Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 4 Jul 1995

Vol. 455 No. 4

Adjournment Debate. - Closure of Glasnevin (Dublin) College.

Ba mhaith liom buíochas a ghabháil leis an Aire Oideachais as ucht teacht isteach í féin chun an t-ábhar seo a phlé. Is mór an trua orm an rún seo a chur os comhair na Dála, cé go gcaithfidh mé a rá go raibh sé ar an gclár le tamall fada. Beidh fhios ag an Aire agus go deimhin ag an Teach féin go bhfuil scéal Choláiste Móibhí i mbéal an phobail de bharr ócáid dhúnadh an choláiste breis is seachtain ó shin. Bhí mé i láthair agus bhí an séipéal a bhíodh ag Coláiste Móibhí in aice le Coláiste Oideachais Eaglais na hÉireann plódaithe le scoláirí ó na fichidí ar aghaidh go dtí an lá inniú. Ócáid an-bhrónach a bhí ann agus dúradh roinnt rudaí ar an ócaid sin.

I cannot accept a number of the statements that were made on that occasion and that is why it is important for me to air what was said and the decisions that were taken which I believe will have a negative impact on our education system in general.

It was stated that part of the reason for closing Coláiste Móibhí was that the standard of Irish in Church of Ireland secondary schools was improving. I do not have evidence of that and I would like the Minister to tell me if she has such evidence. It was also said that the qualifications attained, particularly in Irish, by students at Coláiste Móibhí were perhaps too high and that, because of our points system, students were deciding to take other courses in universities rather than taking up the teaching profession. It was felt, therefore, that the purposes behind the setting up of Coláiste Móibhí was not being served.

It is regrettable that the achievement of high results is considered a penalty. It was stated also that an additional lecturer would be provided for the Church of Ireland college of education which would, in some way, constitute a replacement for the closure of a college. That defies belief entirely.

I expect this decision by the Department of Education was financially motivated, although I understand ways are sought to save money wherever possible. I am concerned, however, that a similar argument would be put forward for the closure of a minority institution and I am sure many others throughout the country fear similar treatment from the Department. I would like the Minister to give some assurance that this policy will not be continued.

I want to ask the Minister four questions arising out of this decision. First, is the Minister amenable to the general provision of Irish medium education outside the majority Roman Catholic management system? Second, will she measure the trends in the standard of Irish teaching in primary schools under Church of Ireland management so as to assess whether her decision has had no effect, a negative effect or an effect which I would find difficult to understand, a positive one? Third, what are the circumstances in which Coláiste Móibhí could reopen or a similar institution that would serve the needs previously served by Coláiste Móibhí? Fourth, has the Minister taken note of how this decision is perceived in Northern Ireland where the issue of minority rights is important and which gave rise to heated argument and, quite often, tragic consequences in the past?

If this decision had been taken north of the Border there would have been an outcry. I am saddened that this closure occurred at a time when, for example, Meanscoil Béal Feiriste enjoyed the support of all parties in this House. Such was that support that a train was organised to travel to Belfast prior to the Northern Ireland Department of Education giving the go ahead for funding to maintain that minority school. The decision to close Coláiste Móibhí would not have been taken if the school was located in the North.

I am happy to speak on this matter as it affords me the opportunity to explain both the reason for the decision to close the juniorate and the special arrangements which my Department has put in place to strengthen the teaching of Irish in the Church of Ireland College of Education.

The original Coláiste Móibhí was one of six all-Irish preparatory colleges, established in 1926, for the purpose of preparing candidates for admission to the teacher training colleges. In 1968, Coláiste Móibhí was discontinued as a preparatory college and a junior section was established in the new Church of Ireland College of Education in Rathmines. This juniorate took in students, after intermediate certificate, who followed the leaving certificate course, largely through Irish. This was in order to assist in the recruitment of appropriately-qualified Protestant candidates for the Church of Ireland college. It was not compulsory for those students to proceed to the college of education on completion of their course in the juniorate but, of course, the majority of them did so.

The first proposal for closure came in 1981, from the Church of Ireland authorities. At the time, however, the Department of Education asked for the juniorate to remain in operation so as to ensure an adequate standard of Irish among Protestant candidates for primary teacher training. A review of the operation of the juniorate was initiated by the Department in the early 1990s. The outcome of that review was that the Department accepted the need to phase out the juniorate as its continuation could not be justified on either financial or educational grounds.

Following negotiations with the college authorities, it was decided not to approve an intake to the juniorate in 1993 and to phase out its operation culminating in closure in the summer of 1995. A severance package was approved for all staff in the juniorate.

The negotiations between the Department and the College authorities also focused on provision to strengthen appropriately the Irish language programme in the Church of Ireland College of Education following the closure of the juniorate. I am happy to inform the House that, following the successful completion of those negotiations, an agreed Irish language enrichment programme is being put in place and resourced by the Department of Education.

The programme has the following elements: an additional lecturer in Irish is being employed to implement the programme and first year students in the 1995-96 academic year, and thereafter, will have (a) a two week intensive course in Irish at the college; (b) a one week observation period in a Scoil Lán Ghaeilge, or in a Gaeltacht school; (c) a three week period in the Gaeltacht; (d) in addition to the existing Irish course in the college, extra tuition in Irish throughout the three academic years of the BEd., course. The new programme will be subject to existing assessment procedures and will be monitored by the Department's inspectorate, and its operation will be fully reviewed at the end of each year to ensure that its aims and objectives are being achieved.

Top
Share