Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 8 Jun 1995

Vol. 454 No. 2

Private Members' Business. - Coastal Protection: Motion (Resumed).

The following motion was moved by Deputy Michael Smith on Wednesday, 7 June 1995:
That Dáil Éireann condemns the Government for its failure to put in place a comprehensive programme of action to combat coastal erosion, for its lack of interest in the problems which this is causing for many coastal communities and for the exclusion of the worst-affected areas in many towns throughout the country, including Bray, from a range of special incentives to encourage private investment to facilitate the refurbishment of areas affected by coastal erosion.
Debate resumed on amendment No. 1.
To delete all words after "That" and substitute the following:
"Dáil Éireann supports the Government's commitment to develop and implement a targeted coast protection programme in respect of priority coastal areas, including Bray."
—(Minister for the Marine.)

I wish to make a few points on coastal erosion relevant to County Donegal. When one considers the budget for the Department of the Marine, one would not believe we are an island country. A budget of approximately £50 million for that Department is ludicrous. It should receive additional funding, particularly to deal with the problem of coastal erosion which, in general, only comes to light during inclement weather conditions. At other times it is forgotten.

The sea is gradually washing away land in many parts of County Donegal and I have made representations to Ministers in this and the previous Governments in this regard. At Lag near Malin Head on the Inishowen Peninsula a person has lost acres of land because of coastal erosion. The Minister should place more emphasis on coastal erosion affecting small homesteads. If we do not address the problem now, it will be too late because it will cost a great deal more to do so in a few year's time.

Deputy Michael Smith put forward a relatively cost effective solution in proposing the setting up of a group of people to examine coastal erosion problems. In the past damage to our coast was to a certain extent catered for in the budget on a piecemeal basis. Unfortunately, this problem does not have similar significance for all Deputies, but because we are an island country there should be all-party consensus on the matter and the Minister should accept that Deputy Smith's proposal is for the common good.

This initiative would involve cross-Border co-operation. During the fight for fishing rights in the European Community, the first people to support us regarding cross-Border co-operation were Northern Ireland fishermen, illustrating the amount of common ground between the entire population. At that time Northern Ireland fishermen supported the efforts of Ministers in Europe on behalf of the entire island. As this initiative would receive the support of people in Northern Ireland, the matter should be considered on an all-Ireland basis.

Will the Minister consider the cross-Border support this initiative would receive, the amount of funding allocated to the Department of the Marine and the large number of small homesteads being washed away by the sea? Structural Funding should be designated to assist those people who are losing acres of ground.

I wish to share my time with Deputies McGinley, Kavanagh, Bell, Lynch, Sean Ryan and the Minister of State, Deputy McManus.

I am sure that is satisfactory and agreed.

The problem of coastal erosion will not disappear. Large tracts of land, including smallholdings, in the west are being gradually washed away. For example, a householder in Erris had to be rehoused by Mayo County Council because of coastal erosion. The remains of people buried in a graveyard in that area are also being washed away.

A heading in a recent edition of the Connaught Telegraph stated that Mark Killilea, MEP, condemned county councils and the Government for not taking up millions of pounds for coastal erosion. I sent a copy of that heading to the Minister and county managers for comment. If money in Europe is not being drawn down, it is a damning indictment on county councils and the Government and it is unacceptable.

Two years ago major storms occurred in the west and in recent years many areas have suffered flooding and stormy weather. Blacksod, Louisburg and Achill are severly affected by coastal erosion and when I raise the problem at county council level, I am told it is not the responsibility of the county council, that it deals only with grounds owned by it, such as entrances to beaches and so on. This problem will have to be tackled by Government, local authorities and private landowners because it is wrong that they continue to pass the buck in this respect. We must remember that our coastline, beaches and waters belong to all our people. It is totally irresponsible that adequate funding is not provided for the protection of our coasts, small holdings and the homes of those who experience problems from coastal erosion. It is not possible for private individuals to spend millions of pounds on coastal protection. The Minister, when replying, might confirm that there is money available within the European Union that has not been drawn down by this or previous Governments or local authorities. If that is the case it is indeed serious.

A number of weeks ago I brought local authority officials to Dooagh where there is a serious coastal erosion problem. I requested them to prepare and send a report to Government and Mayo County Council to ascertain what can be done about it. In County Mayo there are ten blue flag beaches but if coastal erosion is allowed continue, we shall not have ten beaches left. They are being further eroded annually. While the Government claims it has not the requisite funds to tackle the problem, we must do something about it or our beaches will continue to deteriorate in quality and quantity.

This is a serious problem, particularly in the west. There is a beautiful beach outside Westport — Bartraw — which people from Louisburgh, Westport and surrounding areas visit regularly. Our European Commissioner, Pádraig Flynn, said he loved to take his dog there for a walk. I challenged him when he was Minister for the Environment on not having invested the funds to preserve it. I hope that, as a European Commissioner, he can help the Government and local authorities to extract whatever funds are available in Europe to tackle this very serious problem.

The Government and local authorities cannot continue to say merely that there are inadequate funds and they can do nothing about it. We must save our coastline and the small holdings located along it.

Many coastal communities, particularly along our western seaboard, live in constant fear of the next storm and its consequences, having experienced what happened to their farms and properties in recent storms, placing them in enormous danger. We have all become accustomed to listening to news bulletins following winter storms and the havoc they wreak by further coastal erosion. Island homes on Arranmore in my constituency are in danger of falling into the sea, having been flooded on numerous occasions because of coastal erosion. We have a duty to protect these people and their homesteads. There is also a graveyard there in danger.

A recent survey of coastal erosion shows that there are approximately 1,500 kilometres of our coastline at great risk, which would cost some £125 million to protect adequately. I listened to the Minister of State's contribution and understand that over the duration of the 1994 to 1999 programme £5.5 million is available, which is totally inadequate for the purpose. I do not blame this Government solely. All of us have a responsibility in this respect.

The last major coastal protective measures of which I am aware were adopted under the aegis of the Congested Districts Boards at the end of the last and beginning of this century. Travelling across my constituency from Bundoran to Portnew, to Arranmore and to Magheraroarty, one observes that most of the protective walls or other structures that remain were built at the end of the last century or early this century by those boards. These coastal erosion difficulties have been aggravated over many years, leaving us in our present dilemma.

The Minister and Government recently requested all local authorities to submit applications for grant aid for a number of beaches within their respective jurisdictions. I know that Donegal County Council has submitted applications in respect of Roy, Rathmullen, Teelin, Drum, Salthill, Mountcharles, beaches experiencing enormous difficulty through coastal erosion. I could add another four or 24 just as bad, such as Magheraroarty, which entire townland has already been cut off on several occasions, to the extent that one more storm would be sufficient to totally maroon a number of houses or lead to their collapse into the sea.

The finance and other resources available for this purpose are totally inadequate. If there are funds available within Europe, as one of our MEPs so eloquently claimed in a western newspaper, they should be tracked down by the Government so that the money can be expended for the protection of these coastal communities. I look forward to the response of the Government and Mayo County Council to Deputy Ring about these elusive millions supposed to be available.

As Deputy Bell will not be contributing, I wish to share my time with Deputy Seán Ryan.

Our part of this island has approximately 4,000 miles of coastline. About 1,000 miles of coastline are in need of urgent remedial attention, of which approximately 150 miles are critical and warrant immediate attention. This has been a problem over very many years. The Oxford Dictionary interpretation of "erosion" is the gradual wearing away of something. Two former Ministers of State, one with responsibility within the Department of the Environment and the other for the Office of Public Works, are well aware of the coastal erosion problem, having been in an ideal position to appreciate it. I am amazed that this motion should have been tabled by them because, while there may be other matters for which they were not responsible, they must accept responsibility for the coastal erosion that occurred over the many years their party was in power.

Looking back over the relevant estimates one is amazed to find that in 1987, £173,000 was allocated to the Office of Public Works for coastal protection. In 1988 that allocation was totally abolished and funds were not allocated by the then Fianna Fáil Government for that purpose. In 1993, when I carried some responsibility, along with my party in Government, taking into account the rate of inflation, that figure was reduced to £220,000. This year, that figure is £771,000 within the Vote for the Department of the Marine, constituting a 118 per cent increase on the preceding year.

(Wexford): Thanks to the former Minister for the Marine, Deputy Andrews.

The Leas-Cheann Comhairle and I undertook some valuable work in our constituency in Arklow three or four years ago when coastal protection works were urgently needed, having made very strong representation to the then Fianna Fáil Minister who listened to our pleas.

Local authorities are responsible for protective measures to minimise coastal erosion and must provide 50 per cent funding for that purpose, the Department of the Environment contributing the remainder. Invariably this is too high a cost for any local authority, something they cannot afford. They cannot prevent coastal erosion because they are starved of funds. We must all be aware of that and the Government in power must give a 75 per cent or 80 per cent State grant for coastal erosion in any local authority area. Fire brigade action is taken in every constituency but in County Wicklow, which has a soft coast from Bray Head to Wicklow Head to Wexford, a real coastal erosion problem exists.

The problem of coastal erosion is exacerbated when it occurs in a large urban area such as Bray. Many Members made representations on behalf of the people of Bray for action to be taken. I very much welcome the proposed £2 million scheme for Bray to prevent coastal erosion and I am delighted that £260,000 will be made available immediately for the first phase of the scheme to improve the groynes and the rock armour in the Bray area. Discussions are taking place with engineers in Bray on the further operation of that scheme. As the motion refers to Bray I am happy to inform the movers of it that action will be taken in the Bray area. We can all be proud of this initiative taken by the Government, not just in the past week but over a period in consultation with the Minister of State at the Department of the Marine.

County Wicklow has a major problem with coastal erosion but the immediate problem in the Bray area is being attended to and money is being made available to address it. I thank the Minister and the Department for the prompt action taken in this area.

I thank Deputy Kavanagh for giving me the opportunity to make a brief contribution on the important issue of coastal erosion. Our coastline, which is almost 5,800 kilometres long, is of immense importance to all of us in terms of our economy and our environment. Given that our coastal and dune system is non-renewable it is vital that the extent of the problem of coastal erosion is fully recognised by the Department and that a plan be devised and implemented to resolve it.

The National Coastal Erosion Committee report, "Coastal Management — A Case for Action", published by Eolas, highlights some disturbing and indeed startling information. Approximately 1,500 kilometres of our coastline are presently at risk from coastal erosion and approximately 490 kilometres require immediate attention at a staggering cost of £125 million. The cost of dealing with this problem will have major implications for the Government and particularly for local authorities in coastal areas.

I acknowledge that, for the first time ever, EU Structural Funds will be made available by the Government. The figure is approximately £5 million but that is totally inadequate to deal with the problem. I hope the Minister will review this figure following the contributions of Members in this debate.

It is imperative that we examine alternatives to the more conventional remedies used in the past for dealing with coastal erosion. We must critically examine methods used in other countries such as The Netherlands, Denmark, the USA and Great Britain, where coastal erosion has been a problem, and learn from their experiences.

Given the importance of our coastline and our harbours to our expanding tourism industry and for local employment, I ask the Minisier to reconsider the directive to local authorities which in effect states that projects costing less than £75,000 will not be entitled to grant-aid and are not to be submitted for consideration.

Cheaper alternatives to dealing with the problem of coastal erosion must be considered. Beach renewal, dune nourishment, the use of vegetation and sand fencing are some of the available options. Given the financial state of local authorities, they cannot be expected to fund such schemes entirely from their own sources.

The borough of Portrane, in my constituency, has been identified as an area in need of urgent attention. Over the years, acres of fields and dune structure have disappeared into the sea due to coastal erosion. At present, many residential properties are at risk in this area. This is an example of what is happening throughout the county. Other areas in my constituency have been identified in various reports over the years as being in need of attention including Corballis Beach in Donabate, the Velvet Strand in Portmarnock, Loughshinny Harbour, North Shore in Skerries, Barnageera and Balbriggan Harbour.

Last week, the blue flag was withdrawn from Portrane Beach and Portmarnock Beach was not awarded the blue flag because of lack of dune management. This major problem must be addressed and I hope the Minister will respond favourably in this regard. We must implement an overall plan; action is required now.

I wish to share my time with the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Deputy McManus.

I am sure that is satisfactory and agreed.

This is a timely motion. Coastal erosion is an inevitable by-product of Ireland's geographic position. Our extensive coastline, which is almost 6,000 kilometres long, is one of our most valuable resources and, like other natural resources, it is fragile, non-renewable and vulnerable not just to the element's but to the excesses of development also. Coastal erosion can be caused by bad planning and excessive development in our seaside resorts.

I welcome the amendment. The greatest threat to our coastline is not from erosion but from pollution. In that context, the threat of nuclear pollution is particularly worrying. Any moves to protect our coastline from the natural elements must be accompanied by equally vigorous measures to avert the threat of a nuclear catastrophe. The potential for such a catastrophe exists across the Irish Sea in the guise of THORP. We must all be conscious of the fact that the privatisation of the nuclear industry in the United Kingdom represents an enhanced threat to people living here, and not just those living on the east coast. I hope I am proved wrong in that regard but it is something of which we must all be aware.

Various studies indicate that the Irish Sea is the most radioactive sea in this part of the world. That can be attributed directly to unhindered nuclear dumping. I am glad the Government took a very active stand on this issue. That will be appreciated not just by this generation but by future generations because it is an issue of which we must all be extremely conscious.

This Government is committed to averting these threats by using all international arbitration means at its disposal. While the Irish Sea continues to be endangered by nuclear pollution, our coastline will remain vulnerable to a greater threat than coastal erosion. I am not dismissing the problem of coastal erosion or the economic impact it has on the communities that depend entirely on tourism. People probably snigger at the suggestion that we have a huge tourism trade but those living in these areas benefit from tourism. Even with our weather the majority of Irish people holiday at home by the seaside.

I realise the importance of protecting our shoreline from erosion and I welcome the steps the Government has taken in this regard. A 1992 study shows 1,500 kilometres of coastline is at risk from coastal erosion with some 490 kilometres requiring immediate attention. That brings into sharp focus what needs to be done. Protecting our coastline from the inevitable effects of coastal erosion is daunting, a task that no one Government should be asked to do overnight. It will be a long and arduous task.

Up to the end of the century EU Structural Funds of £5.1 million will be made available for protection works and of this, £670,000 will be spent this year on works in Wexford and on commencing a scheme in Bray, County Wicklow. We need to look at these schemes critically and learn from our mistakes. I am sure other methods of protecting our coastline will be found. Cork is a harbour town and has a very serious problem with its quay walls. County Cork has benefited from the scheme for seaside resorts introduced under the Finance Bill. Perhaps we should consider expanding what is considered a coastal area and examine the criteria for zoning areas for protection. I am aware that Cork Corporation and Cork County Council will be seeking moneys in this regard and I hope they will get a sympathetic hearing from the Minister.

I welcome the Government's decision to put money into coastal protection in Bray, County Wicklow. This is long awaited and warmly welcomed in the county. It is indicative of changes not just nationally but in the European Union that recognition is finally being given to the fact that coastal erosion is a problem that will not go away and a cause of great danger. A lady in my constituency is watching her house collapse into the river because of erosion. From that experience I can see directly what potential erosion has to destroy people's lives and property. I am very conscious that we have taken a major step forward in looking seriously at the potential of coastal erosion to impact badly on people's lives.

For a long time the European Union did not concern itself with coastal erosion. Obviously studies were carried out but the question of funding was left in abeyance, I suppose because the European Union was fearful of the responsibility in facing up to this phenomenon. We have simply run out of time and it is important to consider it seriously. A coastal protection programme has major cost implications for any island and there are no easy solutions. It is a challenge for designers and engineers to look at how we can control the elements to protect human life and property. It is not an easy thing to do. It is not a case of raising walls and barriers. That has been tried and there are many monuments to human folly over the past century where attempts were made to control the elements in an inappropriate way. The elements responded by destroying the human constructions. There is a general recognition that soft engineering is the way to combat the worst excesses of the sea and the construction of beaches and natural formations to protect landmass is the way forward. An example of how not to proceed is Bray seafront where a promenade was constructed in the last century at a time of great optimism and belief in enterprise. The sea wall has been constantly under pressure and has been eroded since that time. I know the area very well because I live on the seafront. This news is of tremendous relief to them and at last the problem is being taken seriously and action is being taken. I warmly commend the two Ministers involved for having finally set about providing the solution to what is a major problem for Bray.

I suppose the by-election has nothing to do with Bray being so lucky.

We are delighted because we have an interest in County Wicklow as well. I agree that this motion is timely. I wish to share my time with Deputies Moffatt, Sargent and Michael Ahern.

Is that agreed? Agreed.

We have no coherent policy on coastal erosion. The great fear of every politician is that his or her constituency is diminishing. I do not know about the vote but my constituency is diminishing rapidly. Only recently the European Union took an interest and has offered us £5 million in the present tranche of funds for coastal erosion. It is interesting to note that in one area of County Wexford, Rosslare, £5 million will be spent. That is just on one location. The former Government put coastal erosion to the top of the agenda and this Government is following on from that. However £5 million is a pittance in this context.

Every Deputy tends to deal with his own constituency. I will concentrate on County Wexford, particularly as the coastline of Wexford is, like its people, soft and gentle. We have 177 miles of beach, the most secure of which is probably the beautiful area of the Hook where I live, because it is surrounded by rocks. Four areas in Wexford have been designated as having severe problems. I refer to Courtown/Ardamine, Cullenstown, Cahore and Duncannon. That is not to say there are not other areas in County Wexford which are also under threat. Rosslare is one of those where a scheme is in place, although not completed. Will the Minister ensure that scheme is continued because what has been done so far has been a success, and the contribution Rosslare makes to the tourism industry is well known? The tax take from Rosslare in any one year is about £500,000, so any works carried out there would be cost effective.

There are other areas in Wexford about which I will not have time to speak later, so I will mention them briefly now. One is the 7,000 acres in the Kilmore/Baldwinstown/Duncormick area in south Wexford which are under sea level. It is not commonly known that in south Wexford we have the equivalent of the Dutch polders, protected by a bank with water pumped over that bank every day. The banks are built only a foot higher than necessary at the moment and that 7,000 acres is under severe threat because of global warming — I do not suppose this House will change international policy on that but we certainly should have an input. The Minister should take account of this and any other such areas in the country. During recent storm the bank was breached and several thousand acres were under water as were some houses which had to be evacuated — a problem not mentioned earlier during this debate.

I understand some 12 counties are affected by coastal erosion. Local authorities and groups are expected to contribute towards the cost of works to prevent erosion. That would be reasonable if such charges were fair. The figures mentioned yesterday do not take into account the cost of a full scheme — 25 per cent of the cost of a full scheme is too great for a local authority to carry. I hope this will not be used as an excuse for not carrying out works. The shoreline is a national asset and should be charged to the national purse. Some areas obviously make money from the fact that they are coastal but the charge to local authorities and local people should be less than it is.

In the recent past Wexford County Council was asked to submit four priorities. Wexford County Council estimates the cost of the first phase of works at Courtown/Ardamine at almost £500,000, Cullenstown at £108,000, Cahore at £90,000 and Duncannon at £75,000, and the benefits would be substantial. Wexford County Council has had many discussions about the areas mentioned. The estimated tourism revenue from north east Wexford is about £25 million a year and there is a substantial tax take from that for the Government. This estimate came from the County Wexford Coastal Zone Management Plan of 1992, and two thirds of the income may be attributed to the intensely developed Courtown/ Ardamine area which is well known particularly to Dublin people. The Courtown north beach encompasses a blue flag beach which will be under greater threat the further in the sea comes. This beach is backed by an area of scientific interest. It will be interesting to see if Europe will make a more substantial contribution since it is promoting ASIs and NHAs so vehemently here. Courtown Habour is located between the two beaches at Ardamine and Courtown and is used as a yachting harbour — it is the only haven between Arklow and Wexford.

Cullenstown is much closer to home and every year acres of ground are lost to the sea. The banks there are of clay and any attack there sweeps much needed land into the sea. My colleague, Deputy Browne, yesterday called for compensation for a small farmer for the loss of his land and that must be considered. The land in that area is disappearing day by day, but there are quite a few houses in that area which makes the problem all the more serious. The vagaries of the sea are difficult to understand and in recent times the sea has been quite kind to us in Cullenstown in that the river has changed its course. Officials of the Department will be aware that now is the right time to proceed with works at Cullenstown. If we wait for the sea to change again, which could happen any day, the cost will be far higher.

At a cost of £75,000 works should commence at Duncannon immediately. The Minister may say there is no money in the kitty, but this must be top of the agenda when land and houses are disappearing into the sea.

I visited Cahore recently and to see a house with its gable wall being undermined by the sea and almost hanging over the cliff is frightening. I invite the Minister, Deputy Gilmore, on his next visit to Wexford, to see for himself the severe threat we are under in Wexford and the absolute necessity for moneys to be poured in immediately. I hope he will bring as good news the next time he comes as he did last time.

I am glad to have the opportunity to say a few words about coastal erosion. I come from Mayo which, being a coastal county, also has problems. In constituency terms Mayo is divided into east and west. I am sure Deputy Ring outlined the problems experienced in west Mayo and east Mayo also experiences problems. In the debate so far, most attention has focused on the east. I am sure Deputy Nealon will speak about the problems in Sligo and the Enniscrone region. The western coastline is prone to erosion, not only through storm damage and pollution but as a result of people removing sand and damaging dunes. We have only lately come to realise the importance of our coastline to farmers, fishermen and tourists.

We must address the problem of coastal erosion. The previous Minister, Deputy Andrews, secured funding for that and I hope the Minister will follow his footsteps. If we manage to secure 75 per cent EU funding we could match it with 25 per cent funding.

There are ten blue flag beaches in Mayo. Unfortunately, some beaches lost this status but the north Mayo area, particularly around Ross, has again attained blue flag status. Deputy Smith referred to the national coastal authority and had many ideas on how to solve the problem of coastal erosion. Local authorities have a role to play in the management of our coastlines. We must address the problem now. It has been stated that £25 million is necessary to undertake coastal works. However, only £5 million is available but from small beginnings great things grow. We should look at other countries and see how they tackled the problem of coastal erosion.

Ba mhaith liom buíochas a ghabháil le mo chomh-Theachtaí as am a roinnt liom.

Coastal erosion seems to be part of the folklore of politics in much the same way as drainage of the Shannon. The Government asserts that everything is under control and that adequate funding is available but that is not so. The problem is escalating. The Government should be honest enough to admit it cannot fully control coastal erosion. Fingal County Council requires £1.2 million in the short term and that sum could be matched by other county councils.

Deputy Ryan stated that Portrane has been given priority status by the council, it is only when you visit the area that you realise that houses and lands are disappearing into the sea. The area may make for picturesque postcards but if you are unable to live in your home it poses major problems.

Coastal erosion has caused serious problems at Donabate, Barnageera, Skerries and Hampton. Portmarnock lost its blue flag status as a result of failure to tackle coastal erosion, among other issues. There are problems at Corballis and Balbriggan. Sand has been taken from the harbour and further up the coast. The penalties for so doing are derisory and the Minister should seek to dissuade people from taking sand by imposing greater penalties. When sand is taken from the beach the area is covered by stones and pebbles and the amenity value of the beach is reduced. That is not exactly coastal erosion but coastal change which could easily be guarded against.

The Minister should clarify whether £5.1 billion or £5.1 million is available under the operational programme. The Minister for the Marine, Deputy Barrett, is quoted in The Irish Times as saying it is £5.1 billion while several Deputies on both sides of the House spoke of £5.1 million.

The approach taken to tackle the problem of coastal erosion reminds me of the way the traffic problem in my town was approached. The Government seems to be dealing with that problem by telling shopkeepers to wash their windows and householders to wash the front of their houses instead of finding an alternative route for the traffic.

Deputy Barrett mentioned global warming, climatic change and so on and these are contributory factors. We talk about CO 2 abatement rather than CO 2 reduction and we must change that attitude if we are to tackle the root cause of the problem. There is no point in talking about patching up parts of the coastline while there is an increase in CO 2 emissions which damage the atmosphere and exacerabate the greenhouse effect. If we are to reduce those emissions we must have tax reform and a reduction in labour costs. There should be a tax on carbon and energy. Unless that forms part of Government policy any commitment to contain coastal erosion will be short term and will not succeed.

I wish to share my time with Deputies Kirk and Kenneally. Coastal erosion is of great concern to those living in coastal counties as it affects farming, tourism and fishing. The previous Government was aware of the necessity to take remedial action. The former Minister, Deputy Andrews, secured EU funding to carry out remedial works and a plan for dealing with the problem of erosion was drawn up. I hope the Government will continue this corrective action and provide the necessary funding. I wish it every success in dealing with this immense problem.

Three areas in my constituency are affected by coastal erosion. In spite of the remedial works carried out some years ago erosion is still a problem in the Youghal area. Further works need to be undertaken but the Department of the Marine and the Department of the Environment cannot decide which of them is responsible. Tourism is a major business in the Youghal area and it is essential that the strand is maintained in good condition. In the Garryvoe area erosion is threatening one of the few bird sanctuaries in the south and if proper remedial works are not carried out it will be destroyed. This will be a major loss to the ecology of the area. In the Knockadoon area hundreds of acres of land have been lost to the sea in recent years. The county council does not have funding to carry out the necessary remedial works and I ask the Minister to ensure that adequate funding is made available for this purpose.

I thank Deputy Ahern for sharing his time with me. Coastal erosion is a major problem and in recent years large tracts of land in County Louth have been lost to the sea. While erosion is a problem in some areas the laying of deposits in other areas can also cause problems. It may be possible to develop these areas as wildlife habitats.

If this problem is not tackled farmers and those involved in the tourism industry will be badly affected. Ready access to coasts and blue flags are essential to the tourism industry, particularly in eastern counties which are behind western and southern counties in the development of this industry. It is vitally important to protect our natural amenities. In the Annagassan area of County Louth some people are afraid their houses will topple into the sea as a result of erosion.

I agree that there should be a twin track approach to dealing with this problem. First, the necessary remedial work should be carried out as a matter of urgency. The reality is that gabion cages and barriers are very expensive and time consuming to install. While the marine engineers have developed ways of dealing with the problem, the necessary finance needs to be provided to local authorities as a matter of urgency. At present local authorities are responsible for the problem but they do not have adequate resources to deal with it.

Second, consideration must be given to the effect of climatic changes, for example, the greenhouse effect and global warming. We cannot deal with these problems in isolation and even though there is greater awareness of the need to tackle these problems, more action must be taken at EU level. It is pointless to spend millions of pounds in remedial works if no action is taken on a wider level.

As a member of a local authority, I know county managers feel powerless to deal with this problem. Coastal erosion is the main issue of concern in many areas, yet members of local authorities can do little about it. They are continually telling their constituents they know there is a problem but they do not have the resources to tackle it. I hope the Government will provide the necessary finance to deal with this problem.

I wish to share my time with Deputy Nealon.

Is that agreed? Agreed.

The coastline is a resource of immense value in economic, environmental, ecological and sociological terms. However, coastal erosion now poses a serious threat to the coastal environment. The coastal resource is fragile and unrenewable and the systems operating in the coastal zone depend to a significant extent on the preservation of the coast. The Government recognises that erosion is a serious problem and shares the concern of Opposition parties in this regard. A number of initiatives have been introduced in recent years. For example, EU funding is being made available for the first time to assist in undertaking protection works at targeted priority locations. Under the Operational Programme for Environmental Services 1994-99, the Government has provided £5.1 million with the primary objective of preserving the State-owned foreshore, local authority owned property, tourist amenities including the beach and dune systems natural habitats and the ecology.

The Government recognises that this level of funding is insufficient to tackle all the erosion along the coast and has, therefore, committed itself to look at what extra funding can be provided. It must be borne in mind that this funding represents a significant increase on the level of funding provided in previous years. The record of funding provided by the people opposite has been dismal. In order to draw up a national programme of priority protection works the various coastal authorities have been invited to make a detailed submission on each of their top four priority coastal protection proposals. The majority of local authorities have now responded and their proposals will be examined by the Department of the Marine, having regard to the rates of erosion benefits arising, the types of work required at the various sites, the associated costs——

There is nothing about west Cork in it.

——consideration is to be given as to whether it is appropriate, in certain circumstances, to undertake protection works that have been submitted. On the basis of this examination a comprehensive targeted programme of priority works will be drawn up. The Department of the Marine is also involved in an international coast protection project entitled ECOPRO — environmental friendly coastal protection. As part of this project major coastal protection works involving the construction of rock groynes and the provision of beach nourishment material have been undertaken at Rosslare strand.

What about Union Hall and Castletownbere?

These works are being monitored on an ongoing basis and the result will feed into a code of practice to be drawn up by the ECOPRO project partners which includes Government agencies, local authorities, universities and voluntary groups in both Ireland and Denmark. This code of practice will be of immense value in aiding both local authorities and coastal landowners to understand the dynamics of the erosion process and provide guidance on how required protection work can be carried out in an environmentally friendly manner.

At the commencement of this debate Deputy Michael Smith suggested there was a need to establish a national coast authority to oversee the management of the coastal resources. What a pity he did not think of that a decade ago and less damage would be done. This is an issue which is being examined by the Government. An interdepartmental working group comprising officials from the Department of the Marine, the Department of the Environment and the Office of Public Works has been established to investigate an overall framework for coastal planning and management, covering land use, planning and control, coastal protection, nature conservation, marine resource development, marine environmental protection and the links between these. To further the development of an overall policy for managing the coastal zone, a major consultancy project is to be awarded shortly. The brief that is being given in relation to this study identifies the need for a coherent framework for managing and developing the coastal zone, based on the principles of conservation and sustainable use. The study is a major new development which will have an important impact not only in Ireland but also at European level in terms of the development of a European policy on coastal zone management.

I am sure the House will agree that while much remains to be achieved in terms of the development and protection of our coast, the Government has shown its commitment by setting in motion a number of significant developments and that a comprehensive targeted strategy in relation to coastal protection is now under way, thanks to this Government.

What about west Cork?

EU funding is being made available for the first time and the broader question of how we manage our coastal zone is being examined. For the benefit of the Members concerned, the total cost of the schemes already submitted exceeds £24 million. Nothing has been done since the foundation of the State by successive Governments, until this Government, to tackle the problem. That is what we intend to do.

(Wexford): Deputy Andrews got the money.

What we need most of all is some concept of the magnitude of this problem. I do not think anyone realises how coastal erosion is eating into our coast all over the country. While some money is being made available it is not sufficient to meet the requirements. Sligo County Council was asked to forward its submission. It made a submission for a modest number of areas: Enniscrone, £500,000; Strandhill, £275,000; Mullaghmore, £425,000; and Rockley, £330,000. That is a modest proposal from Sligo County Council by comparison with the needs in the area. It accounts for £1.5 million. This is an area which is in need of vast amounts of money. Studies must be carried out on the best ways to undertake this work. There are various ways but the boulder, which I think is the best, is extremely expensive. There is another method, which was introduced to the Sligo area, bent grass which is very effective in that area. I would remind the Minister that that was introduced to the Rockley area of Sligo by Lord Palmerston who subsequently became Prime Minister of Britain.

Ba mhaith liom mo chuid ama a roinnt leis na Teachtaí Ó Gallchóir, Ó Díomsaigh agus Mac Gabhann——

Acting Chairman

Is that agreed? Agreed.

——agus molaim na Teachtaí as an rún seo a chur os comhair na Dála, mar tá sé thar a bheith tábhachtach.

I am delighted this motion is before the House at this time in view of the fact that as a number of speakers have said, some EU funding is available for the first time to help deal with the problem of coastal erosion. That is encouraging and needs to be built on for the future. It is interesting to look at the range of problems which can be created in coastal areas. I am aware from my own county that in Lahinch, a substantial part of the town is under threat by undercutting from the sea. That is relatively unusual nationally. During recent storms the pier at Ballyvaughan was badly damaged and has resulted in a huge cost to the local authority, particularly in the context of cutbacks in road funding in 1995. An area close to Kilrush, which has escaped for a long number of years, had the sea walls breached and a house and a huge amount of farmland was flooded earlier in the year. In the north Clare area, in a relatively secluded bay, in the Parkmore area of Burn, a house was flooded to a depth of about three feet; another relatively unusual occurrence connected, undoubtedly, to bad weather conditions and the heavy rainfall this winter. In the Quilty area there is a sluice which has been giving trouble for a long time. Extensive repairs were carried out which were not entirely satisfactory. The county council has indicated that at relatively modest cost it could be improved further. In the Kilkee area landowners, at their own expense, constructed a sluice which is extremely successful. I am not sure of the exact cost but it was less than 10 per cent of the cost which was mentioned by a national body. As Deputy Nealon said that is one of the approaches we need to adopt: less costly works which can be and frequently are equally effective. They may require ongoing maintenance but it is worth doing.

I wish to refer to the work of the national coastal erosion committee. I welcome the fact that interdepartmental groups are following up on it. This is excellent work which was undertaken by the county and city engineers. It highlights the weaknesses in the current strategy and makes recommendations for the future. It also provides a superb data base which will be of vital use to the Department in pursuing this issue. It draws attention to the fact that there is a number of agencies, none of whom is inclined to accept ultimate responsibility. That issue needs to be addressed in a management plan and in an Act to replace the Foreshore Act and the Coastal Protection Act.

(Donegal South-West): I congratulate the new Minister for the Marine. Deputy Barrett, on his appointment and wish him well during his term of office. Ar an chéad dul síos ba mhaith liom buíochas a ghabháil leis na Teachtaí ar an taobh seo den Teach, Teachtaí Smith. Browne agus Dempsey, a thug deis dúinn an cheist thábhachtach seo a phlé sa Dáil.

Apart from the problem of unemployment in my constituency the matter of erosion is one of the most serious. In my county the total length of our coast is 650 kilometres, of which 240 kilometres is soft coast and 130 kilometres is at risk. This is not a Deputy from the county being alarmist, it is a fact and those are the statistics.

The Minister will appreciate that coastal constituencies depend largely on tourism and fisheries. Counties such as Donegal are affected annually by a series of storms which have caused and continue to cause serious damage and lead, on occasion, to hardship. The fishing industry is of importance to County Donegal, from the Foyle Estuary in the north to Bundoran in the south. It has a number of major ports, including Killybegs, Greencastle and Burtonport, and many smaller ports, not to mention the islands. This industry, which is a major employer, as well as our beaches, golf courses and harbours have been adversely affected. Action needs to be taken quickly to rectify the problem in areas such as Downings, Cloghaneely, Knockfolen, Magheraroarty, Gweedore, The Rosses, Arranmore island and the beaches at Maghery, Portnoo, Murvagh and Bundoran.

Under the National Development Plan £5.1 million is to be made available but this will be insufficient to resolve this serious problem. The European Union recognises that there is a necessity to provide funds to overcome it. However, this is only a token gesture. If we are serious about tackling this problem the National Development Plan must be redrafted. The Government must give a commitment to do this. Rather than point the finger at his predecessor the Minister should take the opportunity to make an input to this process in the weeks and months ahead.

It is well known that the £5.1 million will be used to improve small harbours and piers. It should not be forgotten, however, that other amenities such as golf courses, which play an integral role in the development of the tourism industry, have also been adversely affected. An integrated coastal protection management system must be put in place. My party has given the Minister an opportunity to do this. I will work with the Minister, the Minister of State, Deputy Gilmore, and departmental officials to emphasise at European level, at the fisheries committee and in discussions with Commissioner Bonino the need to provide additional funding.

Primary responsibility for coastal protection lies with the property owner, whether it be a private individual or a local authority. The role of the Department of the Marine is to work in conjunction with the local authorities in the management of the coastal zone rather than individual sites. Unless and until we move away from this concept we will never be able seriously to tackle the problem of coastal erosion. Landowners and local authorities are helpless. They cannot cope with the power and energy of the sea and the resources of Government are needed if a serious attempt is to be made to tackle this worrying and escalating problem. I support the call by my party's spokesperson, Deputy Smith, for the setting up of a national coastal authority within an existing Government Department. If we are serious about tackling this problem this needs to be done as a matter of urgency.

There is insufficient awareness of the scourge of coastal erosion. A study undertaken in 1992 by the County and City Engineers Association showed that out of a total national coastline of 5,800 kilometres over 1,500 kilometres were at risk, while some 490 kilometres required immediate attention at a cost of £125 million. These figures were quoted yesterday by the Minister for the Marine and it appears that they have not been updated since 1992. This reflects the lack of urgency in tackling the problem.

Nationally, £5.092 million has been included in the National Development Plan for the period 1994-99. This amount alone is needed in my own county of Waterford where 170 kilometres of coastline are in need of some protection.

Protection of the nation's coastline with its attendant advantages for tourism, agriculture, etc. is a national and not a local responsibility. It is an essential ingredient of the infrastructure supporting economic development and it should be 100 per cent funded by the State in common with other infrastructure such as roads, water supply, sewerage facilities, etc.

In Waterford the following areas need to be protected: Clonea, Ardmore, the Cunnigar, Bonmahon, Abbeyside, Tramore Burrows, Woodstown, Annestown, Ballyvoile, Whiting Bay, Dunmore East, Passage East, Kilfarrassy, Garrarus, Ballymacart, Ballingoul, Ballyquin, Ballinard, Glencorrin and Rathmoylan. I wish to mention two of these in particular. If the Cunnigar is breached the complexion of the town of Dungarvan will change. This provides protection for the town. It is not an immediate problem but if something is not done now it will be a major problem.

The other area I would like to mention is Ballyquin which I visited on Saturday last. It is located a couple of miles from Ardmore, Ireland's tidiest town in 1992. I had not visited the town for some time and was appalled at the damage inflicted since my last visit. There is a small farmhouse to which the edge of the coast is daily getting nearer. The family involved are watching their farm being eaten away inch by inch. The extent of the problem has got progressively worse in recent years and unless something is done this holding will be wiped out in ten to 20 years and the house will literally fall into the sea. I have a graphic photograph which I can give to the Minister if he so wishes.

There seems to be no real difference between spring tides and slack tides. This means that the land is being buffeted all the time. I have made repeated representations to various Ministers but to no avail. The Coast Protection Act, 1963 is outmoded, inflexible and unsuitable and I urge the Ministers to replace it with more modern and comprehensive legislation.

I thank Members on all sides of the House for participating in this debate in which stark messages of concern were conveyed. We now have a clear picture of the extent to which the sea has invaded many coastal areas. Graphic pictures were painted of family farms and towns where the problem has reached catastrophic proportions.

With the possible exception of Deputy Sheehan who is extremely happy with what is happening in Cork, almost everyone else is anxious that more resources should be provided and deep consideration given to this problem. There is also considerable support for the proposal that a national coastal authority be established to allow a single-minded approach. Such an authority would have dedicated, experienced and committed engineering and other staff. The question of additional funding from the European Union and the national Exchequer was also raised.

To some extent this debate has been overshadowed by the incredible mismanagement of the economy during the past six months. It may well be the case that the resources that are desperately needed have been dissipated because of the actions of the Government. I hope that in the course of this debate we have been able to concentrate the mind on the need to find ways to help communities along the coastline who are grappling with this problem. We should not leave them isolated.

We would be happy to support the Government if it put forward alternative measures similar to the ones we have proposed. The establishment of a single authority with dedicated and committed staff and the provision of additional resources is the only way to pursue this question. If the Government agreed to do this we would consider withdrawing the motion but in the absence of any coherent policy or commitment to eradicate this scourge we will force a vote on the issue.

Amendment put.
The Dáil divided: Tá, 69; Níl, 55.

  • Allen, Bernard.
  • Barrett, Seán.
  • Bell, Michael.
  • Boylan, Andrew.
  • Bradford, Paul.
  • Bhreathnach, Niamh.
  • Bree, Declan.
  • Broughan, Tommy.
  • Browne, John (Carlow-Kilkenny).
  • Bruton, Richard.
  • Burke, Liam.
  • Burton, Joan.
  • Byrne, Eric.
  • Connaughton, Paul.
  • Costello, Joe.
  • Coveney, Hugh.
  • Crawford, Seymour.
  • Creed, Michael.
  • Crowley, Frank.
  • Deasy, Austin.
  • Deenihan, Jimmy.
  • De Rossa, Proinsias.
  • Durkan, Bernard J.
  • Mitchell, Jim.
  • Mulvihill, John.
  • Nealon, Ted.
  • Noonan, Michael (Limerick East).
  • O'Keeffe, Jim.
  • O'Shea, Brian.
  • O'Sullivan, Toddy.
  • Owen, Nora.
  • Pattison, Séamus.
  • Penrose, William.
  • Quinn, Ruairí.
  • Ferris, Michael.
  • Finucane, Michael.
  • Fitzgerald, Brian.
  • Fitzgerald, Frances.
  • Flaherty, Mary.
  • Flanagan, Charles.
  • Gilmore, Eamon.
  • Harte, Paddy.
  • Higgins, Jim.
  • Higgins, Michael D.
  • Hogan, Philip.
  • Howlin, Brendan.
  • Kavanagh, Liam.
  • Kemmy, Jim.
  • Kenny, Enda.
  • Kenny, Seán.
  • Lynch, Kathleen.
  • McCormack, Pádraic.
  • McDowell, Derek.
  • McGahon, Brendan.
  • McGinley, Dinny.
  • McManus, Liz.
  • Mitchell, Gay.
  • Rabbitte, Pat.
  • Ring, Michael.
  • Ryan, John.
  • Ryan, Seán.
  • Shatter, Alan.
  • Sheehan, P.J.
  • Shortall, Róisín.
  • Stagg, Emmet.
  • Taylor, Mervyn.
  • Timmins, Godfrey.
  • Upton, Pat.
  • Walsh, Eamon.

Níl

  • Ahern, Dermot.
  • Ahern, Michael.
  • Ahern, Noel.
  • Aylward, Liam.
  • Brennan, Séamus.
  • Briscoe, Ben.
  • Browne, John (Wexford).
  • Burke, Raphael P.
  • Byrne, Hugh.
  • Callely, Ivor.
  • Clohessy, Peadar.
  • Connolly, Ger.
  • Dempsey, Noel.
  • de Valera, Síle.
  • Doherty, Seán.
  • Fitzgerald, Liam.
  • Flood, Chris.
  • Foley, Denis.
  • Foxe, Tom.
  • Geoghegan-Quinn, Máire.
  • Hilliard, Colm M.
  • Jacob, Joe.
  • Kenneally, Brendan.
  • Killeen, Tony.
  • Kirk, Séamus.
  • Kitt, Tom.
  • Lawlor, Liam.
  • Lenihan, Brian.
  • Leonard, Jimmy.
  • McCreevy, Charlie.
  • McDaid, James.
  • McDowell, Michael.
  • Moffatt, Tom.
  • Morley, P.J.
  • Moynihan, Donal.
  • Nolan, M.J.
  • Noonan, Michael (Limerick West)
  • O'Donnell, Liz.
  • O'Donoghue, John.
  • O'Hanlon, Rory.
  • O'Keeffe, Batt.
  • O'Keeffe, Ned.
  • O'Leary, John.
  • O'Malley, Desmond J.
  • O'Rourke, Mary.
  • Power, Seán.
  • Quill, Máirín.
  • Ryan, Eoin.
  • Smith, Brendan.
  • Smith, Michael.
  • Treacy, Noel.
  • Wallace, Dan.
  • Wallace, Mary.
  • Walsh, Joe.
  • Woods, Michael.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies J. Higgins and B. Fitzgerald; Níl, Deputies D. Ahern and Callely.
Amendment declared carried.
Motion, as amended, put and declared carried.
Top
Share