——and to send a message to it. It will certainly not change the Government, which has a majority of 35 seats but I think a clear message can be sent to it by the voters of those constituencies. It is a pity that in Mayo-West voters have had to wait for 18 months to replace a former Deputy and that in Dublin South Central they have had to wait for 17 months. It is time to review the way we fill by-elections because a Government with a majority can refuse to move the writs, oppose their moving and in one sense retain an almost false majority. I am certain there is a better way of automatically filling vacancies.
Earlier the Minister of State made reference to the performance of the Government. There is a number of issues on which the Government needs to be taken up on and given an answer by voters in these constituencies. In its first budget the Government announced a tax amnesty which yielded £250 million from tax dodgers who were not even required to bring their money back to this country. The Government also announced the introduction of a 1 per cent income levy — another tax on work — which was removed in its second budget. This year the Government announced the extension of the famous residential property tax. The Taoiseach would not answer questions in the Dáil on comments he had made on this issue. The questions that I and others tabled to him were transferred to the Minister for the Environment.
Many of us find it impossible to ask questions of the Taoiseach, the leader of the Government. Frequently questions are transferred to other Ministers who do not have responsibility for the Taoiseach's remarks. I find it very difficult to understand how a Government which was given a mandate for change, particularly the smaller partner, can constantly refuse to be held accountable for its actions in this House. While I welcome the fact that £10 million is to be spent in improving facilities in the Oireachtas, it is more important that we change the procedures in this House which are out of date and do not allow the Government to be held accountable. As you are aware, a Cheann Comhairle, questions are either ruled out of order if a matter has been referred to in the preceding few months or transferred to other Ministers. This is not good enough from any Government but particularly from a Government which has a majority of 35 seats.
During the past 15 months the Government has signed contracts with communications consultants to the tune of £2.5 million. I note that the Government is to spend approximately £6.2 million on ministerial offices. In advance of the spending of Structural Funds, many companies are concerned about the manner in which Government contracts are awarded. There is no transparency, fairness or equity. We need to change the tendering procedures. Many people have asked me how a company which owes this country £11 million can be given a C2 certificate and can compete with others and get away with only paying 20p in the pound. This is not fair and is causing much concern among companies.
The Taoiseach rightly criticised bank interest rates, but the answer is not for the State to become involved in banking. A State fertiliser company owes £180 million, a State telecommunications company owes £1 million, while the State owes £28 billion. The State should not become involved in banking. We have a competition authority and its powers to deal with unfair practices should be enforced. The Central Bank has to approve all bank charges and interest rates and those powers should be used fully. I do not support the idea that the State should become a third banking force. Lame-duck companies and those with political clout would be given loans that the taxpayer would have to pay back at the end of the day. There are 39 licensed banks and the two main banks dominate the market. However neither dominates more than 25 per cent of any segment of the market. What we need is consolidation and greater competition in the banking sector. The Government should encourage this and ensure that the powers that exist are fully enforced.
We had the Structural Funds debacle when there was a failure to tell the truth in this House about the sum of money involved. The Government was established on the basis that the famous £8 billion was in the bag. The President of the Commission was drawn into the debacle and we sought to use his influence to get us a good deal.
I welcome the Tánaiste's remarks in relation to Peter Sutherland. The Taoiseach misled the House on two occasions recently when he said that Mr. Sutherland had told him he was not interested in the job. I do not believe the Taoiseach discussed the matter with him. I welcome the fact that the Tánaiste intervened.