Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 15 Apr 1997

Vol. 477 No. 5

Written Answers. - Separated Husbands.

Noel Ahern

Question:

241 Mr. N. Ahern asked the Minister for Justice if statistics are available for the number of husbands and fathers ordered out of their houses or joint property under the family law separation legislation; the research or analysis, if any, which is available on such data in relation to such men's whereabouts afterwards; if data is available in relation to the numbers which end up homeless; and if the constitutionality of this provision in no-fault separations has been tested. [9898/97]

When granting an order of judicial separation the judge can make a number of different orders in relation to the family home. For example, under section 10 of the Family Law Act, 1995 the judge can make an order granting sole rights of residence in the family home to one spouse to the exclusion of the other spouse. The judge can also make a barring order against either spouse.

Court records are not maintained in a way which would provide statistics on the number of cases in which rights of sole occupancy in the family home were granted to one spouse. However, statistics which are available on the number of judicial separations granted by the Circuit Court and the High Court and on the number of barring orders granted by the Circuit Court for recent years are given below. It is not possible to say how many of these barring orders were granted to women or how many were granted in the course of judicial separations proceedings.

It is a matter for the judge concerned having heard the facts of each case and considered all other relevant information including the circumstances of the parties involved to decide whether or not to make an order in favour of either spouse granting him-her sole residency in the family home. It is also for the judge to decide if the circumstances of the case warrant the granting of a barring order against either spouse. No research has been carried out by my Department into the whereabouts of the excluded-barred spouse following the making of such orders and it has no information on the number of persons who may have become homeless as a result thereof.

While the constitutionality of legislative provisions is a matter for the courts and one in which I have no function, I am aware that in the case of T.F.v. Ireland the Attorney General and M. F., the constitutionality of section 16 (a) of the Judicial Separation and Family Law Reform Act, 1989, which gave the court a power, similar to that in section 10 (1) (a) of the Family Law Act, 1995, on the granting of a decree of judicial separation to make an order granting sole occupancy of the family home to one spouse to the exclusion of the other spouse, was challenged, and that the Supreme Court held that that power did not constitute an unjust attack on the property rights of the other spouse.
Judicial Separations — Circuit Court

Year

19-10-89 to 31-12-90

1-1-91 to 31-7-91

1-8-91 to 31-7-92

1-8-92 to 31-7-92

1-8-93 to 31-7-94

1-8-94 to 31-7-95

Applications received

875

578

1,193

1,328

1,340

1,398

Applications granted

377

369

745

967

892

929

Judicial Separations — High Court.

Year ending

31-7-91

31-7-92

31-7-93

31-7-94

31-7-95

Applications received

64

43

25

41

46

Applications granted

20

16

19

21

17

Number of Barring Orders granted by the Circuit Court for the legal years 1989-90 to 1993-94.

Year

Order Granted

1989-90

90

1990-91

124

1991-92

191

1992-93

209

1993-94

272

Top
Share