Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 28 Mar 1996

Vol. 463 No. 5

Order of Business.

It is proposed to take No. 7 — motion re. International Natural Rubber Agreement, 1995, No. 14 — statements on the White Paper on Foreign Policy and No. 15 — Pensions (Amendment) Bill, 1995 — Second Stage (resumed).

It is also proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that: No. 7 shall be decided without debate; and the following arrangements shall apply in relation to No. 14: (1) the opening statement of a Minister or Minister of State and of the main spokespersons for the Fianna Fáil Party and the Progressive Democrats party shall not exceed 30 minutes in each case; (2) the statement of each other Member called upon shall not exceed 20 minutes in each case; (3) Members may share time; and (4) a Minister or Minister of State shall be called upon to make a statement in reply not exceeding 15 minutes.

Is the proposal that No. 7 be decided without debate agreed? Agreed. Are the proposals for dealing with No. 14, Statements on the White Paper on Foreign Policy, agreed? Agreed.

I asked the Taoiseach twice yesterday if he would report on his conversations with the authorities in Cairo and the developments in regard to the shipments of Irish beef. I am sure the Department of Foreign Affairs has made available to him cuttings from newspapers in the Gulf, the United Arab Emirates and other countries which focus on Irish beef. Will the Taoiseach avail of the opportunity either now or later in the day to set the record straight on what the Irish authorities are doing in regard to this very serious matter?

This has been the subject of much debate in the House over the past week. It is not relevant to the Order of Business. Deputies cannot continually raise matters of this kind which are not strictly relevant. I would be anxious to facilitate Members in dealing with the matter formally and in accordance with the procedures of the House.

I beg your indulgence for a few moments, a Cheann Comhairle, given that we do not have many billion pound industries and developments seldom move ahead at the rate this one is moving. Everyone is worried about the way in which the Irish case is being misconstrued by others.

I am aware of all that.

I would like to give the Taoiseach an opportunity to update the House on what happened yesterday and the action being taken by the Government.

I am also aware of the extent to which the matter has been adverted to in the House.

I had a very positive conversation with President Mubarak yesterday. I cannot at this stage indicate the definitive outcome of it but I expect to see some outcome shortly. Over the past two days we have been intensively engaged in discussions with the Iranian authorities about the situation there. The Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry and its chief veterinary officer will travel to Egypt today to back up what I said in general terms to President Mubarak with detailed technical information which clearly indicates the very good health status of Irish beef. On the question of the United Arab Emirates, our Ambassador in Riyadh who is accredited to the Emirates is extremely active in this area and is giving reassurances throughout the Gulf about the quality of Irish beef. This matter is being intensively pursued in every way possible by the appropriate Irish authorities and if we are advised that further interventions by me or Ministers are necessary they will be made promptly.

May I——

We cannot debate the matter now. I have given the Deputy some latitude on the matter this morning.

I thank you, a Cheann Comhairle. Will the Taoiseach ask the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry to consult directly with the Northern Ireland authorities to avoid some of the over the top reports on early morning programmes on Radio Ulster and other stations?

I will convey Deputy's Ahern's advice to the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry who is dealing with the issue on a number of fronts. If he has not already done so, he will certainly pursue that line of inquiry. It is important for people to retain a sense of proportion about the matter, given that Irish precautions have been extremely good historically. They have been substantially increased since 1990 in terms of the controls and Irish beef has a very good quality record. While being justly determined to get all the relevant information about the source of any product they consume — I would urge them to be anything less than vigilant in this area — it is important for people to retain a sense of proportion about this matter having regard to consumer safety and that we are talking about an industry whose stock is valued at approximately £5 billion and which makes an enormous contribution to employment in urban and rural areas. We must retain a sense of proportion and be active, as the entire Government is, in pursuing this matter. I thank the Ceann Comhairle for allowing, exceptionally I hope, the leader of the Opposition to raise this matter this morning as it has enabled me to give these reassurances.

I ask you, a Cheann Comhairle, to allow me raise a serious matter in regard to the compensation tribunal. It is important for the Minister for Health to make a statement in the House today as the allegations made in court are serious and were not denied by the State. It means that the women affected can claim aggravated or exemplary damages which they are precluded from claiming under the Government's tribunal. For that and other reasons——

I have ruled strictly on that matter and I am concerned that the Deputy should raise it again.

(Limerick East): Did the Deputy read the report?

I read the report but was this information concealed?

(Limerick East): The Deputy should read it again.

I also know what was said in court yesterday and that the State did not deny the allegations.

(Limerick East): The Deputy should read the report again.

The Minister should make a statement in the House today about this very serious matter.

The matter is seized by the courts and we should allow them to deliberate.

It is not a trial by jury so, therefore, no jury can be influenced by this.

It is a preliminary hearing.

The Minister should make a statement instead of interrupting. A full statement by him would be appropriate.

That is a matter for the Minister in due course.

We are talking about more than 1,000 women and the least they deserve is a statement in the House.

Are these women not as important as cattle?

Yesterday on the Order of Business the Taoiseach told the Leader of Fianna Fáil that the Government was proceeding with the legislation to sell one third of Telecom Éireann. Has the Taoiseach reflected on that decision and is he really proposing to introduce some time this year legislation which would allow one third of this company to be sold for a derisory sum in a panic sale after bungled negotiations?

Is legislation promised in this area?

When this matter was raised yesterday the Deputy, his party's spokesperson on this subject, was not present in the House.

The Taoiseach has also been absent at times.

He ought to have been present, given that his party decided to raise the matter. I wonder why the leader of his party raised the matter in his absence.

The Taoiseach is absent more often than I am.

Given that he was absent it is not surprising that he has got a garbled account of what I said yesterday and has misquoted me quite seriously.

I have what the Taoiseach said word for word.

I said that legislation——

My account is not garbled, it is word for word.

Please, Deputy Brennan.

I said that legislation to give effect to the strategic alliance would be prepared and ready for the end of the year.

It is not a strategic alliance, it is a panic sale.

I referred to the strategic alliance——

It is no such thing.

——and did not make any other references.

The sale is taking place for ideological reasons, it is a panic sale for a derisory sum.

Deputy Brennan's attempts to distort what I said does no service to his party or the interests of the taxpayer or the workers in Telecom Éireann.

It is being sold for half the price mentioned by the Minister 12 months ago.

Please, Deputy Brennan.

It is being sold for half the price.

Order, I cannot have two Members standing at the same time. Deputy Brennan, resume your seat.

Given that Deputy Brennan and his party——

Only one of the initial ten bidders is left.

——were unable to make any decisions on this matter during their lengthy period in office, a sustained period of silence from them on this and many other topics would be appropriate.

It is a disgraceful way to sell a State asset. It is a public scandal to sell this share in Telecom Éireann for £200 million less than what was asked for last year.

It is particularly disorderly for two Members to be engaged in a shouting match of this kind.

This is an absolute scandal.

When will the Finance Bill be published, in view of the fact that this is 28 March, the date set aside by the Minister for Finance for a private briefing for people prepared to pay the Labour Party £100 in the Sylvan Suite in Jury's Hotel at 1 o'clock, people who will be disappointed by its cancellation?

It will be published this afternoon, and I am sure the Deputy will find in it much of interest to him. This legislation will bring considerable benefits to people throughout the country, including those on our offshore islands.

The letter that went out was correct in one respect — that the Bill is to be published today. Does the Government intend to introduce legislation arising out of the decision in Strasbourg yesterday in relation to journalists and the protection of their sources? Will the Government take into account the implications of that judgment in the context of the Freedom of Information Bill? Further, on the compellability of witnesses Bill which is also before the House, will the Taoiseach indicate whether his Government will accept the amendment I have tabled?

I expect the freedom of information Bill will be available in the second half of the year.

What about the other questions?

In light of a report published yesterday which indicated serious stress levels among young people, particularly young girls, in the context of the State examination system, the leaving certificate in particular, does the Government intend to bring forward proposals to change the points system?

(Interruptions.)

Deputy Martin——

This is a very serious issue.

I will not continue to address Deputy Martin, and I will not permit him to ignore me in this fashion.

It is a very serious issue for many young people and I raised it a number of times in the House.

The Deputy should resume his seat.

I only asked about proposals.

What the Deputy raised is essentially a question. The Deputy should table a question.

I did, and I did not get a response from the Minister.

That is not my fault.

The Minister said she would make no changes, but there is a need for some changes.

There is no point in tabling questions because they are always transferred.

Can we anticipate legislation to give effect to the recommendations of the recently published report on the insurance industry?

I will inquire into that matter and communicate with the Deputy.

I am proceeding shortly to the business as ordered. I will hear the two Deputies offering.

On legislation by the Minister for Justice, is the Taoiseach aware that half a dozen female gardaí have been moved to Garda Headquarters to fill administrative positions?

I thought the Deputy had something relevant to raise.

Is this a proper use of resources?

In light of yesterday's announcement by the Government of recommendations in the report of the task force on travellers, will it be necessary to introduce legislation to give effect to them?

Has legislation been promised in this area?

I have no indication that legislation will be required, but if it transpires in the implementation of the decisions of the Government that legislation is necessary it will be introduced.

Deputy Kenneally rose.

I made a statement to the House and I am sticking by it.

Top
Share