. There is a precedent that when an Irish person brings great credit on this country by winning a major sporting award we would extend congratulations to them. He happens to live in Dublin North——

And happens to be Fianna Fáil.

How did he manage to win?

A man of many talents.

How does the Deputy know?

I know him well.

He is one of the Minister's 11,000. The Programme for Government promises to amend the Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act to include Telecom Éireann. When will that amendment come before the House? As the Taoiseach is aware, all the forebodings about the rebalancing of Telecom charges has come to pass and over 55 per cent of domestic users have increased telephone bills.

There is no legislation promised.

Will the Minister apologise to the people for misleading them?

(Interruptions.)

There are questions on the Order Paper concerning that matter.

An amendment to that legislation was promised.

There is no promised legislation.

It is in the Programme for Government.

The Programme for Government is not legislation.

It has gone out the door with the Ethics Bill.

The Committee on Foreign Affairs will meet later today to deal with the Estimate for overseas development aid. Has the Taoiseach received the request which the committee received from the Concern aid agency to assist in the provision of an airstrip at Ngara, Burundi, in view of the appalling position in Rwanda? Does the Government intend to introduce a Supplementary Estimate to provide the money needed for this airstrip?

We must hesitate to interfere in the workings of committees.

Is there a Government decision in relation to the matter and will a Supplementary Estimate be introduced to provide for the air-strip?

I am anxious to facilitate Deputies in raising important matters——

It is an urgent matter.

——but we must have regard to regulations governing the Order of Business.

I appreciate that and I tried to keep in order by relating it to the Estimate for overseas development aid, which is a legitimate matter to raise on the Order of Business.

It is a circuitous route to adopt.

Will the Taoiseach make time available for statements on the Grace Livingstone murder inquiry so that the House will know precisely what has been happening?

There are other ways and means of raising that matter. The Deputy should put down a question——

Is it in order to ask the Taoiseach to make time available for statements?

It is not in order now.

Will the Taoiseach bring forward a criminal justice Bill so that this matter can be debated in the House? There is growing concern about the absence of a murder squad and the way in which murder investigations——

Please, Deputy Mitchell. Deputy Rabbitte is offering.

Is it intended to bring forward a criminal justice Bill as promised so that these serious matters, including the need for a murder squad, can be discussed?

The legislation is at an early stage of preparation.

In other words, we will have to wait three years for it.

After many years this House agreed a reasonable interpretation of the sub judice rule. However, it now appears that a sub judice rule is being applied in respect of any matter before a committee of the House so that no Member of this House may raise it in this Chamber. I seek your guidance, Sir, on how we might approach this matter. It is the most absurd proposition that Members cannot raise in this Chamber a matter before a committee of the House.

I am aware of observations made on this matter and the element of ambiguity involved. I propose to clarify matters for the Deputy — and Deputy Enda Kenny — who raised the matter yesterday evening. I will communicate with the Deputies concerned with a view to elaboration in respect of the ruling I made. My ruling was never intended to place a block on matters from committees being raised in the House. I will communicate with the Deputies in some detail on this subject.

I seek clarification on another matter. I received a letter from you, Sir, which presumably was based on information supplied by the Department of the Environment concerning a question which asked——

Please, Deputy Barrett, my rulings may not be challenged in this fashion.

I am not challenging your rulings.

If the Deputy wishes to have any elaboration on the matter my office is at his disposal.

I am not challenging your rulings.

The Deputy is——

If you wait a second you will hear what I want to say. Presumably you were informed, as the letter says, that the Minister has no official responsibility——

Please, Deputy Barrett.

Sorry, a Cheann Comhairle, I want to make——

The Deputy is being disorderly.

No, I am——

You may not challenge my rulings in this fashion, Deputy.

I am not challenging your rulings, Sir.

You are, Deputy.

You have not heard what I want to say.

You were quoting from a letter I conveyed to you——

——but you may not do so.

I will have to submit a letter. I want to make a point——

If the Deputy wishes to pursue the matter my office is at his disposal.

I was elected to this Assembly and I will speak here, not in your office.

I will not be treated with disdain. If the Deputy feels the Minister's reply or my reply was out of order he has ways and means of following it up.

It has nothing to do with your office.

He may not challenge my reply.

I am not challenging your reply. I am merely asking a question.

I am exasperated by the Deputy's attitude.

I merely want to ask a question. The Minister is answerable to this House for the expenditure of moneys voted in it for works to be carried out by his Department or another agency.

That is correct.

Since the National Roads Authority was set up anyone who raises a question about the construction or completion date of a major road is told that the Minister has no responsibility to the Dáil——

There are other ways of dealing with this matter. The Deputy can raise this matter by way of question or motion.

I have never heard such nonsense——

Please, Deputy Barrett.

I want to say——

The same Minister——

The Deputy will now resume his seat.

The same Minister met a deputation in Mayo to discuss the construction of a road there——

Deputy Barrett will now resume his seat——

——and made an announcement at the meeting about the construction of the road.

Deputy Barrett will resume his seat.

Yet he is not answerable to this House. Who is codding whom about democracy?

More transparency.

He is shirking his responsibilities.

I am proceeding to the business ordered. This is quite disorderly.

May I——

I will call the Deputy if his question is relevant.

(Interruptions.)

This House is becoming more irrelevant every day.

The Government's huge majority——

The Government allocated £200,000 to Fianna Fáil cumann members to open a GAA pitch in Mullingar. The way in which public money is being expended is a disgrace.

This is quite disorderly. I call Deputy Jim Higgins.

Nobody is prepared to defend it, including yourself, Sir. It is about time a stop was put to the practice whereby Members of this House are silenced when they try to raise important issues.

Parting is such sweet sorrow.

Democracy depends on us. The spin doctors are taking over this House.

Deputy Barrett, I will not allow my impartiality to be called into question by you or anyone else in this House.

I apologise, but the spin doctors are taking over.

I call Deputy Jim Higgins.

On the question of promised educational legislation, now that planning seems to have gone out the window while we are awaiting such legislation and the numbers allowed to sit the higher diploma in education has been cut in half this year, thus leaving people with worthless degrees from the point of view of teaching — they will not even be able to emigrate — will the Taoiseach outline the new time frame for (a) the White Paper on education and (b) the education Bill——

I want to facilitate the Deputy, I thought he was raising a question appropriate to the Order of Business but clearly he is not.

It relates to the education Bill.

It relates to the promised education Bill.

Will the regional technical college be in Castlebar?

Has a Bill been promised in respect of education?

There are two parts to my question.

The Deputy may not elaborate now.

I want to know the position in regard to the White Paper, which is the precursor, and the education Bill which will follow. Will the Taoiseach intervene with the Minister for Education to ensure that the ridiculous cuts in higher education are stopped once and for all?

I do not have any cause to intervene with the Minister for Education.

The Taoiseach certainly has cause to intervene with the Minister for the Environment.

As I think the Deputy is aware the education Bill is due to be introduced in 1995 and the White Paper on education is due to be introduced before the end of this year.

So the Taoiseach agrees with the cuts?

On the question of legislation, some months ago I raised with the Taoiseach the question of a charities Bill and voiced my concern about the possible misuse of the generosity of the public by some charities which are not worthy of the name and the concerns of legitimate charities about the lack of up-to-date legislation. The Taoiseach indicated that some progress was being made in this regard. I strongly urge the Taoiseach to take into account the comments made in the meantime by the Comptroller and Auditor General about this matter and to introduce the new charities legislation as soon as possible.

I am proceeding to item No. 12.

I urge the Taoiseach to respond to my request.

The Deputy has made a speech.

I am referring to the charities legislation.

The Deputy has been allowed quite some latitude.

Will the Taoiseach say when we can expect the charities Bill?

Is it proposed to introduce a charities Bill?

As I am sure the Deputy is aware, the Bill is at a very early stage of preparation. The Department is dealing first with other priority legislation.

I will continue to press the Taoiseach on this issue.

Top
Share