I propose to take Questions Nos. 236, 238, 246, 248, 257 and 258 together.
I refer the Deputy to the report of the inquiry which I established to investigate the failure to inform Judge Lynch of the Government decision of 1 August 1996 to remove him from the Special Criminal Court. This report outlines the sequence of events surrounding this failure. It deals with the receipt of the Attorney General's letters dated 2 October 1996 and dated 1 November 1996 on pages 4 and 7 and I refer the Deputy particularly to those pages of the report.
The letters from the Attorney General were not marked urgent or for immediate attention. Furthermore, none of the correspondence received by me or my Department in this matter was sent by registered mail.
With regard to the response to the Attorney General's letter of 1 November, the report of the inquiry, as I stated in my statement to this House on 20 November, confirms that the actions taken by me on 5 November on receipt of the Attorney General's letter and on 6 November to rectify the failure commenced with my query to an official in the Courts division.
The Attorney General's letter of 1 November was received in my Department on 5 November. As I stated to this House on 21 November I understand that letters issuing from the Office of the Attorney General are, as is the case in most Government Departments, either hand delivered or sent by post. I do not know why the letter dated 1 November was not received in my Department until 5 November but it should perhaps be mentioned that a weekend intervened between these two dates.