I propose to take Questions Nos. 44 and 83 together.
As I indicated in reply to previous questions on this subject, the decision to undertake a special restoration programme for regional and county roads took account of the seriously deficient condition of significant lengths of these roads, a fact which is attested to by the views of public representatives in this House and elsewhere. The main problems with the non-national road network are to be found in county council areas and these have been given high priority in the allocation of the 1996 non-national road grants which I recently announced. Over £73 million has been set aside under the restoration programme in 1996 and will be used for the repair of road pavements on non-national roads in county council areas.
A total of £8 million in discretionary block grants has been allocated to urban road authorities in 1996 for works on roads in their areas; and £4.9 million of this is allocated to county borough corporations. The level of block grant allocations to urban authorities generally has increased significantly in the last few years, from £5.5 million in 1993 to £8 million in 1996, an increase of 45 per cent. In the same period, discretionary block grants to county boroughs have increased from just under £4 million to £4.9 million, an increase of 23 per cent. In addition, a sum of £3.07 million has been allocated to urban authorities in 1996 under the EU co-financed scheme of grants for improvement projects; of this amount, £1.87 million is allocated to county borough corporations.