Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 28 Nov 1995

Vol. 458 No. 8

Written Answers. - Net Disposable Income.

Joe Walsh

Question:

82 Mr. J. Walsh asked the Minister for Finance if, in respect of the tax year 1995/1996, he will give details of the disposable income, net of income tax, PRSI levies, travelling to work expenses, FIS entitlements, the value of a medical card, local authority differential rent, and the usual social welfare entitlements of a married employee with a spouse and three dependant children living in a local authority house, with a non-working spouse, earning gross incomes at £1,000 intervals between £6,000 and £16,000 per annum; and the plans, if any, he has to adjust the tax and welfare systems to improve the operation of the labour market. [17887/95]

The net income for an employed married person, with a non-working spouse and three children, earning gross incomes at £1,000 intervals between £6,000 and £16,000 per annum is shown in the following table. This table also sets out the additions to and deductions from gross income in arriving at levels of net income.

It is estimated that an unemployed married person with three children would have a net income of £7,124 per annum when account is taken of all allowances, including secondary benefits, medical card, and the costs of local authority differential rent and work-seeking. When this is compared with the information in the table it is clear that at all gross incomes between £6,000 and £16,000 this person is better off in work rather than in unemployment. Indeed the married person described would be better off in work at any level of earnings from employment when his earnings and family income supplement are taken into account.

The Government recognises that adjusting the tax and welfare systems to improve the operation of the labour market is an important policy objective. In recognition of the considerable complexities involved, the Government set up a working group of experts in the tax and social welfare area to look at these issues with a view to developing a strategic approach to the closer integration of the tax and social welfare systems. The Government is awaiting the Group's final report.

Net Disposable Income: Single Earner Couple, Three Children, 1995-96 £ per annum

Gross Pay

Tax

PRSI

Levies

Net Pay

Plus

Net Income

Less

Net Disposable Income

FIS

Medi-Card Value

LA Rent

Travel to Work Costs

£

£

£

£

£

£

£

£

£

£

6,000

187

5,813

3,420

440

9,673

917

600

8,156

7,000

242

6,758

2,820

440

10,018

969

600

8,449

8,000

297

7,703

2,220

440

10,363

1,020

600

8,743

9,000

20

352

8,628

1,620

440

10,688

1,069

600

9,019

10,000

420

407

9,173

1,020

440

10,633

1,060

600

8,973

11,000

820

462

9,718

420

440

10,578

1,052

600

8,926

12,000

1,220

517

270

9,993

9,993

1,030

600

8,363

13,000

1,620

572

292

10,516

10,516

1,109

600

8,807

14,000

2,020

627

315

11,038

11,038

1,187

600

9,251

15,000

2,420

682

337

11,561

11,561

1,266

600

9,695

16,000

2,716

737

360

12,187

12,187

1,360

600

10,227

Notes on Table:
1. The main factors contributing to the apparent decline in net income as gross income increases are the withdrawal rate of Family Income Supplement (60 per cent) and the operation of marginal relief for income tax (involving a 40 pe cent tax rate).
2. It is essential in interpreting this table that the mechanism for reviewing Family Income Supplement (FIS) is understood. FIS is renewable on a 12-monthly basis. Once awarded it will not be reduced/withdrawn until the end of the period regardless of any upward movements in pay. Therefore, gross income from employment can increase significantly during the course of a year while any adjustment of FIS will not occur until after the end of the year. The Expert Working Group has pointed out in its interim report that FIS withdrawal does not generally occur at the same time as a gross pay increase.
3. The numbers of people who potentially lose disposable income as gross pay increases are small. In so far as FIS and marginal relief income tax are the main elements of the trap, the number of people affected by the trap is essentially a function of the numbers who both receive FIS and pay tax. The numbers of people both paying tax and receiving FIS is of the order of 1,500 to 2,000. The OECD has also concluded that this situation potentially "applied only to a very small proportion of the employee workforce (0.75 per cent)".
Top
Share