Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 14 Mar 1995

Vol. 450 No. 6

Adjournment Debate. - Army School of Music.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for giving me permission to raise this matter on the Adjournment and I thank the Minister of State. Deputy Barrett, for attending.

The Army School of Music was established in 1923. Its objectives were the production of first-class military bands; the training of bandsmen for these bands; the training of Irish bandsmasters and the development of Irish music. It was hoped at the time that the scheme would contribute to music literacy and promote a revival of interest in music throughout the country. The formation of the bands had begun, and since 1936 each of the four commands has had its own band. The bands have been a great source of pride for many years. How often have we all seen and heard the Army Band perform at a State or military occasion, a concert, a visit to a school or an appearance at a local festival or field day? The bands provided a wonderful service to communities throughout Ireland. We must not underestimate the enormous contribution the Army School of Music has made to the development of music. It is vital that development continues because it is as important today as it was 70 years ago.

An efficiency audit group was established in 1988 to examine the workings and practices of each Government Department with a view to recommending improved or alternative methods which would reduce costs and improve efficiency. We had a debate in this House last week on the EAG report and there was widespread agreement that change is necessary within the Defence Forces — anybody who is in contact with members of the Defence Forces knows that they agree change is necessary. It was insinuated some time ago that members of the Defence Forces were reluctant to change, but nothing could be further from the truth. It is obvious that when the efficiency audit group studied the Defence Forces, in many cases it simply scratched the surface; it took the easy option.

The strength of the Army School of Music is 193 and Price Waterhouse recommends that the number be reduced to 45, the School of Music be retained and that there be only one band. The efficiency audit group had no idea of the difficulties implementation of these proposals would create. It knows the cost of everything and the value of nothing.

Let us look back to the time the present members of our Army bands started their careers. The majority of these people signed up when they were 14, 15 or 16 years of age and the only training they received was musical. Therefore, there is no point talking about redeployment. These people have been involved in music all their lives. They are professional musicians and have no other qualifications. When these men and women joined the Army School of Music major contractual restrictions were placed on them. Courses and opportunities available to other soldiers were not available to band members. These people now feel cheated. They accepted the major contractual restrictions at the time because they were in for the long haul.

Leaks about this matter appear week after week and this has had a negative effect on the morale of the members of the Army School of Music. They feel uncertain about their future and their families feel let down. They now realise the Minister is seriously considering the abolition of the Army School of Music. This is poor reward for people who have given so much pleasure to so many people. The Minister refused to accept the proposals put forward in regard to the Equitation School and I compliment him on that. He is obviously in touch with the Equitation School and is aware of the opportunities there.

The Minister should recognise the great service the Army School of Music has provided by refusing to accept the proposal. He should consult with these people before making a decision about their future. It is the least they deserve. While I recognise the necessity for change within the Defence Forces, members of that Army School of Music provide a very important service, very much appreciated by Irish people, and they should be allowed continue in their chosen careers.

If the proposal put forward is implemented members of the Army bands will have great difficulty in getting employment elsewhere. Since they are trained specifically for music, there are few opportunities for them outside the Army. The Minister must change his tune on this matter.

I am grateful to Deputy Power for the opportunity to clarify the position regarding the future of the Army School of Music in the context of the Efficiency Audit Group review of the Defence Forces. Last week, in the course of a debate in Private Members' time, it was made clear that no decisions of any kind have been taken regarding the reform of any unit of the Defence Forces, including the Army School of Music. There has been no change in that position.

Since the leaking of the report prepared by Price Waterhouse for the Efficiency Audit Group, there has been an endless succession of rumours regarding various aspects of the Defence Forces. Having exhausted imaginary barrack closures as a source of mischief, this week, the rumour machine is, apparently, taking an interest in military music. Almost all of these rumours are inaccurate. Many of them are complete nonsense. Some of the speculation causes needless annoyance to members of the Defence Forces. Is this really the best way of promoting a balanced and informed debate on the future of the Defence Forces?

I repeat that the Government's overall objective for the Defence Forces is to develop a modern, efficient, organisation, staffed and equipped to fulfil the roles assigned to them by Government. This objective is in the national interest; it is in the interest of the Defence Forces themselves and is an objective which is supported on all sides of the House. The Government is mindful that there are important human, social and economic dimensions to the process of reform. It has been made clear, both by the Minister for Defence and by me, that in moving towards this objective there will be an extensive process of consultation. This process is already well under way. It goes without saying that there will be no compulsory redundancies. This guarantee applies to military bandsmen on the same basis as it applies to all personnel of the Defence Forces.

Given that no decisions have been taken, there is little point in engaging in speculation about the possible implications of change for each individual unit of the Defence Forces. However, I can assure the House that the lurid tales of cutbacks and closures which have circulated in recent times are completely wide of the mark. The rumours and speculation about the Army School of Music are as ill-informed as all the rest.

For many years, the Army School of Music, and the generations of military musicians who have received their training there, has made an invaluable contribution to the life of the Defence Forces. Army bands play an important role on many State ceremonial occasions. They are also in constant demand to give public performances at major events throughout the country. This coming Friday is St. Patrick's Day. The Army bands have been booked for months in advance and will be centre stage for the celebration of our national day. For many years, Army musicians have maintained an admirable standard of excellence. The presence of Army bands has contributed a unique lustre to important national events. They play an important role in maintaining the esprit de corps of the Defence Forces.

When the Government is planning for the future of the Defence Forces, its focus will be on building on the many positive attributes of the Army, Naval Service and Air Corps. I can assure the House that in reaching decisions about the future organisation of the Defence Forces, the Government will take full account of the illustrious tradition of military music associated with the Army School of Music.

The Dáil adjourned at 9.15 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 15 March 1995.

Top
Share