Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 23 Nov 1995

Vol. 458 No. 7

Adjournment Debate. - EU Funding for Border Region.

I thank the Minister of State, Deputy Doyle, for coming in to take the Adjournment debate but I am disappointed the Taoiseach is not present in view of the fact that I am raising his reported comments at a meeting in the Mount Errigal Hotel in Donegal on 27 October 1995. I am very concerned about his comments as reported and recorded at the meeting of the North West Regional Cross-Border Group.

The Taoiseach made the following three points: first, that the National Roads Authority on both sides of the Border would co-operate — and nobody has any difficulty with that — but it was disappointing that he did not refer to the county and regional roads which are causing the problem in Border areas. Second, he said that the drawing down of maximum European funding was not a priority as against keeping spending under control. Nobody more than I would be calling on the Government to keep spending under control but for the Taoiseach to suggest that to do so we cannot draw down the maximum amount of European funding is a false sense of economy. I never heard a Government Minister say that before and I was surprised at him. Third, he said to increase funding to Border areas it would have to be redirected from elsewhere and that this could not be done in view of the commitment to contain spending within a 2 per cent increase. That raises serious and fundamental questions, the most important being this Government's commitment to the Border region. I never had much faith in this Government because for the first time there is no Minister or Minister of State from a Border constituency.

No payments were made under the INTERREG programme in 1994 but payments will be made in 1995. If you take out the INTERREG, which is additional funding provided by the European Union specifically for Border regions, the allocation for county and regional roads is reduced which is indicative of the lack of commitment to Border areas. Out of the 5,000 jobs created by overseas industry in this country, 14 were created in one county of my constituency and nine in the other and we have not yet seen the benefits from the ceasefire.

The European Union, the United States and the people who subscribe to the international fund for Ireland all recognise the problems in the Border area. It is recognised that all frontier areas have problems but things are even more difficult in the Border area because of the 25 years of violence although the Government obviously does not recognise the problems. I appeal to the Government not to offer pious platitudes but to give us our entitlement, the allocation of money that has been provided by the taxpayers of the European Union as well as the additional funding to which we are entitled. We will then get on with the job in the Border region.

The Taoiseach's reported comments show a complete lack of regard for the Border region. To date we have not seen anything from this Government. I would like Deputy Doyle to convey to the Taoiseach the disappointment, not just of myself but of all other Deputies and Senators in the Border area, at the lack of interest shown by the Government and the depression caused by the comments attributed to him.

As other regions, the Border region is benefiting from expenditure under Structural Funds operational programmes as outlined in the Community Support Framework 1994-1999. The Border region is also benefiting from the INTERREG II Community Initiative and from the EU Initiative under the programme for peace and reconciliation.

For the CSF and these two Community Initiatives additionality is a requirement to which the Government is comfortably adhering. The Government is committed to remaining within the expenditure parameters set out in our policy document, A Government of Renewal. However, our commitment to meet the additionality requirements under the CSF and the Community Initiative is consistent with these expenditure parameters.

As regards EU funded programmes which specifically target the Border region and areas adjacent to it, it is worth mentioning that under INTERREG II there is an EU aid allocation of 89.5 ECU, approximately IR£72 million. This programme covers infrastructure — including roads, energy, transport, telecommunications — environmental protection — including management of water resources and removal of pollutants — natural resources, human resources and economic development — including tourism, community development and special economic development measures such as linkages.

To ensure that the INTERREG programme is more effectively delivered an INTERREG development officer has been appointed and has set up offices in both Monaghan and Armagh. This officer will be mainly responsible for coordinating activity on the ground.

In addition, EU funding has been provided to support the Northern Ireland peace process. This programme covers the broad areas of urban and rural regeneration; employment; cross-Border development; social inclusion; and productive investment and industrial development.

The total EU funding available to the initiative is 300 million ECU over three years. At least 20 per cent of this funding will be available for the six Border counties. Funding over a further two-year period will be subject to a review of the progress by the Commission. The EU grant rate is up to a maximum of 75 per cent.

Every effort has been made to ensure that, wherever possible, actions under the programme will be bottom-up and that local groups have the maximum input into the delivery of the programme. The bulk of the programme will be delivered by intermediary bodies funded by way of global grants. The programme will therefore be distinctively different from any of the other programmes, including INTERREG. Its main objective is to support peace and reconciliation and, therefore, measures involving social inclusion will be particularly emphasised. It will not be a top-up for existing programmes. Furthermore, Departments have been asked to examine existing CSF operational programmes to see how they can be refocused to ensure maximum synergies with the peace programme.

Considerable cross-Border co-operation is developing at local authority level. Donegal County Council has joined forces with the Derry, Strabane and Limavady District Councils to form the North-West Cross-Border Group. The group has a secretariat in Derry funded under the EU INTERREG I initiative and I understand has also applied for funding under the new programme to continue the secretariat. My Department is currently examining its application with our counterparts in Department of Economic Development in Belfast. An announcement on funding should be made shortly.

The foregoing underlines the Government's ongoing commitment to Border regions and emphasises the extent to which we recognise the particular problems of that area.

We are not getting the money.

If Deputy O'Hanlon wishes to raise a query on a particular aspect of the Taoiseach's statement, I will be delighted to give him a specific response.

The Dáil adjourned at 4.55 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 28 November 1995.

Top
Share