Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 13 Nov 1996

Vol. 471 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Aid for Shellfish Farmers.

Ba mhith liom i dtosach buíochas a ghlacadh leis an Aire Stáit sa ucht teach isteach agus éisteacht len a bhfuil le rá agam. Tá mé cinnte go bhfuil an tAire fiosrach faoi cén tubaist atá taréis titim ar iascairí an iarthair nár chuala sé faoi agus beidh athas air a chloisteáil nach bhfuil fadhb ann i láthair na huaire. Is fadhb í a éireoidh, áfach, agus ba cheart dúinn a bheith faoi réir chuige. Mura réiteofar an fhadhb seo tá go leor daoine ar mhaith leo dul ag plé le slog-éisc nach mbeidh in ann é sin a dhéanamh i ngeall ar éiginnteacht sa tionscal.

I thank the Minister of State for coming in to reply. He is probably wondering if some disaster has hit the shellfish industry recently. To my knowledge this has not happened but we will need a compensation fund in place when the problem arises to ensure the continuance in business of shellfish farmers. We all agree that shellfish is one of our underdeveloped natural resources. It is important that we develop it in such a way that individuals and small groups will be able to derive the maximum advantage. One of the major difficulties to date has been that a person, through no fault of their own but through natural circumstances, could lose a year's income due to red tide.

Algal blooms or red tides are phenomena that occur in Irish maritime waters from time to time. They occur both offshore and inshore and are caused by the tiny plants which inhabit the open seas. Blooms are brought about by an extensive growth of one or several species of these tiny plants. Most blooms are natural events, quite harmless and even beneficial to the environment. Some blooms can be so intense that they cause a discolouration of the water. This discolouration is usually brown, red-brown or red-orange, hence the name red tide.

Occasionally blooms can contain toxic or harmful species while on other occasions they are responsible for bringing about drastic changes in water quality which can be detrimental to aquaculture operations in both fish and shellfish. One such change is the significant reduction in the oxygen content in the water and such an occurrence effectively wiped out a major shellfish operation involving abalone in Clew Bay last year. A few species of these tiny plants have the capacity to produce potent toxins that can find their way through both fish and shellfish to humans. The plants responsible for the vast majority of shellfish toxicity problems in Ireland belong to a group called dinophysis and its related toxicity is called DSP.

The length of closure following red tide can vary depending on the intensity of the toxins. Closure at any time is disruptive but is extremely serious during the winter sales period October-March each year when the bulk of the crop is sold.

The financial consequences vary depending on the lenght of closure and the tonnage at the time in a particular bay. The most recent example is Killary Harbour in my constituency which was closed from November 1995 to May 1996, resulting in a loss of sales of approximately 500 tonnes. Mussels are valued at between £400 and £450 a tonne. The consequences of such a closure are that the farmer loses the total crop or faces a serious reduction in the value of the crop and a serious loss of income over a long period, in some cases a year.

In the event of red tide I suggest a fund be available, out of which compensation could be paid automatically to fish farmers in the event of such a natural occurrence. Similar compensation funds have been made available for farmers who suffered serious losses in potato crops etc. I understand a compensation package was made available to farmers in the south-west region in recent years for loss of mussels. It is important that oyster, fish and mussel farmers should be guaranteed an income which is necessary if this industry is to reach its potential. Security of income should be put on a regular footing. An industry that has not contributed in the way it should would reach its full potential and give to the economy a new source of income which it badly needs.

Ba mhaith lion iarraidh ar an Aire breathnú go báiúil ar an iarratas seo. Dhéanfadh sé andifríocht d'fhorbairt an tionscail seo. Is ceann le na riachtanais mhóra atá ann. Déarfainn féin go dtuigeann sé tábhacht an tslog-éisc do phobal an chósta agus an méid gur féidir leis cur le hioncam na ndaoine atá ina gcomhnaí sna ceantair sin.

The shellfish industry is a young industry with enormous potential. The total amount of shellfish farmed has tripled since 1980. Most of this has been due to the development of the Pacific oyster and rope mussel farms, which together employ 1,574 fulltime and part-time people. Over half of existing farms were set up since 1987 and the pace of start-ups has accelerated in recent years.

A generous emergency aid package for shellfish growers was put in place during the past year to assist the industry with losses that had been sustained in previous years. The scheme comprised two main elements. First, the package addressed problems experienced by the rope mussel industry. A sum of £100,000 was provided to implement key elements of the report of the task force on biotoxin contamination and monitoring. Following discussions with the Irish Aquaculture Association, I established this group in March 1995, to assist in the search for remedies to the unprecedented toxicity problems arising from DSP (Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning) contamination of rope-grown mussels. As the Deputy may be aware, this is commonly known as red tide. The contaminations resulted in prolonged closures of farms and restricted harvesting arrangements with consequent adverse economic impacts on growers and markets alike, particularly for the rope mussel industry in the south west region.

Toxic algal blooms caused by natural blooming of microscopic marine plant life has impacted severely on rope mussel producers in recent years. As a significant segment of the aquaculture industry in Ireland, the rope mussel industry makes a vital contribution to employment and local economies in coastal areas. This report, compiled with full industry participation and extensive consultation with producer representative bodies and co-operatives, identified a wide range of solutions to tackle the problems besetting the industry. A key recommendation of the task force was a proposal for the introduction of an emergency aid scheme for the industry to restore industry confidence and protect employment.

However, financial assistance is only one element of a range of measures designed to combat the biotoxicity problem. In addition, the report has recommended the introduction and implementation of a new marine biotoxin action plan. Key components of the plan which are now put in place include an enhanced national monitoring programme for biotoxins covering all the main shellfish growing areas in Ireland, and the establishment of a national marine liaison advisory group, now up and running, to oversee implementation of the report's recommendations, to provide an ongoing forum for industry inputs and for the periodical review of the results of the national monitoring programme with a facility to recommend modifications as necessary.

The second element of the emergency aid package was in respect of the pacific oyster industry. A substantial number of oyster farmers engaged in the cultivation of pacific oysters experienced unprecedented levels of mortalities in 1995 seed inputs, due to the unusually hot summer and high seawater temperatures.

Following a national survey of oyster farms, undertaken by BIM, to pinpoint the extent of losses, it was estimated that 71 million seed out of a total industry input of 118 million seed was lost. An emergency aid package of £300,000 was put in place to assist affected growers to restock farms and help to restore production potential, thereby protecting jobs on the farms affected. Of the 200 pacific oyster farms operating around the coast, it is estimated that 85 had experienced losses of varying magnitude. As continuity of supply is the key to developing and maintaining markets for oyster growers, non-replacement of seed inputs immediately would have disrupted market supply in future years.

The effects of exposure of oyster seed to warm weather conditions can be mitigated and preventative measures and refinements in methods of culture are being researched by the marine institute and the industry to prevent a recurrence in future years.

The industry did, of course, have to bear a share of the losses as part of the normal commercial risk associated with farming and husbandry operations. The provision of compensation funds on the lines described by the Deputy must have regard to Exchequer resources and the requirements for EU Commission approval for aids to industry which are stringently applied.

It is not feasible or desirable that shellfish farmers necessarily should be compensated for losses due to natural phenomena. In the case of recent emergency aid schemes which received both Government and EU approval, the objective was to restore production capability rather than compensate growers for losses. It must be recognised that shellfish farmers, with the finfish sector of the aquaculture industry, operate in the commercial sector and cannot realistically expect to be compensated by the State for losses due to natural phenomena. In relation to any emergency aid package, including that for mussels and oysters to which I have referred, such EU approval is not lightly given and I am advised, would not be given for repetitive events arising from naturally occurring phenomena such as red tides.

The Dáil adjourned at 9.35 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 14 November 1996.

Top
Share